Author name: Kelly Newman

a-large-meteor-is-visible-from-much-of-ohio-and-parts-of-neighboring-states

A large meteor is visible from much of Ohio and parts of neighboring states

A large meteor crashed through the sound barrier above northern Ohio on Tuesday morning, producing a large fireball and what local residents described as an extremely loud “boom.”

According to various eyewitness reports, the meteor’s bright streak through the morning sky was visible across a wide area. A National Weather Service meteorologist in Pennsylvania, Jared Rackley, captured video of the meteor passing through the atmosphere and creating a large fireball. So far, there have been no reports of impacts on the ground.

The precise location of the fireball was pinpointed by a near-infrared optical detector on a geostationary satellite at 9: 01 am ET (13: 01 UTC). This “geostationary lightning mapper” revealed that the meteor traversed through the atmosphere in northern Ohio, just west of Cleveland, and over Lake Erie.

A meteoroid—a small body moving through space—is called a meteor when it encounters a planet’s atmosphere and subsequently produces a bright streak of light. This occurs because the meteoroid is traveling many times faster than the speed of sound.

In this case, the “boom” was not due to breaking the sound barrier, like a supersonic aircraft, but rather to the hypersonic meteoroid generating a powerful shockwave as it moved through the atmosphere. This shockwave compresses the air, producing a series of sonic booms or even a rumbling sound.

No further information was available about the size and impacts of the meteor as of mid-morning on Tuesday. This story will be updated if additional information becomes available.

A large meteor is visible from much of Ohio and parts of neighboring states Read More »

national-academies-of-sciences-says-no-to-demands-it-remove-climate-info

National Academies of Sciences says no to demands it remove climate info

The attorneys general requested a response by March 2, one that addresses a set of leading questions, such as, “Why did the National Academies include a chapter on climate science that is not based on balanced or sound science?” and “What procedures will the National Academies establish to prevent similar advocacy-based chapters in future editions?” Since then, Ars has been contacting both the NAS and the Montana attorney general’s office (which published the letter) to try to find out whether a response was provided.

We finally learned yesterday that the response had been issued two days ahead of the deadline (it’s the final page of this PDF). Weighing in at just two sentences, the NAS says it used the same procedures to generate the climate chapter as it did for every other chapter, procedures that had been developed jointly with the Federal Judicial Center. “The manual, including the chapter on climate science, will continue to be available on the Academy’s website,” the response concludes.

The response leaves no obvious next step for the attorneys general. Their letter notes that the NAS is heavily dependent upon funding from the federal government to prepare its expert reports, and so producing reports that displease Republicans could be risky, but they have no ability to directly influence that funding.

Meanwhile, the political interference with the report drew a second response, this coming from many of the authors of the other chapters of the Reference Manual, who published an open letter decrying the political interference. In addition to noting the value of the Reference Manual and the rigorous peer review all chapters go through, the authors highlight the dangers posed by the actions of the attorneys general:

If political actors can determine which fields of established science are disfavored and off-limits to judicial education, every scientific discipline relevant to complex litigation becomes vulnerable to the same tactic. The integrity of the process by which judges evaluate scientific evidence should not be subject to political interference or veto.

The real danger is long term. If chapters continue to get deleted any time they run afoul of the current political winds, then it will become increasingly challenging to get the best scientists and legal scholars to contribute to the manual or its peer review. Over time, the quality of the material will decay, leaving judges less well-prepared to face cases with a heavy scientific component. Society as a whole will end up the loser.

National Academies of Sciences says no to demands it remove climate info Read More »

f1-in-china:-i’ve-never-seen-so-many-people-in-those-grandstands

F1 in China: I’ve never seen so many people in those grandstands


Formula 1’s new style of racing puts on an entertaining sprint weekend in Shanghai.

SHANGHAI, CHINA - MARCH 15: Ferrari's British driver Lewis Hamilton drives during the Formula 1 Grand Prix of China at Shanghai International Circuit on March 15, 2026 in Shanghai, China. (Photo by Zhang Hengwei/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

A multi-lap duel between the two Ferraris was thrilling to watch. Credit: Zhang Hengwei/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images

A multi-lap duel between the two Ferraris was thrilling to watch. Credit: Zhang Hengwei/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images

Formula 1 raced in China this past weekend, just a week after the sport kicked off its 2026 season in Australia. Most of the teams had a better handle on the sport’s complicated new cars in China, and the more traditional racetrack environment played better to the strengths of their hybrid power units, with enough hard braking zones to recharge batteries without having to sap engine power instead.

We have a better idea of the grid’s current pecking order, at least for now. There’s some daylight between each of the top three teams and a close battle for midfield honors. Meanwhile, the specter of unreliability is well and truly with us; four cars failed to even take the start, and seven (of 22) were not classified as finishing. For fans of those teams and drivers, it wasn’t a great weekend, especially if you woke up at 3 am to watch the race. But F1 generally put on an entertaining show in Shanghai.

