car review

Porsche’s best daily driver 911? The 2025 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid review.

car review, Cars, Features, Porsche 911 Carrera GTS, Porsche 911 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid / Beth Washington / August 15, 2025

An electric turbocharger means almost instant throttle response from the T-Hybrid.

Porsche developed a new T-Hybrid system for the 911, and it did a heck of a job. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Porsche 911 enthusiasts tend to be obsessive about their engines. Some won’t touch anything that isn’t air-cooled, convinced that everything went wrong when emissions and efficiency finally forced radiators into the car. Others love the “Mezger” engines; designed by engineer Hans Mezger, they trace their roots to the 1998 Le Mans-winning car, and no Porschephile can resist the added shine of a motorsports halo.

I’m quite sure none of them will feel the same way about the powertrain in the new 911 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid (MSRP: $175,900), and I think that’s a crying shame. Because not only is the car’s technology rather cutting-edge—you won’t find this stuff outside an F1 car—but having spent several days behind the wheel, I can report it might just be one of the best-driving, too.

T-Hybrid

This is not just one of Porsche’s existing flat-six engines with an electric motor bolted on; it’s an all-new 3.6 L engine designed to comply with new European legislation that no longer lets automakers rich out a fuel mixture under high load to improve engine cooling. Instead, the engine has to maintain the same 14.7:1 stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio (also known as lambda = 1) across the entire operating range, thus allowing the car’s catalytic converters to work most efficiently.

The 911 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid at dawn patrol. Jonathan Gitlin

Because the car uses a hybrid powertrain, Porsche moved some of the ancillaries. There’s no belt drive; the 400 V hybrid system powers the air conditioning electrically now via its 1.9 kWh lithium-ion battery, and the water pump is integrated into the engine block. That rearrangement means the horizontally opposed engine is now 4.3 inches (110 mm) lower than it was before, which meant Porsche could use that extra space in the engine bay to fit the power electronics, like the car’s pulse inverters and DC-DC converters.

And instead of tappets, Porsche has switched to using roller cam followers to control the engine’s valves, as in motorsport. These solid cam followers don’t need manual adjustment at service time, and they reduce friction losses compared to bucket tappets.

The added displacement—0.6 L larger than the engine you’ll find in the regular 911—is to compensate for not being able to alter the fuel ratio. And for the first time in several decades, there’s now only a single turbocharger. Normally, a larger-capacity engine and a single big turbo should be a recipe for plenty of lag, versus a smaller displacement and a turbocharger for each cylinder bank, as the former has larger components with more mass that needs to be moved.

The GTS engine grows in capacity by 20 percent. Porsche

That’s where one of the two electric motors comes in. This one is found between the compressor and the turbine wheel, and it’s only capable of 15 hp (11 kW), but it uses that to spin the turbine up to 120,000 rpm, hitting peak boost in 0.8 seconds. For comparison, the twin turbos you find in the current 3.0 L 911s take three times as long. Since the turbine is electrically controlled and the electric motor can regulate boost pressure, there’s no need for a wastegate.

The electrically powered turbocharger is essentially the same as the MGU-H used in Formula 1, as it can drive the turbine and also regenerate energy to the car’s traction battery. (The mighty 919 Hybrid race car, which took Porsche to three Le Mans wins last decade, was able to capture waste energy from its turbocharger, but unlike the 911 GTS or an F1 car, it didn’t use that same motor to spin the turbo up to speed.)

On its own, the turbocharged engine generates 478 hp (357 kW) and 420 lb-ft (570 Nm). However, there’s another electric motor, this one a permanent synchronous motor built into the eight-speed dual-clutch (PDK) transmission casing. This traction motor provides up to 53 hp (40 kW) and 110 lb-ft (150 Nm) of torque to the wheels, supplementing the internal combustion engine when needed. The total power and torque output are 532 hp (397 kW) and 449 lb-ft (609 Nm).

A grey Porsche 911 parked in a campsite — No Porsches were harmed during the making of this review, but one did get a little dusty. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Now that’s what I call throttle response

Conceptually, the T-Hybrid in the 911 GTS is quite different from the E-Hybrid system we’ve tested in various plug-in Porsches. Those allow for purely electric driving thanks to a clutch between transmission and electric traction motor—that’s not present in the T-Hybrid, where weight saving, performance, and emissions compliance were the goal rather than an increase in fuel efficiency.

Regardless of the intent, Porsche’s engineers have created a 911 with the best throttle response of any of them. Yes, even better than the naturally aspirated GT3, with its engine packed full of motorsports mods.

I realize this is a bold claim. But I’ve been saying for a while now that I prefer driving the all-electric Taycan to the 911 because the immediacy of an electric motor beats even the silkiest internal combustion engine in terms of that first few millimeters of throttle travel. The 3.0 L twin-turbo flat-six in most 911s doesn’t suffer from throttle lag like it might have in the 1980s, but there’s still an appreciable delay between initial tip-in and everything coming on song.

Initially, I suspected that the electric motor in the PDK case was responsible for the instantaneous way the GTS responds from idle, but according to Porsche’s engineers, all credit for that belongs to the electric turbocharger. However the engineers did it, this is a car that still provides 911 drivers the things they like about internal combustion engines—the sound, the fast refueling, using gears—but with the snappiness of a fast Taycan or Macan.

Centerlock wheels are rather special. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Porsche currently makes about 10 different 911 coupe variants, from the base 911 Carrera to the 911 GT3 RS. The GTS (also available with all-wheel drive as a Carrera 4 GTS for an extra $8,100) is marginally less powerful and slightly slower than the current 911 Turbo, and it’s heavier but more powerful than the 911 GT3.

In the past, I’ve thought of GTS-badged Porsches as that company’s take on the ultimate daily driver as opposed to a track day special, and it’s telling that you can also order the GTS with added sunshine, either as a cabriolet (in rear- or all-wheel drive) or as a Targa (with all-wheel drive). You have to remember to tick the box for rear seats now, though—these are a no-cost option rather than being fitted as standard.

The T-Hybrid powertrain adds 103 lbs compared to the previous GTS, so it’s not a lightweight track-day model, even if the non-hybrid GTS was almost nine seconds slower around the Nürburgring. On track, driven back to back with some of the others, you might be able to notice the extra weight, but I doubt it. I didn’t take the GTS on track, but I drove it to one; a trip to Germany to see the Nürburgring 24 race with some friends presented an opportunity to test this and another Porsche that hadn’t made their way to the East Coast press fleet yet.

