Government and policy

bedazzled-by-big-tech,-the-uk’s-ai-summit-is-overlooking-big-issues

Bedazzled by big tech, the UK’s AI summit is overlooking big issues

World leaders and tech titans are currently descending on southern England for an AI safety summit, but the flashy event isn’t impressing everyone.

Over the next two days, around 100 bigwigs will attend the event at the historic Bletchley Park, a country estate around 90km north of London. During World War Two, the site was home to the codebreakers who cracked Nazi Germany’s notorious Enigma encryption device. Some 80 years later, the British government wants to show that the UK is still a tech superpower — but the plans have caused alarm.

Critics have various concerns. They worry that the summit organisers are spellbound by “frontier AI,” famous names, and far-flung fears, while overlooking more pressing and inclusive issues.

A show-stealing late addition to the schedule elevated their suspicions. On Monday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak revealed that he will be “in conversation” with Elon Musk on X.

Musk adds further lustre to a star-studded guest list.

Among the invitees are several political heavyweights, including US Vice President Kamala Harris, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, and Chinese Vice Minister Wu Zhaohui.

Also in attendance are various tech titans, such as Microsoft President Brad Smith, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and Meta AI chief Yann LeCun. But the event is not for everyone.

“My fear is that the summit will focus on headline-grabbing existential threats.

Much of the tech sector feels that only industry giants and political leaders will be seated at Sunak’s conference table.

Dr Hector Zenil, the founder of healthcare startup Oxford Immune Algorithmics, is worried that the event will be dominated by generative AI and big tech. He has called on Sunak to involve a greater balance of commercial and academic representation.

“If the AI Safety Summit is to be judged a success — or at least on the right path to creating consensus on AI safety, regulation, and ethics — then the UK government must strive to create an even playing field for all parties to discuss the future use cases for the technology,” Zenil said.

“The Summit cannot be dominated by those corporations with a specific agenda and narrative around their commercial interests, otherwise this week’s activities will be seen as an expensive and misleading marketing exercise.”

In conversation with @elonmusk

After the AI Safety Summit

Thursday night on @x pic.twitter.com/kFUyNdGD7i

— Rishi Sunak (@RishiSunak) October 30, 2023

Zenil’s views are common across the sector. Among the industry insiders who share his unease is Victor Botev, the CTO and co-founder of Iris.ai, an Oslo-based startup.

A former AI researcher at Chalmers University and now a business leader, Botev wants broader representation from both academia and industry at the meeting.

“It is vital for any consultation on AI regulation to include perspectives beyond just the tech giants,” he said. “Smaller AI firms and open-source developers often pioneer new innovations, yet their voices on regulation go unheard. The summit missed a great opportunity by only including 100 guests, who are primarily made up of world leaders and big tech companies.”

Venture capitalists have raised similar concerns. 

“Going forward, we also must have more voices for startups themselves. The AI safety summit’s focus on big tech, and shutting out of many in the AI startup community, is disappointing,” said Ekaterina Almasque, General Partner at European VC OpenOcean

“It is vital that industry voices are included when shaping regulations that will directly impact technological development.”

Frontier AI apocalypses

The glitzy guestlist has been accompanied by a fittingly dramatic agenda. This combination, critics say, is a distraction from more pressing concerns.

They note that the programme will exclusively focus on “frontier” AI systems — a hazy term for advanced, general-purpose AI models. In a recent government report, the term “frontier AI” was applied almost entirely to large language models (LLMs) — particularly OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Zenil suspects the focus has been influenced by CEOs who are invested in this field. He wants the government to take a broader view.

“It is absolutely critical that the UK has a coherent strategy for AI that encompasses all aspects of the technology and different models. Above all, this is important because no one approach will become the ‘silver bullet’ for AI adoption,” he said.

“If the AI Summit at Bletchley Park and the AI advisory committee are dominated by individuals with a particular research or commercial focus for AI, then it will make it harder to develop regulatory frameworks which reflect all the potential use cases.”

Dr Hector Zenil, Oxford Immune Algorithmics founder
Zenil has also worked as a senior researcher for the government-funded Alan Turing Institute. Credit: Oxford Immune Algorithmics

Another cause of consternation is the summit’s focus on “extreme” hypothetical threats and doomsday scenarios. Sunak has personally highlighted these cataclysmic possibilities.

