rfk jr

“chaos”-at-state-health-agencies-after-us-illegally-axed-grants,-lawsuit-says

“Chaos” at state health agencies after US illegally axed grants, lawsuit says

Nearly half of US states sued the federal government and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. today in a bid to halt the termination of $11 billion in public health grants. The lawsuit was filed by 23 states and the District of Columbia.

“The grant terminations, which came with no warning or legally valid explanation, have quickly caused chaos for state health agencies that continue to rely on these critical funds for a wide range of urgent public health needs such as infectious disease management, fortifying emergency preparedness, providing mental health and substance abuse services, and modernizing public health infrastructure,” said a press release issued by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser.

The litigation is led by Colorado, California, Minnesota, Rhode Island, and Washington. The other plaintiffs are Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Nearly all of the plaintiffs are represented by a Democratic attorney general. Kentucky and Pennsylvania have Republican attorneys general and are instead represented by their governors, both Democrats.

The complaint, filed in US District Court for the District of Rhode Island, is in response to the recent cut of grants that were originally created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. “The sole stated basis for Defendants’ decision is that the funding for these grants or cooperative agreements was appropriated through one or more COVID-19 related laws,” the states’ lawsuit said.

The lawsuit says the US sent notices to states that grants were terminated “for cause” because “the grants and cooperative agreements were issued for a limited purpose: to ameliorate the effects of the pandemic. Now that the pandemic is over, the grants and cooperative agreements are no longer necessary as their limited purpose has run out.”

“Chaos” at state health agencies after US illegally axed grants, lawsuit says Read More »

the-cdc-buried-a-measles-forecast-that-stressed-the-need-for-vaccinations

The CDC buried a measles forecast that stressed the need for vaccinations

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Leaders at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ordered staff this week not to release their experts’ assessment that found the risk of catching measles is high in areas near outbreaks where vaccination rates are lagging, according to internal records reviewed by ProPublica.

In an aborted plan to roll out the news, the agency would have emphasized the importance of vaccinating people against the highly contagious and potentially deadly disease that has spread to 19 states, the records show.

A CDC spokesperson told ProPublica in a written statement that the agency decided against releasing the assessment “because it does not say anything that the public doesn’t already know.” She added that the CDC continues to recommend vaccines as “the best way to protect against measles.”

But what the nation’s top public health agency said next shows a shift in its long-standing messaging about vaccines, a sign that it may be falling in line under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime critic of vaccines:

“The decision to vaccinate is a personal one,” the statement said, echoing a line from a column Kennedy wrote for the Fox News website. “People should consult with their healthcare provider to understand their options to get a vaccine and should be informed about the potential risks and benefits associated with vaccines.”

ProPublica shared the new CDC statement about personal choice and risk with Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health. To her, the shift in messaging, and the squelching of this routine announcement, is alarming.

“I’m a bit stunned by that language,” Nuzzo said. “No vaccine is without risk, but that makes it sound like it’s a very active coin toss of a decision. We’ve already had more cases of measles in 2025 than we had in 2024, and it’s spread to multiple states. It is not a coin toss at this point.”

For many years, the CDC hasn’t minced words on vaccines. It promoted them with confidence. One campaign was called “Get My Flu Shot.” The agency’s website told medical providers they play a critical role in helping parents choose vaccines for their children: “Instead of saying ‘What do you want to do about shots?,’ say ‘Your child needs three shots today.’”

Nuzzo wishes the CDC’s forecasters would put out more details of their data and evidence on the spread of measles, not less. “The growing scale and severity of this measles outbreak and the urgent need for more data to guide the response underscores why we need a fully staffed and functional CDC and more resources for state and local health departments,” she said.

Kennedy’s agency oversees the CDC and on Thursday announced it was poised to eliminate 2,400 jobs there.

When asked what role, if any, Kennedy played in the decision to not release the risk assessment, HHS’s communications director said the aborted announcement “was part of an ongoing process to improve communication processes—nothing more, nothing less.” The CDC, he reiterated, continues to recommend vaccination “as the best way to protect against measles.”

“Secretary Kennedy believes that the decision to vaccinate is a personal one and that people should consult with their healthcare provider to understand their options to get a vaccine,” Andrew G. Nixon said. “It is important that the American people have radical transparency and be informed to make personal healthcare decisions.”

