car review

The most efficient Crosstrek ever? Subaru’s hybrid gets a bit rugged.

car review, Cars, First drive, Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid / Beth Washington / September 30, 2025

MG2 then sits at the rear of the CVT, linked via a planetary gearset, and working in concert with the gasoline engine to power the wheels. Alone, MG2 can also manage a minimal mile or so of EV-only range at a max of 19 mph (30.5 km/h)—but more importantly, boosts total low-end torque and high-end horsepower, as well as handling regenerative braking. (We’re still waiting on the exact horsepower contribution and will update this when we hear back from Subaru.)

It might be a boxer, but it’s no heavyweight

The Atkinson 2.5 L puts out just 162 hp (119 kW) and 154 lb-ft (209 Nm) of torque on its own, but MG2 contributes enough juice for combined system rating peaks of 194 hp (143 kW). That’s an improvement of 14 hp versus the ICE-only (non-Atkinson) 2.5 L Boxer’s 180 hp (and 178 lb-ft). Those numbers might still seem paltry compared to so many other automakers in the modern era, which responded to governmental regulations by hybridizing ever bigger and heavier cars to make them more powerful rather than necessarily more efficient—BMW’s gargantuan M5 stands out as a recent offender. Not so for Crosstrek, which still tips the scales at a relatively svelte 3,662 pounds (1,661 kg), further contributing to efficiency while accelerating.

There’s a horizontally opposed boxer engine under there. And the orange HV cables are a clue there’s a hybrid system, too. Michael Teo Van Runkle

The new Crosstrek Hybrid only manages insignificant weight savings compared to 3,717 lbs (1,686 kg) for the previous plug-in, which boasted 17 miles (27 km) of all-electric range. But that generation therefore sacrificed trunk space to house a much larger 8.8-kWh lithium-ion battery. Dual motors and the smaller battery pack do contribute to a 400-pound (181-kg) gain versus the equivalent non-hybrid variant of the current generation, though. Yet in addition to the power improvements, fuel economy jumps up to EPA ratings of 36 mpg (6.5.L//100 km) city, 36 highway, and (therefore) 36 combined—38 percent better than the ICE Crosstrek, according to Subaru.

In back-to-back drives through the forested hills of northern Oregon and southern Washington, punching the go pedal in a Crosstrek Hybrid brings on a much more potent rush of throttle response and acceleration, far outpacing the naturally aspirated engine. The constant-velocity transmission simulates shifts despite effectively holding the hybrid system in its happy place, and the sound of MG2 working produces a fun little whine, almost like a turbocharger. All while the Symmetrical AWD system smoothly and predictably meters traction out to each wheel in quintessential Subaru fashion.

The most efficient Crosstrek ever? Subaru’s hybrid gets a bit rugged. Read More »

zr1,-gtd,-and-america’s-new-nurburgring-war

ZR1, GTD, and America’s new Nürburgring war

car review, Cars, Chevrolet Corvette ZR1, Corvette ZR1X, Features, First drive, Ford Mustang GTD, Nordschleife, Nurburgring / Mike M. / September 29, 2025

Drive quickly and make a lot of horsepower.

Ford and Chevy set near-identical lap times with very different cars; we drove both.

Credit: Tim Stevens | Aurich Lawson

There’s a racetrack with a funny name in Germany that, in the eyes of many international enthusiasts, is the de facto benchmark for automotive performance. But the Nürburgring, a 13-mile (20 km) track often called the Green Hell, rarely hits the radar of mainstream US performance aficionados. That’s because American car companies rarely take the time to run cars there, and if they do, it’s in secrecy, to test pre-production machines cloaked in camouflage without publishing official times.

The track’s domestic profile has lately been on the rise, though. Late last year, Ford became the first American manufacturer to run a sub-7-minute lap: 6: 57.685 from its ultra-high-performance Mustang GTD. It then did better, announcing a 6: 52.072 lap time in May. Two months later, Chevrolet set a 6: 49.275 lap time with the hybrid Corvette ZR1X, becoming the new fastest American car around that track.

It’s a vehicular war of escalation, but it’s about much more than bragging rights.

The Green Hell as a must-visit for manufacturers

The Nürburgring is a delightfully twisted stretch of purpose-built asphalt and concrete strewn across the hills of western Germany. It dates back to the 1920s and has hosted the German Grand Prix for a half-century before it was finally deemed too unsafe in the late 1970s.

It’s still a motorsports mecca, with sports car racing events like the 24 Hours of the Nürburgring drawing hundreds of thousands of spectators, but today, it’s better known as the ultimate automotive performance proving ground.

It offers an unmatched variety of high-speed corners, elevation changes, and differing surfaces that challenge the best engineers in the world. “If you can develop a car that goes fast on the Nürburgring, it’s going to be fast everywhere in the whole world,” said Brian Wallace, the Corvette ZR1’s vehicle dynamics engineer and the driver who set that car’s fast lap of 6: 50.763.

“When you’re going after Nürburgring lap time, everything in the car has to be ten tenths,” said Greg Goodall, Ford’s chief program engineer for the Mustang GTD. “You can’t just use something that is OK or decent.”

Thankfully, neither of these cars is merely decent.

Mustang, deconstructed

You know the scene in Robocop where a schematic displays how little of Alex Murphy’s body remains inside that armor? Just enough of Peter Weller’s iconic jawline remains to identify the man, but the focus is clearly on the machine.

That’s a bit like how Multimatic creates the GTD, which retains just enough Mustang shape to look familiar, but little else.

Multimatic, which builds the wild Ford GT and also helms many of Ford’s motorsports efforts, starts with partially assembled Mustangs pulled from the assembly line, minus fenders, hood, and roof. Then the company guts what’s left in the middle.

Ford’s partner Multimatic cut as much of the existing road car chassis as it could for the GTD. Tim Stevens

“They cut out the second row seat area where our suspension is,” Ford’s Goodall said. “They cut out the rear floor in the trunk area because we put a flat plate on there to mount the transaxle to it. And then they cut the rear body side off and replace that with a wide-body carbon-fiber bit.”

A transaxle is simply a fun name for a rear-mounted transmission—in this case, an eight-speed dual-clutch unit mounted on the rear axle to help balance the car’s weight.

The GTD needs as much help as it can get to offset the heft of the 5.2-liter supercharged V8 up front. It gets a full set of carbon-fiber bodywork, too, but the resulting package still weighs over 4,300 lbs (1,950 kg).

With 815 hp (608 kW) and 664 lb-ft (900 Nm) of torque, it’s the most powerful road-going Mustang of all time, and it received other upgrades to match, including carbon-ceramic brake discs at the corners and the wing to end all wings slung off the back. It’s not only big; it’s smart, featuring a Formula One-style drag-reduction system.

At higher speeds, the wing’s element flips up, enabling a 202 mph (325 km/h) top speed. No surprise, that makes this the fastest factory Mustang ever. At a $325,000 starting price, it had better be, but when it comes to the maximum-velocity stakes, the Chevrolet is in another league.

More Corvette

You lose the frunk but gain cooling and downforce. Tim Stevens

On paper, when it comes to outright speed and value, the Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 seems to offer far more bang for what is still a significant number of bucks. To be specific, the ZR1 starts at about $175,000, which gets you a 1,064 hp (793 kW) car that will do 233 mph (375 km/h) if you point it down a road long enough.

Where the GTD is a thorough reimagining of what a Mustang can be, the ZR1 sticks closer to the Corvette script, offering more power, more aerodynamics, and more braking without any dramatic internal reconfiguration. That’s because it was all part of the car’s original mission plan, GM’s Brian Wallace told me.

“We knew we were going to build this car,” he said, “knowing it had the backbone to double the horsepower, put 20 percent more grip in the car, and oodles of aero.”

