Cars

brembo-develops-brakes-with-almost-no-brake-dust-and-less-wear

Brembo develops brakes with almost no brake dust and less wear

As electric vehicles reduce car exhaust as a source of particulate emissions, people are increasingly focusing on other vehicular sources of pollution that won’t go away with electrification. Tires are one of them, particularly as we grapple with overweight EVs with tire-shredding torque. And brakes are another—even an EV with regenerative braking will occasionally need to use its friction brakes, after all.

Over in Europe, the people responsible for writing regulations have taken this into consideration with the upcoming Euro 7 standard, which sets new limits on 10- and 2.5-micron particulate emissions on all new vehicles—including EVs—starting next year. And to help OEMs achieve that target, Brembo has developed a new brake and pad set called Greentell that it says cuts brake dust emissions by 90 percent, improving durability in the process.

“We started 10 years ago to investigate a different solution. The main topic that we had in mind was to develop a disk that is greener than the current production of cast iron,” said Fabiano Carminati, VP of disc technical development at Brembo.

The solution had to be feasible for mass-market applications, not just as a specialty product. “For the first time, we apply this technology in a huge volume, not like just a niche, but in a high-volume product,” he told me.

“Greentell is the best compromise from a green point of view and [for] performance because the direct pleasure of the end user is a must for us,” he said. “So the goal is to find a coupling that mix[es] the best driving pleasure with the best green product. Green means low emission and green process. It was a really, really difficult challenge for us. We invested a lot of time; we invested a lot of money.”

Brembo develops brakes with almost no brake dust and less wear Read More »

toyota-debuts-all-new-rav4-with-hybrid-and-phev-powertrains-only

Toyota debuts all-new RAV4 with hybrid and PHEV powertrains only

An all-new version of Toyota’s bestselling RAV4 crossover debuted last night. For generation six, Toyota North America is going all-electrified, with hybrid and plug-in hybrid powertrains on offer. And while the RAV4 isn’t quite a software-defined vehicle as we understand the term, it features an all-new software platform tying everything together.

Toyota has grouped the various RAV4 configurations into three groups: core, rugged, and sport. And there are three different powertrain options: front-wheel drive hybrid, all-wheel drive hybrid, and all-wheel drive PHEV, although some trims are only available in certain configurations.

Front-wheel drive hybrid RAV4s feature a 226 hp (168 kW) 2.5 L engine, with all-wheel drive hybrid models offering a slight increase at 236 hp (176 kW). The PHEV generates a combined 320 hp (239 kW), and Toyota says it can go 50 miles (80 km) on a single charge.

Better efficiency is thanks in part to the adoption of more efficient silicon carbide inverters, although the battery has also increased in capacity. Certain trims (Woodland, XSE) even offer the ability to DC fast-charge the PHEV, which Toyota says takes 30 minutes to go from 10–80 percent state of charge.

Toyota debuts all-new RAV4 with hybrid and PHEV powertrains only Read More »

2025-hyundai-ioniq-9-first-drive:-efficient,-for-a-big-one

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 first drive: Efficient, for a big one

Only the $58,995 Ioniq 9 S is available with a rear-wheel drive powertrain. In this case, one with 215 hp (160 kW) and 258 lb-ft (350 Nm) and a range of 325 miles (539 km) from the 110.3 kWh (gross) battery pack. All other trims feature twin motor all-wheel drive, but you give up little in the way of range.

The $62,765 SE and $68,320 SEL offer a combined 303 hp (226 kW) and 446 lb-ft (605 Nm) and 320 miles (515 km) of range, and the $71,250 Performance Limited, $74,990 Performance Calligraphy, and $76,490 Performance Calligraphy Design use a more powerful front motor to generate a total of 442 hp (315 kW) and 516 lb-ft (700 Nm), and a range of 311 miles (500 km).

The Ioniq 9’s interior loses some of the charm of the concept. Hyundai

While a short first drive is not the best place to evaluate an EV’s range efficiency, driven day to day in Eco mode, I wouldn’t be surprised if you were able to easily exceed 3 miles/kWh (20.7 kWh/100 km). Other drive modes include Normal, which uses the front motor much more often and therefore is markedly quicker than Eco; Sport, which has quite a lot of initial throttle tip-in and will head-toss your passengers if you have any; Terrain, first seen on the Ioniq 5 XRT; and Snow.

The ride is quite firm on surface streets but less so at highway speeds over seams and expansion gaps. As you start to corner faster you can expect to encounter understeer, but since this is a three-row SUV weighing between 5,507-6,008 lbs (2,498-2,725 kg), one has to wonder what else was expected. At sensible speeds, it’s easy to see out of and place it on the road, and if you’re stuck in a tailback with a couple of grumpy children in the back, it’s a calming enough environment to keep you from being over-stressed.