“In the most unlikely but extreme cases, there is even the risk that humanity could lose control of AI completely through the kind of AI sometimes referred to as super intelligence,” he said last week.

Such apocalyptic prospects, critics argue, are dramatically overblown.  Some blame the media for inflating the dangers, while others argue that tech bosses exaggerate the risks to conceal the real and present problems that they’re creating.

They are more concerned about the tangible threats of climate change, biases against marginalised groups, and cyber-attacks. They note, for instance, that a recent study found that Google’s AI could soon consume as much electricity as Ireland.

Almasque, from VC firm OpenOcean, fears the summit’s priorities are skewed.

“It looks likely to focus mostly on bigger, long-term risks from AI, and far less on what needs to be done, today, to build a thriving AI ecosystem,” she said. “It’s like a startup worrying about its IPO price before it’s raised seed funding.”

These concerns are shared by Natalie Cramp, CEO of data company Profusion, which has previously advised the UK government. She is wary of the fixation on an imaginary future.

“My fear is that the AI safety summit will focus on headline-grabbing existential threats at the expense of the more mundane problems that have the capacity to do a lot of damage right now,” Cramp said.

Headshot of Natalie Cramp, CEO at data company Profusion,
Natalie Cramp, CEO at data company Profusion.

The build-up to the summit has amplified the dissent. Ahead of the event, Sunak revealed a core component of his plan will be a new “world-first” AI safety institute. 

Dr Asress Gikay, a senior lecturer in AI at Brunel University London, was unimpressed by the announcement. Gikay is dismissive of the institute’s aim to prompt international agreements. She suspects that Sunak has ulterior motivations.

 “The Prime Minister seems more focused on making political statements by unrealistic and unachievable agendas rather than addressing more pressing and attainable issues, such as domestic AI investment and the development of a robust policy and regulatory framework for responsible AI at the national level,” she said. 

Taking chances

Amid the scepticism, there is also optimism about the AI summit’s potential. The big-name attendees and international media attention suggest the UK can be a key player in global developments. 

The country’s thriving AI sector adds credibility to the event, while its pro-innovation approach to regulation provides a point of differentiation from European Union governance. Britain’s unique international position could also provide a bridge between the US, EU, and China. 

Emad Mostaque, CEO of Stability AI —which develops the Stable Diffusion text-to-image model — is among the high-profile supporters of the summit.

“The UK has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to become an AI superpower and ensure that AI benefits all, not just big tech,” he said.

Botev, the co-founder of Iris.ai, is more cautiously hopeful. He is upbeat about the summit’s potential, but worried that the government may make a rash decision for a front-page news story.

“With the global AI community watching, the UK should resist this urge,” he said. “The summit is a chance for the UK to chart a global direction on AI governance, ensuring progress without compromising safety. With care and wisdom, the UK can develop forward-thinking regulations that promote innovation while establishing trust.”

Bedazzled by big tech, the UK’s AI summit is overlooking big issues Read More »

meta-begrudgingly-launches-e9.99-ad-free-subscription-for-facebook-and-instagram

Meta begrudgingly launches €9.99 ad-free subscription for Facebook and Instagram

The effects of the EU’s regulatory crusade on Big Tech are beginning to make themselves known to consumers. Yesterday, Meta launched ad-free subscription services for Facebook and Instagram within the bloc. Users will be able to pay from €9.99 to use the social media platforms without seeing ads — or continue using them for free and have their data collected. 

We are probably not alone in the experience that ads have completely taken over much of what began as a means of actually connecting with friends (and sharing photos of our lunch). Adding to that, with more and more sophisticated targeted advertising and tracking across various apps, ads have become, at times, spookily accurate. 

When surveyed, the instinctual reaction of the TNW editorial office was a resounding “no.” However, €9.99 a month to escape a barrage of ads might not seem such a horrible proposition for everyone — although, given Meta’s revenue model, one that the tech giant did not want to have to make. 

“We believe in a free, ad-supported internet – and will continue to offer people free access to our personalised products and services regardless of income,” the company said in a statement. However, it said it was introducing the new subscription model to comply with European Union regulations. 

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Meta also, perhaps a little resentfully, added that it “respects the spirit and purpose of these evolving European regulations, and are committed to complying with them.” 

Purchase via an app store, pay more

The ad-free subscription service will also be available to residents in the EEA and Switzerland, and have a different price depending on where you purchase it. The €9.99 is when buying it on the web, whereas paying for it via iOS or Android will cost €12.99. Meta stated that the higher price was due to the additional charges by Apple and Google through their respective policies. 