I’d probably pick that Panamera if most of my driving was on the autobahn. With a top speed of 194 mph (312 km/h) the 911 GTS is capable of holding its own on the derestricted stretches even if its Vmax is a few miles per hour slower than the four-door sedan. But the 911 is a smaller, lighter, and more nimble car that moves around a bit more, and you sit a lot lower to the ground, amplifying the sensation of speed. The combined effect was that the car felt happier with a slightly lower cruising speed of 180 km/h rather than 200 km/h or more in the Panamera. Zero-62 mph (100 km/h) times don’t mean much outside the tollbooth but should take 2.9 seconds with launch control.

A Porsche 911 seen from the top — Despite the nondescript gray paint, the GTS T-Hybrid still turned plenty of heads. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Keep going

For the rest of the time, the 911 GTS evoked far more driving pleasure. Rear-wheel steering aids agility at lower speeds, and there are stiffer springs, newly tuned dampers, and electrohydraulic anti-roll bars (powered by the hybrid’s high-voltage system). Our test car was fitted with the gigantic (420 mm front, 410 mm rear) carbon ceramic brakes, and at the rear, the center lock wheels are 11.5 inches in width.

In the dry, I never got close to finding the front tires’ grip limit. The rear-wheel steering is noticeable, particularly when turning out of junctions, but never to the degree where you start thinking about correcting a slide unless you provoke the tires into breaking traction with the throttle. Even on the smooth tarmac preferred by German municipalities, the steering communicated road conditions from the tires, and the Alcantara-wrapped steering wheel is wonderful to grip in your palms.

So it’s predictably great to drive on mountain roads in Sport or Sport+. However, the instant throttle response means it’s also a better drive in Normal at 30 km/h as you amble your way through a village than the old GTS or any of the 3.0 L cars. That proved handy after Apple Maps sent me down a long dirt road on the way to my rental house, as well as for navigating the Nürburgring campsite, although I think I now appreciate why Porsche made the 911 Dakar (and regret declining that first drive a few years ago).

Happily, my time with the 911 GTS didn’t reveal any software bugs, and I prefer the new, entirely digital main instrument display to the old car’s analog tachometer sandwiched between two multifunction displays. Apple CarPlay worked well enough, and the compact cabin means that ergonomics are good even for those of us with shorter arms. There is a standard suite of advanced driver assistance systems, including traffic sign detection (which handily alerts you when the speed limit changes) and collision warning. Our test car included the optional InnoDrive system that adds adaptive cruise control, as well as a night vision system. On the whole, the ADAS was helpful, although if you don’t remember to disable the lane keep assist at the start of each journey, you might find it intruding mid-corner, should the car think you picked a bad line.

My only real gripe with the 911 GTS T-Hybrid is the fact that, with some options, you’re unlikely to get much change from $200,000. Yes, I know inflation is a thing, and yes, I know that’s still 15 percent less than the starting price of a 911 GT3 Touring, which isn’t really much of a step up from this car in terms of the driving experience on the road. However, a 911 Carrera T costs over $40,000 less than the T-Hybrid, and while it’s slower and less powerful, it’s still available with a six-speed manual. That any of those three would make an excellent daily driver 911 is a credit to Porsche, but I think if I had the means, the sophistication of the T-Hybrid system and its scalpel-sharp responsiveness might just win the day.

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

Porsche’s best daily driver 911? The 2025 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid review. Read More »

2025 Subaru WRX tS review: A scalpel-sharp chassis lets this car dance

car review, Cars, Subaru WRX / Shannon Garcia / August 7, 2025

Lots of suspension tweaks but no extra power for this WRX variant.

Subaru went with a sedan for the current version of the WRX. Credit: Jim Resnick

The Subaru WRX has always been the equivalent of an automotive shrug. Not because it lacks character but because it simply doesn’t care what others think. It’s a punk rock band with enough talent to fill stadiums but band members who don’t seem to care about chasing fame. And the STI versions of yesteryear proved so talented that fame chased them.

For 2025, Subaru updated the WRX to now include the tS, which at first glance appears to be the same flannel-wearing street fighter. But looks can be deceiving. The tS hides sharpened tools underneath, translating to better handling and responsiveness.

What does “tS” really mean?

Subaru positions the tS as being tuned by STI, but it’s not an STI return. Sure, that’s technically true; only Subaru can name something STI. And to be clear, there’s no extra power here, no gigantic wing that takes out flocks of birds, and no pink STI badge on the trunk. But the tS is imbued with enough STI-ness to make a case.

A blue Subaru WRX in profile

The WRX still sticks to the same recipe that made it so popular, starting in the late ’90s. Credit: Jim Resnick

The hardware updates begin with electronically controlled dampers, stiffer engine mounts, a reworked steering rack, and huge, gold-painted Brembo brakes from the WRX TR, with six-piston calipers in front and two-piston units in the rear. Subaru’s engineers didn’t try to reinvent the WRX. They just put some finishing touches on it.

The engine story remains essentially the same. A 2.4 L turbocharged flat-four still produces 271 hp (202 kW) and 258 lb-ft (350 Nm) of torque from 12.0 psi of turbo boost, unchanged from the standard WRX, and the familiar boxer thrum remains. Power courses through a six-speed manual transmission to Subaru’s faithful symmetrical all-wheel-drive system. And not that most WRX buyers or fans would care much, but the sportster logs low EPA figures of just 19/26/22 city/highway combined MPG (12.4/9/10.7 L/100 km).

Driving: Precision dancing

The WRX tS doesn’t go any quicker than the base WRX since they both carry the same output, same transmission, and same essential guts and weight, but it’s no less fun. I didn’t do any measured testing of hard acceleration times, but I did dance around with the tS on my private test track in the Arizona desert.

A blue Subaru WRX seen from the rear 3/4s — Quad pipes burble pleasantly. Credit: Jim Resnick

I’m no Fred Astaire, but cinched into a willing, capable car, finding Ginger Rogers in front of you is rare. When I do, it’s time for celebration. Meet Ginger. As a WRX, she might be wearing ripped jeans and rubber soles, but when gliding across this dance floor (sinewy roads), no one cares.

Over the years, several plucky, beasty sportsters have punched way above their weight classes. The STIs of the past; the late, great Integra Type R (yes, I’m old enough to have tested it when new); the odd ’60s vintage racing Mini Cooper S (“the flying shoebox”); and various strains of VW Golf GTI all conspire to plant a smile on the face of even the most jaded car snob. This is the tS.