Responding to questions about criticism of the decision among some CDC staff, Nixon wrote, “Some individuals at the CDC seem more interested in protecting their own status or agenda rather than aligning with this Administration and the true mission of public health.”

The CDC’s risk assessment was carried out by its Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics, which relied, in part, on new disease data from the outbreak in Texas. The CDC created the center to address a major shortcoming laid bare during the COVID-19 pandemic. It functions like a National Weather Service for infectious diseases, harnessing data and expertise to predict the course of outbreaks like a meteorologist warns of storms.

Other risk assessments by the center have been posted by the CDC even though their conclusions might seem obvious.

In late February, for example, forecasters analyzing the spread of H5N1 bird flu said people who come “in contact with potentially infected animals or contaminated surfaces or fluids” faced a moderate to high risk of contracting the disease. The risk to the general US population, they said, was low.

In the case of the measles assessment, modelers at the center determined the risk of the disease for the general public in the US is low, but they found the risk is high in communities with low vaccination rates that are near outbreaks or share close social ties to those areas with outbreaks. The CDC had moderate confidence in the assessment, according to an internal Q&A that explained the findings. The agency, it said, lacks detailed data about the onset of the illness for all patients in West Texas and is still learning about the vaccination rates in affected communities as well as travel and social contact among those infected. (The H5N1 assessment was also made with moderate confidence.)

The internal plan to roll out the news of the forecast called for the expert physician who’s leading the CDC’s response to measles to be the chief spokesperson answering questions. “It is important to note that at local levels, vaccine coverage rates may vary considerably, and pockets of unvaccinated people can exist even in areas with high vaccination coverage overall,” the plan said. “The best way to protect against measles is to get the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.”

This week, though, as the number of confirmed cases rose to 483, more than 30 agency staff were told in an email that after a discussion in the CDC director’s office, “leadership does not want to pursue putting this on the website.”

The cancellation was “not normal at all,” said a CDC staff member who spoke anonymously for fear of reprisal with layoffs looming. “I’ve never seen a rollout plan that was canceled at that far along in the process.”

Anxiety among CDC staff has been building over whether the agency will bend its public health messages to match those of Kennedy, a lawyer who founded an anti-vaccine group and referred clients to a law firm suing a vaccine manufacturer.

During Kennedy’s first week on the job, HHS halted the CDC campaign that encouraged people to get flu shots during a ferocious flu season. On the night that the Trump administration began firing probationary employees across the federal government, some key CDC flu webpages were taken down. Remnants of some of the campaign webpages were restored after NPR reported this.

But some at the agency felt like the new leadership had sent a message loud and clear: When next to nobody was paying attention, long-standing public health messages could be silenced.

On the day in February that the world learned that an unvaccinated child had died of measles in Texas, the first such death in the U.S. since 2015, the HHS secretary downplayed the seriousness of the outbreak. “We have measles outbreaks every year,” he said at a cabinet meeting with President Donald Trump.

In an interview on Fox News this month, Kennedy championed doctors in Texas who he said were treating measles with a steroid, an antibiotic and cod liver oil, a supplement that is high in vitamin A. “They’re seeing what they describe as almost miraculous and instantaneous recovery from that,” Kennedy said.

As parents near the outbreak in Texas stocked up on vitamin A supplements, doctors there raced to assure parents that only vaccination, not the vitamin, can prevent measles.

Still, the CDC added an entry on Vitamin A to its measles website for clinicians.

On Wednesday, CNN reported that several hospitalized children in Lubbock, Texas, had abnormal liver function, a likely sign of toxicity from too much vitamin A.

Texas health officials also said that the Trump administration’s decision to rescind $11 billion in pandemic-related grants across the country will hinder their ability to respond to the growing outbreak, according to The Texas Tribune.

Measles is among the most contagious diseases and can be dangerous. About 20 percent of unvaccinated people who get measles wind up in the hospital. And nearly 1 to 3 of every 1,000 children with measles will die from respiratory and neurologic complications. The virus can linger in the air for two hours after an infected person has left an area, and patients can spread measles before they even know they have it.

This week Amtrak said it was notifying customers that they may have been exposed to the disease this month when a passenger with measles rode one of its trains from New York City to Washington, DC.