That’s a lot of fans

The sport has been visiting the city since 2004. The setting is a classic turn-of-the-century facility designed and built by Herman Tilke. It’s a captivating-looking place, with a pond-filled paddock, a vast grandstand that spans the start-finish straight, and a layout that resembles the character for “shang,” which creates some rather tricky corners, like the spiraling decreasing radii of turns 1 and 2.

A view ahead of the Formula 1 Chinese Grand Prix at Shanghai International Circuit in Shanghai, China on March 15, 2026. (Photo by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

The grandstands at the start-finish straight are like little else in F1.

Credit: Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The grandstands at the start-finish straight are like little else in F1. Credit: Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Over the years, the city of Shanghai—once visible on the distant horizon—has grown closer and closer to the race track. And for most of those years, I’ve noticed that the grandstands just before the back straight were never in use until this year.

“… This is the biggest crowd I’ve ever seen here in Shanghai,” said Lewis Hamilton in the post-race press conference. “When we were doing the drivers’ parade, we went up to Turn 11, 12, and that grandstand has been closed for, I think, almost 20 years, and it was amazing. I was so shocked to see it completely full.”

Indeed, a new concrete grandstand structure replaced the old stands, which were always covered with advertising banners. And it was completely full, as were the rest of them, with others lining the general admission banks. If you were confused by the recent rumors linking Chinese automaker BYD to the sport, the sold-out crowd this year should help it make more sense.

A maiden win is pretty cool

This was F1’s first sprint weekend of the year, meaning there was just one practice session instead of the usual three. Mercedes remains faster than anyone else by a considerable enough margin that, without some very hard work by some of the other teams, the drivers’ and constructors’ championships will almost certainly be Mercedes’. The car makes its speed along the straights, as in 2014, and the last new hybrid power units, Mercedes’ High Performance Powertrains, simply did a better job than any other system. The company’s factory team has a far better understanding of how to exploit the V6/electric motor/battery pack combo than any of its customer teams.

Ferrari remains Mercedes’ closest rival, perhaps half a second down over a lap. The red car is quicker through the corners, and the wisdom of Ferrari’s decision to go for smaller, faster-spooling turbochargers was in evidence at both starts as Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc mixed it with the Mercedes of George Russell and Kimi Antonelli.

SHANGHAI, CHINA - MARCH 15:Race winner Andrea Kimi Antonelli of Italy and Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team Second placed George Russell of Great Britain and Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team Third placed Lewis Hamilton of Great Britain and Scuderia Ferrari and Peter Bonnington, Race Engineer of Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team celebrate on the podium during the F1 Grand Prix of China at Shanghai International Circuit on March 15, 2026 in Shanghai, China. (Photo by John Ricky/Anadolu via Getty Images)

George Russell, Kimi Antonelli, and Lewis Hamilton on the podium after the Chinese Grand Prix.

Credit: John Ricky/Anadolu via Getty Images

George Russell, Kimi Antonelli, and Lewis Hamilton on the podium after the Chinese Grand Prix. Credit: John Ricky/Anadolu via Getty Images

Antonelli’s sprint went awry with a bad start, then avoidable contact with the Red Bull of Isack Hadjar, leaving Russell to share his victory podium with Leclerc and Hamilton. Sunday went a lot better—Antonelli had qualified on pole the day before, and unlike in the sprint, he got his Mercedes moving quickly when the lights went out, staying ahead of his more experienced English teammate.

A better start from Hamilton saw the seven-time champion pass both Mercedes—something that must have felt a little sweet after essentially being ousted from that team in favor of the teenage Antonelli at the start of last year. Before lap three, the teenager was back in the lead, a position he would not relinquish until the checkered flag, taking his debut win and becoming the second-youngest F1 winner in history (after Max Verstappen).

“The start is still our weak point, and to be fair, I didn’t go with great confidence because my two previous starts were really bad, so I didn’t know what to expect,” Antonelli said after the race. “But obviously, I covered a little bit too much on the inside and left too much space on the outside, so probably need to review that. But pace was still good, especially I felt good on the Hards, even though at the end I relaxed a bit too much and did a mistake which put a bit of pressure. But still managed to bring it home.”

For many laps, we were treated to a magnificent duel between Hamilton and Leclerc in their evenly matched Ferraris. Hamilton already has six wins in Shanghai and is among the drivers who loves the circuit. This showed as he gapped Leclerc and held onto the final podium position. In the post-race press conference, after congratulating Antonelli, he sounded happier than we’ve heard in at least a year.

SHANGHAI, CHINA - MARCH 15: A general view of the action during the Formula 1 Grand Prix of China at Shanghai International Circuit on March 15, 2026 in Shanghai, China. (Photo by Zhang Hengwei/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

The Ferraris don’t have the same top speed as the Mercedes cars, but they get off the line much quicker.