At the center of it all is a 5.5-liter twin-turbocharged V8. You can get a big wing here, too, but it isn’t active like the GTD’s.

Chevrolet engineers bolstered the internal structure at the back of the car to handle the extra downforce at the rear. Up front, the frunk is replaced by a duct through the hood, providing yet more grip to balance things. Big wheels, sticky tires, and carbon-ceramic brakes round out a package that looks a little less radical on the outside than the Mustang and substantially less retooled on the inside, but clearly no less capable.

The engine bay of a yellow Corvette ZR1. — A pair of turbochargers lurk behind that rear window. Credit: Tim Stevens

And if that’s not enough, Chevrolet has the 1,250 hp (932 kW), $208,000 ZR1X on offer, which adds the Corvette E-Ray’s hybrid system into the mix. That package does add more weight, but the result is still a roughly 4,000-lb (1,814 kg) car, hundreds less than the Ford.

’Ring battles

Ford and Chevy’s battle at the ‘ring blew up this summer, but both brands have tested there for years. Chevrolet has even set official lap times in the past, including the previous-generation Corvette Z06’s 7: 22.68 in 2012. Despite that, a fast lap time was not in the initial plan for the new ZR1 and ZR1X. Drew Cattell, ZR1X vehicle dynamics engineer and the driver of that 6: 49.275 lap, told me it “wasn’t an overriding priority” for the new Corvette.

But after developing the cars there so extensively, they decided to give it a go. “Seeing what the cars could do, it felt like the right time. That we had something we were proud of and we could really deliver with,” he said.

Ford, meanwhile, had never set an official lap time at the ‘ring, but it was part of the GTD’s raison d’être: “That was always a goal: to go under seven minutes. And some of it was to be the first American car ever to do it,” Ford’s Goodall said.

That required extracting every bit of performance, necessitating a last-minute change during final testing. In May of 2024, after the car’s design had been finalized by everyone up the chain of command at Ford, the test team in Germany determined the GTD needed a little more front grip.

To fix it, Steve Thompson, a dynamic technical specialist at Ford, designed a prototype aerodynamic extension to the vents in the hood. “It was 3D-printed, duct taped,” Goodall said. That design was refined and wound up on the production car, boosting frontal downforce on the GTD without adding drag.

Chevrolet’s development process relied not only on engineers in Germany but also on work in the US. “The team back home will keep on poring over the data while we go to sleep, because of the time difference,” Cattell said, “and then they’ll have something in our inbox the next morning to try out.”

When it was time for the Corvette’s record-setting runs, there wasn’t much left to change, just a few minor setup tweaks. “Maybe a millimeter or two,” Wallace said, “all within factory alignment settings.”

A few months later, it was my turn.

Behind the wheel

No, I wasn’t able to run either of these cars at the Nürburgring, but I was lucky enough to spend one day with both the GTD and the ZR1. First was the Corvette at one of America’s greatest racing venues: the Circuit of the Americas, a 3.5-mile track and host of the Formula One United States Grand Prix since 2012.

A head-on shot of a yellow Corvette ZR1. — How does 180 mph on the back straight at the Circuit of the Americas sound? Credit: Tim Stevens

I’ve been lucky to spend a lot of time in various Corvettes over the years, but none with performance like this. I was expecting a borderline terrifying experience, but I couldn’t have been more wrong. Despite its outrageous speed and acceleration, the ZR1 really is still a Corvette.

On just my second lap behind the wheel of the ZR1, I was doing 180 mph down the back straight and running a lap time close to the record set by a $1 million McLaren Senna a few years before. The Corvette is outrageously fast—and frankly exhausting to drive thanks to the monumental G forces—but it’s more encouraging than intimidating.

The GTD was more of a commitment. I sampled one at The Thermal Club near Palm Springs, California, a less auspicious but more technical track with tighter turns and closer walls separating them. That always amps up the pressure a bit, but the challenging layout of the track really forced me to focus on extracting the most out of the Mustang at low and high speeds.

The GTD has a few tricks up its sleeve to help with that, including an advanced multi-height suspension that drops it by about 1.5 inches (4 cm) at the touch of a button, optimizing the aerodynamic performance and lowering the roll height of the car.

A black Ford Mustang GTD in profile.

Heavier and less powerful than the Corvette, the Mustang GTD has astonishing levels of cornering grip. Credit: Tim Stevens

While road-going Mustangs typically focus on big power in a straight line, the GTD’s real skill is astonishing grip and handling. Remember, the GTD is only a few seconds slower on the ‘ring than the ZR1, despite weighing somewhere around 400 pounds (181 kg) more and having nearly 200 fewer hp (149 kw).

The biggest difference in feel between the two, though, is how they accelerate. The ZR1’s twin-turbocharged V8 delivers big power when you dip in the throttle and then just keeps piling on more and more as the revs increase. The supercharged V8 in the Mustang, on the other hand, is more like an instantaneous kick in the posterior. It’s ferocious.

Healthy competition

The ZR1 is brutally fast, yes, but it’s still remarkably composed, and it feels every bit as usable and refined as any of the other flavors of modern Corvette. The GTD, on the other hand, is a completely different breed than the base Mustang, every bit the purpose-built racer you’d expect from a race shop like Multimatic.

Chevrolet did the ZR1 and ZR1X development in-house. Cattell said that is a huge point of pride for the team. So, too, is setting those ZR1 and ZR1X lap times using General Motors’ development engineers. Ford turned to a pro race driver for its laps.

A racing driver stands in front his car as mechanics and engineers celebrate in the background. — Ford factory racing driver Dirk Muller was responsible for setting the GTD’s time at the ‘ring. Credit: Giles Jenkyn Photography LTD/Ford

An engineer in a fire suit stands next to a yellow Corvette, parked on the Nurburgring. — GM vehicle dynamics engineer Drew Cattell set the ZR1X’s Nordschleife time. Credit: Chevrolet

That, though, was as close to a barb as I could get out of any engineer on either side of this new Nürburgring. Both teams were extremely complimentary of each other.

“We’re pretty proud of that record. And I don’t say this in a snarky way, but we were first, and you can’t ever take away first,” Ford’s Goodall said. “Congratulations to them. We know better than anybody how hard of an accomplishment or how big of an accomplishment it is and how much effort goes into it.”

But he quickly added that Ford isn’t done. “You’re not a racer if you’re just going to take that lying down. So it took us approximately 30 seconds to align that we were ready to go back and do something about it,” he said.

In other words, this Nürburgring war is just beginning.

ZR1, GTD, and America’s new Nürburgring war Read More »

Small, affordable, efficient: A lot to like about the 2026 Nissan Leaf

car review, Cars, First drive, nissan leaf / Mike M. / September 12, 2025

Smaller on the outside, bigger on the inside, and it goes farther on a single charge.

The color is called Seabreeze Blue Pearl, and isn’t it great it’s not silver or grey? Credit: Nissan

SAN DIEGO—The original Nissan Leaf was a car with a mission. Long before Elon Musk set his sights on Tesla selling vast numbers of electric vehicles to the masses, then-Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn wanted Nissan to shift half a million Leafs a year in the early 2010s. That didn’t quite come to pass, but by 2020, it had sold its 500,000th EV, which went from its factory in Sunderland, England, to a customer in Norway.

Pioneering though they were, both first- and second-generation Leafs were compromised. They were adapted from existing internal combustion engine platforms, with the electric powertrains shoehorned inside. The cars’ real handicaps were a lack of liquid cooling for the battery packs. Like an older Porsche 911, the Leaf was air-cooled, albeit with none of the collector value. That’s all changed for generation three.

