car review

2025 VW ID Buzz review: If you want an electric minivan, this is it

car review, Cars, VW ID. Buzz / 9u50fv / July 3, 2025

The fast charging stats are acceptable for a 400 V powertrain. VW quotes 30-minute fast-charging from 10 to 80 percent, with the battery able to accept peak rates of 170 kW. In practice, I plugged in with 35 percent SoC and reached 80 percent after 21 minutes. Meanwhile, a full AC charge should take 7.5 hours.

You want plenty of space in a minivan, and there’s a huge amount here. In the US, we only get a three-row version of the Buzz, which offers features that the two-row, Euro-only version can’t, like air vents and opening windows in the back. There are also a plethora of USB-C ports. You sit up high, with an H-point (where your hip goes) that’s a few inches above that of other minivan drivers.

One of the downsides of that large battery is the extra height it adds to the Buzz, although a tight turning circle and light steering mean it’s never a chore to drive. However, getting in could be a little simpler for people on the smaller end of the spectrum if there were grab handles or running boards.

The width shouldn’t prove a problem, given the number of commercial Buzzes you now see working as delivery vans or work trucks in Europe these days. The bluff front and large frontal area may also explain the wind noise at highway speeds, although that can easily be drowned out by the sound system (or two rows of children, perhaps). Driving slowly, and therefore efficiently, is made simpler by the lack of side bolstering of the seats and that high H-point that magnifies any amount of roll when cornering.

VW’s infotainment system still lags a bit, and the car relies on capacitive controls, but at least they’re backlit now. Jonathan Gitlin

Both middle and third row are viable places to put fully grown adults, even for long drives. The specs actually give the third row the edge, with 42.4 inches (1,077 mm) of legroom versus 39.9 inches (1,014 mm) for the middle row, and VW had to issue a recall because the rear bench is slightly wider than federal rules allow if you only have two seatbelts.

2025 VW ID Buzz review: If you want an electric minivan, this is it Read More »

2025 Audi S5 and A5 first drive: Five-door is the new four-door

Audi A5, Audi S5, car review, Cars, First drive / Mike M. / June 18, 2025

The S5 is eager and more engaging to drive than the A5. Jonathan Gitlin

Like the Q5 last week, the A5 and S5 use a new electronic architecture called E3 1.2. This is a clean-sheet approach to the various electronic subsystems in the car, replacing decades of legacy cruft and more than a hundred individual electronic control units with five powerful high-performance computers, each with responsibility for a different domain: ride and handling, infotainment, driver assists, and convenience functions, all overseen by a master computer.

On the road

Sadly, those looking for driver engagement will not find much in the A5. Despite the improvements to the front suspension, there’s still very little in the way of feedback, and in comfort mode, the steering was too light, at least for me. In Dynamic mode, on the other hand, the car felt extremely sure-footed in bad weather. The A5 makes do with conventional springs, so the ride doesn’t change between drive modes, but Audi has tuned it well, and the car is not too firm. I noted a fair amount of wind noise, despite the acoustic front glass that comes with the ($6,450) Prestige package.

The S5 will appeal much more to driving enthusiasts. The steering provides a better picture of what the front tires are doing, and the air suspension gives the car a supple ride, albeit one that gets firmer in Balanced rather than Dynamic modes. Like some other recent fast Audis, the car is deceptively quick, and because it’s quite quiet and smooth, you can find yourself going a good deal faster than you thought. The S5’s exhaust note also sounds rather pleasant and not obnoxious.

The A5 cabin has a similar layout as the Q5 and Q6 e-tron SUVs. Audi

The A5 starts at $49,700, but the $3,600 Premium Plus package is likely a must-have, as this adds adaptive cruise control, a heads-up display, top-down parking cameras, and some other features (including USB-C ports). If you want to get really fancy, the Prestige pack adds speakers in the front headrests, OLED taillights, the aforementioned acoustic glass, plus a second infotainment screen for the front passenger.

Meanwhile, the S5 starts at $62,700; the Premium Plus package (which adds mostly the same stuff) will set you back $3,800. For the S5, the $7,550 Prestige pack includes front sports seats, Nappa leather, rear window sunshades, the passenger display, and the adaptive sports suspension. Those are all some hefty numbers, but the A5 and S5 are actually both cheaper in real terms than the models launched in 2018, once you take seven years’ worth of inflation into account.

2025 Audi S5 and A5 first drive: Five-door is the new four-door Read More »

The new version of Audi’s best-selling Q5 SUV arrives in the US

Audi Q5, Audi SQ5, car review, Cars, First drive / Kelly Newman / June 11, 2025

The driving dynamics are improved, and there’s plenty of tech to play with.