The Robert test

Knowing what good entertainment is worth, I brought my friend Robert along for an afternoon of WRXing. He owns multiple exotic sports cars, loves talking about them (but has never taken them to the track), and can rarely be bothered to discuss anything else with wheels. Robert flies in private jets, wears Brioni, and has a place on Park Avenue stocked with a case of Dom. (Perignon, that is.) “Jaded” is scratching the surface.

Subaru WRX tS interior — It’s very blue in here. Credit: Jim Resnick

After about 10 solid minutes of no-nonsense, twisting private test-track floggery at 6,000 rpm, full of opposite-lock steering and ABS tickling, I looked over at Robert as we came to a stop. I couldn’t have slapped the grin off his face if I tried.

“They sell this to the public?” he asked incredulously.

I relayed some more facts to Robert before we roared off again.

“These new adaptive dampers offer three modes, including Comfort, Normal, and Sport. There’s also a fourth Individual setting where you pick your throttle response, steering weight, damper stiffness, and all-wheel-drive behavior,” I told him.

He demanded to go again.

Subaru WRX engine bay — STI has not worked its magic under here. Credit: Jim Resnick

“Yeah, also, Subaru reduced the body roll rate by 30 percent from the WRX TR and limited brake dive and acceleration squat by 50 percent, I think through the new dampers,” I said as we entered a high-speed corner at about 95 mph.

It was at this point that Robert asked if we had a sick bag onboard. He was quiet the rest of the afternoon.

To be sure, I love an overachiever, and that’s the WRX tS. The smart cookies out there in Subie-world will take care of the tS engine in creative ways to bring into fuller balance the power/handling equilibrium, because if someone messes with the tS suspension, they’d be nuts. It’s about as stiff and capable as I could ever want in a car that needed to be driven on real roads. Perhaps grippier rubber? But even then, more grip would throw off the natural chuckability of the tS, and I love chuckable cars. The tS’s steering quickness and feel are both right on point.

Interior and daily use: Highs and lows

Big seat bolsters, but they don’t fit every back. Jim Resnick

Inside, the WRX tS doesn’t reinvent the Subaru design playbook, but it does offer upgrades. The most obvious are the Recaro front seats, which are a mixed bag. They provide oodles of support but are perhaps too aggressive for some body shapes. They’re extremely snug and hold you in place, provided you fit into them. I’m not that broad-shouldered, but the Recaro’s side bolsters nearly allow air to pass between my back and the seatback, so tightly coupled are the upper side bolsters.

The 11.6-inch portrait-oriented infotainment screen returns, and while it packs all the obvious functionality, such as Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, and a decent native navigation system, it still suffers from terribly sluggish response times. The new digital gauge cluster offers multiple display options, including a driver-focused performance view with boost pressure, gear position, and torque distribution.

A new digital gauge cluster can be configured as a typical presentation of dials or a track-oriented cluster with a bar graph tach. Navigation depicts maps crisply, too.

But Subaru’s EyeSight, which offers a variety of driver monitoring systems, breaks all known records in nannyism with pervasive, over-the-top reminders about driver attention. The system instructed me to keep my hands on the steering wheel, even though my hands were already on the steering wheel. It told me to keep my eyes on the road, but I was looking straight ahead at the car in front of me. Perhaps it was programmed by a very nervous George Costanza?

The build quality in the WRX TS is up to snuff, and soft-touch materials cover more surfaces than before. The cabin isn’t quite that of a luxury car, nor would anyone really expect it to be. It’s functional, durable, and right in character for the tS and for a Subaru.

The WRX tS retains some quirks, like the raucous engine note, especially under load and when first fired up. Until the fast idle has settled down, the exhaust is very boomy at the rear of the car.

Would it be a turbo Subie if it didn’t have a hood scoop? Jim Resnick

And then there’s the price. At $48,875, including the required destination charge, the un-optioned WRX tS gives you almost no change from $50,000. That’s a big heap of money for a WRX with no additional power than others and no STI badge, except on the gauges and shift knob. However, you do get a chassis above reproach, brakes that never give up, and steering that can shame some exotics. And it renders the Roberts in your life mute.

A veteran of journalism, product planning and communications in the automotive and music space, Jim reports, critiques and lectures on autos, music and culture.

2025 Subaru WRX tS review: A scalpel-sharp chassis lets this car dance Read More »

2025 Morgan Plus Four review: Apparently, they do still make them like this

car review, Cars, Morgan Plus Four / Mike M. / August 5, 2025

A Morgan Plus Four with the door open — Morgan motoring is best when exposed to the elements. Credit: Michael Teo Van Runkle

In Sport+, the optional active sports exhaust system ($2,827.50) also helps to impart a slightly more serious soundtrack. This one manages a bit of drama as turbo whine and intake rush creep in through a complete lack of sound insulation. Plus, the exhaust barks out back with little pops and bangs on throttle liftoff.

Without a doubt, nothing on the road can quite compare to a Plus Four today. What other lightweight sports cars even survived into the modern era, when a Porsche Boxster or even a Lotus Emira now weigh above 3,000 pounds (1,360 kg)? Only the Mazda MX-5, perhaps, which weighs slightly more, with swoopy modern styling and economy car materials on the inside.

Speaking of which, plenty on the Plus Four could use a bit more of a premium touch. The steering wheel looks reminiscent of a Lotus Elise or even an original Tesla Roadster, plasticky and cheap despite the leather and physical shape actually turning out fairly nice. A thin wood rim would go a long way, as would remedying some other questionable build quality decisions throughout.

The interior lacks the charm of the exterior. Michael Teo Van Runkle

More wood on the dash, rather than the standard painted silver, might reduce glare with the convertible top laid back. And even with the roof up and the removable door panels in place, the Plus Four never approaches anywhere near weatherproof, as I felt strong drafts from around my left elbow, and the sliding plexiglas windows entirely lack seals. The sun visor attachments also rattle incessantly, and the Sennheiser premium sound system can’t even bump loud enough to drown the annoyance out, so perhaps skip that $3,770 option.

Some of the Plus Four’s issues seem easily fixable: Remove the roof, forget the music, and torque down some fittings a bit more here and there. Needing to worry about such avoidable irritations in the first place, though, proves that Morgan may have modernized the car, but a certain level of classic British engineering still applies.