The new Leaf is built on a dedicated EV platform shared with Nissan’s alliance partners Renault and Mitsubishi, and which we have previously seen used to good effect in the Nissan Ariya. The benefits of using a platform purpose-designed for electric propulsion are obvious from the space efficiency. The new car is 3 inches (75 mm) shorter from the outside, but offers nearly 9 inches (221 mm) more rear leg room (yes, really), making it a much more suitable place to put adults.

Is it a sedan? Is it a crossover? Nissan

Although the new Leaf is 0.8 inches (20 mm) wider, it’s a few mm shorter and has a lower drag coefficient (Cd 0.26), so the overall effect is a more efficient shape. The nose bears a family resemblance to the Ariya, and the body style is sort of a crossover, sort of a fastback sedan, depending on your frame of reference.

Here and there, you’ll notice iconography that calls out the automaker’s name: two vertical stripes (ni in Japanese), then three horizontal ones (san in Japanese). I’m told that if you look, there are some ginkgo leaves as Easter eggs hidden in the design, but I did not find them during our hours with the car.

For now, there’s one powertrain option: a 214 hp (160 kW), 262 lb-ft (355 Nm) motor (packaged together with its inventor and reducer), powered by a 75 kWh (net) lithium-ion battery pack. The battery pack is integrated into the car’s thermal management system, which also loops in the chiller, the motor, and the HVAC system. It can fast-charge at up to 150 kW via the NACS port built into its left side (or using a CCS1 adapter here) and should charge from 10–80 percent in 35 minutes. On the driver’s side is a J1772 port for AC charging that can also work bidirectionally to send up to 1.5 kW of AC power to an external device via an adapter.

Nissan said it kept the J1772 port because it expects to sell the new Leaf to a lot of legacy customers who already have their own home charger, and it wanted to minimize the number of adapters necessary.

Let’s talk trim levels

How far it goes on a single charge depends on which trim level you’re in. Nissan brought some preproduction Leaf Platinum+ models to the first drive. These are very highly equipped, with an electrochromic dimming roof, the LED head- and taillights you see in the images, a couple of AC outlets inside the car (with the ability to power up to 3.4 kW across two outlets), and a better sound system. But it also comes on 19-inch alloy wheels, and as we all know, bigger wheels mean smaller range. Indeed, the Leaf Platinum+ has a range of 259 miles (417 km) on a single charge.

The $34,230 SV+ loses the panoramic roof and the interior V2L outlets, and you’ll have to manually open and close the tailgate at the back. And the alloy wheels are an inch smaller, which increases the range to 288 miles (464 km).

But it keeps the heated front seats and the twin 14.3-inch displays (one for your instruments, one for infotainment) with Google built in. For the Platinum+ and SV+, that means onboard Google Maps with a route planner that will take into account your state of charge and which can precondition the battery if it knows your destination is a fast charger.

19-inch Nissan Leaf wheel — Big wheels have their drawbacks. Credit: Nissan

Nissan is only including the Google connected services for the first year, though—after that, owners will have to pay a monthly fee, although Nissan wasn’t able to tell us how much that is. Conveniently, both wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are included and will continue to work after the year’s trial. And you can manually precondition the battery for charging, but automatic preconditioning via the infotainment system will not work without an active subscription.

The SV+ and Platinum can also be optioned with a heat pump ($300).

But the $29,990 S+ cannot. And it lacks the twin displays of the car you see in the images, which means no automatic battery preconditioning, although like the more expensive trims it does still have wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. You also get 18-inch steel wheels with aero hubcaps, and a range of 303 miles (487 km) on a single charge. See what I mean about wheel size and range?

How does it drive?

A Nissan Leaf — Turning over a new leaf. Credit: Nissan

I’d very much like to spend some time in an S+ and an SV+, if only to see what difference a larger tire sidewall makes to the ride comfort. On 19-inch wheels, the ride was firm and translated bumps and divots through the suspension and into the cabin. There wasn’t much body roll, but your progress will be limited by the grip available to the low rolling-resistance tires—push too hard and the result is plenty of understeer.

But this is not a “push too hard” kind of EV. With just 214 hp, it accelerates quickly enough to get out of its own way, but it’s telling that Nissan did not share a 0–60 mph time during the briefing. (If I had to guess, I’d say between 5–6 seconds, which used to be considered very rapid.)

It has four drive modes—Eco, Normal, Sport, and Personal—with three different throttle maps and two steering weights to choose from. And there are now four levels of lift-off regenerative braking, which you toggle on with the left steering wheel paddle and off with the right paddle. You can’t turn regen completely off, so like General Motors’ family of EVs, the Leaf will not really coast and loses a few mph even on downhill stretches, as it converts some kinetic energy to electrical energy.

There’s also an e-Step button on the dash, which turns on maximum regen braking and may add some friction braking to the mix. Unlike using the paddles, this setting should remain on the next time you start the car. But neither of the full regen settings is able to bring the car to a complete stop—we were told that the feature is viewed with suspicion in some markets, including Japan, and like pop-out door handles, it appears that China is in the process of banning one-pedal driving entirely.

There are plenty of real buttons and switches in here. Nissan

Both e-Step and max-regen work very well in traffic or on a twisty road, where they simulate engine braking. But given the choice, I would use the paddles to control regen braking. That’s because, like the Mercedes EQ family of EVs, in this mode the brake pedal moves toward the firewall as the car slows. The engineer’s excuse for this is that the pedal moves by the same distance it would have moved had the driver used it to slow the car by the amount it has just slowed. But my rebuttal is that the brake pedal should always be where I expect to find it in an emergency, and if that’s an inch farther away, that’s not cool.

That’s really a minor gripe, though; no one says you have to push the e-Step switch on the dash. Slightly more annoying—but only slightly—is the wind noise from the sideview mirrors, which is noticeable even at 45 mph (72 km/h), although easily drowned out if you’re listening to something on the audio system.

For a daily driver, the third-generation Leaf is rather compelling, especially the S+, although the lack of heated front seats in that model might be too much of a deal-breaker, considering how important seat heaters are to EV efficiency in winter. (Because it’s more efficient to heat the driver than warm all the air in the car.)

The SV+ is more likely to be the sweet spot—this trim level can have the Seabreeze paint you see here or a white pearl, which are alternatives to the four shades available to the S+. The Hyundai Kona EV and Kia Niro EV are probably the Leaf’s two closest rivals, both of which are compelling cars. And the forthcoming Kia EV3 will probably also be cross-shopped. All of which is good news if you’re looking for a smaller, affordable electric car.

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

Small, affordable, efficient: A lot to like about the 2026 Nissan Leaf Read More »

2025 VW Jetta GLI: Save the manuals, but not like this

car review, Cars, Volkswagen Jetta GLI / Beth Washington / August 27, 2025

the American sedan take on a GTI

Specs mean nothing if you get the feel and execution wrong.

Built in Mexico, the Volkswagen Jetta is a North American sedan take on the Golf hatchback. Credit: Jim Resnick

Manual transmissions have gone the way of the dodo, but you can still find a few out there. Bless Volkswagen for keeping the helical gears turning, both literally and figuratively. The 2025 Jetta GLI, Volkswagen’s sporty sedan, still offers a gear lever with actual gears attached at the other end, and a third pedal hanging down from under the dash. Meanwhile, Golf GTI fans are still sobbing in their beer because 2024 was the last model year you could row your own in the hot hatch—now it’s paddles only.

Volkswagen updated the 2025 Jetta GLI with a new grille, LED headlights, and light bars that connect across both the front grille and rear taillights. There’s a red accent stripe that runs across the lower front fascia and turns up at the front corners, somewhat like The Joker’s lipstick, but way less menacing. It’s less distinctive than the Golf GTI, though, and the design even reminds me of the 2017-era Honda Accord a bit. So, yes, in a face-off, the Golf GTI wins.