This is the third-generation Audi Q5. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

ASPEN, Colo.—There’s a lot riding on Audi’s next Q5. The model has been Audi’s bread and butter here since the model went on sale in the US in 2009, as tastes changed and sedans fell out of favor. The third-generation Q5 is built on an all-new platform and is one of a new generation of software-defined vehicles that’s meant to ditch a lot of legacy crud for a clean sheet approach. You would have known all of that from our look at the new Q5 in a studio last year, when Audi briefed us on its new platform. What you wouldn’t have known from that piece is how it drives, particularly on US roads. The answer is: surprisingly well.

PPC

Just a few years ago, the world’s big car brands were telling us that soon everyone would be driving electric cars, and that it would be wonderful. Things haven’t quite panned out the way people thought they might when prognosticating in 2018, though. Electric powertrains have yet to reach price parity, in many places infrastructure still lags, and so automakers are developing new combustion-powered vehicles, particularly for markets like the US, where adoption remains far behind Europe or China.

For Audi and the other premium brands within the Volkswagen Group empire, that’s a new platform called PPC, or Premium Platform Combustion. PPC will provide the bones for new vehicles in a range of sizes and shapes, the same way the MLB (and MLB Evo) platforms have done until now. In a week, you can read about the A5, for example, but as the sales figures show, SUVs are what people want, so the Q5 comes first.

And this is the third-generation Audi SQ5. Jonathan Gitlin

To begin with, the US will get just two choices of powertrain. The Q5, which starts at $52,200, is powered by a 2.0 L turbocharged, direct-injection four-cylinder engine, which generates 268 hp (200 kW) and 295 lb-ft (400 Nm), which is sent to all four wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. The SQ5 is the fancier, more powerful version. This starts at $64,800, and its 3.0 L turbocharged, direct-injection V6 provides 362 hp (270 kW) and 406 lb-ft (550 Nm), again to all four wheels via a seven-speed DCT.

At some point Audi will likely put a plug-in hybrid powertrain in the Q5, but there’s no guarantee it would come to the US, particularly if the US government remains hostile to both foreign trade and environmental protection. Audi sells a 48 V mild hybrid Q5—essentially a powerful starter motor—in Europe but currently has no plans to bring that version to the US. Happily for those looking for an entirely electric Audi midsize SUV, the Q6 e-tron is ready and waiting.

But you can get the Q5, and the SQ5, in a pair of different body styles. As before, Audi has a Sportback variant, which trades the upright rear hatch for a more sloping roofline. What the Sportback loses in rear headroom, it makes up for in style but should drive the exact same way. In Colorado, Audi only had the regular SUVs for us to test.

Software-defined vehicles

Although the Q5 and Q6 e-tron don’t share a common platform, they do share a common electronic architecture. Gone are the days of CANBUS and a hundred or more discrete black boxes and ECUs, each with a single function. Instead, it’s an entirely clean-sheet approach known as a software-defined vehicle, where a handful of powerful computers are each responsible for controlling a different domain, in this case vehicle dynamics, driver assists, infotainment, climate, and convenience, all tied together by Ethernet, with a backbone computer overseeing it all.

VW Group bit off a bit more than it could chew and tried simultaneously developing not one but two SDV architectures, before realizing no one wanted to work on the one the company actually needed sooner. That architecture is called E3 1.2, and with a bit of focus, VW Group’s software division has gotten it out the door.

I feel like Audi has taken a step back in terms of HMI for this latest generation of user interfaces. And why can’t I put a map display here? Audi

The practical upshot of SDVs, unlike older cars with their single-function black boxes, is that everything on an SDV should be updatable. The flip side is the potential for more bugs, although I can report that the Q5s and SQ5s we encountered in Colorado felt much more mature, software-wise, than the somewhat buggy preproduction cars using E3 1.2 that we drove in mid-2024.

As for VW’s future SDV architecture, it might well come from Rivian instead of its in-house division. Last summer, VW Group invested $5 billion in Rivian to gain access to the startup’s SDV technology.

As part of E3 1.2, the Q5 gets the latest version of Audi’s MMI infotainment, which now uses Android Automotive OS. There’s a more powerful voice assistant, triggered by “Hey, Audi,” that uses natural language processing that’s able to easily understand me, and which I think provides a good alternative to using a touchscreen while driving. I lament the lack of customizability, particularly in the main driver display and the fact that you can no longer display a map there, despite that being a feature Audi pioneered.

You can also add a second infotainment screen for the passenger, although only by ticking the box for the Prestige trim, which adds $8,400 to the price of a Q5, or $6,400 to the price of an SQ5. More on this later.