The subscription service will be available for people 18 years of age and older, whereas the company stated it would “continue to explore how to provide teens with a useful and responsible ad experience given this evolving regulatory landscape.”

Meta said that if users chose to continue to engage with its platforms for free, their experience would stay the same. Advertisers will also be able to continue running personalised advertising campaigns in Europe. 

Published

Back to top

Meta begrudgingly launches €9.99 ad-free subscription for Facebook and Instagram Read More »

eu-backs-new-project-that-combines-solar-power-with-agriculture

EU backs new project that combines solar power with agriculture

A new “agrivoltaics” initiative looking to prove the commercial viability of integrating solar power plants with agriculture has won the favour of Brussels. The EU is backing German renewable energy company BayWa, in a first-of-its-kind scheme that could be a win-win for farmers and the climate. 

In order to develop the project, BayWa has secured €6.5mn from the EU’s LIFE Programme (which has a total of €5.43bn available for the period 2021 to 2027). Armed with fresh funding, the company looks to build six so-called agrivoltaics projects across five European countries by 2027.  

Agrivoltaics involves combining solar power generation and agriculture on the same piece of land and has been touted for its myriad benefits, including saving water, increasing soil health, and boosting pollinator numbers. The solar panels can also act as an additional source of revenue for farmers.

Working with EU representatives, landowners, and local communities, BayWa aims to develop the commercial viability of agrivoltaics and to demonstrate its benefits as an effective climate-adaptation strategy for fruit and crop cultivation in Europe, the company said. 

Three of the new projects, in France, Spain, and the Netherlands, aim to test the effectiveness of mixing solar panels with fruit plantations, within an “innovative financing model.” Meanwhile, the three remaining projects, in Germany, Spain, and Italy, will examine ways to scale up agrivoltaics alongside arable crops like summer and winter wheat or soya.

“With these six projects, across five countries, we’re pushing innovative Agri-PV applications into the marketplace,” said Dr. Stephan Schindele, head of product management at BayWa. “Only if the farming, environment, and energy sectors work hand in hand, can we successfully adapt to climate change.”

According to a recent EU study, combining farming and solar photovoltaic electricity production on a mere 1% of the bloc’s farmland could surpass the EU’s entire 2030 targets for solar energy generation.

The benefits of a hybrid food-energy system could also help ease opposition to solar projects among people who consider solar panels a threat to farmland or an eyesore. For instance, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak recently announced plans to clamp down on solar panel installations across British farmland in a bid to “protect food security”. However, evidence from agrivoltaics trials counters such claims — farms that had solar panels installed were as, if not more, productive than those without.   

Nevertheless, the EU paper also highlighted that a lack of government incentives, complex permitting hurdles, and opposition from rural communities threaten to hold back the roll out of agrivoltaic systems. 

EU backs new project that combines solar power with agriculture Read More »

uk-police-urged-to-double-down-on-facial-recognition

UK police urged to double down on facial recognition

In a controversial move, UK police is being encouraged to double its use of retrospective facial recognition to track down known offenders.

Specifically, in a letter to force chiefs, policing minister Chris Philp said that using the AI-enabled technology  would allow for over 200,000 searches of images against the Police National Database by May 2024.

Philp also encouraged the increase of live facial recognition, which captures live footage of crowds and compares it with a list of wanted suspects to alert the police. The technology is already being heavily used by UK law enforcement — with King Charles III’s coronation in May representing its largest-ever public space deployment in British history.

“AI technology is a powerful tool for good, with huge opportunities to advance policing and cut crime,” the minister said in a statement. Facial recognition, he noted, has already proven its value in identifying criminals and missing people, while freeing up police time and resources.

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

But while a recent report by the National Physics Laboratory highlighted the high accuracy of these systems, growing concerns over the technology range from the lack of clear regulation and risks of bias to the emergence of an Orwellian state of surveillance.

For example, in October, a cross-party group of MPs and non-profit organisations called on private companies and the UK police to “immediately stop” the use of facial recognition for public surveillance.

“Live facial recognition has never been given explicit approval by Parliament,” tweeted former Brexit secretary David Davis, who also joined the call. “It is a suspicionless mass surveillance tool that has no place in Britain,” he added.