The test GLI’s wheels get black paint with the Black Package (blackened wheels and side mirror caps). The Monument Gray color option pairs with a black roof, which must seem like a good idea to people who don’t live in the Southwest, where cars overheat before they’re even started.

A black Jetta wheel — Our test car had the black package. Credit: Jim Resnick

Performance: Punch without poetry

VW’s long-running EA888 2.0 L engine, which debuted back in 2007 in the Audi A3, resides under the hood. Now in its fourth turbocharged generation, it develops a healthy 228 hp (170 kW) and 258 lb-ft (350 Nm) of torque, entirely respectable numbers from modest displacement and compact external dimensions.

Mated to this particular 6-speed manual, the engine has its work cut out for itself. On my very first drive, before examining the technical data on gearbox ratios, I could tell that the manual 6-speed had massive gaps between first, second, and third gears.

Diving further into the gearing matter, the ratio spread between first and third gears is vastly wider in the 6-speed manual transmission than in the 7-speed DSG semi-automatic gearbox. This means that as you upshift the manual, the engine is faced with a huge drop in engine revs when you let out the clutch, placing the engine well below the rev range it would prefer to operate within to provide maximum power.

VW Jetta engine bay — EA888 in the house. Credit: Jim Resnick

Let’s look at the ratios, and remember that a lower numerical value means a “taller” or “higher” ratio, just like on multi-speed bicycles. The manual’s first gear is 3.77:1, where the DSG’s is 3.40:1. Upshift to the 2.09:1 second gear in the manual, and you select a gear that’s a whopping 55 percent taller than first gear. Conversely, the same 1-2 shift in the DSG (from 3.40:1 up to 2.75:1) results in a 19 percent taller gear ratio—a far narrower gap.

Third gear tells a similar story. The 6-speed manual’s third ratio (1.47:1) is 17 percent higher than the 1.77:1 ratio in the DSG (again, this “taller” gear giving 17 percent less mechanical advantage). Advantage: automatic.

Closer ratios mean better, faster engine torque recovery and better continued acceleration, because the engine will be spinning in the happier part of its power band—engines being happiest when revving at their torque peak and beyond.

Now, you might well argue that the manual’s third gear gives a higher top speed in-gear than the DSG automatic’s. And that’s 100 percent true. But it’s also irrelevant when you have three (or four!) more gears left to go in the transmission.

And then there’s the action of the shifter itself, with very long throws from forward to aft gates.

A white VW Jetta in profile

It’s quite handsome from some angles. Credit: Jim Resnick

But wait. I began this diatribe by complimenting the Jetta GLI for still offering a choice of manual or automatic gearbox. Indeed, if the manual gearbox had the DSG automatic’s ratios, the paragraphs above would have a very different tenor. The lesson here is that not all manuals are created equal.

We can also look objectively at the stopwatch. Using others’ published figures (don’t take our word for it), 0–60 mph figures tell the tale, as well. Car and Driver cites a time of 6.0 seconds to 60 mph for the manual GLI, where they achieved 5.6 seconds for the dash in the DSG automatic, a big gap.

Regardless of which transmission is used, a limited-slip differential tries to put the power down evenly, and adaptive suspension with multiple driving modes serves up a responsive connectedness to, or relative isolation from, the road surface. Compared to the standard GTI (not the Golf R), the Jetta GLI still rides with a greater accent on ride comfort, and that’s not always a bad thing, especially given the Jetta’s greater rear seat accommodations, which offer 2.4 inches (61 mm) more rear legroom than the GTI. Real adults can live back there for hours at a time without fidgeting, whereas you likely tickle that threshold in a GTI after a little over an hour.

Interior & tech

Inside, the GLI features perforated leather heated and cooled seats, a leather-wrapped and flat-bottom steering wheel that is still saddled with capacitive multifunction controls, a digital instrument cluster that can be configured with traditional dials or a compartmentalized digital-looking display, plus an 8-inch infotainment screen. While the latter may seem small compared to other cars that sport TV-size tablets perched on the dash, it at least comes fully equipped with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. There’s a slow creep elsewhere in the industry to make this functionality either optional or simply unavailable, which is unforgivable in an era where we can hardly survive without our smartphones.

While much of the controls sit within the infotainment touchscreen, major climate controls reside just below, using capacitive sliders. These sliders are not anywhere near as intuitive as switches and knobs, but at least you don’t need to hunt and peck through endless menus to find them while driving.

The Jetta isn’t as modern as the 8th-generation Golf inside, but it’s had a bit of a tech upgrade. Jim Resnick

The GLI comes standard with active driver assists, including blind-spot warning, forward collision warning, emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and emergency assist.

Volkswagen managed to incorporate some pragmatic features and comforts. A 15 W wireless and cooled charging pad sits up front, and the trunk sports 14.1 cubic feet (400 L) of space with an actual spare tire under the trunk floor (although it’s a compact spare with limited mileage range).

The premium Beats Audio system in the Jetta GLI pumps 400 W through nine speakers, including a subwoofer. With all those speakers and electrons going for it, I expected way more than it delivered. It creates muddy bass frequencies that are simply inescapable, either by attenuating the bass or by lowering subwoofer gain.

Despite the preponderance of directionless bass, the system produces very little body to the music played, whether it’s jazz from Bill Evans or punk from Bad Religion. Midrange and high-end reproduction is no better. Shrill treble joins the errant bass, making everything sound muddy and indistinct. Delicate acoustic piano passages have little clarity, and Joni Mitchell hides behind a giant curtain of Saran Wrap. Poor Joni.

Driving the GLI is sometimes joyful, as the engine responds eagerly across all RPMs. The chassis and suspension prove willing, though a bit soft for a sports sedan. VW’s steering feels communicative, but not among the best of the modern electrically boosted lot.

VW equips this GLI with all-season Hankook Energy GT tires, sized 225/40R18. I specifically cite these tires because they underperform for the GLI. They don’t produce grip adequate for a sporty sedan, and they come up short underpinning the GLI. So, on a scale of 1 to 10, if the GLI’s engine is a 9, if the gearbox is a 5, and the interior is an 8.5, the GLI’s Hankook tires are a 6.

The GLI’s brakes are a version of the tire story. Despite borrowing front rotors and calipers from the lovely Golf R, they proved grabby, overboosted, and touchy in the GLI. Like the gearbox and tires, specs can tell you nothing in terms of feel and execution.

The GLI’s fuel economy lands at a decent 26/36/30 city/highway/combined mpg (9/6.5/7.8 L/100 km). In thoroughly mixed driving, I achieved an average of 29.1 mpg (8 L/100 km) over my approximately 400 miles (644 km).

The overall truth

The 2025 Jetta GLI certainly possesses sporty aspirations, but a few things hold it back from being the complete package that its Golf GTI stablemate is. Although the Golf GTI no longer offers a manual, the GLI’s 6-speed transmission disappoints both in feel and performance, with huge gaps between cogs. Of course, this malady could be overcome by ordering a DSG automatic GLI, but then any fun gleaned by rowing your gears is also lost.

This car could be better than it is. Credit: Jim Resnick

Closer to the road, mediocre tires generate modest grip. Compared to the Golf, the Jetta gains in rear seat legroom but loses in feel, performance, and tenacity. If it’s performance with practicality you’re after, the $35,045 price of this GLI as tested will get you what you need. But you’ll want something a bit spicier.

A veteran of journalism, product planning and communications in the automotive and music space, Jim reports, critiques and lectures on autos, music and culture.