The driving experience: Q5

We began our day in the Q5, albeit one fitted with the optional air suspension and 20-inch wheels (18-inch wheels are standard, and 19-inch wheels are also available). Despite the altitude, there was more than sufficient power and torque to move the Q5’s 4,244 lb (1,925 kg) curb weight—forced induction providing the same benefit here as it did for piston-engined aircraft a century ago or more. At sea level, you could expect to reach 60 mph in 5.8 seconds, or 100 km/h in 6.2 seconds, according to Audi.

There’s plenty of storage places, and all the bits you touch feel pleasant under hand. Audi

There’s a new drive mode called Balanced, which fits between Comfort and Dynamic; on the road this mode is well-named as it indeed provides a good balance between ride comfort and responsiveness, with just enough but not too much weight to the steering. There’s also an individual mode that lets you pick and choose your own suspension, transmission, and steering settings, plus off-road and off-road plus modes, which we’ll encounter again later.

In fact, for a midsize crossover, the Q5 proved quite engaging from behind the wheel. It doesn’t lean too much when cornering, although if you plan to negotiate a sequence of twisty tarmac, the lower ride height in Dynamic mode, plus the firmer air springs, is definitely the way to go. When you’re not in a hurry or grinding along the highway, the ride is comfortable, and up front, there is little road noise thanks to some acoustic glass. I would like to try a car fitted with the conventional steel springs, however.

The cockpit layout is similar to the electric Q6 e-tron, with the same “digital stage” that includes a second infotainment screen for the passenger. But the materials here feel of a higher quality—my guess is that weight saving was much less of a concern for the gasoline-powered Q5 than the battery-carrying Q6. There is plenty of cargo room in the back, and perhaps a little more rear legroom than the photo would suggest—38 inches (965 mm), according to the spec sheet.

The driving experience: SQ5

The SQ5 can be specced with Nappa leather. Audi

The second half of our day was spent in the SQ5, most of it above 10,000 feet (3 km). Even in the thin air, the car was responsive, with the extra power and torque over the Q5 quite apparent. Audi was evidently confident in the SQ5, since our drive route included more than an hour on unpaved roads. None of the cars, all equipped with 21-inch wheels and lower-profile tires, had any trouble with punctures, and the off-road plus mode, which raises up the suspension, changes the throttle mapping, and disables the stability control, coped perfectly well over stretches of road that few luxury SUVs will ever face. I can report that as occupants, we weren’t even particularly jostled.

I liked the way the SQ5 sounded, particularly in Dynamic, and it’s engaging enough to drive that you’d take the long way home in it, despite being an SUV. However, it’s also deceptively quick, in part thanks to being quiet and refined inside. There’s a lack of intrusion from the outside environment that removes the noise and vibrations associated with speed, so you can look at the dash or heads-up display and see you’re 20 mph faster than you thought. That’s not great when mountain roads with no guard rails trigger your fear of heights, but the fact that I’m writing this means it ended OK.

They make you pay

I enjoyed driving both the Q5 and SQ5, but as is always the case on first drives for the media, we were presented with very well-equipped examples to test. For example, the great ride I experienced with the Q5 requires the $8,400 Prestige pack, which also adds the acoustic glass that made it so quiet inside. That’s also the only way to get heated rear seats and ventilated front seats, the clever OLED tail lights, or the second display for the passenger. (On the SQ5 the Prestige pack is only $6,400, since air suspension is standard on all SQ5s, and adds Nappa leather as well.)

A pair of Audi Q5s parked by some mountain scenery — With scenery like this, who needs to look at cars? Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Some other features that I expected would be standard were instead behind the Premium Plus pack—$4,500 for the Q5 and $3,500 for the SQ5. I would expect the high-resolution, full-color heads-up display to be an extra, but you also have to tick this option if you want USB-C ports (2 x 60 W in the front, 2 x 100 W in the rear) in the car. And you probably do.

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

The new version of Audi’s best-selling Q5 SUV arrives in the US Read More »

2025 Acura ADX review: A crossover that balances budget with spirit

Acura ADX, car review, Cars / 9u50fv / June 6, 2025

As you might imagine, a steady stream of cars to review comes and goes from my parking spot. Some weeks, they stand out, like the bright green Aston Martin, the murdered-out Bentley, or the VW ID. Buzz you can read about soon; these cars usually spark conversations with neighbors, particularly those who don’t know why there’s a different vehicle in that spot each week.

At other times, the vehicles are more anonymous, and I’m not sure this ADX sparked any community discussions. Compact crossovers are a popular breed and blend into the background—particularly when they’re painted an unobtrusive shade.

Which is not to say the ADX is not handsome; the Urban Gray Pearl paint looked good even in the near-constant rain (which explains the Acura-supplied images rather than my own) that coincided with our time with the tester. And from the driver’s seat, the view down the hood, along those creases, is a lot more interesting than most comparable crossovers, considering the ADX’s $35,000 starting price.

