mergers

higher-prices,-simpler-streaming-expected-if-hbo-max-folds-into-paramount+

Higher prices, simpler streaming expected if HBO Max folds into Paramount+


The end of HBO Max is “certainly plausible.”

A still from the second season of HBO’s The Last of Us. Credit: HBO

Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) has a ‘for sale’ sign up. And that could mean big changes for subscribers to the company’s most popular streaming service, HBO Max.

After receiving unsolicited acquisition offers, WBD recently declared itself open to “strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value.” WBD drew new attention by being open to selling its streaming business (WBD is also still open to moving forward with previously shared plans to split into a cable company and a streaming and movie studios company next year).

Naturally, mergers and acquisitions talk has heated up since then, with Paramount as one of the most eager suitors. Paramount, which merged with Skydance in August, is reportedly planning to keep “much of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. intact” if a deal happens, per a Bloomberg report that cited unnamed people familiar with the plans of David Ellison, Paramount’s CEO.

For HBO Max subscribers, the most pertinent part of Bloomberg’s report follows:

Under Ellison’s plan, Warner Bros.’ HBO Max streaming service would merge into the existing Paramount+ platform, one of the people said. He believes combining the offerings will allow more people to see the work of film and TV show creators. The libraries of the two companies will make Paramount+ more compelling for subscribers.

The purported strategy would likely end the ability to subscribe to HBO Max in favor of the opportunity to pay for a beefier version of Paramount+.

More broadly, the merger talks bring into question the future for HBO Max subscribers should Warner Bros. engage in any sort of M&A activity with one of its most desirable businesses.

Higher prices are possible

Choice is typically seen as good for consumers. But in the case of streaming, which only recently overtook broadcast and cable viewing, the recent expansion of services available is often viewed negatively. Streaming fragmentation forces people to jump from service to service in order to find something to watch and to pay for more subscriptions.

As a result, a WBD merger could be a double-edged sword for streaming subscribers. The most obvious con is the potential for price hikes.

Speaking to Ars about a potential WBD merger, Vikrant Mathur, co-founder of streaming technology provider Future Today, said:

On one hand, it means subscribers getting access to a larger library, a simpler content discovery, and a consistent streaming experience, but on the other, we risk increasing subscription costs for current subscribers of both services, a trend that has been leading to subscription fatigue and diminishing the original promise of streaming.

Max Alderman, partner at FE International, an M&A advisory firm with a specialty in content businesses, said HBO Max subscribers can expect “friction” if Paramount buys HBO Max. He pointed out that overlapping platforms often result in “temporary confusion around pricing, content access, and brand continuity.” Alderman added:

Over the longer run, though, a combined offering could improve content breadth and potentially deliver better value per dollar.

Still, a Paramount-owned HBO Max stands the risk of failing to meet subscribers’ expectations, “especially for a service like HBO Max that’s earned a reputation for high-end, prestige programming,” Julie Clark, VP of media and entertainment at TransUnion, which works in streaming ads, told Ars.

The end of HBO Max?

With cable declining, HBO Max is the HBO brand’s best bet at longevity. The idea of HBO dissolving into shows and movies that you find on Paramount+ doesn’t sound like a fitting ending to a 53-year-old brand that has brought us shows like The Sopranos, The Wire, Game of Thrones, and White Lotus. HBO has gone through multiple streaming rebrands, but the end of a dedicated HBO streaming service, as suggested by Bloomberg’s report, is a different level. Yet, HBO Max folding into Paramount+ is “certainly plausible,” according to Alderman.

“The current market doesn’t support redundant platforms competing for the same audience,” he explained.

Today’s streaming services are focused on reaching and maintaining profitability long term. In its most recent earnings report, Paramount’s streaming business, which includes Paramount+, BET+, and Pluto TV, reported adjusted operating income before depreciation and amortization of $157 million, up from $26 million a year ago. The numbers were largely driven by Paramount+ growing subscribers to 77.7 million and charging more.

In its earnings report this week, WBD said that its streaming business, which includes HBO Max and Discovery+, posted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of $345 million, compared to $289 million a year ago. WBD claims 128 million streaming subscribers, primarily through HBO Max.

“This potential merger underscores the escalating content and distribution costs in the industry,” Alderman said. “For [subscription video on demand platforms] to succeed, they need scale of revenue, as well as operational cost efficiencies, both of which can come through consolidation.” 