Credit: Zhang Hengwei/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images

The Ferraris don’t have the same top speed as the Mercedes cars, but they get off the line much quicker. Credit: Zhang Hengwei/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images

“We’ve got a lot of work to do to try and keep up, but I had so much fun. We had a great start. I wasn’t able to keep these guys behind, but to stay in the fight is one of the most enjoyable races I’ve had in a long, long time, if ever. The fact that the cars are the way they are this year, and that battle with Charles at the end, was awesome. Great wheel-to-wheel battle, very fair and just what we want,” Hamilton told journalists.

DNS, DNF

There were fewer smiles at the other end of the time sheet. Four cars failed to even take the start of Sunday’s race, including both McLarens, the Audi of Gabriel Bortoleto, and the Williams of Alex Albon, all experiencing last-minute technical failures. Three more would fail to finish: both Aston Martins and the Red Bull of Max Verstappen. We’ve looked at the ongoing reliability problems at Aston Martin recently, and as in Australia, Verstappen made dreadful starts in both the sprint and Grand Prix.

Making matters worse, the Red Bull team seems closer in pace to the midfield teams than the leading three teams, and Verstappen was behind the Haas of Oliver Bearman and looked set to finish there in sixth place until a problem with the hybrid’s cooling forced his retirement. The four-time champion remains vocal about his distaste for the new format, and this weekend will have done nothing to change that.

SHANGHAI, CHINA - MARCH 14: Oscar Piastri of Australia and McLaren prepares to drive during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of China at Shanghai International Circuit on March 14, 2026 in Shanghai, China. (Photo by Mark Sutton - Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images)

Oscar Piastri has completed zero laps in either the Australian or Chinese Grands Prix this year. (But he did finish sixth in the sprint race.)

Credit: Mark Sutton – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images

Oscar Piastri has completed zero laps in either the Australian or Chinese Grands Prix this year. (But he did finish sixth in the sprint race.) Credit: Mark Sutton – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images

I wonder if history is starting to rhyme a little? Multiple-champion Sebastian Vettel never really clicked with the hybrids introduced in 2014, and multiple champion Hamilton similarly never got comfortable with the ground-effect cars of 2022–2025. Could it be that multiple-champion Verstappen just won’t gel with the 53: 47 split hybrids?

His Red Bull team and the other 10 teams on the grid will be working flat out as the cost cap and regulations allow them to improve their cars. More downforce, less drag, a reduction in mass, an improvement in power output—all these things and more are on the menu. The next race, in Japan in two weeks, is probably too soon to expect any upgrades, and the teams will now have all of April to work on that back at their respective bases; the ongoing conflict in the Middle East has forced the cancellation of the Bahrain and Saudi Arabian Grands Prix, with no replacements being arranged.

That means we should see new parts in Miami. And perhaps a tweak to qualifying, with deployment from the electric motor limited in this mode so the electric motor can be used for more of the lap.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

F1 in China: I’ve never seen so many people in those grandstands Read More »

perplexity’s-“personal-computer”-brings-its-ai-agents-to-the,-uh,-personal-computer

Perplexity’s “Personal Computer” brings its AI agents to the, uh, Personal Computer

Last month Perplexity announced the confusingly named “Computer,” its cloud-based agent tool for completing tasks using a harness that makes use of multiple different AI models. This week, the company is moving that kind of functionality to the desktop with the confusingly named “Personal Computer,” now available in early access by invite only.

Much like the cloud-based version, Personal Computer asks users to describe general objectives rather than specific computing tasks—an introductory video shows Personal Computer’s questions in a sidebar asking things like, “Create an interactive educational guide” and “create a podcast about whales.” But Personal Computer, running on a Mac Mini, also gives Perplexity’s agents local access to your files and apps, which it can open and manipulate directly to attempt to complete those tasks.

That should sound familiar to users of the open source OpenClaw (previously Moltbot), which similarly allows users to let AI agents loose on their personal machines. From the outside, Personal Computer looks like a more buttoned-up, user-friendly version of the same concept, with an easy-to-read, dockable interface that can help users track multiple tasks. Perplexity users can also log in remotely to their local copy of Personal Computer, making it “controllable from any device, anywhere,” Perplexity says.

Perplexity’s “Personal Computer” brings its AI agents to the, uh, Personal Computer Read More »

google-play-games-for-pc-is-getting-more-premium-titles-and-cross-buy-with-android

Google Play Games for PC is getting more premium titles and cross-buy with Android

Buy once (or more) to play anywhere

While Google announced last year it was opening the door to all Android games on Windows, things haven’t exactly worked out like that. It should have been easy, though. None of these “Windows” games is actually built for Windows—Play Games uses virtualization to run a lightweight Android OS in a container for the games. Hypothetically, all Android games should work, but there are still some big gaps.