It’s built in Mexico alongside the Honda HR-V and shares a platform with the Acura Integra and Honda Civic. Like the HR-V, there’s no hybrid option, just a 1.5 L turbocharged four-cylinder engine with 190 hp (142 kW) and 179 lb-ft (243 Nm). There’s also only one choice of transmission—a continuously variable transmission.

This has preprogrammed “shift points” that simulate the gears of a more conventional transmission. Acura says it has been programmed for performance, and you can use the steering wheel’s paddles to change up or down a virtual gear. The turbocharged engine starts making all its torque from 1,700 rpm, but if you’re in a hurry, you’ll first hear the revs rise out of proportion to the initial increase in speed, and full power doesn’t arrive until 6,000 rpm, with the redline 500 rpm further north. It’s not the best-sounding engine in the world when it’s revved up, either.

As standard, the ADX is just front-wheel drive, but all-wheel drive is available for an additional $2,000. This can send up to half the engine’s available torque to the rear wheels, but expect it to be front-biased in day-to-day driving conditions.

Acura ADX hood — I love the view from the driver’s seat down the spine of the hood. Credit: Acura

Fuel efficiency is not remarkable, but here it’s about average for the class. With all-wheel drive, as tested, the EPA estimates 27 mpg combined (8.7 L/100 km); I actually returned a slightly better 28 mpg (8.4 L/100 km) across the week.

2025 Acura ADX review: A crossover that balances budget with spirit Read More »

2025 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 first drive: Engineered for insane speed

car review, Cars, Chevrolet Corvette ZR1, First drive / Mike M. / May 30, 2025

Cooling for the ZR1 became an even higher priority, because the LT6 and LT7 employ extremely tight tolerances between the crankshaft and connecting rods, which mandates keeping the 5W-50 oil below 120° C (248° F) at all times. And the system simply works, as even on a hot and humid Texas day, I only noticed oil temperatures cresting above 104° C (220° F) occasionally.

The interior is better than any prior generation of Corvette, but it feels prosaic compared to the cockpits of its more exotic mid-engined rivals. Michael Teo Van Runkle

The hardtop convertible ZR1 lacks the split-engine venting and shoulder intakes, while cutting into headroom so much that I skipped out while wearing a helmet. Other journalists noticed a drop-off in performance for the convertibles, and probably more so than the mild weight gains of just about 100 lbs (45 kg) might suggest. Instead, temperatures probably came into play, as the ECU drew back timing and instead allowed mild overboost of 24–25 psi to compensate for the Texas day. Even so, an engineer admitted he thought the engine was probably down 5–10 percent on power.

The fact that I hit my highest-ever top speed despite the ZR1 potentially giving up somewhere between 53 to 106 hp (40–80 kW) only makes this Corvettes sound even more insane. But I essentially wound up driving the turbos, since the DCT’s gear ratios carry over from the Stingray and therefore drop out of peak power when shifting from second to third and third to fourth.

I suspect nothing short of an F1 racecar feels this fast on a circuit of this size. A track designed for corner exit speeds double my pace in the ZR1 helps explain why Chevrolet declined to set us loose on public roads behind the wheel.

A Corvette ZR1 parked by turn 1 at COTA. — We drove it on track—will owners cope with this much power on the street? Credit: Michael Teo Van Runkle

That’s a concern for potential buyers, though, and why the ZR1’s electronics undoubtedly ratchet back the insanity. Chevy still uses Bosch’s ninth-generation traction control, which debuted on C7 and operates on a 10-millisecond loop, even if the ABS runs at 5 milliseconds—while the ESC is at 20 milliseconds. I suspect this computerized nannying slowed me down a fair amount, in addition to the torque-by-gear restrictions in first and second that purposefully protect driveline components.

We’ve probably reached peak internal-combustion Corvette, which is something of a hint about the all-too-real question of where Chevy can go from here. If so, this car reaches a new level of unfathomable American ingenuity, combined with a newfound level of refinement and traction management that attempts to belie the undeniable absurdity to a minimal, arguably necessary, extent.

2025 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 first drive: Engineered for insane speed Read More »

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 first drive: Efficient, for a big one

car review, Cars, First drive, Hyundai Ioniq 9 / Mike M. / May 20, 2025

Only the $58,995 Ioniq 9 S is available with a rear-wheel drive powertrain. In this case, one with 215 hp (160 kW) and 258 lb-ft (350 Nm) and a range of 325 miles (539 km) from the 110.3 kWh (gross) battery pack. All other trims feature twin motor all-wheel drive, but you give up little in the way of range.

The $62,765 SE and $68,320 SEL offer a combined 303 hp (226 kW) and 446 lb-ft (605 Nm) and 320 miles (515 km) of range, and the $71,250 Performance Limited, $74,990 Performance Calligraphy, and $76,490 Performance Calligraphy Design use a more powerful front motor to generate a total of 442 hp (315 kW) and 516 lb-ft (700 Nm), and a range of 311 miles (500 km).