2025 VW Jetta GLI: Save the manuals, but not like this Read More »

Porsche’s best daily driver 911? The 2025 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid review.

car review, Cars, Features, Porsche 911 Carrera GTS, Porsche 911 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid / Beth Washington / August 15, 2025

An electric turbocharger means almost instant throttle response from the T-Hybrid.

Porsche developed a new T-Hybrid system for the 911, and it did a heck of a job. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Porsche 911 enthusiasts tend to be obsessive about their engines. Some won’t touch anything that isn’t air-cooled, convinced that everything went wrong when emissions and efficiency finally forced radiators into the car. Others love the “Mezger” engines; designed by engineer Hans Mezger, they trace their roots to the 1998 Le Mans-winning car, and no Porschephile can resist the added shine of a motorsports halo.

I’m quite sure none of them will feel the same way about the powertrain in the new 911 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid (MSRP: $175,900), and I think that’s a crying shame. Because not only is the car’s technology rather cutting-edge—you won’t find this stuff outside an F1 car—but having spent several days behind the wheel, I can report it might just be one of the best-driving, too.

T-Hybrid

This is not just one of Porsche’s existing flat-six engines with an electric motor bolted on; it’s an all-new 3.6 L engine designed to comply with new European legislation that no longer lets automakers rich out a fuel mixture under high load to improve engine cooling. Instead, the engine has to maintain the same 14.7:1 stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio (also known as lambda = 1) across the entire operating range, thus allowing the car’s catalytic converters to work most efficiently.

The 911 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid at dawn patrol. Jonathan Gitlin

Because the car uses a hybrid powertrain, Porsche moved some of the ancillaries. There’s no belt drive; the 400 V hybrid system powers the air conditioning electrically now via its 1.9 kWh lithium-ion battery, and the water pump is integrated into the engine block. That rearrangement means the horizontally opposed engine is now 4.3 inches (110 mm) lower than it was before, which meant Porsche could use that extra space in the engine bay to fit the power electronics, like the car’s pulse inverters and DC-DC converters.

And instead of tappets, Porsche has switched to using roller cam followers to control the engine’s valves, as in motorsport. These solid cam followers don’t need manual adjustment at service time, and they reduce friction losses compared to bucket tappets.

The added displacement—0.6 L larger than the engine you’ll find in the regular 911—is to compensate for not being able to alter the fuel ratio. And for the first time in several decades, there’s now only a single turbocharger. Normally, a larger-capacity engine and a single big turbo should be a recipe for plenty of lag, versus a smaller displacement and a turbocharger for each cylinder bank, as the former has larger components with more mass that needs to be moved.

The GTS engine grows in capacity by 20 percent. Porsche

That’s where one of the two electric motors comes in. This one is found between the compressor and the turbine wheel, and it’s only capable of 15 hp (11 kW), but it uses that to spin the turbine up to 120,000 rpm, hitting peak boost in 0.8 seconds. For comparison, the twin turbos you find in the current 3.0 L 911s take three times as long. Since the turbine is electrically controlled and the electric motor can regulate boost pressure, there’s no need for a wastegate.

The electrically powered turbocharger is essentially the same as the MGU-H used in Formula 1, as it can drive the turbine and also regenerate energy to the car’s traction battery. (The mighty 919 Hybrid race car, which took Porsche to three Le Mans wins last decade, was able to capture waste energy from its turbocharger, but unlike the 911 GTS or an F1 car, it didn’t use that same motor to spin the turbo up to speed.)

On its own, the turbocharged engine generates 478 hp (357 kW) and 420 lb-ft (570 Nm). However, there’s another electric motor, this one a permanent synchronous motor built into the eight-speed dual-clutch (PDK) transmission casing. This traction motor provides up to 53 hp (40 kW) and 110 lb-ft (150 Nm) of torque to the wheels, supplementing the internal combustion engine when needed. The total power and torque output are 532 hp (397 kW) and 449 lb-ft (609 Nm).

A grey Porsche 911 parked in a campsite — No Porsches were harmed during the making of this review, but one did get a little dusty. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Now that’s what I call throttle response

Conceptually, the T-Hybrid in the 911 GTS is quite different from the E-Hybrid system we’ve tested in various plug-in Porsches. Those allow for purely electric driving thanks to a clutch between transmission and electric traction motor—that’s not present in the T-Hybrid, where weight saving, performance, and emissions compliance were the goal rather than an increase in fuel efficiency.

Regardless of the intent, Porsche’s engineers have created a 911 with the best throttle response of any of them. Yes, even better than the naturally aspirated GT3, with its engine packed full of motorsports mods.

I realize this is a bold claim. But I’ve been saying for a while now that I prefer driving the all-electric Taycan to the 911 because the immediacy of an electric motor beats even the silkiest internal combustion engine in terms of that first few millimeters of throttle travel. The 3.0 L twin-turbo flat-six in most 911s doesn’t suffer from throttle lag like it might have in the 1980s, but there’s still an appreciable delay between initial tip-in and everything coming on song.

Initially, I suspected that the electric motor in the PDK case was responsible for the instantaneous way the GTS responds from idle, but according to Porsche’s engineers, all credit for that belongs to the electric turbocharger. However the engineers did it, this is a car that still provides 911 drivers the things they like about internal combustion engines—the sound, the fast refueling, using gears—but with the snappiness of a fast Taycan or Macan.

Centerlock wheels are rather special. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Porsche currently makes about 10 different 911 coupe variants, from the base 911 Carrera to the 911 GT3 RS. The GTS (also available with all-wheel drive as a Carrera 4 GTS for an extra $8,100) is marginally less powerful and slightly slower than the current 911 Turbo, and it’s heavier but more powerful than the 911 GT3.

In the past, I’ve thought of GTS-badged Porsches as that company’s take on the ultimate daily driver as opposed to a track day special, and it’s telling that you can also order the GTS with added sunshine, either as a cabriolet (in rear- or all-wheel drive) or as a Targa (with all-wheel drive). You have to remember to tick the box for rear seats now, though—these are a no-cost option rather than being fitted as standard.

The T-Hybrid powertrain adds 103 lbs compared to the previous GTS, so it’s not a lightweight track-day model, even if the non-hybrid GTS was almost nine seconds slower around the Nürburgring. On track, driven back to back with some of the others, you might be able to notice the extra weight, but I doubt it. I didn’t take the GTS on track, but I drove it to one; a trip to Germany to see the Nürburgring 24 race with some friends presented an opportunity to test this and another Porsche that hadn’t made their way to the East Coast press fleet yet.

I’d probably pick that Panamera if most of my driving was on the autobahn. With a top speed of 194 mph (312 km/h) the 911 GTS is capable of holding its own on the derestricted stretches even if its Vmax is a few miles per hour slower than the four-door sedan. But the 911 is a smaller, lighter, and more nimble car that moves around a bit more, and you sit a lot lower to the ground, amplifying the sensation of speed. The combined effect was that the car felt happier with a slightly lower cruising speed of 180 km/h rather than 200 km/h or more in the Panamera. Zero-62 mph (100 km/h) times don’t mean much outside the tollbooth but should take 2.9 seconds with launch control.

A Porsche 911 seen from the top — Despite the nondescript gray paint, the GTS T-Hybrid still turned plenty of heads. Credit: Jonathan Gitlin

Keep going

For the rest of the time, the 911 GTS evoked far more driving pleasure. Rear-wheel steering aids agility at lower speeds, and there are stiffer springs, newly tuned dampers, and electrohydraulic anti-roll bars (powered by the hybrid’s high-voltage system). Our test car was fitted with the gigantic (420 mm front, 410 mm rear) carbon ceramic brakes, and at the rear, the center lock wheels are 11.5 inches in width.