The Home Office has rejected these concerns, and according to Philp, facial recognition has “sound legal basis” that has been confirmed by the courts. The Home Office also said that the public will be notified when entering an area where the technology is used and that personal data is deleted immediately if no match is found.

Meanwhile, the EU’s upcoming AI Act will ban predictive policing and facial recognition in public spaces in an attempt to outlaw invasive massive surveillance systems.

Published

Back to top

UK police urged to double down on facial recognition Read More »

uk-helps-fund-rocket-factory-augsburg-in-lead-up-to-scotland-launch

UK helps fund Rocket Factory Augsburg in lead up to Scotland launch

German startup Rocket Factory Augsburg has secured £3.5mn (4mn) in funding from the UK Space Agency as it prepares for its maiden flight next year.

The funding was awarded under the European Space Agency’s Boost! Programme, which aims to help companies develop new launch technologies and bring them to the market. 

Rocket Factory UK, a subsidiary of the German company, will use the funding to develop and operate the infrastructure needed for the satellite launch and to test equipment. The company plans to launch its first rocket in Q2 2024 from SaxaVord Spaceport in Scotland’s Shetland Islands — the first-ever spaceport in Western Europe.  

The funding announcement came as UK science minister George Freeman visited SaxaVord Spaceport to see progress at the site and meet key members of the project team. 

“This £3.5mn investment will enable RFA UK to develop the technologies necessary to launch from SaxaVord Spaceport in Scotland, creating dozens of jobs locally and growing the Scottish cluster as a key part of the UK space sector,” said Freeman.  

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The UK Space Agency also previously awarded Lockheed Martin £23.4mn (27mn) in two separate grants to support its launch operations at SaxaVord.   

Although SaxaVord has already constructed most of the spaceport, it still needs UK Civil Aviation Authority approval to conduct orbital missions. Once approved, RFA will have exclusive access to the spaceport’s Launch Pad Fredo for orbital launches. 

Founded in 2018, RFA is developing a three-stage launcher called RFA One with a payload capacity of 1,300 kilograms to low Earth orbit. The company plans to undercut the competition by offering payloads of up to 1,300 kg at a base cost of $3,000 to $4,000 per kg. By 2030, it hopes to launch approximately 50 times per year to dedicated orbits for full satellite constellations.

RFA has spent a little over €40mn so far in its quest to become Europe’s first small launch provider. A small-lift launch vehicle is a rocket orbital launch vehicle that is capable of lifting 2,000 kg or less.  

Other companies operating in this arena include UK-based Skyrora, which also aims to launch its first rocket from SaxaVord at the end of this year, and PLD Space, a Spanish startup which aims to launch Europe’s first reusable rocket from a site in South Spain.

Published

Back to top

UK helps fund Rocket Factory Augsburg in lead up to Scotland launch Read More »

uk-launches-100m-ai-fund-to-help-treat-incurable-diseases

UK launches £100M AI fund to help treat incurable diseases

From making variant-proof vaccines to preventing genetic diseases and improving cancer treatments, AI could truly be an invaluable tool in solving some of the biggest challenges in healthcare.

Against this backdrop, the UK aims to harness the tech’s potential and has launched a £100mn fund to accelerate AI deployment in areas where its capabilities could lead to breakthroughs in treating previously incurable diseases.

Specifically, the funding will further support the eight critical healthcare missions outlined by the Life Sciences Vision — the UK’s ambitions for the sector over the next decade.

Neurodegenerative diseases such as dementia are at the top of the list — where AI could enable the development of new precision treatments. For instance, it could help leverage health data in order to identify those at risk of dementia, ensure that the right patients are participating in the right trials, develop effective treatments, and provide insights on how well the therapies work.

Other key areas include mental health conditions, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, vaccine development, drug discovery, and cancer treatment. The funding will also seek to create solutions that will reduce pressure on the NHS and waiting times for patients.

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

“Safe, responsible AI will change the game for what it’s possible to do in healthcare, closing the gap between the discovery and application of innovative new therapies, diagnostic tools, and ways of working that will give clinicians more time with their patients,” said Michelle Donelan, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology.

The scheme aims to bring together the entire healthcare ecosystem, inviting proposals from academia, industry, the NHS, and clinicians. Within the next 18 months, it will invest in testing new technologies addressing the UK’s “greatest” clinical needs. Over the next five years, the government also expects to have transformed mental health research.