For example, Play Games for Windows has thus far not supported paid games outside of those on Play Pass, and even some Play Pass content has been absent. In the latter case, that may be because developers have opted out. Google now says developers can choose to have Play Pass content available on both platforms. Regardless, the selection of free-to-play microtransaction factories in Play Games for PC hasn’t exactly screamed “premium experience.”

We should start seeing more paid games for Windows pop up, but Google’s going about it in an odd way. While these are still Android games at their core, Google is treating Windows as a separate platform. Thus, it has announced, “Buy once, play anywhere.” The idea is that developers can offer premium games in Google Play that include both Android and Windows access.

On mobile devices, anything you buy is always available on all other Android phones and tablets, but it’s apparently not the same for Windows. Developers have to join this program to offer cross-buy functionality, and it does not work for games you’ve previously purchased on Android. In addition, premium upgrades purchased on Android don’t necessarily carry over. Google says that depend son developer support and is unrelated to the new cross-buy program.

Google is making strides as it builds its desktop gaming catalog, but it still has a long way to go before it can attract any new players. In the distant past, Google might have just mirrored all mobile games on PC and called it a day, but Play Games on PC isn’t shaping up to be a Wild West. Google today is more deliberative and interested in controlling how apps are distributed. This is just another example of that mentality.

Updated 3/11 at 9PM ET with additional comment from Google. 

Google Play Games for PC is getting more premium titles and cross-buy with Android Read More »

14,000-routers-are-infected-by-malware-that’s-highly-resistant-to-takedowns

14,000 routers are infected by malware that’s highly resistant to takedowns

Researchers say they have uncovered a takedown-resistant botnet of 14,000 routers and other network devices—primarily made by Asus—that have been conscripted into a proxy network that anonymously carries traffic used for cybercrime.

The malware—dubbed KadNap—takes hold by exploiting vulnerabilities that have gone unpatched by their owners, Chris Formosa, a researcher at security firm Lumen’s Black Lotus Labs, told Ars. The high concentration of Asus routers is likely due to botnet operators acquiring a reliable exploit for vulnerabilities affecting those models. He said it’s unlikely that the attackers are using any zero-days in the operation.

A botnet that stands out among others

The number of infected routers averages about 14,000 per day, up from 10,000 last August, when Black Lotus discovered the botnet. Compromised devices are overwhelmingly located in the US, with smaller populations in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Russia. One of the most salient features of KadNap is a sophisticated peer-to-peer design based on Kademlia, a network structure that uses distributed hash tables to conceal the IP addresses of command-and-control servers. The design makes the botnet resistant to detection and takedowns through traditional methods.

“The KadNap botnet stands out among others that support anonymous proxies in its use of a peer-to-peer network for decentralized control,” Formosa and fellow Black Lotus researcher Steve Rudd wrote Wednesday. “Their intention is clear: avoid detection and make it difficult for defenders to protect against.”

Distributed hash tables have long been used to create hardened peer-to-peer networks, most notably BitTorrent and the Inter-Planetary File System. Rather than having one or more centralized servers that directly control nodes and provide them with the IP addresses of other nodes, DHTs allow any node to poll other nodes for the device or server it’s looking for. The decentralized structure and the substitution of IP addresses with hashes give the network resilience against takedowns or denial of service attacks.

14,000 routers are infected by malware that’s highly resistant to takedowns Read More »

trump’s-divisive-fda-vaccine-regulator-self-destructs,-will-exit-agency-(again)

Trump’s divisive FDA vaccine regulator self-destructs, will exit agency (again)

For the second time, Vinay Prasad is set to leave the Food and Drug Administration.

In a post on social media Friday, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary announced that Prasad will exit in April, adding that he got “a tremendous amount accomplished” during his year at the agency.

Prasad’s tenure was generally marked by controversy, but he is departing amid a cluster of self-destructive decisions. Those include a shocking rejection of an mRNA vaccine (which was over the objections of agency scientists and quickly reversed); a demand for an additional clinical trial on a gene therapy for Huntington’s disease, which was widely seen as moving the goalpost for the therapy; his startling choice to publicly attack the maker of that gene therapy, UniQure; and alleged abuse of FDA staff, who say he created a toxic work environment.

The moves have collectively roiled those within the agency, the Trump administration, the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, as well as patient advocacy groups.

On Monday, BioSpace reported that financial analysts were all but cheering Prasad’s departure, calling it “a big win for biotech, especially for companies in the rare disease space.” Several biotech companies that have faced setbacks and rejections at the hands of Prasad saw stock bumps on Monday. UniQure, for instance, saw its stock leap around 25 percent from Friday afternoon.