The Ioniq 9’s interior loses some of the charm of the concept. Hyundai

While a short first drive is not the best place to evaluate an EV’s range efficiency, driven day to day in Eco mode, I wouldn’t be surprised if you were able to easily exceed 3 miles/kWh (20.7 kWh/100 km). Other drive modes include Normal, which uses the front motor much more often and therefore is markedly quicker than Eco; Sport, which has quite a lot of initial throttle tip-in and will head-toss your passengers if you have any; Terrain, first seen on the Ioniq 5 XRT; and Snow.

The ride is quite firm on surface streets but less so at highway speeds over seams and expansion gaps. As you start to corner faster you can expect to encounter understeer, but since this is a three-row SUV weighing between 5,507-6,008 lbs (2,498-2,725 kg), one has to wonder what else was expected. At sensible speeds, it’s easy to see out of and place it on the road, and if you’re stuck in a tailback with a couple of grumpy children in the back, it’s a calming enough environment to keep you from being over-stressed.

Hyundai has wisely priced the Ioniq 9 between the related Kia EV9 (which also uses the E-GMP platform) and EVs from premium OEMs like the Volvo EX90, Mercedes EQS SUV, or the aforementioned Rivian.

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 first drive: Efficient, for a big one Read More »

Forgive me, Volvo, I was wrong: The 2025 V60 Cross Country review

car review, Cars, Volvo V60 Cross Country / DJ Henderson / May 17, 2025

Perhaps if I was more patient I’d have gotten closer to the EPA combined 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km), too—instead the best I could average was 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km). One wonders how much lower it would be without the 48 V mild hybrid system.

While I am a big fan of the way the V60’s front seats look, they could do with quite a lot more lateral support. It definitely feels like you’re sat on them, not in them, if that makes sense. The $56,595 (including delivery charge) Ultra trim adds ventilation and a good massage function to the front seats, as well as options like the tan Nappa leather you see in the (not-great) photo. (Sadly Volvo’s media site didn’t have any good ones either.) Ultra also adds a heads-up display and a better sound system, although our test car was given an even better $3,200 Bowers and Wilkins sound upgrade.

Otherwise, the cabin is still much as it was five years ago. I appreciate the helpful features, like well-designed hooks in the cargo area that keep your shopping bags in place, which aren’t always as useful as the ones here. While the infotainment system is old and its screen is small by 2025’s standards, there are four USB-C ports in the car, and Google is built-in. There’s also Apple CarPlay, but you’ll need to use a cable. You’ll want to plug your phone in anyway, as there’s no wireless charging pad.

My biggest complaint about the V60 Cross Country is the over-eager rear emergency braking system. A large curb or bollard can trigger it, slamming on the anchors in the process, which is annoying when I am backing into a parking space at maybe 5 mph, but I understand why the safety-conscious automaker has programmed it the way it has. After two weeks with the car there was little else I could find to criticize, and I missed its agility, easy ride, and relatively reasonable size compared to the big electric SUVs that have taken its place in the testing schedule since.

Raising the V60 by 2.4 inches does not in fact ruin the car. Jonathan Gitlin

Station wagon shopping in 2025 is a short process; once Audi stops selling the A4 Allroad, this V60 Cross Country has no real rival left. So it’s a good thing it’s a pretty decent example of the breed.

Forgive me, Volvo, I was wrong: The 2025 V60 Cross Country review Read More »

The 2025 VW Tiguan caters to US tastes at an affordable price

car review, Cars, First drive, Volkswagen Tiguan / 9u50fv / May 16, 2025

In the modern era, cars keep getting bigger and bigger between generations. Or at least, they’re certainly not getting smaller. That’s especially true in America, where bigger is always better and the vehicles in the current crop of “compact” crossovers are now nearly as large as full-size SUVs from a decade ago. Don’t ask about curb weights, either, as more powerful drivetrains, including widespread adoption of hybrid-electric components, add significant mass, as highlighted by the new BMW M5 “sport sedan.”

Within that fray, however, the new Volkswagen Tiguan stands apart. VW purposefully refined the third-gen Tiguan to cater better to American consumer needs, which meant dropping the third row to create more interior volume for the front and rear seats. The wheelbase still measures the same length at 109.9 inches (2,791 mm), but shorter overhangs mean the overall length actually shrinks by nearly two inches. Yet more efficient packaging on the inside also results in a marginal passenger volume increase of about two percent.

To help keep pricing attractive at below $30,000 to start, VW also decided to skip out on a hybrid variant, but the new EA888evo5 2.0 L turbocharged-four nonetheless delivers more power and improved fuel economy. And all of the above actually contributes to the Tiguan losing weight while evolving from the second to third generation, shaving about 160 lbs (72.5 kg), depending on trim.