It’s understandable that a brand that acquires HBO Max would seek to streamline operations with any streaming business that it already owns. But it’s hard to imagine any buyer throwing out the HBO name.

“I’d be skeptical that the HBO brand is going away completely. We’ve seen the name yo-yo, and it’s clear that it still packs a punch for consumers looking for premium content,” Clark said.

Even if HBO Max lives as a tile within the Paramount+ app, or the app of another buyer, (à la Hulu under Disney+), it wouldn’t make sense to get rid of the legendary acronym completely.

“HBO is one of the few streaming brands that still commands prestige pricing,” Alderman said.

If a company does acquire any form of HBO, one of its top challenges is expected to be streamlining operations while maintaining HBO’s premium brand. This could be especially difficult under a “more mainstream umbrella like Paramount+,” Alderman noted.

Streaming has already diluted the HBO brand somewhat. Through streaming, HBO is now associated with stuff from DC Comics and Cartoon Network, as well as reality shows, like 90 Day Fiancé and Naked and Afraid. Merging with Paramount+ or even Netflix could expand the HBO umbrella more.

That expanded umbrella could allow a company like Paramount to better compete against Netflix, something WBD executives have shied away from. HBO Max is “not everything for everyone in a household,” JB Perrette, WBD’s streaming president and CEO, said this spring.

“What people want from us in a world where they’ve got Netflix and Amazon [Prime Video] are those things that differentiate us,” Casey Bloys, chairman and CEO of HBO and Max content, told The Wall Street Journal in May.

A “stress test” for more streaming mergers

Aside from the impact on HBO Max subscribers, WBD’s merger talks have broad implications. A deal would open the door for much more consolidation in the streaming space, something that experts have been anticipating for some years and that addresses the boom of streaming services. Per Clark, discussions of a Paramount-WBD merger are “less about two studios joining forces and more about a stress test for future M&A.”

If WBD accepts a Paramount bid and that bid clears regulatory hurdles, it would signal that “premium content under fewer umbrellas is back in play,” Clark said.

A Paramount-WBD merger is likely to speed up consolidation among mid-tier players, like NBCUniversal, Lionsgate, and AMC, Alderman said, pointing to these companies’ interest in scaling their streaming businesses and in building differentiated portfolios to counter Netflix and Disney+’s expansive libraries.

If Paramount and WBD don’t merge, Clark expects to see more “piecemeal” strategies, such as rights-sharing, joint venture bundles, and streaming-as-a-service models.

Photo of Scharon Harding

Scharon is a Senior Technology Reporter at Ars Technica writing news, reviews, and analysis on consumer gadgets and services. She’s been reporting on technology for over 10 years, with bylines at Tom’s Hardware, Channelnomics, and CRN UK.

Higher prices, simpler streaming expected if HBO Max folds into Paramount+ Read More »

disney-makes-antitrust-problem-go-away-by-buying-majority-stake-in-fubo

Disney makes antitrust problem go away by buying majority stake in Fubo

Fubo’s about-face

Fubo’s merger with Disney represents a shocking about-face for the sports-streaming provider, which previously had raised alarms (citing Citi research) about Disney’s ownership of 54 percent of the US sports rights market—ESPN (26.8 percent), Fox (17.3 percent), and WBD (9.9 percent). Fubo successfully got a preliminary injunction against Venu in August, and a trial was scheduled for October 2025.

Fubo CEO David Gandler said in February that Disney, Fox, and WBD “are erecting insurmountable barriers that will effectively block any new competitors.

“Each of these companies has consistently engaged in anticompetitive practices that aim to monopolize the market, stifle any form of competition, create higher pricing for subscribers, and cheat consumers from deserved choice,” Gandler also said at the time.

Now, set to be a Disney company, Fubo is singing a new tune, with its announcement claiming that the merger “will enhance consumer choice by making available a broad set of programming offerings.”

In a statement today, Gandler added that the merger will allow Fubo to “provide consumers with greater choice and flexibility” and “to scale effectively,” while adding that the deal “strengthens Fubo’s balance sheet” and sets Fubo up for “positive cash flow.”

Ars Technica reached out to Fubo about its previously publicized antitrust and anticompetitive concerns, whether or not those concerns had been addressed, and new concerns that it has settled its lawsuit in favor of its own business needs rather than over a resolution of customer choice problems. Jennifer Press, Fubo SVP of communications, responded to our questions with a statement, saying in part:

We filed an antitrust suit against the Venu Sports partners last year because that product was intended to be exclusive. As its partners announced last year, consumers would only have access to the Venu content package from Venu, which would limit choice and competitive pricing.