In the dry, I never got close to finding the front tires’ grip limit. The rear-wheel steering is noticeable, particularly when turning out of junctions, but never to the degree where you start thinking about correcting a slide unless you provoke the tires into breaking traction with the throttle. Even on the smooth tarmac preferred by German municipalities, the steering communicated road conditions from the tires, and the Alcantara-wrapped steering wheel is wonderful to grip in your palms.

So it’s predictably great to drive on mountain roads in Sport or Sport+. However, the instant throttle response means it’s also a better drive in Normal at 30 km/h as you amble your way through a village than the old GTS or any of the 3.0 L cars. That proved handy after Apple Maps sent me down a long dirt road on the way to my rental house, as well as for navigating the Nürburgring campsite, although I think I now appreciate why Porsche made the 911 Dakar (and regret declining that first drive a few years ago).

Happily, my time with the 911 GTS didn’t reveal any software bugs, and I prefer the new, entirely digital main instrument display to the old car’s analog tachometer sandwiched between two multifunction displays. Apple CarPlay worked well enough, and the compact cabin means that ergonomics are good even for those of us with shorter arms. There is a standard suite of advanced driver assistance systems, including traffic sign detection (which handily alerts you when the speed limit changes) and collision warning. Our test car included the optional InnoDrive system that adds adaptive cruise control, as well as a night vision system. On the whole, the ADAS was helpful, although if you don’t remember to disable the lane keep assist at the start of each journey, you might find it intruding mid-corner, should the car think you picked a bad line.

My only real gripe with the 911 GTS T-Hybrid is the fact that, with some options, you’re unlikely to get much change from $200,000. Yes, I know inflation is a thing, and yes, I know that’s still 15 percent less than the starting price of a 911 GT3 Touring, which isn’t really much of a step up from this car in terms of the driving experience on the road. However, a 911 Carrera T costs over $40,000 less than the T-Hybrid, and while it’s slower and less powerful, it’s still available with a six-speed manual. That any of those three would make an excellent daily driver 911 is a credit to Porsche, but I think if I had the means, the sophistication of the T-Hybrid system and its scalpel-sharp responsiveness might just win the day.

Porsche’s best daily driver 911? The 2025 Carrera GTS T-Hybrid review. Read More »

2025 Subaru WRX tS review: A scalpel-sharp chassis lets this car dance

car review, Cars, Subaru WRX / Shannon Garcia / August 7, 2025

Lots of suspension tweaks but no extra power for this WRX variant.

Subaru went with a sedan for the current version of the WRX. Credit: Jim Resnick

The Subaru WRX has always been the equivalent of an automotive shrug. Not because it lacks character but because it simply doesn’t care what others think. It’s a punk rock band with enough talent to fill stadiums but band members who don’t seem to care about chasing fame. And the STI versions of yesteryear proved so talented that fame chased them.

For 2025, Subaru updated the WRX to now include the tS, which at first glance appears to be the same flannel-wearing street fighter. But looks can be deceiving. The tS hides sharpened tools underneath, translating to better handling and responsiveness.

What does “tS” really mean?

Subaru positions the tS as being tuned by STI, but it’s not an STI return. Sure, that’s technically true; only Subaru can name something STI. And to be clear, there’s no extra power here, no gigantic wing that takes out flocks of birds, and no pink STI badge on the trunk. But the tS is imbued with enough STI-ness to make a case.

A blue Subaru WRX in profile

The WRX still sticks to the same recipe that made it so popular, starting in the late ’90s. Credit: Jim Resnick

The hardware updates begin with electronically controlled dampers, stiffer engine mounts, a reworked steering rack, and huge, gold-painted Brembo brakes from the WRX TR, with six-piston calipers in front and two-piston units in the rear. Subaru’s engineers didn’t try to reinvent the WRX. They just put some finishing touches on it.

The engine story remains essentially the same. A 2.4 L turbocharged flat-four still produces 271 hp (202 kW) and 258 lb-ft (350 Nm) of torque from 12.0 psi of turbo boost, unchanged from the standard WRX, and the familiar boxer thrum remains. Power courses through a six-speed manual transmission to Subaru’s faithful symmetrical all-wheel-drive system. And not that most WRX buyers or fans would care much, but the sportster logs low EPA figures of just 19/26/22 city/highway combined MPG (12.4/9/10.7 L/100 km).

Driving: Precision dancing

The WRX tS doesn’t go any quicker than the base WRX since they both carry the same output, same transmission, and same essential guts and weight, but it’s no less fun. I didn’t do any measured testing of hard acceleration times, but I did dance around with the tS on my private test track in the Arizona desert.

A blue Subaru WRX seen from the rear 3/4s — Quad pipes burble pleasantly. Credit: Jim Resnick

I’m no Fred Astaire, but cinched into a willing, capable car, finding Ginger Rogers in front of you is rare. When I do, it’s time for celebration. Meet Ginger. As a WRX, she might be wearing ripped jeans and rubber soles, but when gliding across this dance floor (sinewy roads), no one cares.

Over the years, several plucky, beasty sportsters have punched way above their weight classes. The STIs of the past; the late, great Integra Type R (yes, I’m old enough to have tested it when new); the odd ’60s vintage racing Mini Cooper S (“the flying shoebox”); and various strains of VW Golf GTI all conspire to plant a smile on the face of even the most jaded car snob. This is the tS.

The Robert test

Knowing what good entertainment is worth, I brought my friend Robert along for an afternoon of WRXing. He owns multiple exotic sports cars, loves talking about them (but has never taken them to the track), and can rarely be bothered to discuss anything else with wheels. Robert flies in private jets, wears Brioni, and has a place on Park Avenue stocked with a case of Dom. (Perignon, that is.) “Jaded” is scratching the surface.

Subaru WRX tS interior — It’s very blue in here. Credit: Jim Resnick

After about 10 solid minutes of no-nonsense, twisting private test-track floggery at 6,000 rpm, full of opposite-lock steering and ABS tickling, I looked over at Robert as we came to a stop. I couldn’t have slapped the grin off his face if I tried.

“They sell this to the public?” he asked incredulously.

I relayed some more facts to Robert before we roared off again.

“These new adaptive dampers offer three modes, including Comfort, Normal, and Sport. There’s also a fourth Individual setting where you pick your throttle response, steering weight, damper stiffness, and all-wheel-drive behavior,” I told him.

He demanded to go again.

Subaru WRX engine bay — STI has not worked its magic under here. Credit: Jim Resnick

“Yeah, also, Subaru reduced the body roll rate by 30 percent from the WRX TR and limited brake dive and acceleration squat by 50 percent, I think through the new dampers,” I said as we entered a high-speed corner at about 95 mph.

It was at this point that Robert asked if we had a sick bag onboard. He was quiet the rest of the afternoon.

To be sure, I love an overachiever, and that’s the WRX tS. The smart cookies out there in Subie-world will take care of the tS engine in creative ways to bring into fuller balance the power/handling equilibrium, because if someone messes with the tS suspension, they’d be nuts. It’s about as stiff and capable as I could ever want in a car that needed to be driven on real roads. Perhaps grippier rubber? But even then, more grip would throw off the natural chuckability of the tS, and I love chuckable cars. The tS’s steering quickness and feel are both right on point.

Interior and daily use: Highs and lows

Big seat bolsters, but they don’t fit every back. Jim Resnick

Inside, the WRX tS doesn’t reinvent the Subaru design playbook, but it does offer upgrades. The most obvious are the Recaro front seats, which are a mixed bag. They provide oodles of support but are perhaps too aggressive for some body shapes. They’re extremely snug and hold you in place, provided you fit into them. I’m not that broad-shouldered, but the Recaro’s side bolsters nearly allow air to pass between my back and the seatback, so tightly coupled are the upper side bolsters.