Even so, nothing else I’ve driven mixes driving pleasure and crowd pleasing at the level of the new Plus Four. At the price of $103,970 as tested, I simply cannot forgive the decision not to offer the choice of a manual transmission, which would transform this classy roadster into an entirely different animal indeed.

2025 Morgan Plus Four review: Apparently, they do still make them like this Read More »

Lotus still knows how to make a driver’s car: The 2025 Emira V6, driven

car review, Cars, Lotus Emira / 9u50fv / August 1, 2025

The mid-engine sports car is an increasingly rare breed, but Lotus still carries the torch with its Emira, which is available with a choice of supercharged V6 or turbocharged inline-four cylinder engines. Between its steering, compact dimensions, standard manual transmission, and low mass, it’s a breath of fresh air, and it’s ready to capture the hearts of enthusiasts. Pricing starts at $102,250 for the V6, which is in direct competition with the Porsche 718 Cayman GTS while it lasts, and a sea of mostly cosmetic options inflated this example to $116,950.

Like many Lotuses before it, the Emira’s foundation is a bonded aluminum chassis with Bilstein passive damper-equipped double-wishbone suspension at all four corners and the engine mounted right behind the seats. Curb weight isn’t as low as you’d think at 3,187 lbs (1,445 kg), but it’s contained within an overall length, width (sans mirrors), and height of 173, 75, and 48 inches (4,395 mm, 1,905 mm, 1,220 mm), respectively.

Mid-engine layouts generally put the same components like radiators in the same places, and the Emira’s shape follows its predecessors (as well as cars from McLaren or Ferrari) with large intake ducts straked across its doors and rear fenders, a low nose, and little overhang past the axles. In fact, these are key in its sense-of-occasion appeal; climbing over its door sills and into its driver position is teeming with “let’s go” energy, and the view out the windshield—fenders, short nose, and all—is more exotic than anything else at its price.

A lime green Lotus Emira in profile

The shape is dictated by the underlying form. Credit: Peter Nelson

Behind the seats is a Toyota-sourced 3.5 L V6. Lotus has tuned the engine and added an Eaton/Edelbrock-sourced supercharger. It revs freely like a sportbike, and it produces a sharp, angry tone anywhere above 2,000 rpm. Adding to the drama is a clear view of the bypass valve in the rear-view mirror, feeding or re-routing boost depending on throttle input. Power is rated at 400 hp (300 kW) and 310 lb-ft (420 Nm) of torque, which feels healthy everywhere—but especially within the final thousand rpm or so. Hitting 60 mph (97 km/h) from a standstill takes just 4.3 seconds.

Lotus still knows how to make a driver’s car: The 2025 Emira V6, driven Read More »

2025 Polestar 3 drives sporty, looks sharp, can be a little annoying

car review, Cars, Polestar 3 / Kelly Newman / July 29, 2025

Earlier this month, Ars took a look at Volvo’s latest electric vehicle. The EX90 proved to be a rather thoughtful Swedish take on the luxury SUV, albeit one that remains a rare sight on the road. But the EX90 is not the only recipe one can cook with the underlying ingredients. The ingredients in this case are from a platform called SPA2, and to extend the metaphor a bit, the kitchen is the Volvo factory in Ridgeville, South Carolina, which in addition to making a variety of midsize and larger Volvo cars for the US and European markets also produces the Polestar 3.

What’s fascinating is how different the end products are. Intentionally, Polestar and Volvo wisely seek different customers rather than cannibalize each other’s sales. As a new brand, Polestar comes with many fewer preconceptions other than the usual arguments that will rage in the comment section over just how much is Swedish versus Chinese, and perhaps the occasional student of history who remembers the touring car racing team that then developed some bright blue special edition Volvo road cars that for a while held a production car lap record around the Nürburgring Nordschliefe.

That historical link is important. Polestar might now mentally slot into the space that Saab used to occupy in the last century as a refuge for customers with eclectic tastes thanks to its clean exterior designs and techwear-inspired interiors. Once past the necessity of basic transportation, aesthetics are as good a reason as most when it comes to picking a particular car. Just thinking of a Polestar as a brand that exemplifies modern Scandinavian design would be to sell it short, though. The driving dynamics are just too good.

Although it shares a platform with the big Volvo, the Polestar 3 is strictly a two-row SUV. Jonathan Gitlin

High praise

In fact, if there’s another brand out there that might be starting to pay attention to the way Polestars drive, it should be Porsche. Bold words indeed. Often, dual-motor EVs have one motor rated as more powerful than the other, or perhaps even of different designs. But the long-range dual motor Polestar 3 (MSRP: $73,400) is fitted with a pair of identical 241 hp (180 kW), 310 lb-ft (420 Nm) permanent magnet motors. The drive units are not entirely identical, however—at the rear, clutches on either side allow for true torque vectoring during cornering, as well as disconnecting the rear axle entirely for a more efficient mode.

2025 Polestar 3 drives sporty, looks sharp, can be a little annoying Read More »

The 2025 Audi RS 3 is a five-cylinder firecracker

Audi RS3, car review, Cars / 9u50fv / July 25, 2025

First offered in a passenger car by Mercedes-Benz back in 1974, the five-cylinder engine has always been a bit of an automotive oddball. The unconventional configuration eventually gained a foothold in the 1980s with manufacturers who needed a transversely mounted motor that was narrower than a V6 but wanted something smoother and more powerful than an inline-four.

For a time, the engine, with its distinctive exhaust warble, became closely associated with Audi’s lineup, aided in no small part by the motorsport successes of five-cylinder rally cars like the Sport Quattro S1 E2. But as technology progressed and turbocharging became more prevalent, the need for a straight-five layout dwindled. Today, the $63,400 RS 3 is the final five-cylinder holdout—not just for Audi, but for production cars in general.

In an era increasingly focused on electrification and modularity, the improbable introduction of the second-generation RS 3 back in 2022 seemed like fan service—an apparition that would likely vanish after a handful of diehards got their fill. But despite the headwinds that traditional performance cars have faced in recent years, the RS 3 not only lives on, it has actually been refreshed for 2025. While the tweaks are more evolutionary than revolutionary, they make what was already a highly entertaining sports sedan even more compelling. Well, for the most part anyway.