The CDC buried a measles forecast that stressed the need for vaccinations Read More »

report:-mrna-vaccines-are-in-rfk-jr’s-crosshairs;-funding-in-question

Report: mRNA vaccines are in RFK Jr’s crosshairs; funding in question

Ars Technica has reached out to the NIH and HHS for comment and will update this story with any new information provided. The agencies did not respond to comment requests from KFF.

Kennedy’s misinformation

Before becoming the top health official in America, Kennedy had long railed against vaccines, becoming one of the world’s most prominent anti-vaccine advocates and most prolific spreaders of misinformation and disinformation about vaccines. A 2019 study found Kennedy was the single leading source of anti-vaccine ads on Facebook. Kennedy subsequently faced bans from YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram for spreading misinformation.

Researchers directly blame Kennedy and the Trump administration for the attack on vaccine research.

“Kennedy’s war on vaccines has started,” the mRNA vaccine researcher in Philadelphia told KFF.

“There will not be any research funded by NIH on mRNA vaccines,” the scientist in New York similarly told the outlet. “MAGA people are convinced that these vaccines have killed and maimed tens of thousands of people. It’s not true, but they believe that.”

Kennedy has made various statements against vaccines generally, as well as mRNA vaccines specifically. He falsely claimed the vaccine causes severe harms, including causing neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s. In 2021, during the height of the pandemic, Kennedy petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to revoke the authorization of COVID-19 vaccines and refrain from approving any future COVID-19 vaccines. A study in 2022, meanwhile, estimated that the vaccines had saved more than 3 million lives and prevented more than 18 million hospitalizations.

The NIH’s recent moves aren’t the first sign that Kennedy will use his powerful position to attack mRNA vaccines. Late last month, Bloomberg reported that HHS was considering canceling a $590 million grant to vaccine-maker Moderna to develop mRNA vaccines against potential pandemic influenza viruses. That includes the H5N1 virus that is currently devastating US poultry and spreading wildly in dairy cows.

An HHS spokesperson told media at the time that “while it is crucial that the US Department and Health and Human Services support pandemic preparedness, four years of the Biden administration’s failed oversight have made it necessary to review agreements for vaccine production.”

It remains unclear what is happening with that grant review. Moderna declined to comment when Ars reached out for any potential updates Monday.

Report: mRNA vaccines are in RFK Jr’s crosshairs; funding in question Read More »

nci-employees-can’t-publish-information-on-these-topics-without-special-approval

NCI employees can’t publish information on these topics without special approval

The list is “an unusual mix of words that are tied to activities that this administration has been at war with—like equity, but also words that they purport to be in favor of doing something about, like ultraprocessed food,” Tracey Woodruff, director of the Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment at the University of California, San Francisco, said in an email.

The guidance states that staffers “do not need to share content describing the routine conduct of science if it will not get major media attention, is not controversial or sensitive, and does not touch on an administration priority.”

A longtime senior employee at the institute said that the directive was circulated by the institute’s communications team, and the content was not discussed at the leadership level. It is not clear in which exact office the directive originated. The NCI, NIH and HHS did not respond to ProPublica’s emailed questions. (The existence of the list was first revealed in social media posts on Friday.)

Health and research experts told ProPublica they feared the chilling effect of the new guidance. Not only might it lead to a lengthier and more complex clearance process, it may also cause researchers to censor their work out of fear or deference to the administration’s priorities.

“This is real interference in the scientific process,” said Linda Birnbaum, a former director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences who served as a federal scientist for four decades. The list, she said, “just seems like Big Brother intimidation.”

During the first two months of Donald Trump’s second presidency, his administration has slashed funding for research institutions and stalled the NIH’s grant application process.

Kennedy has suggested that hundreds of NIH staffers should be fired and said that the institute should deprioritize infectious diseases like COVID-19 and shift its focus to chronic diseases, such as diabetes and obesity.

Obesity is on the NCI’s new list, as are infectious diseases including COVID-19, bird flu and measles.

The “focus on bird flu and covid is concerning,” Woodruff wrote, because “not being transparent with the public about infectious diseases will not stop them or make them go away and could make them worse.”

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

NCI employees can’t publish information on these topics without special approval Read More »

top-10-moments-of-rfk-jr.’s-reality-bending-confirmation-hearings

Top 10 moments of RFK Jr.’s reality-bending confirmation hearings


There were a lot of doozies as RFK Jr. tried to convince lawmakers he’s pro-vaccine.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., US President Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services testifies during his Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on January 29, 2025 in Washington, DC. In addition to meeting with the Senate Finance Committee, Kennedy also met with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Thursday. Credit: Getty | Win McNamee

In hearings Wednesday and Thursday, senators questioned President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., over his fitness to be the country’s top health official and control the mammoth $1.7 trillion agency.