The definitive agreement that Fubo signed with Disney today will actually bring more choice to the market. As part of the deal, Fubo extended carriage agreements with Disney and also Fox, enabling Fubo to create a new Sports and Broadcast service and other genre-based content packages. Additionally, as the antitrust litigation has been settled, the Venu Sports partners can choose to launch that product if they wish. The launch of these bundles will enhance consumer choice by making available a broad set of programming offerings.

“… a total deception”

Some remain skeptical about Disney buying out a company that was suing it over antitrust concerns.

Disney makes antitrust problem go away by buying majority stake in Fubo Read More »

microsoft-cancels-blizzard-survival-game,-lays-off-1,900

Microsoft cancels Blizzard survival game, lays off 1,900

Survival game won’t survive —

Job cuts hit Xbox, ZeniMax businesses, too, reports say.

Activision Blizzard survival game

Enlarge / Blizzard shared this image teasing a now-cancelled game in 2022.

Blizzard Entertainment/Twitter

The survival game that Blizzard announced it was working on in January 2022 has reportedly been canceled. The cut comes as Microsoft is slashing jobs a little over four months after closing its $69 billion Activision Blizzard acquisition.

Blizzard’s game didn’t have a title yet, but Blizzard said it would be for PC and console and introduce new stories and characters. In January 2022, Blizzard put out a call for workers to help build the game.

The game’s axing was revealed today in an internal memo from Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer seen by publications including The Verge and CNBC that said:

Blizzard is ending development on its survival game project and will be shifting some of the people working on it to one of several promising new projects Blizzard has in the early stages of development.

Spencer said Microsoft was laying off 1,900 people starting today, with workers continuing to receive notifications in the coming days. The layoffs affect 8.64 percent of Microsoft’s 22,000-employee gaming division.

Another internal memo, written by Matt Booty, Microsoft’s game content and studios president, and seen by The Verge, said the layoffs are hitting “multiple” Blizzard teams, “including development teams, shared service organizations and corporate functions.” In January 2022, after plans for the merger were first announced, Bobby Kotick, then-CEO of Activision Blizzard, reportedly told employees at a meeting that Microsoft was “committed to trying to retain as many of our people as possible.”

Spencer said workers in Microsoft’s Xbox and ZeniMax Media businesses will also be impacted. Microsoft acquired ZeniMax, which owns Bethesda Softworks, for $7.5 billion in a deal that closed in March 2021.

After a bumpy ride with global regulators, Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard purchase closed in October. Booty’s memo said the job cuts announced today “reflect a focus on products and strategies that hold the most promise for Blizzard’s future growth, as well as identified areas of overlap across Blizzard and Microsoft Gaming.”

He claimed that layoffs would “enable Blizzard and Xbox to deliver ambitious games… on more platforms and in more places than ever before,” as well as “sustainable growth.”

Spencer’s memo said:

As we move forward in 2024, the leadership of Microsoft Gaming and Activision Blizzard is committed to aligning on a strategy and an execution plan with a sustainable cost structure that will support the whole of our growing business. Together, we’ve set priorities, identified areas of overlap, and ensured that we’re all aligned on the best opportunities for growth.

Laid-off employees will receive severance as per local employment laws, Spencer added.

Additional departures

Blizzard President Mike Ybarra announced via his X profile today that he is leaving the company. Booty’s memo said Ybarra “decided to leave” since the acquisition was completed. Ybarra was a top executive at Microsoft for over 20 years, including leadership positions at Xbox, before he started working at Blizzard in 2019.

Blizzard’s chief design officer, Allen Adham, is also leaving the company, per Booty’s memo.

The changes at the game studio follow Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick’s exit on January 1.

Microsoft also laid off 10,000 people, or about 4.5 percent of its reported 221,000-person workforce, last year as it worked to complete its Activision Blizzard buy. Microsoft blamed those job cuts on “macroeconomic conditions and changing customer priorities.”

Today’s job losses also join a string of recently announced tech layoffs, including at IBM, Google, SAP, and eBay and in the gaming community platforms Unity, Twitch, and Discord. However, layoffs following Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard deal were somewhat anticipated due to expected redundancies among the Washington tech giant’s biggest merger ever. This week, Microsoft hit a $3 trillion market cap, becoming the second company to do so (after Apple).

Microsoft cancels Blizzard survival game, lays off 1,900 Read More »