On the outside, the RS 3 scores new front and rear fascias that clean up the look, while new matrix LED headlights and a new 19-inch wheel design bolster the performance-oriented vibe. The cabin, meanwhile, is outfitted with new multi-colored ambient LED lighting, a new low-profile shifter design, and a new steering wheel that incorporates two dedicated drive mode buttons and aluminum paddle shifters. The steering wheel’s C8 Corvette-style flat top and bottom design complements the interior’s angular theme, but the touch-sensitive control panels on the spokes (which replace the physical buttons and dials on the outgoing car’s steering wheel) feel like a step backward in terms of accuracy and overall usefulness.

The 2025 Audi RS 3 is a five-cylinder firecracker Read More »

Audi has a new midsize EV, and we’ve driven it: The 2025 A6 Sportback

Audi A6, car review, Cars, First drive / Beth Washington / July 23, 2025

Audi S6 drives on a straight road past vineyards — Long straight roads glide underneath. Credit: Audi

The car’s cabin layout and ergonomics are starting to feel familiar at this point—it shares much not only with the electric Q6 e-tron but also Audi’s new midsize combustion cars, the A5 and Q5. (We’ll leave for now the fact that a combustion A6, unrelated to today’s vehicle in virtually all but name, is also in development, bringing an end to the “odd numbers for ICE, even numbers for EV” convention that briefly took hold at the automaker. Now nameplate chaos reigns.)

Hey Audi…

The voice control proved a frustrating alternative to using the touchscreen, with a lot of “I’m sorry I can’t do that” and “can you ask me that again” for commands that I’m pretty sure ought to have worked. But both the A6 and S6 felt mature in terms of software, something that wasn’t true for the same infotainment platform a year ago. I remain frustrated with how limited the UI options remain for the main instrument display, however.

I keep writing this, but Audi pioneered the use of high-resolution digital displays instead of analog dials and gave owners quite a lot of choice, including the option of a moving map for navigation. Now, there’s a way to make the display very minimal, which would be useful at night, but otherwise, you’re extremely limited in what you can display in front of you. The optional full-color heads-up display has the same augmented-reality direction tech that we’ve seen in other luxury cars, and it remains helpful when driving on unfamiliar roads, although that requires using the native navigation app; Apple CarPlay users should still see turn-by-turn directions on the HUD, though.

The layout is starting to become familiar. Audi

There’s no true one-pedal driving mode, just a choice between B—0.25 G of lift-off regeneration deceleration—and D, which can be toggled between none, 0.06 G, and 0.15 G of lift-off regen braking using the paddles behind the steering wheel. B is preferable when the road turns twisty, something both A6 and S6 coped with surprisingly well. Hairpins proved the steering and suspension rapid enough to rotate the car quickly, and what felt like numb steering initially began to reveal some information about road surfaces and available grip as the road surface changed then changed again. There’s also a noticeable difference between the drive modes. Comfort feels a little soft and wallowing, Dynamic effectively transfers more bumps into the cabin, and Balanced is a rather good midpoint between the two, and where I spent most of my time. I should also note the lack of fatigue I felt despite a full day behind the wheel of both cars.

Audi has a new midsize EV, and we’ve driven it: The 2025 A6 Sportback Read More »

2025 Aston Martin Vanquish Volante: A-M’s ultimate GT goes topless

Aston Martin Vanquish Volante, car review, CarPlay Ultra, Cars, First drive / Kelly Newman / July 23, 2025

It’s hard to blame them. Top up or down, the Vanquish’s aesthetic is one of eagerness and aggression, largely due to the F1-derived aero elements to cool the massive power unit as well as to balance out air from front to back. The rest is all Aston Martin-quality craftsmanship, shaping the Vanquish into a taut, sleek form wrapped in formal attire.

An Aston Martin Vanquish engine bay — Yes, you could just have an electric motor make this much torque and power almost silently. Credit: Aston Martin

Bond. Aluminum Bond.

The secret underlying the Vanquish’s capabilities is its bonded aluminum body, which is perfectly suited for a grand tourer like this. Bonding panels together rather than welding them makes controlling the NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) levels much easier as the adhesives absorb vibrations, while the stiffness provides much more control in terms of lateral movement. This also means the suspension has less to compensate for, which means it can be stiffer without adding teeth-rattling jitter.

Indeed, on the move, the Vanquish Volante is velvety-smooth on the highway, and with the top down, conversations don’t need to be shouted. Raise the soft top and the well-sealed cover is indistinguishable from the coupe as far as your ears are concerned.

The even-keeled nature is also due in part to the balance Aston Martin maintains between the throttle input and the electronic rear differential. At low speeds, the Vanquish is quite agile, but a progressive power band keeps it from being nervous or jerky when laying down the power, with the wheels effectively locked in place at high speeds for added stability.

A silver Aston Martin Vanquish Volante seen in profile

If a Vantage is for track work, a Vanquish is for cruising. Credit: Aston Martin

We’re talking autobahn speeds, here, by the way. What we’d usually muster on the highway is a cakewalk for this immense luxury chariot. It goes too fast too quickly, for better or for worse, with 80 mph (129 km/h) feeling like half of that. Different drive modes make a palpable difference in behavior, with GT mode supporting smooth, long stretches while Sport and Sport + offer more engaging, throaty behavior for twisty backroads. Here, the car continues to be well-mannered, though the occasional dab for power triggers an overeager automatic into dropping a gear or two, sending the V12 into a fury.

2025 Aston Martin Vanquish Volante: A-M’s ultimate GT goes topless Read More »

2026 Mercedes-Benz CLA feels like a real car, not a science experiment

car review, Cars, First drive, Mercedes-Benz CLA / 9u50fv / July 17, 2025

Mercedes’ new 800 V electric powertrain is ready for the public, and we’ve driven it.

Mercedes-Benz has high hopes for its new EV technology, which debuts in the 2026 CLA. Credit: Mercedes-Benz

The Mercedes-Benz CLA is a marked departure from Mercedes’ EV efforts. Instead of a dedicated line of EQ vehicles—like the EQB, EQC, and EQS—we’re getting vehicles “with EQ Technology.” It started with the electric G Wagon, but the CLA is the first mainstream product to make the change. The thing is that the change is significant and for the better. Several months ago, we got some time in a prototype CLA; now we’ve driven the final product.

The CLA returns for the 2026 model year as an EV first (with a hybrid coming) on an all-new 800-volt architecture. This architecture will find its way to other Mercedes vehicles, like the upcoming GLB and GLC. This thoroughly modern setup features some of the company’s biggest innovations.