Kennedy would come to the role not with a background in medicine, public health, or science but as a former environmental lawyer who has become one of the most prominent and influential anti-vaccine advocates in the country. For decades, Kennedy has spread misinformation about lifesaving vaccines, sowed doubt about their safety, and peddled various conspiracy theories.

That includes his unwavering false claim—despite decades of research to the contrary and countless debunkings—that vaccines are linked to autism (they are not). Kennedy has also made the bizarre false claim that Lyme disease, a bacterial infection spread by tick bites, is “highly likely” to be a military bioweapon (it is not). When asked about this by Senator Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) in the Senate Finance Committee hearing Wednesday, Kennedy admitted, “I probably did say that.” In the hearing Thursday, held by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP), Kennedy did not deny falsely claiming that AIDS is a different disease in Africa than it is in the US.

The hearings were predictably contentious, at times raucous and emotional, and filled with staggering, reality-bending comments and moments. Here are our top 10:

1. “I am pro-vaccine,” Kennedy tried to claim.

For much of the two hearings, Kennedy tried to walk back his decadeslong history of attacking and undermining vaccines, claiming that he is not anti-vaccine but rather in favor of following the science and ensuring safety. But, his statements in and out of the hearings were conflicting. For instance, in the hearing, he touted that all of his children were vaccinated. But in previous public statements, he has said that he would “do anything, pay anything” to go back in time and not vaccinate his children.

At numerous times, senators tried to pin Kennedy down on his stance on vaccines overall, as well as on specific vaccines. Generally, Kennedy responded that if the senators personally showed him data indicating that a vaccine is safe, he would change his views and even “publicly apologize” for being wrong. (A pledge he couldn’t make if he thought they were safe now.) He refused to say that vaccines do not cause autism.

Some of the senators tried to show him data, referencing the deep scientific literature supporting the safety and efficacy of vaccines, including the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine (MMR) and the HPV vaccine. Some even held up stacks of studies. “The evidence IS there,” Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said forcefully. But Kennedy always raised quibbles with whatever studies senators presented and said he would discuss individual studies with senators after the hearing.

At the conclusion of the HELP hearing Thursday, Senator Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a former gastroenterologist, confronted Kennedy with a high-quality meta-analysis finding no link between autism and vaccines. But Kennedy again dismissed it and referred Cassidy to an article published online by an anti-vaccine advocate.

Cassidy then looked up the study while another senator questioned Kennedy and raised the issue in his closing remarks. “I looked at the article by Dr. Mawson and it seems to… have some issues,” Cassidy said. “I’ll just put that to the side.

“And that is why I’ve been struggling with your nomination,” he continued. Cassidy noted that he agreed with Kennedy’s comments on topics such as chronic health issues and obesity, but “as someone who had discussed immunizations with thousands of people… I have approached it using the preponderance of evidence to reassure, and you have approached it using selective evidence to cast doubt.”

Cassidy wondered aloud: “Does a 71-year-old man who has spent decades criticizing vaccines and is financially invested in finding faults with vaccines, can he change his attitudes and approach now that he’ll have the most important position influencing vaccine policy in the United States?… Will you overturn a new leaf?”

2. “A perfect metaphor”

Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) raised concern that Kennedy not only cast doubt on vaccine safety, but had said that the people who run the country’s vaccine program should be in jail, likening them to Nazis and pedophiles. Murphy quoted Kennedy saying in 2013, “To me this is like Nazi death camps. Look at what it does to the families who participate in the vaccine program. I can’t tell why someone would do something like that, I can’t tell you why ordinary Germans participated in the Holocaust. I can’t tell you what was going on in their minds.”

Murphy also noted that Kennedy called the Catholic church’s sexual abuse cases a “perfect metaphor” for the vaccine program in the US.

In his response to Murphy, Kennedy only doubled down on the claims, arguing that certain members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine program had, like members of the Catholic church, “written off a generation of kids” due to “misplaced institutional loyalty to the CDC and because of entanglements with the drug companies.”