The 11.6-inch portrait-oriented infotainment screen returns, and while it packs all the obvious functionality, such as Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, and a decent native navigation system, it still suffers from terribly sluggish response times. The new digital gauge cluster offers multiple display options, including a driver-focused performance view with boost pressure, gear position, and torque distribution.

A new digital gauge cluster can be configured as a typical presentation of dials or a track-oriented cluster with a bar graph tach. Navigation depicts maps crisply, too.

But Subaru’s EyeSight, which offers a variety of driver monitoring systems, breaks all known records in nannyism with pervasive, over-the-top reminders about driver attention. The system instructed me to keep my hands on the steering wheel, even though my hands were already on the steering wheel. It told me to keep my eyes on the road, but I was looking straight ahead at the car in front of me. Perhaps it was programmed by a very nervous George Costanza?

The build quality in the WRX TS is up to snuff, and soft-touch materials cover more surfaces than before. The cabin isn’t quite that of a luxury car, nor would anyone really expect it to be. It’s functional, durable, and right in character for the tS and for a Subaru.

The WRX tS retains some quirks, like the raucous engine note, especially under load and when first fired up. Until the fast idle has settled down, the exhaust is very boomy at the rear of the car.

Would it be a turbo Subie if it didn’t have a hood scoop? Jim Resnick

And then there’s the price. At $48,875, including the required destination charge, the un-optioned WRX tS gives you almost no change from $50,000. That’s a big heap of money for a WRX with no additional power than others and no STI badge, except on the gauges and shift knob. However, you do get a chassis above reproach, brakes that never give up, and steering that can shame some exotics. And it renders the Roberts in your life mute.

A veteran of journalism, product planning and communications in the automotive and music space, Jim reports, critiques and lectures on autos, music and culture.

2025 Subaru WRX tS review: A scalpel-sharp chassis lets this car dance Read More »

2025 Morgan Plus Four review: Apparently, they do still make them like this

car review, Cars, Morgan Plus Four / Mike M. / August 5, 2025

A Morgan Plus Four with the door open — Morgan motoring is best when exposed to the elements. Credit: Michael Teo Van Runkle

In Sport+, the optional active sports exhaust system ($2,827.50) also helps to impart a slightly more serious soundtrack. This one manages a bit of drama as turbo whine and intake rush creep in through a complete lack of sound insulation. Plus, the exhaust barks out back with little pops and bangs on throttle liftoff.

Without a doubt, nothing on the road can quite compare to a Plus Four today. What other lightweight sports cars even survived into the modern era, when a Porsche Boxster or even a Lotus Emira now weigh above 3,000 pounds (1,360 kg)? Only the Mazda MX-5, perhaps, which weighs slightly more, with swoopy modern styling and economy car materials on the inside.

Speaking of which, plenty on the Plus Four could use a bit more of a premium touch. The steering wheel looks reminiscent of a Lotus Elise or even an original Tesla Roadster, plasticky and cheap despite the leather and physical shape actually turning out fairly nice. A thin wood rim would go a long way, as would remedying some other questionable build quality decisions throughout.

The interior lacks the charm of the exterior. Michael Teo Van Runkle

More wood on the dash, rather than the standard painted silver, might reduce glare with the convertible top laid back. And even with the roof up and the removable door panels in place, the Plus Four never approaches anywhere near weatherproof, as I felt strong drafts from around my left elbow, and the sliding plexiglas windows entirely lack seals. The sun visor attachments also rattle incessantly, and the Sennheiser premium sound system can’t even bump loud enough to drown the annoyance out, so perhaps skip that $3,770 option.

Some of the Plus Four’s issues seem easily fixable: Remove the roof, forget the music, and torque down some fittings a bit more here and there. Needing to worry about such avoidable irritations in the first place, though, proves that Morgan may have modernized the car, but a certain level of classic British engineering still applies.

Even so, nothing else I’ve driven mixes driving pleasure and crowd pleasing at the level of the new Plus Four. At the price of $103,970 as tested, I simply cannot forgive the decision not to offer the choice of a manual transmission, which would transform this classy roadster into an entirely different animal indeed.

2025 Morgan Plus Four review: Apparently, they do still make them like this Read More »

Lotus still knows how to make a driver’s car: The 2025 Emira V6, driven

car review, Cars, Lotus Emira / 9u50fv / August 1, 2025

The mid-engine sports car is an increasingly rare breed, but Lotus still carries the torch with its Emira, which is available with a choice of supercharged V6 or turbocharged inline-four cylinder engines. Between its steering, compact dimensions, standard manual transmission, and low mass, it’s a breath of fresh air, and it’s ready to capture the hearts of enthusiasts. Pricing starts at $102,250 for the V6, which is in direct competition with the Porsche 718 Cayman GTS while it lasts, and a sea of mostly cosmetic options inflated this example to $116,950.

Like many Lotuses before it, the Emira’s foundation is a bonded aluminum chassis with Bilstein passive damper-equipped double-wishbone suspension at all four corners and the engine mounted right behind the seats. Curb weight isn’t as low as you’d think at 3,187 lbs (1,445 kg), but it’s contained within an overall length, width (sans mirrors), and height of 173, 75, and 48 inches (4,395 mm, 1,905 mm, 1,220 mm), respectively.

Mid-engine layouts generally put the same components like radiators in the same places, and the Emira’s shape follows its predecessors (as well as cars from McLaren or Ferrari) with large intake ducts straked across its doors and rear fenders, a low nose, and little overhang past the axles. In fact, these are key in its sense-of-occasion appeal; climbing over its door sills and into its driver position is teeming with “let’s go” energy, and the view out the windshield—fenders, short nose, and all—is more exotic than anything else at its price.

A lime green Lotus Emira in profile

The shape is dictated by the underlying form. Credit: Peter Nelson

Behind the seats is a Toyota-sourced 3.5 L V6. Lotus has tuned the engine and added an Eaton/Edelbrock-sourced supercharger. It revs freely like a sportbike, and it produces a sharp, angry tone anywhere above 2,000 rpm. Adding to the drama is a clear view of the bypass valve in the rear-view mirror, feeding or re-routing boost depending on throttle input. Power is rated at 400 hp (300 kW) and 310 lb-ft (420 Nm) of torque, which feels healthy everywhere—but especially within the final thousand rpm or so. Hitting 60 mph (97 km/h) from a standstill takes just 4.3 seconds.

Lotus still knows how to make a driver’s car: The 2025 Emira V6, driven Read More »

2025 Polestar 3 drives sporty, looks sharp, can be a little annoying

car review, Cars, Polestar 3 / Kelly Newman / July 29, 2025

Earlier this month, Ars took a look at Volvo’s latest electric vehicle. The EX90 proved to be a rather thoughtful Swedish take on the luxury SUV, albeit one that remains a rare sight on the road. But the EX90 is not the only recipe one can cook with the underlying ingredients. The ingredients in this case are from a platform called SPA2, and to extend the metaphor a bit, the kitchen is the Volvo factory in Ridgeville, South Carolina, which in addition to making a variety of midsize and larger Volvo cars for the US and European markets also produces the Polestar 3.

What’s fascinating is how different the end products are. Intentionally, Polestar and Volvo wisely seek different customers rather than cannibalize each other’s sales. As a new brand, Polestar comes with many fewer preconceptions other than the usual arguments that will rage in the comment section over just how much is Swedish versus Chinese, and perhaps the occasional student of history who remembers the touring car racing team that then developed some bright blue special edition Volvo road cars that for a while held a production car lap record around the Nürburgring Nordschliefe.

That historical link is important. Polestar might now mentally slot into the space that Saab used to occupy in the last century as a refuge for customers with eclectic tastes thanks to its clean exterior designs and techwear-inspired interiors. Once past the necessity of basic transportation, aesthetics are as good a reason as most when it comes to picking a particular car. Just thinking of a Polestar as a brand that exemplifies modern Scandinavian design would be to sell it short, though. The driving dynamics are just too good.