The CLA will be available with either one or two electric motors, with a two-speed setup for efficiency and performance. The 250+ base model makes 268 hp (200 kW) and 247 lb-ft (335 Nm) of torque. Mercedes is claiming up to 792 km of range with this model on the WLTP cycle. Accounting for WLTP’s optimism, it’s still possible we might see an EPA-rated range over 400 miles, but Mercedes isn’t quoting any real numbers yet.

Not quite a sedan, more like a four-door coupe. Mercedes-Benz

The dual motor, all-wheel drive 4Matic variant, makes 349 hp ( 260 kW) and 380 lb-ft (515 Nm) of torque. It also has a two-speed setup. The WLTP estimate from Mercedes here is up to 771 km, which would still be potentially 400 miles under EPA testing in the real world.

Peak DC fast charging is 320 kW, with a 10–80 percent charging time of 22 minutes for the 85 kWh usable lithium-ion battery pack. For comparison, the current EQB peaks at just 110 kW.

Two charge ports

Like the upcoming Nissan Leaf, the charge connector situation will be a little weird on the CLA. It’ll have a standard SAE J-1772 plug for level 2 charging, but sitting next to it, behind the charging door, is also a NACS connector for DC fast charging. It’s not my favorite solution to the problem. If you were to switch from a Model 3 to a CLA, you might already have a Tesla charger in your garage, and you’ll need an adapter for the J-plug, but we are in a strange transitional time for all of this. At least they’re on the same side of the car.

Some early cars making their way to the United States will only support 800 V DC fast charging stations. Those would include Mercedes’ own stations, along with Ionna. But those early cars won’t work on the nation’s biggest 400 V network, Tesla Superchargers.

Mercedes tells us that these early cars will be limited to demonstration vehicles, with customer vehicles early next year supporting both 400 V and 800 V chargers.

“After the initial limited delivery of cars late this year for demonstration of the CLA’s fast-charging abilities, 2026 US customer orders from early next year will feature a converter and be capable of charging at 400 V and faster 800 V, meaning the largest number of US charging points, currently over 140,000.”

Customers shouldn’t have to think about it when they receive their own cars, which is ultimately what matters the most. It does, however, highlight some of the challenges of developing EVs in a fast-changing environment.

Finally, a hood that opens

The CLA with EQ Technology has some new changes for Mercedes in the cargo capacity department, too. It’s the first Mercedes with a frunk since the W23 of the 1930s. It was silly to offer a hood on a car that is bolted shut, so it’s nice to not only see Mercedes change course on that but also provide 2.5 cubic feet (71 L) of storage up there.

The cockpit layout is similar to the EQ Mercedes EVs. Mercedes-Benz

That gives the CLA overall cargo capacity of 18.7 cubic feet (530 L) between the frunk and the trunk. The trunk swallows two people’s luggage without much issue, but the load lift into the trunk is pretty high. This is not uncommon for a proper sedan, but it is noticeable.

Speaking of being a proper sedan, the new CLA is 1.3 inches (33 mm) longer than the old car, with a 2.4-inch (61 mm) longer wheelbase. It also has more headroom for both front and rear passengers and is a comfortable place to spend time once you get settled.

Our test models all had the AMG Line package, which included sportier seats that are actually quite comfortable. The cabin gives you a feeling of being cocooned in the car, but it doesn’t feel cramped or claustrophobic.

When you look ahead, you have an optional heads-up display and Mercedes’ new MBUX Superscreen. This is a 10.25-inch driver display, a 14-inch center display, and a 14-inch passenger display. They are all powered by MB.OS and Unity Game Engine. The new infotainment includes support for apps, like Disney+ and Angry Birds. The driver can access these while parked, but the passenger can use their display while the vehicle is in motion.

the back half of a Mercedes CLA seen with pedestrians and cyclists in the foreground. — Less eye-catching colors are available. Credit: Mercedes-Benz

While playing Angry Birds, I couldn’t help but notice how good-looking the passenger screen was. In fact, all the screens have excellent contrast and color reproduction, which is partly due to their lack of a screen filter that normally prevents the driver from seeing the screen.

Keep your eyes on the road

However, in the CLA, the passenger display is initially visible to the driver. The camera mounted above the center display, which is also used for features like video conferencing or in-car selfies, watches the driver. If the driver looks toward the passenger display, the screen will be disabled until the driver pays attention to the road again. It’s an interesting way to solve the driver distraction problem while not ruining how the screen looks.

Star Wars’ Andor looks and sounds pretty good with the Burmeister sound system, even if it’s in Danish by default—because we’re in Copenhagen—and I don’t know Danish.

My biggest complaint about the new infotainment system in these versions is huge bezel on the center screen. Some of the bezel is needed for the camera, but in 2025, it comes across as being a bit cheap. They look great, just the bezel doesn’t. I wouldn’t be surprised if upgraded displays in higher-end future models expand to fill those gaps.

We’ll need to spend some time with the CLA on familiar roads before we can truly judge its efficiency. Credit: Mercedes-Benz

Driving the new CLA is a pleasant experience. The 250+ has plenty of grunt for most of the driving normal people do. The two-speed setup operates seamlessly, and at no point did I feel the need for more power.

If you want more power, or more importantly, all-wheel drive, the 350 4Matic delivers. In the normal driving mode, acceleration is even more brisk, but it doesn’t snap your head back. Put the car into the Sport setting, and you get all the acceleration you could really want. Yes, there’ll be more powerful versions in the future. But a 4.8-second run to 60 mph in a non-performance car is plenty.

That’s smooth

The country roads outside Copenhagen don’t offer many opportunities to really push the car to its limits, but ride comfort is excellent. Only when we hit a manhole cover on a torn-up street did I feel like I was driving an entry-level vehicle.

On the other hand, I didn’t feel the need or desire to switch over to the car’s sport mode. With a standard fixed suspension, little changes when you engage the setting (except unlocking the full acceleration power), and frankly, it never felt necessary.

That’s not to say the car isn’t fun or isn’t any good. On the contrary, I could spend a lot of time in one of these and be quite happy with it. However, there’s room to add an AMG variant that really cranks up the performance.

As for looks, I find the car attractive without being too much. I think the darker colors, look better on this car than the lighter ones, as the front grille looks a little busy with lighter colors. I find the car more attractive in person than in photos, and while I wasn’t a fan of the TriStar motif in the rear taillights, it has grown on me.