“You said it was a perfect metaphor,” Murphy pressed, still alarmed by the comparison of immunization to child sex abuse.

“Well, if you have 1 in 36 kids with neurological injuries and if that is linked, then that’s something we should study,” Kennedy replied, referring to the rate of autism (again falsely linking the condition to vaccines).

3. “She’s not going to be a pincushion”

Despite the slips, Kennedy kept trying to convince senators that he was not anti-vaccine. Other senators, meanwhile, seemed to celebrate Kennedy’s track record.

“You brought to light the vaccines over the last couple years,” Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said. “I’ve had my first granddaughter here in a couple of weeks and my son and his wife have done their research about vaccines, and she’s not going to be a pin cushion. We’re not going to allow that to happen. But you brought that up… I appreciate you doing that.”

4. “We can’t move forward”

Without question, the most emotional moment of both hearings was during questioning by Senator Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), who spoke of how the false link between vaccines and autism had affected her and her family. “You may not know that I am the proud mother of a 36-year-old young man with severe cerebral palsy,” she said, her voice cracking. “And a day does not go by when I don’t think about what did I do when I was pregnant with him that might have caused the hydrocephalus that has so impacted his life. So, please do not suggest that anybody in this body of either political party doesn’t want to know what the cause of autism is,” she said, her voice rising.

“Mr. Kennedy, that first autism study rocked my world,” Hassan continued, referring to the deeply flawed, now retracted 1998 study published in the Lancet by Andrew Wakefield, who first claimed to find a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. “Like every mother I worried about whether in fact the vaccine had done something to my son,” she said. But, the study was small (12 children, only eight with autism), and editors later found “clear evidence of falsification of data.”

“Over time, the scientific community studied and studied and studied and found that it was wrong,” Hassan said. The study was retracted in 2010. “Sometime science is wrong. We make progress, we build on the work, and we become more successful. And when you continue to sow doubt about settled science it makes it impossible for us to move forward. So that’s what the problem is here—it’s the relitigating and rehashing and continuing to sow doubt so we can’t move forward. And it freezes us in place.”

5. “It will cast a shadow”

In addition to stalled progress, many senators expressed deep concern that Kennedy’s confirmation could lead to needless suffering and deaths from vaccine-preventable diseases. But Cassidy took the possibility one step further.

“As a patriotic American, I want President Trump’s policies to succeed,” Cassidy stated. “But if there is someone that is not vaccinated because of policies or attitudes you [Kennedy] bring to the department, and there’s another 18-year-old who dies of a vaccine-preventable disease… it’ll be blown up in the press. The greatest tragedy will be her death. But I can also tell you an associated tragedy: that will cast a shadow over President Trump’s legacy.”

6. “Of the ages”

During Sanders’ questioning Thursday, he drew attention to another vaccine: COVID-19 vaccines. Sanders referenced a study that estimated the vaccines saved more than 3 million lives in the US and prevented more than 18 million hospitalizations. President Trump, meanwhile, once called them “one of the greatest miracles of the ages,” Sanders noted.

However, Sanders pointed out that Kennedy had, during the height of the pandemic, petitioned the Food and Drug Administration to revoke authorization of COVID-19 vaccines and refrain from approving any future COVID-19 vaccines.

Sanders asked Kennedy if the scientists and the president were wrong.

“Senator I filed that lawsuit after CDC recommended the vaccine for 6-year-old children without any evidence that it would benefit them and without testing on 6-year-old children and that was my reason for filing that lawsuit,” Kennedy responded.

This answer was misleading, at best. The 2021 petition Kennedy filed was specifically to revoke existing authorization and block all future COVID-19 vaccines for “all demographic groups,” not just children. It further requested the FDA to prohibit minors from participating in COVID-19 vaccine trials and to refrain from issuing any authorizations for minors under age 16 to get Pfizer’s vaccine or under age 18 to get any other COVID-19 vaccine.

Sanders then pressed Kennedy if the COVID-19 vaccine saved lives.

Kennedy responded: “I don’t know. We don’t have a good surveillance system, unfortunately.”

Sanders: “We don’t know?”

Kennedy: “I don’t think anybody can say that. If you show me science that shows that…”

Sanders: “You know, Bobby, you say ‘If I show you’—you’re applying for the job. I mean, clearly, you should know this. And that is that the scientific community has established that—that [the] COVID vaccine saved millions of lives—and you’re casting doubt. That is really problematic.”