Constant controversy

This will be Prasad’s second exit from the FDA during the current Trump administration. In July, he resigned amid his controversial handling of a gene therapy treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, as well as criticism from far-right activist Laura Loomer, who called Prasad a “leftist saboteur.” He was reinstated less than two weeks later.

Since his return, Prasad has held key roles at the FDA; he is the chief medical and scientific officer and the director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), which also makes him the top regulator of vaccines, gene therapies, and other biologic products.

His qualifications for those roles were always questionable. While Prasad is a professor at the University of California, San Francisco and a practicing hematology-oncologist (a doctor specializing in blood disorders and cancers), he came to the FDA with no regulatory experience and no expertise in vaccines or gene therapies. Prasad’s rise to regulatory relevance stemmed instead from his online criticism of pandemic-era public health policies, including COVID-19 vaccines, and his appearances on podcasts.

Trump’s divisive FDA vaccine regulator self-destructs, will exit agency (again) Read More »

after-falling-far-behind-the-rest-of-industry,-blue-origin-creates-new-stock-option-plan

After falling far behind the rest of industry, Blue Origin creates new stock option plan


“It’s a big fat middle finger for those that thought they had something.”

Jeff Bezos, shown here in 2018, apparently characterizing the value of Blue Origin’s original stock option plan. Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Jeff Bezos, shown here in 2018, apparently characterizing the value of Blue Origin’s original stock option plan. Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Two years after he founded his space company in the summer of 2004, Jeff Bezos penned a letter that greeted new employees with the message, “Welcome to Blue Origin!” A copy of this letter was subsequently given to new employees for nearly two decades.

At one point in the letter, Bezos questioned whether Blue Origin was a good investment.

“I accept that Blue Origin will not meet a reasonable investor’s expectations for return on investment over a typical investing horizon,” Bezos wrote. “It’s important to the peace of mind of those at Blue to know I won’t be surprised or disappointed when this prediction comes true. On the other hand, I do expect that over a very long-term horizon—perhaps even decades from now—Blue will be self-sustaining and operationally profitable, and will yield returns.”

Decades later, Blue Origin is still not operationally profitable. Although the company’s finances are not public, by various estimates, Bezos is still investing at least a few billion dollars annually to keep the lights on.

Recently, Blue Origin has made impressive strides and seen financial returns from the sale of BE-4 engines and commercial launches, such as a forthcoming mission for AST SpaceMobile on its New Glenn rocket. However, as revenues rise, so have expenses, with the company continually expanding its facilities and workforce, now totaling more than 11,000 employees.

Top aerospace engineers and technicians do not come cheap, and Blue Origin competes in a heated market for the best talent. Bezos has a lot to offer prospective employees: a compelling mission, high salaries, a demanding but not suffocating work environment, and more. But when it comes to one key aspect of retaining talent, Blue Origin rates far behind the rest of the industry.

Imagine you are a super-bright rocket scientist. A decade ago, you and a buddy both graduated from the University of Southern California as hotshot engineers. You had your pick of space companies. Your friend went to SpaceX and climbed the ladder there into a senior engineering role. You followed a similar arc at Blue Origin. Along the way, your friend racked up stock options that, after SpaceX goes public in the next year, may be worth tens of millions of dollars.

But what about you? How much are your stock options at Blue Origin worth? The answer to this (spoiler alert: zero) raises questions about Blue Origin’s competitiveness in an increasingly competitive space industry.

Equity incentive plan

From the beginning, SpaceX offered employee stock options. Initially, employees did not place too much value in them. For example, Bob Reagan was a machinist hired to lead the company’s in-house manufacturing, and later oversaw the build-out of the company’s large factory in Hawthorne, Calif. SpaceX founder Elon Musk gave Reagan a hard deadline of October 2007 to have the building ready for move-in, and the machinist exhausted himself to have everything ready. His reward? Stock options.

“He gave me a ten-thousand-share bonus, and I was so pissed off because I thought that was nothing,” Reagan told me in the book Liftoff. Several years later, Reagan was able to retire wealthy. Laughing at the memory of his anger about the options in an interview in 2019, Reagan said of Musk, “I guess he took care of me.”

Over the years, SpaceX employees have been able to periodically sell stock options at private liquidity events, when SpaceX sought to raise money from the capital markets. Those shares will become even more valuable when the company goes public, with many engineers becoming worth tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars.

As stock-option plans became more common in the space industry, Blue Origin sought to offer its own plan a decade ago. Launched on February 22, 2016, the “Blue Origin Equity Incentive Plan” gave employees the chance to “participate in Blue Origin’s growth and success, and to encourage them to remain in the service of Blue Origin.”

The 19-page document outlining the terms of this plan laid out the rules of the stock option plan. In some ways, the plan was fairly conventional, but in other ways, it was markedly different from most plans out there. Perhaps the biggest change from most plans was this: “All Options, whether vested or unvested, shall expire on the tenth anniversary of their Vesting Commencement Date unless such Options expire earlier.”