There’s some ID.4 in here, but also a big helping of generic. Michael Teo Van Runkle

Generic outside, great inside

Volkswagen USA recently invited Ars to join a rainy test drive of the Tiguan’s SE and SEL R-Life trims in Bozeman, Montana. At first glance, the new exterior definitely hews more closely to current crossover trends, which the Tiguan arguably helped to inaugurate back in the late-2000s. There’s also a healthy dose of Volkswagen ID.4 design language throughout, especially at the nose. The interior truly steps up to a new level, though. I started out in an almost-base Tiguan SE, which means front-wheel drive and minimal options, not even onboard navigation.

Like most buyers, though, I connected my iPhone via Wireless CarPlay, which effectively makes onboard nav obsolete. And the SE’s 12.9-inch touchscreen atop the dash provides all the necessary tech, as premium materials throughout clearly prioritize touchpoints to enhance the impression of quality.

The 2025 VW Tiguan caters to US tastes at an affordable price Read More »

2025 Bentley Continental GT: Big power, big battery, big price

Bentley Continental GT Speed, car review, Cars / Kelly Newman / May 13, 2025

We spend a week with Bentley’s new plug-in hybrid grand touring car.

The new Bentley Continental GT was already an imposing figure before this one left the factory in Crewe clad in dark satin paint and devoid of the usual chrome. And under the bonnet—or hood, if you prefer—you’ll no longer find 12 cylinders. Instead, there’s now an all-new twin-turbo V8 plug-in hybrid powertrain that offers both continent-crushing amounts of power and torque, but also a big enough battery for a day’s driving around town.

We covered the details of the new hybrid a bit after our brief drive in the prototype this time last year. At the time, we also shared that the new PHEV bits have been brought over from Porsche. There’s quite a lot of Panamera DNA in the new Continental GT, as well as some recent Audi ancestry. Bentley is quite good at the engineering remix, though: Little more than a decade after it was founded by W.O., the brand belonged to Rolls-Royce, and so started a long history of parts-sharing.

Mind if I use that?

Rolls-Royce and Bentley went their separate ways in 2003. The unraveling started a few years earlier when the aerospace company that owned them decided to rationalize and get itself out of the car business. In 1997, it sold the rights to Rolls-Royce to BMW, or at least the rights to the name and logos. Volkswagen Group got the rest, including the factory in Crewe, and got to work on a new generation of Bentleys for a new century.

This paint is called Anthracite Satin. Jonathan Gitlin

VW Group was then under the overall direction of Ferdinand Piëch, often one to let bold engineering challenges make it all the way through into production. Piëch wanted to prove to the rest of the industry that VW could build a car every bit as good as Mercedes, and thus was born the Phaeton. Over-engineered and wearing too-plebeian a badge, the Phaeton was a flop, but its platform was the perfect foundation for some new Bentleys. These days, VW itself doesn’t have anything quite as sophisticated to share, but Porsche certainly does.

It has become common these days to disclose power and torque; in more genteel times, one was simply told that the car’s outputs were “sufficient.” Well, 771 hp (575 kW) and 737 lb-ft (1,000 Nm) could definitely be described by that word, even with two and a half tons to move. The twin-turbo 4.0 L V8 generates 584 hp (435 kW) and 590 lb-ft (800 Nm), and, as long as you have the car in sport mode, sounds rather like Thor gargling as you explore its rev range.

Even if you can’t hear that fast-approaching thunder, you know when you’re in Sport mode, as the car is so quick to respond to inputs. I was able to tell less of a difference between Comfort and B mode, the latter standing for “Bentley,” obviously, and offering what is supposed to be a balanced mix of powertrain and suspension settings.

Even in Sport, the Continental GT will raise its nose and hunker down at the rear under hard acceleration, and the handling trends more toward “heavy powerful GT” rather than “lithe sports car.” For a car like this, I will happily take the slightly floaty ride provided by the air springs and two-valve dampers over a bone-crushing one, however. It can be blisteringly quick if you require, with a 0-to-60 time of just 3.2 seconds and a top speed of 208 mph (335 km/h), while cosseting you from most of the world outside. The steering is weighty enough that you feel you’re actually piloting it in the corners, and it’s an easy car to place on the road.

As this is a plug-in, should you wish, you can drive off in silence thanks to the electrical side of that equation. The 188 hp (140 kW) electric motor isn’t exactly fast on its own, but with 332 lb-ft (450 Nm) there’s more than enough instant torque to get this big GT car underway. The lithium-ion battery pack is in the boot—ok, the trunk—where its 25.9 kWh eat some luggage capacity but balance out the weight distribution. On a full charge, you can go up to 39 miles, give or take, and the electric-only mode allows for up to 87 mph (140 km/h) and 75-percent throttle before the V8 joins the party.