7. The basics

Beyond vaccination, Kennedy stumbled through basic explanations of Medicare and Medicaid, which are managed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) housed within the HHS. On Wednesday, Kennedy described Medicaid as “fully paid for” by the federal government—that is incorrect; it is jointly funded by the federal government and states. He also completely flubbed understanding that CMS has the authority to enforce the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA).

On Thursday, Hassan asked him to define the purpose of Medicare Parts A, B, and C. Kennedy got the answers for all three wrong. He described Medicare Part A as “mainly for primary care or physicians,” when the answer is that it covers inpatient care at hospitals. For Part B, Kennedy said it was “for physicians and doctors,” when the correct description is coverage for outpatient care and home health. And Part C, Kennedy described as “a program where it’s the full menu of all the services: A, B, C, and D.” Part C covers Medicare Advantage, the private insurance option for seniors on Medicare. “It appears you don’t know the basics of this program,” Hassan said.

8. 5G and “other things”

In a quick exchange with Senator Andrew Kim (D-NJ), Kennedy confirmed some of his other concerning beliefs. “In the past you said ‘Wi-Fi radiation does all kinds of bad things, including causing cancer,'” Kim began. “Do you still stand by that statement?”

Kennedy replied, “Yes.”

He has pushed the unproven claim that Wi-Fi “opens up your blood-brain barrier.”

Kim moved on quickly: “And 5G, do you feel the same way?” Kennedy said yes again, clarifying that he was talking about electromagnetic radiation generally, which “changes DNA” and does “other things.”

9. Lucrative position

On Wednesday, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) highlighted that Kennedy has made a lot of money from being an anti-vaccine advocate. In the past two years, Kennedy earned $2.5 million from working with a law firm encouraging people to sign up to be part of lawsuits against vaccine makers. If they sign up, Kennedy gets paid. If the law firm wins the case, Kennedy gets a 10 percent cut.

Warren asked Kennedy if he would agree that he wouldn’t take personal compensation from any lawsuits against drug companies while being health secretary and for four years afterward. Kennedy would not agree to do that. Instead he argued that Warren was insisting that he not be allowed to sue drug companies. “No I am not,” she protested, noting that she was only asking that what he did as secretary wouldn’t benefit him financially.

“The bottom line is the same: Kennedy can kill off vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it,” Warren concluded.

“Senator, I support vaccines. I support the childhood schedule. I will do that. The only thing I want is good science,” Kennedy replied.

10. Onesies

The last big moment of the hearings goes to Sanders for having the best visual aids. On Wednesday, in the Finance committee hearing, Sanders brought large posters of baby clothes (onesies) that are currently for sale by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the anti-vaccine group Kennedy founded and ran between 2015 and 2023.

One of the onesies read “Unvaxxed Unafraid” and the other read “No Vax No Problem.” Both are currently on sale for $26 each.

Sanders asked Kennedy if he would ask CHD to stop selling them. Kennedy didn’t answer the question, only noting he had resigned from CHD to run his political campaigns. Bernie pressed: “Are you supportive of this clothing, which is militantly anti-vaccine?”

“I am supportive of vaccines. I want good science,” Kennedy replied.

“But you will not tell the organization you founded not to continue selling that product,” Bernie concluded.

Photo of Beth Mole

Beth is Ars Technica’s Senior Health Reporter. Beth has a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and attended the Science Communication program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She specializes in covering infectious diseases, public health, and microbes.

Top 10 moments of RFK Jr.’s reality-bending confirmation hearings Read More »

rfk-jr.-claims-trump-promised-to-put-him-in-charge-of-nih,-cdc,-and-more

RFK Jr. claims Trump promised to put him in charge of NIH, CDC, and more

Earlier this week, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. used a Zoom call to tell his supporters that Donald Trump had promised him “control” of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the federal agency that includes the Centers for Disease Control, Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, as well as the Department of Agriculture. Given Kennedy’s support for debunked anti-vaccine nonsense, this represents a potential public health nightmare.

A few days after, Howard Lutnick, a co-chair of Trump’s transition team, appeared on CNN to deny that RFK Jr. would be put in charge of HHS. But he followed that with a long rant in which he echoed Kennedy’s spurious claims about vaccines. This provides yet another indication of how anti-vaccine activism has become deeply enmeshed with Republican politics, to the point where it may be just as bad even if Kennedy isn’t appointed.