I haven’t driven the G580, but the GLC prototype I drove last month and the CLA feel different. Unlike previous Mercedes EVs, these feel like cars and not just science experiments. Yes, the technology is all there, but the one thing that BMW was able to do on its EVs that previous EQs lacked was delivering a driving experience that felt like it wasn’t exclusively dictated by math. There’s also no word on pricing yet.

The CLA with EQ Technology might be a mouthful, but it represents a significant leap forward.

2026 Mercedes-Benz CLA feels like a real car, not a science experiment Read More »

Rivian’s new Quad-Motor R1T and R1S beat the competition in any conditions

car review, Cars, First drive, Rivian, Rivian R1S, Rivian R1T / Mike M. / July 8, 2025

Faster than a supercar to 60, still able to rock crawl with the best of them.

Lots of EVs can accelerate quickly, few also have off-road abilities that would put a mountain goat to shame. Credit: Tim Stevens

It’s getting harder to find hyperboles to describe the performance of modern EVs. Horsepower figures measured in four digits and acceleration figures clocking in well under three seconds aren’t exactly de rigueur, but they’re well short of rare these days.

Rivian’s latest generation ticks those boxes, joining the automaker’s range alongside the cheaper dual-motor models we tested last year. The new Gen 2 Quad-Motor versions of the company’s R1S SUV and R1T truck offer 1,025 hp (764 kW) and 1,198 lb-ft (1,624 Nm) of torque, enough to get the pick-up from 0 to 60 mph in just 2.5 seconds—the heavier SUV is a tenth slower. That’s awfully quick for a truck that weighs in at around 7,000 pounds (3,175 kg) and can tow 11,000 pounds (5,000 kg) or, in the case of the SUV, seat seven comfortably.

That spread of performance and practicality is impressive, but as I learned in a day behind the wheel of both the $115,990 truck and $121,990 SUV, winding around and over the mountains surrounding Lake Tahoe, that’s just scratching the surface of what they can do.

Rivian launched its second-generation R1 last year, with a cheaper dual motor version. Now it’s time for the more powerful quad motor powertrain to hit the road. And the trails. Tim Stevens

More motors, more potential

As you can guess by the name, the Quad-Motor editions of Rivian’s R1 machines offer four motors, one per wheel. That, of course, provides those astronomical performance figures, providing the sheer force necessary to accelerate them so quickly.

But it goes well beyond that. Most EVs with all-wheel drive—including the cheaper dual-motor R1S and R1T that Rivian started selling last year—rely on a pair of motors: one up front and one out back, each splitting its power across two wheels courtesy of a differential. Each differential divvies up the twisting force from a motor but introduces extra friction and drivetrain losses into the equation.

Most traditional differentials also struggle with wheelspin, such that when one wheel starts to lose grip, the EV actually needs to apply the brakes on that wheel to keep it from spinning wildly. Hitting the brakes while you’re trying to accelerate isn’t great for maximum performance.

Rivian R1 interior — Rivian continues to eschew buttons and phone-casting interfaces like CarPlay. Credit: Tim Stevens

Installing one motor per wheel simplifies the whole setup immensely. Now, each motor can be controlled individually, with no differentials required to ensure power goes where it’s needed. If one wheel starts to slip, the car can simply cut that motor’s power without impacting any of the other three.

That process is helped by Rivian’s new system architecture introduced in the Gen 2 R1 platform last year. This not only greatly simplified the architecture of the vehicles, cutting cost and weight, but it enabled far more finite control over those motors.

The four motors are backed by a 140 kWh (usable) NMC battery pack, which, for the first time on a Rivian, is charged via a Tesla-style NACS port. That pack offers up to 374 miles (602 km) of range per the EPA if you go with the efficiency-minded all-season wheel and tire setup. Switch the Quads over to Conserve drive mode, and Rivian’s engineers told me upwards of 400 miles (643 km) on a charge is possible.

But if you want that eye-opening acceleration figure mentioned above, you’ll need to opt for the optional summer wheel and tire package, which swaps out the low-rolling resistance tires for a set of Michelin Pilot Sport 5 S tires on staggered 22-inch wheels, measuring 275 wide at the front and 305 at the rear.

More into the off-road side of the equation? There’s another wheel and tire package available: 20-inch wheels with aggressive Pirelli Scorpion tires. Choose wisely, because your selected wheel and tire will have a huge impact on the personality of your Quad.

Rolling clean

I started my day in an R1T Quad-Motor on the street performance-oriented Michelin tires, and sadly, the first hour or so was spent idling through traffic. That meant leaving most of those 1,025 horses safely blanketed in the stable, but it did give me time to sample the more nuanced changes in the Quad.

I’ve spent a fair bit of time in Rivian’s second-generation machines, but Quad-Motor features a few updates. The cel-shaded visual display design has been cleaned up a bit, especially the gauge cluster view of the world around you, meaning the entirety of the interface looks equally clean and charming.

Sadly, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are still missing, which I found particularly annoying when testing the now Atmos-equipped sound system. Since I couldn’t access the music I’d downloaded on my phone, I was stuck relying on the truck’s data connection to stream music through Apple Music. Connectivity is spotty in the rural routes around Lake Tahoe, and it was rare that I got through a single track without stuttering or outright pausing. Fumbling for my phone and having to pair over Bluetooth felt awfully low-rent for a $119,900 as-configured machine.

Rivian infotainment screen showing the RAD tuner — The RAD tuner is new. Credit: Tim Stevens

An unexpected software surprise was the new RAD Tuner. This presents you with a screen full of vehicle parameters to modulate, including standard stuff like suspension stiffness and throttle response, plus far more nuanced parameters like front-to-rear torque split and even roll stiffness. You can modify any of the stock on- or off-road modes or just add new ones to your heart’s content.

As someone who is often frustrated by the lack of configurability in modern EVs, I loved being able to tweak every slider. Each adjustment is paired with an intuitive graph and explanation showing you exactly what it does. Best of all, I could really feel the differences. Dragging the roll slider up and down made the R1T go from a relaxed, floppy feel to a taut, engaging turner.

Unfortunately, nothing I changed made the ride quality any better. The truck was surprisingly harsh over broken asphalt, and there was a fair bit of road noise, too. That’s a big difference from what I’ve experienced from Rivian’s R1 machines in the past, making me think the sportier wheel and tire package is the culprit here. I unfortunately did not have a chance to sample the all-season wheels and tires, but I would have to figure their less aggressive design would be an improvement.