In other words, regardless of whether an employee remained with the company, all options expired after 10 years from the date of issuance. The first options expired last month.

There was another problem with the Blue Origin plan. Stock options could only be exercised “upon a liquidity event,” which was defined as a sale of the Blue Origin business or an Initial Public Offering. Neither of which has happened.

Initial excitement turns into frustration

Blue Origin offered options initially at a strike price of $4 a share, meaning that if there were a liquidity event at something like $10 a share, employees could exercise their options and sell their shares at a significantly higher price. Over the years, this strike price increased to $5.36 a share, still a good deal.

Most employees tucked these options away, not expecting too much from them. If anything, several current and former employees said, they were viewed as a lottery ticket. It was typical for an employee to receive 2,000 shares initially, which would grow over a decade to 10,000 shares.

Employees always understood Bezos was unlikely to sell the company or bring on new investors. But they were nonetheless interested. During Blue Origin’s company-wide town halls, one or two questions would invariably come up about stock options. The answers were always the same: There were no expectations of a liquidity event.

In the years following 2016, perception of the options as an “incentive” began to sour, especially as Blue Origin employees saw peers at other space companies cash in options for meaningful rewards. At SpaceX, even long-time baristas could end up millionaires. Blue employees began to refer to their options as “Monopoly money” with increasing scorn.

When Blue Origin awarded those first options in 2016, the company was still fairly small, having just begun its transition to a large aerospace player. Only a few hundred employees remain a decade later from that initial round, and they are some of Blue’s most dedicated engineers, the people who built the engines and rockets powering the company’s recent success. Now their options have been yanked away.

It would be simple enough to extend the options to at least allow employees to retain some hope. That’s all that many of the people who have stuck with the company for so long have asked for. However, in response to requests to extend the options, Blue issued a form letter that essentially said, “Sorry.” For many of these employees, it feels like a betrayal.

“It’s a big fat middle finger for those that thought they had something, and now they are stuck with empty pockets after spending years working here,” a current employee told Ars.

Blue Origin did not respond to a request for comment on its original equity incentive plan.

Retention may be a challenge

In the early years, before the program’s perception changed, the incentive plan proved a useful recruiting tool. Some employees, especially for a few years after 2016, negotiated lower salaries in favor of more stock options. For these employees, the expiring options are not just a lost lottery ticket but have significantly dented their earning power.

Over time, Blue Origin recruiters stopped emphasizing the options package as part of the company’s benefits. On May 1, 2023, the company told employees it would no longer issue options.

The reasons cited for this were curious. The company told employees that, after a recent review, it had determined that offering equity as part of a hiring package was no longer appropriate. An FAQ further stated that a finite number of shares were available, and that as the company rapidly grew (this was during an intense period when Blue sought to bring the BE-4 rocket engine online and build the New Glenn rocket), it ran out of shares.

Employees wondered whether there would be any other form of compensation or equity offered as an incentive to stay at Blue Origin?

Since then, the issue has not gone away, and long-term incentives remain a question that pops up at town hall meetings with the company’s relatively new chief executive, Dave Limp. He has offered a variety of platitudes that boil down to, “We are looking into things.”

It turns out Limp was telling the truth. On Monday, he emailed the entire company, revealing Blue had created a new stock option plan.

“We are at a pivotal inflection point in our journey to become a world-class manufacturing company, producing at rate and consistently delivering products and services for our customers,” Limp wrote. “We cannot accomplish this without employees that demonstrate high ownership, are driven to achieve our most critical goals, and are motivated to build enduring value at Blue.”

The company will begin granting stock options to employees this spring. “This program is structured to provide opportunities for liquidity events enabling each of you to convert vested stock options into realized value,” Limp wrote.

He promised to offer more information during a company-wide meeting on April 17. It is unclear what will happen to the options under the original equity plan.

The details will matter

In the hypercompetitive aerospace industry, where there is a constant battle to recruit and retain talented engineers, such compensation matters.

Blue Origin has greatly expanded its facilities in Florida, on the Space Coast, where it assembles and launches New Glenn rockets, and is building a series of lunar landers. In this area, the company must compete not just with SpaceX—which is building large launch towers and mega-factories for its Starship vehicles—but also with new space companies such as Relativity Space and Stoke Space, as well as NASA and traditional space powers such as United Launch Alliance.

The competitive nature of the industry has been going on for a long time. In the mid-2010s, as Blue Origin began scaling up, it hired a number of engineers from SpaceX who had experience with building and launching the Falcon 9 for similar operations with New Glenn. Blue Origin lured them away with higher salaries and a (somewhat) more relaxed work environment.

“The folks that left SpaceX to go to Blue are bitter,” one industry source said. “Yes, they got higher pay, but they worked like crazy. And now that they got New Glenn off,  they’re wondering where’s their bonus?”