Trump as Kennedy’s route to power

Kennedy has a long history of misinformation regarding health, with a special focus on vaccines. This includes the extensively debunked suggestion that there is a correlation between vaccinations and autism incidence, and it extends to a general skepticism about vaccine safety. That’s mixed with conspiracy theories regarding collusion between federal regulators and pharmaceutical companies.

While there is no evidence for any of this, and some of it is clearly wrong, the conspiracies have real-world consequences. An anti-vaccine activist in Samoa, aided by a visit from RFK Jr., helped pave the way for a measles outbreak that shut down the government and ultimately led to over 80 deaths.

Kennedy has long been interested in getting access to the agencies that regulate vaccines and other interests of his, such as food safety, under the assumption they are hiding the data that would vindicate his views. And, long before his recent presidential run, he viewed Trump as the route to that access. Shortly before Trump’s inauguration in 2017, Kennedy claimed that he would be appointed to head a vaccine safety commission that Trump would supposedly create once in office. Nothing ever came of that, and it was never clear whether that was due to Trump lying to him, Kennedy exaggerating his significance, or Trump simply telling him what he wanted to hear at the time and never following up.

RFK Jr. claims Trump promised to put him in charge of NIH, CDC, and more Read More »

robert-f-kennedy-jr.-sues-meta,-citing-chatbot’s-reply-as-evidence-of-shadowban

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sues Meta, citing chatbot’s reply as evidence of shadowban

Screenshot from the documentary <em>Who Is Bobby Kennedy?</em>” src=”https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Who-Is-Bobby-Kennedy-screenshot-via-YouTube-800×422.jpg”></img><figcaption>
<p><a data-height=Enlarge / Screenshot from the documentary Who Is Bobby Kennedy?

In a lawsuit that seems determined to ignore that Section 230 exists, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has sued Meta for allegedly shadowbanning his million-dollar documentary, Who Is Bobby Kennedy? and preventing his supporters from advocating for his presidential campaign.

According to Kennedy, Meta is colluding with the Biden administration to sway the 2024 presidential election by suppressing Kennedy’s documentary and making it harder to support Kennedy’s candidacy. This allegedly has caused “substantial donation losses,” while also violating the free speech rights of Kennedy, his supporters, and his film’s production company, AV24.

Meta had initially restricted the documentary on Facebook and Instagram but later fixed the issue after discovering that the film was mistakenly flagged by the platforms’ automated spam filters.

But Kennedy’s complaint claimed that Meta is still “brazenly censoring speech” by “continuing to throttle, de-boost, demote, and shadowban the film.” In an exhibit, Kennedy’s lawyers attached screenshots representing “hundreds” of Facebook and Instagram users whom Meta allegedly sent threats, intimidated, and sanctioned after they shared the documentary.

Some of these users remain suspended on Meta platforms, the complaint alleged. Others whose temporary suspensions have been lifted claimed that their posts are still being throttled, though, and Kennedy’s lawyers earnestly insisted that an exchange with Meta’s chatbot proves it.

Two days after the documentary’s release, Kennedy’s team apparently asked the Meta AI assistant, “When users post the link whoisbobbykennedy.com, can their followers see the post in their feeds?”

“I can tell you that the link is currently restricted by Meta,” the chatbot answered.

Chatbots, of course, are notoriously inaccurate sources of information, and Meta AI’s terms of service note this. In a section labeled “accuracy,” Meta warns that chatbot responses “may not reflect accurate, complete, or current information” and should always be verified.

Perhaps more significantly, there is little reason to think that Meta’s chatbot would have access to information about internal content moderation decisions.

Techdirt’s Mike Masnick mocked Kennedy’s reliance on the chatbot in the case. He noted that Kennedy seemed to have no evidence of the alleged shadow-banning, while there’s plenty of evidence that Meta’s spam filters accidentally remove non-violative content all the time.

Meta’s chatbot is “just a probabilistic stochastic parrot, repeating a probable sounding answer to users’ questions,” Masnick wrote. “And these idiots think it’s meaningful evidence. This is beyond embarrassing.”

Neither Meta nor Kennedy’s lawyer, Jed Rubenfeld, responded to Ars’ request to comment.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sues Meta, citing chatbot’s reply as evidence of shadowban Read More »