Recharging the pack via a plug takes a bit less than three hours. Alternatively, you can do it while you drive, although I remain confused even now about what the “charge” mode did; driving around in Sport did successfully send spare power to the battery pack for later use, but it was unclear how much charge actually happened. I still need to ask Bentley what the miles/kWh readout on the main display actually refers to, because it cannot be the car’s actual electric-only usage, much as I like to imagine the car eeking out 8 miles/kWh (7.8 L/100 km).

Made in England

Then again, the Bentley is British, and as noted with another recent review of an import from those isles, electrical and electronic oddness is the name of the game with cars from Albion. There was an intermittent check engine light on the dashboard. And sometimes the V8 was reluctant to go to sleep when I switched into EV mode. And I also had to remind it of my driving position more than once. Still, those are mere foibles compared to an Aston Martin that freaks out in the rain, I suppose.

The ride on 22-inch wheels is better than it should be. Jonathan Gitlin

Even with a heavy dusting of spring pollen drybrushing highlights onto the Continental GT’s matte exterior, this was a car that attracted attention. Though only a two-door, the rear seats are large enough and comfortable enough for adults to sit back there, although as noted, the cargo capacity is a little less than you’d expect due to the battery above the rear axle.

Obviously, there is a high degree of customization when it comes to deciding what one’s Bentley should look like inside and out. Carbon fiber is available as an alternative to the engine-turned aluminum, and there’s still a traditional wood veneer for the purists. I’d definitely avoid the piano black surrounds if it were me.

I also got deja vu from the main instrument display. The typefaces are all Bentley, but the human machine interface is, as far as I can tell, the exact same as a whole lot of last-generation Audis. That may not be obvious to all of Bentley’s buyers, but I bet at least some have a Q7 at home and will spot the similarities, too.

No such qualms concern the rotating infotainment display. When you don’t need to see the 12.3-inch touchscreen, a button on the dash makes it disappear. Instead, three real analog gauges take its place, showing you the outside air temperature, a clock, and a compass. First-time passengers think it quite the party trick, naturally.

Even with the UK’s just-negotiated tariff break, a new Continental GT will not be cheap. This generation got noticeably more expensive than the outgoing model and will now put at least a $302,100 hole in your bank account. I say at least, because the final price on this particular First Edition stretched to $404,945. I’m glad I only learned that toward the end of my week with the car. For that much money, I’m more annoyed by the decade-old recycled Audi digital cockpit than any of the other borrowed bits. After all, Bentleys have (almost) always borrowed bits.

2025 Bentley Continental GT: Big power, big battery, big price Read More »

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale Turbo review: Italian charm that cuts both ways

Alfa Romeo Tonale, car review, Cars / 9u50fv / May 6, 2025

They say that with age comes wisdom, so it should come as no surprise that on the eve of Alfa Romeo’s 115th anniversary, the company that originally made its name competing in endurance races like the Targa Florio and Mille Miglia with flame-spitting sportscars is currently looking to increase its market share with a sensible, high-riding crossover.

Produced in Stellantis’ Pomigliano d’Arco assembly plant near Naples, Italy, alongside its mechanical twin the Dodge Hornet, the Tonale plug-in hybrid, introduced last year, helped the Italian automaker find a foothold at a time when many of the auto conglomerate’s brands have been struggling. Now, a non-hybrid version of Alfa’s answer to models like the BMW X1 and Audi Q3 has joined the fray, sporting turbocharged power, standard all-wheel drive, and the same sharp styling at a significantly lower base price. But old habits die hard, and as I discovered over the course of a few days with the latest iteration of the Tonale, even Alfa Romeo’s most pragmatic offerings have their fair share of quirks.

The new base model comes with a double overhead-cam 2.0 L inline four-cylinder engine producing 268 hp (200 kW) and 295 lb-ft (400 Nm) of torque. The turbocharged mill is paired with a nine-speed automatic transmission and an all-wheel drive system that can send up to fifty percent of the available torque to the rear wheels. While those numbers are down a bit compared to the Tonale Hybrid, at 3,715 lbs (1,685 kg), the 2.0 L Turbo is more than 400 lbs ( 181 kg) lighter than the PHEV model.

Alfa’s iconic goofy tooth-grin. Alfa Romeo

The 2.0 L Turbo offers more precise handling as a result, while its mid-five-second sprint to 60 mph (98 km/h) is similar to the hybrid’s, despite the latter’s power advantage. EPA fuel economy figures of 21 mpg city (11.2 L/100 km), 29 mpg highway (8.11 L/100 km), and 24 mpg combined (9.8 L/100 km) indicate that the 2.0 L Turbo is thirstier, though. On a drive from LA to Palm Springs and back—which included a bit of canyon driving along the way—I saw an average of about 26 mpg (9 L/100 km).