Given that, I’d probably skip the Michelin tire setup. But with it equipped, the truck was impressive. Acceleration was truly eye-opening, as you’d expect, while the ability to seamlessly apply power to each wheel as needed resulted in a confidence-inspiring machine when the traffic cleared. Only the complete lack of steering feedback dampened the fun, but even so, the R1T Quad-Motor is far more engaging on the road than a truck this size has any right to be.

A pair of Rivians seen off-road at dusk. — Time to get dirty. Credit: Rivian

But things got even more fun when the road ended.

Rolling dirty

The second half of my time behind the wheel was spent in an R1S Quad-Motor outfitted with the more aggressively treaded Pirelli Scorpion tires. That three-row SUV brought me up and over some astonishingly tricky terrain, including a sheer rock wall that, on foot, would have required a ladder.

Over loose gravel and tricky articulations, the new Quad showed its ability to lean on those tires with grip while quickly cutting power to those left hanging in the air. This is the kind of next-level traction management that trumps locking differentials and makes an R1 Quad-Motor a cinch to drive up even the most extreme terrain.

It was easy going down, too. On loose surfaces, with the regen set to maximum and the SUV’s central display showing the output of the individual motors, I could see how each corner of the vehicle dynamically ramped its regen up or down to match the available grip. The result was a clean, straight descent.

The side of a Rivian R1T, seen from the rear. — Tire choice is quite important. Credit: Tim Stevens

The Quad-Motor is even easy to turn around in tight spaces. Rivian’s original Tank Turn returns, now rebranded and expanded as the Kick Turn, enabling 360-degree spins on loose surfaces or even tail-dragging pivots around tight corners. The process of engaging this mode is a bit clumsy, requiring you to hold buttons on the steering wheel simultaneously with both thumbs to indicate spin direction. But, when off-road at least, this helps to make up for the R1’s continued lack of rear steering.

At the end of the day, I honestly wasn’t sure whether I was more impressed by the on-road or off-road capabilities of Rivian’s new Quad-Motor machines. That spectrum of performance makes the top-shelf R1 series unique, an addictive mixture of supercar speed and super truck capability.

Rivian’s new Quad-Motor R1T and R1S beat the competition in any conditions Read More »

2025 VW ID Buzz review: If you want an electric minivan, this is it

car review, Cars, VW ID. Buzz / 9u50fv / July 3, 2025

The fast charging stats are acceptable for a 400 V powertrain. VW quotes 30-minute fast-charging from 10 to 80 percent, with the battery able to accept peak rates of 170 kW. In practice, I plugged in with 35 percent SoC and reached 80 percent after 21 minutes. Meanwhile, a full AC charge should take 7.5 hours.

You want plenty of space in a minivan, and there’s a huge amount here. In the US, we only get a three-row version of the Buzz, which offers features that the two-row, Euro-only version can’t, like air vents and opening windows in the back. There are also a plethora of USB-C ports. You sit up high, with an H-point (where your hip goes) that’s a few inches above that of other minivan drivers.

One of the downsides of that large battery is the extra height it adds to the Buzz, although a tight turning circle and light steering mean it’s never a chore to drive. However, getting in could be a little simpler for people on the smaller end of the spectrum if there were grab handles or running boards.

The width shouldn’t prove a problem, given the number of commercial Buzzes you now see working as delivery vans or work trucks in Europe these days. The bluff front and large frontal area may also explain the wind noise at highway speeds, although that can easily be drowned out by the sound system (or two rows of children, perhaps). Driving slowly, and therefore efficiently, is made simpler by the lack of side bolstering of the seats and that high H-point that magnifies any amount of roll when cornering.

VW’s infotainment system still lags a bit, and the car relies on capacitive controls, but at least they’re backlit now. Jonathan Gitlin

Both middle and third row are viable places to put fully grown adults, even for long drives. The specs actually give the third row the edge, with 42.4 inches (1,077 mm) of legroom versus 39.9 inches (1,014 mm) for the middle row, and VW had to issue a recall because the rear bench is slightly wider than federal rules allow if you only have two seatbelts.

2025 VW ID Buzz review: If you want an electric minivan, this is it Read More »

2025 Audi S5 and A5 first drive: Five-door is the new four-door

Audi A5, Audi S5, car review, Cars, First drive / Mike M. / June 18, 2025

The S5 is eager and more engaging to drive than the A5. Jonathan Gitlin

Like the Q5 last week, the A5 and S5 use a new electronic architecture called E3 1.2. This is a clean-sheet approach to the various electronic subsystems in the car, replacing decades of legacy cruft and more than a hundred individual electronic control units with five powerful high-performance computers, each with responsibility for a different domain: ride and handling, infotainment, driver assists, and convenience functions, all overseen by a master computer.

On the road

Sadly, those looking for driver engagement will not find much in the A5. Despite the improvements to the front suspension, there’s still very little in the way of feedback, and in comfort mode, the steering was too light, at least for me. In Dynamic mode, on the other hand, the car felt extremely sure-footed in bad weather. The A5 makes do with conventional springs, so the ride doesn’t change between drive modes, but Audi has tuned it well, and the car is not too firm. I noted a fair amount of wind noise, despite the acoustic front glass that comes with the ($6,450) Prestige package.

The S5 will appeal much more to driving enthusiasts. The steering provides a better picture of what the front tires are doing, and the air suspension gives the car a supple ride, albeit one that gets firmer in Balanced rather than Dynamic modes. Like some other recent fast Audis, the car is deceptively quick, and because it’s quite quiet and smooth, you can find yourself going a good deal faster than you thought. The S5’s exhaust note also sounds rather pleasant and not obnoxious.

The A5 cabin has a similar layout as the Q5 and Q6 e-tron SUVs. Audi

The A5 starts at $49,700, but the $3,600 Premium Plus package is likely a must-have, as this adds adaptive cruise control, a heads-up display, top-down parking cameras, and some other features (including USB-C ports). If you want to get really fancy, the Prestige pack adds speakers in the front headrests, OLED taillights, the aforementioned acoustic glass, plus a second infotainment screen for the front passenger.

Meanwhile, the S5 starts at $62,700; the Premium Plus package (which adds mostly the same stuff) will set you back $3,800. For the S5, the $7,550 Prestige pack includes front sports seats, Nappa leather, rear window sunshades, the passenger display, and the adaptive sports suspension. Those are all some hefty numbers, but the A5 and S5 are actually both cheaper in real terms than the models launched in 2018, once you take seven years’ worth of inflation into account.

2025 Audi S5 and A5 first drive: Five-door is the new four-door Read More »