While the £100mn investment seems to fall a bit short of the ambition to treat incurable diseases, it will hopefully lead to scientific breakthroughs that could benefit humankind and pave the way for leveraging AI’s power for good.

Published

Back to top

UK launches £100M AI fund to help treat incurable diseases Read More »

netherlands-starts-building-e1.5bn-hydrogen-pipeline-to-cut-reliance-on-natural-gas

Netherlands starts building €1.5bn hydrogen pipeline to cut reliance on natural gas

Today, the Netherlands officially began constructing a 1,200km-long hydrogen pipeline — amid a continent-wide push to wean Europe off natural gas.

The first section of the pipeline will run from the Maasvlakte — a massive man-made extension of the Europoort in Rotterdam (Europe’s largest port) — some 30 kilometres inland to a gas refinery in Pernis, run by petrochemical giant Shell. This phase is scheduled to open in 2025 at a cost of €100mn. 

The ribbon-cutting ceremony was attended by the country’s King Willem-Alexander, the minister for climate and energy policy, Rob Jetten, and Han Fennema, CEO of state-run energy company Gasunie.

“The start of the construction of the hydrogen network today is an important milestone,” said Jetten earlier today. “Hydrogen is ideally suited to making our industry more sustainable and offers economic opportunities for the Netherlands as an important link in Northwestern Europe. I am proud that we are the first country to start building a national network.” 

From 2030, the wider 1,200km network will connect import terminals and hydrogen production facilities with major industrial clusters in the Netherlands, Germany, and Belgium. A large chunk of the network will be made up of repurposed gas pipelines, many of which are set to become redundant as the country looks to reduce its reliance on the fossil fuel. The megaproject will cost about €1.5bn.

The Dutch are building a country-wide hydrogen network that will link places of production with places of consumption, both within the country and beyond its borders. Credit: Gasunie/S&P Global Commodity Insights

The plans tie into the European Hydrogen Backbone initiative, which aims to build a network of 28,000km of dedicated hydrogen pipelines by 2030, expanding to 53,000km across 28 European countries by 2040. The initiative is backed by a group of 31 energy infrastructure operators.

In 2022, hydrogen accounted for less than 2% of Europe’s energy consumption and was primarily used to produce chemical products, such as plastics and fertilisers. Some 96% of this hydrogen was produced with natural gas, resulting in significant amounts of CO2 emissions. 

However, hydrogen — especially the ‘green’ variety produced by the electrolysis of water powered by renewable energy — has been identified by the EU as a key component of the bloc’s future energy mix. The Union plans to produce and import a total of 20 million tonnes of renewable hydrogen a year by 2030. (For context, one kilogram of hydrogen is the energy equivalent of one gallon (3.78 litres) of petrol). Proponents say this will help replace natural gas, powering vehicles and generating electricity.   

You see, some sectors like heavy industry and transportation are almost impossible to decarbonise by electrification alone — they require an easily transferable fuel. And hydrogen, which can be used in existing natural gas networks and emits only water vapour when combusted, is the perfect candidate.

While the Netherlands and many others are furiously building new infrastructure to transport the fuel, their efforts will be futile unless the production of green hydrogen is scaled up in parallel. Currently, green hydrogen accounts for only about 1% of global hydrogen production. It is also about three times as expensive as its grey counterpart, produced from fossil fuel sources. 

One solution showing great promise is wind-to-hydrogen technology, which harnesses the power of offshore wind and vast quantities of water (aka the ocean) to produce fossil-free hydrogen. The first plant of this type was opened in September off the coast of Le Croisic, France. Today it produces half a tonne of hydrogen per day. Only a fraction of what’s needed, but a notable start.  

Netherlands starts building €1.5bn hydrogen pipeline to cut reliance on natural gas Read More »

un-creates-ai-advisory-body-to-‘maximise’-benefits-for-humankind

UN creates AI advisory body to ‘maximise’ benefits for humankind

UN Secretary-General António Guterres has unveiled a dedicated AI advisory body with a mandate to harness the technology’s power for good and mitigate its risks through international collaboration and governance.

“AI could power extraordinary progress for humanity,” Guterres said, pointing to a plethora of benefits — from health and education to the digitalisation of developing economies. In addition, “it could supercharge climate action and efforts to achieve the [UN’s] 17 Sustainable Development Goals by 2030,” he added.