2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale Turbo review: Italian charm that cuts both ways Read More »

The BYD Dolphin review: Here’s what we’re missing out on in America

BYD Dolphin, car review, Cars / Beth Washington / April 29, 2025

Zero to 62 mph (0–100 km/h) takes 7.0 seconds, and the Dolphin tops out at 99 mph (160 km/h). DC fast charging is capped at 88 kW, or 65 kW for the smaller battery, which means it takes 29 minutes to get from 30 to 80 percent state of charge. The performance sounds rather hot hatch-y until you realize the top-spec car weighs 3,655 lbs (1,658 kg), which is a lot for a family hatchback.

BYD Dolphin interior — It’s quite dark in here. Credit: Alex Goy

The interior is fine. There are plenty of neat design quirks, like funky door handles and swoopy surfaces, that make being in there rather pleasant. It’s called the Dolphin, so you can’t expect it to take itself too seriously, but it’s refreshingly fun without seeming tacky. Drivers get a 5-inch display for speed, range, etc., and while it’s a bit on the small side, it’s not the end of the world. Everything else is run through a 12.8-inch touchscreen in the center of the car.

This screen has a party trick

It’s not any mere rectangle, though; it rotates. You can have your map, apps, and whatever else in portrait or landscape at the push of a button. Unless, sadly, you want to use Apple CarPlay. It’s landscape-only for that. It’s fun to show people that you have a wobbly screen, but after messing with it a couple of times, you’ll find your orientation of choice and keep it there.

Rear passengers are taken care of, as are the tall. There’s a 12.2 cubic foot (345 L) trunk, which isn’t the biggest in the world, but it’ll take a small family’s weekly shop and the usual household “stuff” without issue.

The main instrument panel is sparse but functional. Alex Goy

All in all, on paper at least, it seems like a pleasant thing that can fit into most families’ lives without too many issues (so long as they have a home charger).

It’s as pleasingly quick off the line as its numbers suggest, which helps in city traffic, and its electric insta-torque means overtaking on the highway isn’t an issue, either. Of course, there are drive modes to play with—Eco, Normal, Sport, and Snow—but to be honest, leaving it in Normal and cruising around is probably what you’ll end up doing the most. It doesn’t sap power at an alarming rate, nor does it dull the controls. Throttle response is smooth, and brake regen isn’t too grabby, either.

The BYD Dolphin review: Here’s what we’re missing out on in America Read More »

2025 VW Golf GTI: Buttons are back on the menu, smiles never went away

car review, Cars, First drive, Volkswagen Golf GTI / Beth Washington / April 24, 2025

What’s new?

The improvements for model year 2025 amount to new bumpers—shades of Mk2, anybody?—and an illuminated VW badge that would have made you the coolest Beastie Boy in 1986. There are also adaptive front fog lights that turn with the wheels, and VW’s improved 12.9-inch infotainment system has replaced the old 10.25-inch unit. The wireless charging pad for mobile devices is now capable of 15 W, and the much-disliked capacitive multifunction steering wheel has been replaced by a wheel with plastic buttons. Hooray!

The base GTI starts at $32,445, but you’ll want to at least splash out for the $37,420 SE if only for the fantastic ArtVelours seats that previously were only found in the Europe-only Clubsport. The best wheels are found on the $40,880 Autobahn—19-inch telephone dials that evoke the Mk5. The Autobahn also benefits from adaptive dampers, a heads-up display, a parking assistant, leather seats (with 12-way power adjustment for the driver), ventilated front seats, and three-zone climate control.

Golf interiors have always been spartan. Volkswagen

A word of warning about the infotainment. The Wi-Fi stopped working on our test car, which prevented CarPlay from operating. While there is a pair of USB-C ports up front, CarPlay over USB does not appear to be an option. VW PR was not particularly surprised to hear of this malfunction; we had been issued navigation road books for the drive to Summit Point in West Virginia for just this eventuality, but no other journalists reported problems, so it seems to be a random if annoying bug that may well afflict any VW with this 12.9-inch system, at least until VW patches it.

Automakers are making a lot of heavy crossovers and SUVs now, so I mostly have to drive heavy crossovers and SUVs these days. Consequently, any time in something that doesn’t sit a foot off the ground is a refreshing change. Even more refreshing is the 3,188 lb (1,446 kg) curb weight. Sure, a few hundred pounds of the metastasizing weight of modern cars comes with better crash protection, and mod-cons like ventilated seats add a bit of mass, but the Golf has all that stuff and still tips the scales at less than a ton and a half. More of this, please.

2025 VW Golf GTI: Buttons are back on the menu, smiles never went away Read More »