Although it shares a platform with the big Volvo, the Polestar 3 is strictly a two-row SUV. Jonathan Gitlin

High praise

In fact, if there’s another brand out there that might be starting to pay attention to the way Polestars drive, it should be Porsche. Bold words indeed. Often, dual-motor EVs have one motor rated as more powerful than the other, or perhaps even of different designs. But the long-range dual motor Polestar 3 (MSRP: $73,400) is fitted with a pair of identical 241 hp (180 kW), 310 lb-ft (420 Nm) permanent magnet motors. The drive units are not entirely identical, however—at the rear, clutches on either side allow for true torque vectoring during cornering, as well as disconnecting the rear axle entirely for a more efficient mode.

2025 Polestar 3 drives sporty, looks sharp, can be a little annoying Read More »

The 2025 Audi RS 3 is a five-cylinder firecracker

Audi RS3, car review, Cars / 9u50fv / July 25, 2025

First offered in a passenger car by Mercedes-Benz back in 1974, the five-cylinder engine has always been a bit of an automotive oddball. The unconventional configuration eventually gained a foothold in the 1980s with manufacturers who needed a transversely mounted motor that was narrower than a V6 but wanted something smoother and more powerful than an inline-four.

For a time, the engine, with its distinctive exhaust warble, became closely associated with Audi’s lineup, aided in no small part by the motorsport successes of five-cylinder rally cars like the Sport Quattro S1 E2. But as technology progressed and turbocharging became more prevalent, the need for a straight-five layout dwindled. Today, the $63,400 RS 3 is the final five-cylinder holdout—not just for Audi, but for production cars in general.

In an era increasingly focused on electrification and modularity, the improbable introduction of the second-generation RS 3 back in 2022 seemed like fan service—an apparition that would likely vanish after a handful of diehards got their fill. But despite the headwinds that traditional performance cars have faced in recent years, the RS 3 not only lives on, it has actually been refreshed for 2025. While the tweaks are more evolutionary than revolutionary, they make what was already a highly entertaining sports sedan even more compelling. Well, for the most part anyway.

On the outside, the RS 3 scores new front and rear fascias that clean up the look, while new matrix LED headlights and a new 19-inch wheel design bolster the performance-oriented vibe. The cabin, meanwhile, is outfitted with new multi-colored ambient LED lighting, a new low-profile shifter design, and a new steering wheel that incorporates two dedicated drive mode buttons and aluminum paddle shifters. The steering wheel’s C8 Corvette-style flat top and bottom design complements the interior’s angular theme, but the touch-sensitive control panels on the spokes (which replace the physical buttons and dials on the outgoing car’s steering wheel) feel like a step backward in terms of accuracy and overall usefulness.

The 2025 Audi RS 3 is a five-cylinder firecracker Read More »

Audi has a new midsize EV, and we’ve driven it: The 2025 A6 Sportback

Audi A6, car review, Cars, First drive / Beth Washington / July 23, 2025

Audi S6 drives on a straight road past vineyards — Long straight roads glide underneath. Credit: Audi

The car’s cabin layout and ergonomics are starting to feel familiar at this point—it shares much not only with the electric Q6 e-tron but also Audi’s new midsize combustion cars, the A5 and Q5. (We’ll leave for now the fact that a combustion A6, unrelated to today’s vehicle in virtually all but name, is also in development, bringing an end to the “odd numbers for ICE, even numbers for EV” convention that briefly took hold at the automaker. Now nameplate chaos reigns.)

Hey Audi…

The voice control proved a frustrating alternative to using the touchscreen, with a lot of “I’m sorry I can’t do that” and “can you ask me that again” for commands that I’m pretty sure ought to have worked. But both the A6 and S6 felt mature in terms of software, something that wasn’t true for the same infotainment platform a year ago. I remain frustrated with how limited the UI options remain for the main instrument display, however.

I keep writing this, but Audi pioneered the use of high-resolution digital displays instead of analog dials and gave owners quite a lot of choice, including the option of a moving map for navigation. Now, there’s a way to make the display very minimal, which would be useful at night, but otherwise, you’re extremely limited in what you can display in front of you. The optional full-color heads-up display has the same augmented-reality direction tech that we’ve seen in other luxury cars, and it remains helpful when driving on unfamiliar roads, although that requires using the native navigation app; Apple CarPlay users should still see turn-by-turn directions on the HUD, though.

The layout is starting to become familiar. Audi

There’s no true one-pedal driving mode, just a choice between B—0.25 G of lift-off regeneration deceleration—and D, which can be toggled between none, 0.06 G, and 0.15 G of lift-off regen braking using the paddles behind the steering wheel. B is preferable when the road turns twisty, something both A6 and S6 coped with surprisingly well. Hairpins proved the steering and suspension rapid enough to rotate the car quickly, and what felt like numb steering initially began to reveal some information about road surfaces and available grip as the road surface changed then changed again. There’s also a noticeable difference between the drive modes. Comfort feels a little soft and wallowing, Dynamic effectively transfers more bumps into the cabin, and Balanced is a rather good midpoint between the two, and where I spent most of my time. I should also note the lack of fatigue I felt despite a full day behind the wheel of both cars.

Audi has a new midsize EV, and we’ve driven it: The 2025 A6 Sportback Read More »

2025 Aston Martin Vanquish Volante: A-M’s ultimate GT goes topless

Aston Martin Vanquish Volante, car review, CarPlay Ultra, Cars, First drive / Kelly Newman / July 23, 2025

It’s hard to blame them. Top up or down, the Vanquish’s aesthetic is one of eagerness and aggression, largely due to the F1-derived aero elements to cool the massive power unit as well as to balance out air from front to back. The rest is all Aston Martin-quality craftsmanship, shaping the Vanquish into a taut, sleek form wrapped in formal attire.

An Aston Martin Vanquish engine bay — Yes, you could just have an electric motor make this much torque and power almost silently. Credit: Aston Martin

Bond. Aluminum Bond.

The secret underlying the Vanquish’s capabilities is its bonded aluminum body, which is perfectly suited for a grand tourer like this. Bonding panels together rather than welding them makes controlling the NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) levels much easier as the adhesives absorb vibrations, while the stiffness provides much more control in terms of lateral movement. This also means the suspension has less to compensate for, which means it can be stiffer without adding teeth-rattling jitter.

Indeed, on the move, the Vanquish Volante is velvety-smooth on the highway, and with the top down, conversations don’t need to be shouted. Raise the soft top and the well-sealed cover is indistinguishable from the coupe as far as your ears are concerned.

The even-keeled nature is also due in part to the balance Aston Martin maintains between the throttle input and the electronic rear differential. At low speeds, the Vanquish is quite agile, but a progressive power band keeps it from being nervous or jerky when laying down the power, with the wheels effectively locked in place at high speeds for added stability.

A silver Aston Martin Vanquish Volante seen in profile

If a Vantage is for track work, a Vanquish is for cruising. Credit: Aston Martin

We’re talking autobahn speeds, here, by the way. What we’d usually muster on the highway is a cakewalk for this immense luxury chariot. It goes too fast too quickly, for better or for worse, with 80 mph (129 km/h) feeling like half of that. Different drive modes make a palpable difference in behavior, with GT mode supporting smooth, long stretches while Sport and Sport + offer more engaging, throaty behavior for twisty backroads. Here, the car continues to be well-mannered, though the occasional dab for power triggers an overeager automatic into dropping a gear or two, sending the V12 into a fury.

2025 Aston Martin Vanquish Volante: A-M’s ultimate GT goes topless Read More »