However, Guterres cautioned that AI expertise is currently “concentrated in a handful of companies and countries.” This could heighten global inequalities, increase the spread of disinformation and bias, enable surveillance and invasion of privacy — and, overall, lead to the violation of human rights.

“Without entering into a host of doomsday scenarios, it is already clear that the malicious use of AI could undermine trust in institutions, weaken social cohesion, and threaten democracy itself,” noted the Secretary General. “For all these reasons, I have called for a global, multidisciplinary, multistakeholder conversation on the governance of AI so that its benefits to humanity — all of humanity — are maximised, and the risks contained are diminished.”

By the end of this year, UN’s AI advisory body will make preliminary recommendations for three specific areas. These cover international governance of artificial intelligence; a shared understanding of risks and challenges; and key opportunities and enablers for the organisation’s Sustainable Development Goals.

These recommendations will be used for the preparation of the UN’s Summit for the Future in 2024, and will specifically form part of the proposed Global Digital Compact. The initiative aims to outline shared principles for “an open, free, and secure digital future” for all humanity.

The 39-member body hails from a wide range of countries and sectors, such as private companies, academia, governments, and civil society organisations.

Similar global initiatives to ensure the responsible use of artificial intelligence include the G7 AI code of conduct and the upcoming AI Safety Summit in London.

Published

Back to top

UN creates AI advisory body to ‘maximise’ benefits for humankind Read More »

dutch-mps-criticise-new-us-export-ban-on-asml-chip-machine

Dutch MPs criticise new US export ban on ASML chip machine

Dutch politicians have expressed their dismay over the US’ new export rules for ASML, claiming that Washington has “unilaterally” imposed restrictions on selling yet another chip making machine to China.

AMSL has already been prohibited from selling its most sophisticated machines to China since 2019. This year in June (following months of pressure by the US), the Netherlands also introduced stricter export controls of high-end chip manufacturing products citing “national security interests.” Unsurprisingly, ASML’s advanced immersion DUV lithography systems fall under the measures.

But last week, Washington updated its export restrictions to include ASML’s Twinscan NXT1930Di machine if it contains American-made parts. As a result, Europe’s largest tech company will now have to apply for a US license to sell its device, even though exports are allowed according to Dutch regulations.

In response, during a parliamentary meeting on Tuesday, Dutch MPs demanded explanations from Foreign Trade Minister Liesje Schreinemacher, local newspaper Het Financiel Dagblad reports.

This decision means that “unilaterally the rules have been changed,” said Mustafa Amhaouch, MP of the CDA political party. He added that “economic jewels are being thrown aways” as part of the geopolitical showdowns — which leads to uncertainty and financial harm for both the Netherlands and Europe as a whole.

Schreinemacher said she does support a countermeasure, noting that the US has the right to do its own security analysis. She also dismissed suggestions that “economic motives” were at play. In addition, the minister highlighted that ASML does not simply use American-made components, but also has production facilities in the US.

For its part, ASML “will seek further clarification from the US authorities,” but is committed to complying with the export laws and regulations of the countries it operates, the company said in a statement. It doesn’t expect an impact on its financial outlook until 2030.

ASML’s now restricted deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography machine produces a variety of chips, ranging from more advanced, to mid-range, and older ones. According to Schreinemacher, the block will only affect sales to six Chinese factories.

Meanwhile, the minister will further discuss the US measures in an upcoming meeting with EU member states in Brussels, and she said that the EU should have a greater role in decisions regarding the ban of sensitive technologies. “Europe is a strong force, and we must use it,” she noted.

Unlike the US’ clear decoupling strategy from China, the EU has been so far following a de-risking approach. But it seems that it will need to have a stronger stance in what appears to be an escalating chip war.

Dutch MPs criticise new US export ban on ASML chip machine Read More »

how-to-build-a-spaceport

How to build a spaceport

Around 250 kilometres off the north coast of Scotland, the Shetland isle of Unst undergoing a dramatic renovation.

On a peninsula flanked by giant cliffs and open ocean, builders are constructing a spaceport. They call the project SaxaVord. They say it could host the first-ever vertical rocket launches from Western Europe.

It’s a bold objective that welcomes auspicious signs. One was discovered just this summer; another was already known when the team laid their founding stone. 

“It’s going from the Bronze Age to the Space Age.