Weeks after the successful launch of New Glenn, Blue Origin instead cut its workforce by 10 percent.

The email from Limp did not provide details about the new plan, other than saying, “As Blue achieves its goals and increase in value your equity will grow alongside it.”

To compete with SpaceX, Blue must continue to grow. The exact numbers that SpaceX will target with its IPO have not been set, but the company is likely to seek a valuation in the vicinity of $1.5 trillion, which would raise between $30 billion and $50 billion in cash. This is on top of SpaceX’s estimated 2026 revenue of $22 billion to $24 billion.

This gives SpaceX CEO Elon Musk a massive pile of capital to throw at his Starship rocket, Starlink constellation, AI, and orbital data centers.

Bezos has expressed an interest in all of these technologies, too, with his 9×4 New Glenn rocket, lunar lander program, TeraWave constellation, and space-based data centers.

But—and yes, this is a strange thing to write about one of the top five richest people in the world—Bezos does not have the resources to match SpaceX. Blue Origin’s annual revenues are not publicly known, but they are likely on the order of $1 billion a year. Bezos is pumping multiples of that annually to fund the company, but this total is still dwarfed by SpaceX’s annual revenue. And that’s before an IPO.

Until a few years ago, Bezos could more or less match the revenues SpaceX had available with annual contributions to Blue Origin. Both companies had a workforce of over 10,000 people and broad ambitions. But as Starlink sprints ahead, and with an IPO on the horizon, SpaceX is taking a significant leap upward.

All of this raises the possibility that Bezos may finally consider taking on outside investment if he wants Blue Origin to remain competitive with SpaceX.

“He’s never really talked about going for outside investment,” said Chris Davenport, author of Rocket Dreams, about Bezos. “The fact that Elon has had a number of liquidity events is going to put some pressure on Jeff and Blue Origin to at least think about it.”

Photo of Eric Berger

Eric Berger is the senior space editor at Ars Technica, covering everything from astronomy to private space to NASA policy, and author of two books: Liftoff, about the rise of SpaceX; and Reentry, on the development of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon. A certified meteorologist, Eric lives in Houston.

After falling far behind the rest of industry, Blue Origin creates new stock option plan Read More »

satellite-firm-pauses-imagery-after-revealing-iran’s-attacks-on-us-bases

Satellite firm pauses imagery after revealing Iran’s attacks on US bases

Planet Labs, one of the world’s leading commercial satellite imaging companies, said Friday it is placing a hold on releasing imagery of some parts of the Middle East as a regional war enters its second week.

The company, which brands itself as Planet, operates a fleet of several hundred Earth-imaging satellites designed to record views of every landmass on Earth at least once per day. Its customers include think tanks, NGOs, academic institutions, news media, and commercial users in the agriculture, forestry, and energy industries, among others.

Planet also holds lucrative contracts selling overhead imagery to the US military and US government intelligence agencies.

“In response to the conflict in the Middle East, Planet is implementing temporary restrictions on data access within specific areas of the affected region,” Planet said in a statement emailed to Ars. “Effective immediately, all new imagery collected over the Gulf States, Iraq, Kuwait, and adjacent conflict zones will be subject to a mandatory 96-hour delay before it is made available in our archive.”

Imagery over Iran will remain available as soon as it is acquired, the company said. “This change applies to all users except authorized government users who maintain immediate access for mission-critical operations.”

Infographic with satellite images showing damage at a selection of four US military sites, or sites hosting US personnel, in the Middle East in the context of Iranian strikes since February 28, 2026, using images from Planet Labs.

Credit: Graphic by Nalini Lepetit-Chella and Sabrina Blanchard/AFP via Getty Images)/© 2026 Planet Labs/AFP

Infographic with satellite images showing damage at a selection of four US military sites, or sites hosting US personnel, in the Middle East in the context of Iranian strikes since February 28, 2026, using images from Planet Labs. Credit: Graphic by Nalini Lepetit-Chella and Sabrina Blanchard/AFP via Getty Images)/© 2026 Planet Labs/AFP

Overhead intelligence

In the last few days, Planet’s satellite imagery showed the aftermath of Iranian missile and drone strikes on US and allied bases in the region, including damage to the US Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain and to a $1 billion US-built early warning radar in Qatar used for tracking incoming projectiles. Planet said it wants to prevent “adversarial actors” from using its data for “Battle Damage Assessment (BDA)” purposes. In other words, the company doesn’t want to help Iran’s military know where it succeeded and where it failed.

Satellite firm pauses imagery after revealing Iran’s attacks on US bases Read More »

climate-change-sucks,-but-at-least-it-won’t-kill-your-ev-battery

Climate change sucks, but at least it won’t kill your EV battery

The good news is that technological progress more than offsets the effect of a warming world, even (hopefully) extreme scenarios like warming of 4° C. Those older batteries, which have a median lifespan of around 15 years in the current climate, would decrease by about 20 percent to a median of 12 years under 4° of warming, the study finds. But newer batteries, which have a current median lifespan of 17 years, should still last about 17 years on average under such conditions.