Over 1,000 years ago, the locals say, Unst became the first footfall of the Vikings in the North Atlantic. Staff at SaxaVord would joke that they were exchanging longships for spaceships. They hoped to inherit the Norse spirit of exploration.

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The second harbinger revealed an even older heritage. While excavating the site, workers unearthed an ancient burial ground. The discovery suggests the site has over 4,000 years of human activity — three millennia longer than the Viking heritage. SaxaVord sensed another good omen — and a cute new slogan.

“It’s going from the Bronze Age to the Space Age. That’s how we see it,” Scott Hammond, the spaceport’s operations director and deputy CEO, tells TNW. “We also think there’s a stone circle, which would have been aligned with the stars. It just goes to show, doesn’t it? If it was a good location in the Bronze Age, it’s a good location now.”

It’s a good location for several reasons — but more on that later. It’s also a location with a powerful pull for Europe’s burgeoning spacetech sector.

View of SaxaVord Spaceport from the sea
The launch site and ground station are being assembled on Unst’s Lamba Ness peninsula. SaxaVord takes its name from the hill’s largest hill. Credit: SaxaVord

Declining costs, rapid innovation, and growing commercialisation are democratising access to space. In 2022, an estimated 6,905 active satellites were orbiting Earth — 2,105 more than in the previous year. 

Back on our home planet, the demand for rocket launch sites is rising. Dr Christoph Baumeister, who scouts spacectech investments for VC firm Possible Ventures, says the sector is searching for new locations for lift-offs. 

“They definitely are looking for options because you don’t want to be dependent on one country or one company,” he says. “If you look at the spaceports that we have at the moment, they will not be enough to cater for the launches that are projected to happen and that are being planned.”

The surge in launches will also bring benefits down to Earth. From GPS and weather forecasting to solar cells and medical treatments, space delivers countless real-world benefits. As the number of spaceports increases, the breakthroughs could proliferate.

Hammond envisions SaxaVord at the forefront of the innovations. He compares the spaceport’s potential to the canals and railways built during the Industrial Revolution. Once that infrastructure was in place, a boom period began for scientific, technological, and economic development.

“That’s effectively what we are: an infrastructure,” he says. “We will be an enabler for everything else.”

At least, that’s the plan. But building a spaceport isn’t your average construction project. At SaxaVord, the plan comprised a unique series of steps.

1. Find a location

Western Europe has a dearth of suitable sites for spaceports. At present, the region’s only orbital launch complex is the Guiana Space Centre in, err, South America. On the mainland, a combination of densely populated nations, heavy air traffic, and limited easterly expanses of water have left few favourable locations for rocket launches.

Unst is a rare exception. The 120 km2 island is remotely located, surrounded by ocean, and home to only 600 people. It also has a low volume of both sea and air traffic. 

In the north of Unst, satellite launchers can get a clear, unobstructed route into orbit. In addition, the isle already had decent transport links, which were built for the nearby North Sea oil and gas fields.

The SaxaVord team is also confident about the weather conditions. They estimate that 95% of days from spring to autumn will have three hours of suitable winds. During winter, that will drop to around one day in three.

View from the sea of the land in Unst that is being used for SaxaVord Spaceport
Lamba Ness’ open land and proximity to the sea fulfilled two key requirements for the spaceport. Credit: SaxaVord

The British government shares SaxaVord’s optimism. In 2017, the UK Space Agency identified the location as its preferred site for satellite launches. 

“The site offering the maximum payload mass to orbit is SaxaVord in the Shetlands, from where direct launch is possible to both SSO [sun-synchronous orbits] and polar orbits,” the report reads.

It’s a compelling package for a spaceport. But Unst’s natural attractions also created problems.

2. Study your environment

The location and environment of the Shetland Islands make the peninsula a wildlife haven. The archipelago is home to nearly a million seabirds — the largest colony of its kind on this side of the Atlantic. 

As the northernmost point of the British Isles and home of the Hermaness nature reserve, Unst has a particularly powerful appeal to migrating birds. A new spaceport could threaten their habitat.

It’s a repercussion that’s caused controversy for Elon Musk’s SpaceX. The company’s rocket launches in Texas were blamed for the decline of an endangered bird species, which threatened plans to expand the spaceport.

SaxaVord is obligated to mitigate such risks. To launch rockets into space, every British operator must be licensed by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). Part of the licence application is an environmental assessment.

“We are the most real of all the UK’s spaceports.

In SaxaVord’s application, the spaceport proposed a maximum of 30 launches per year, some of which would occur during the bird breeding season.

RSPB Scotland, a conservation charity, had initially opposed the plans. But the organisation withdrew its objection when SaxaVord pledged to avoid launches between mid-May and the end of June — a key period for bird mating.

As part of the assessments, the spaceport took two years of bird counts on the land. The results not only guided the project, but also shone new light on another threat to avians: bird flu.

“Over on Hermanes, puffins are down by 90%,” says Hammond.

A puffin in Unst
Around 25,000 pairs of Puffins make Hermaness their summer home. Credit: Pikist

Unst’s environmental protections extend to human habitations. On the land of the spaceport lies a historical monument site — an old radar base for Britain’s Royal Air Force (RAF) during the Second World War. 

It’s a landmark that was pivotal to the spaceport’s origins. SaxaVord is the brainchild of Frank and Debbie Strang, a married couple who met while serving at the RAF. After discovering the old military site was for sale, the couple bought the land with plans to develop an ecotourism business. 

In 2008, they made a dramatic change of direction. When the UK Space Agency nominated Unst for a spaceport, the Strangs decided to bring the vision to reality. But their origin story had a troublesome subplot. 

Conservationists were concerned about SaxAvord’s threat to the monument. In 2021, an environmental agency made a potentially fatal intervention. 

Historic Environment Scotland said the spaceport would have an “extensive and adverse impact on the cultural significance” of the radar station. The organisation rejected the construction application. But after a year of negotiations and reassurances from SaxaVord, the objection was withdrawn.

As the regulatory barriers lifted, the development moved forward.

3. Design your spaceport

A spaceport is a uniquely challenging design project — particularly in a country that’s never had one before.

As the UK had no specific guidance for rocket launches, Hammond sought direction from US regulations.

“They come under something called CFR 420, which specifies how you need to approach the design of a spaceport,” he says. “And the first focus is always safety.” 

Upon review of the rules, SaxaVord fine-tuned its safety guidelines. Among the final requirements were specific distances from populated areas, proximities to roads, and circumventions of flight paths or busy seas.

“It’s providing a one-stop shop for space.

On the site, the guidance steered the positioning of launch pads, rockets, fuel load, and hangars. The pads, for instance, needed a certain space between them to avoid any explosions spreading fires across the spaceport. A similar concern guided the rocket hanger locations.

“I want my hangars to be as close as possible because bringing a rocket in and out takes time and there’s risk involved with that process,” Hammond says. “But equally, I don’t want it so close that an explosion on the pad would destroy my hangar.” 

SaxaVord Spaceport Deputy CEO Scott Hammond (left) and COO Debbie Strang at the launch site stool base.
Hammond (left), an ex-RAF fighter pilot, was hired by Paul and Debbie Strang (right), to guide plans for the launch site. Credit: SaxaVord

Another crucial part of the plan is the launch schedule.

SaxaVord has applied for up to 30 vertical rocket launches a year. To squeeze in all those lift-offs, the spaceport will operate like a commercial airport. Launches will be scheduled across regular timeslots, with a busier timetable during the summer, when travel conditions are more favourable.

It’s a model that’s attractive to the satellite companies. According to spacetech investor Baumeister, startups want to show clients that they have multiple takeoff options.

“It’s about the speed that they can offer customers,” he says. “If they can have possibilities to launch in Northern America, in Europe, and in Asia… they’re well positioned.”

Once the plans were finalised, the construction could commence. 

4. Start building

SaxaVord elected to build three launch pads, each of which is linked to a set of hangars. The pads will fire rockets of up to 30 metres in length, with maximum payloads of 1,500 kg. They will then fly into sun-synchronous, polar and high-inclination orbits, as well as suborbital trajectories.

To make that happen, SaxaVord has set up facilities for satellite monitoring, fuel storage, launch vehicle preparation, and payload processing. Connectivity will be provided by a ground station network of 1.5m to 3.7m antennas.

All of that requires extensive support infrastructure. To protect the spaceport, security fences have been erected around the perimeter. Access to the site is being improved by extensive upgrades to approach roads, which need to accommodate lorries carrying rockets from the mainland. SaxaVord has also leased an airfield close to the site.

To monitor the launches, on-site tracking and telemetry systems have been installed. The project is also getting flight termination systems — in a case a rocket soars in the wrong direction and disappears.