Older batteries also have a greater distribution of aging. The percentiles are much closer to the median for newer batteries, which under the worst conditions might see a lifetime degradation of up to 10 percent; by contrast, older batteries may suffer a loss of 30 percent or more.

“I think these improvements are well-known to experts in the field. But when I started this project, I was looking at web forums and reading how people were deciding on cars,” Wu said. “There are still a lot of durability concerns about EV batteries.”

After modeling battery lifetimes in 300 cities around the world, Wu and his co-authors found that with older battery technology, countries with the lowest GDP per capita had the greatest reductions in battery lifespan. Under the worst outcomes, Africa, Southeast Asia, and India could see those EV batteries lose 25 percent of their lifespan, compared to 15 percent in Europe or North America. But newer batteries should lose only 4 percent of their lifespan at worst in low-income countries and remain stable in the affluent West.

Of course, this assumes that those lower-GDP nations adopt EVs with the same kinds of battery technology we see in more well-off markets, and they don’t take into account factors like vehicle reliability, changes in powertrain efficiency, or whether charging infrastructure will remain stable in a warmer world. But it’s just another bit of data we can point to showing that EVs aren’t really that scary, just different.

Nature Climate Change, 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-026-02579-z (About DOIs).

Climate change sucks, but at least it won’t kill your EV battery Read More »

ms-exec:-microsoft’s-next-console-will-play-“xbox-and-pc-games”

MS exec: Microsoft’s next console will play “Xbox and PC games”

Last summer, we here at Ars made the argument that the company’s next Xbox console should give up the walled garden approach and just run Windows already. Now, newly named Microsoft Executive Vice President for Gaming Asha Sharma has strongly hinted that this is indeed the direction Microsoft is going, saying its next-generation console will “play your Xbox and PC games.”

In a social media post Thursday afternoon, Sharma said that “our commitment to the return of Xbox” would include a new console codenamed Project Helix that “will lead in performance and play your Xbox and PC games.” Sharma said she would be discussing that commitment and that console itself with developers and partners at her first Game Developers Conference next week.

Sharma’s statement leaves a little wiggle room for Project Helix to be something other than a full-fledged Windows-based living room gaming box. The coming console’s access to PC games could be limited to Microsoft’s existing streaming solution via PC Game Pass, for instance, or to games designed for Microsoft’s own Xbox-branded PC SDK and the PC Xbox app.

Still, a plain reading of Sharma’s statement suggests that Microsoft is getting ready to open up its next console to a complete Windows installation, with the ability to play tens of thousands of existing PC games. That doesn’t come as a complete shock, considering that Microsoft already used the Xbox name for last year’s Windows-based ROG Xbox Ally (and its somewhat console-esque full-screen “Xbox Experience”). Microsoft has also been slowly reducing the number of games that are fully exclusive to Xbox consoles, lowering the value of a walled-off console platform (Sony, meanwhile, pulled back this week from its recent trend of releasing first-party titles on PC as well). Meanwhile, Valve’s coming Steam Machine is threatening to bring Windows-free PC gaming to living rooms everywhere in the near future.

MS exec: Microsoft’s next console will play “Xbox and PC games” Read More »

openai-introduces-gpt-5.4-with-more-knowledge-work-capability

OpenAI introduces GPT-5.4 with more knowledge-work capability

Additionally, there are improvements to visual understanding; it can now more carefully analyze images up to 10.24 million pixels, or up to a 6,000-pixel maximum dimension. OpenAI also claims responses from this model are 18 percent less likely to contain factual errors than before.

ChatGPT reportedly lost some users to competitor Anthropic in recent days, after OpenAI announced a deal with the Pentagon in the wake of a public feud between the Trump administration and Anthropic over limitations Anthropic wanted to impose on military applications of its models. However, it’s unclear just how many folks jumped ship or whether that led to a substantial dip in the product’s massive base of over 900 million users.

To take advantage of the situation, Anthropic rolled out the once-subscriber-only memory feature to free users and introduced a tool for importing memory from elsewhere. Anthropic says March 2 was its largest single day ever for new sign-ups.

OpenAI needs to compete in both capability and cost and token efficiency to maintain its relative popularity with users, and this update aims to support that objective.

GPT-5.4 is available to users of the ChatGPT web and native apps, Codex, and the API starting today. Subscribers to Plus, Team, and Pro are also getting GPT-5.4 Thinking, and GPT-5.4 Pro is hitting the API, Edu, and Enterprise.

OpenAI introduces GPT-5.4 with more knowledge-work capability Read More »