Hyundai has wisely priced the Ioniq 9 between the related Kia EV9 (which also uses the E-GMP platform) and EVs from premium OEMs like the Volvo EX90, Mercedes EQS SUV, or the aforementioned Rivian.

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 first drive: Efficient, for a big one Read More »

f1-in-imola-reminds-us-it’s-about-strategy-as-much-as-a-fast-car

F1 in Imola reminds us it’s about strategy as much as a fast car


Who went home happy from Imola and why? F1’s title race heats up.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 17: Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 on track during during Qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 17, 2025 in Imola, Italy

In Italy there are two religions, and one of them is Ferrari. Credit: Ryan Pierse/Getty Images

In Italy there are two religions, and one of them is Ferrari. Credit: Ryan Pierse/Getty Images

Formula 1’s busy 2025 schedule saw the sport return to its European heartland this past weekend. Italy has two races on the calendar this year, and this was the first, the (deep breath) “Formula 1 AWS Gran Premio Del Made in Italy e Dell’Emilia-Romagna,” which took place at the scenic and historic (another deep breath) Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari, better known as Imola. It’s another of F1’s old-school circuits where overtaking is far from easy, particularly when the grid is as closely matched as it is. But Sunday’s race was no snoozer, and for a couple of teams, there was a welcome change in form.

Red Bull was one. The team has looked a bit shambolic at times this season, with some wondering whether this change in form was the result of a number high-profile staff departures toward the end of last season. Things looked pretty bleak during the first of three qualifying sessions, when Yuki Tsunoda got too aggressive with a curb and, rather than finding lap time, found himself in a violent crash that tore all four corners off the car and relegated him to starting the race last from the pit lane.

2025 has also been trying for Ferrari. Italy expects a lot from the red team, and the replacement of Mattia Binotto with Frédéric Vasseur as team principal was supposed to result in Maranello challenging for championships. Signing Lewis Hamilton, a bona fide superstar with seven titles already on his CV, hasn’t exactly reduced the amount of pressure on Scuderia Ferrari, either.

Frederic Vasseur, Team Principal of Scuderia Ferrari, is at the Formula 1 AWS Gran Premio del Made in Italy e dell'Emilia-Romagna 2025 in Imola, Italy, on May 17, 2025, at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari.

Ferrari team principal Frédéric Vasseur. Credit: Alessio Morgese/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Lewis Hamilton was much closer to teammate Charles Leclerc this weekend, which will be encouraging to everyone. After Hamilton’s exclusion from the Chinese Grand Prix, he has had to run a higher ride height, which has cost him speed relative to his younger teammate. Now it looks like he’s getting a handle on the car and lost out to Leclerc by 0.06 seconds in Q1 and 0.16 seconds in Q2. Unfortunately, Leclerc’s time was only good for 11th, and Hamilton’s was only good for 12th.

Sunday brought smiles for the Red Bull and Ferrari teams. In the hands of Verstappen, the Red Bull was about as fast as the black-and-orange McLarens, and while second was the best Verstappen could do in qualifying, the gap to McLaren’s Oscar Piastri was measured in the hundredths of seconds.

Verstappen’s initial start from the line looked unremarkable, too—the Mercedes of George Russell seemed more of a threat to the pole man. But Verstappen saw an opportunity and dove around the outside almost before Piastri even registered he was there, seizing the lead of the race. Once the Red Bull driver was in clean air, he was able to stretch the gap to Piastri.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 18: Oscar Piastri of Australia driving the (81) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes leads Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 George Russell of Great Britain driving the (63) Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team W16 Lando Norris of Great Britain driving the (4) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes Fernando Alonso of Spain driving the (14) Aston Martin F1 Team AMR25 Mercedes and the rest of the field at the start during the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 18, 2025 in Imola, Italy.

Oscar Piastri is seen here in the lead, but it wouldn’t last more than a corner. Credit: Mark Thompson/Getty Images

Getting past someone is notoriously hard at Imola. In a 2005 classic, Fernando Alonso held off Michael Schumacher’s much faster car for the entire race. Even though the cars are larger and heavier now and more closely matched, overtaking was still possible, like Norris’ pass on Russell.

Undercut? Overcut?

But when overtaking is as hard as it is at a track like Imola, teams will try to use strategy to pass each other with pit stops. Each driver has to make at least one pit stop, as drivers are required to use two different tire compounds during the race. But depending on other factors, like how much the tires degrade, a team might decide to do two or even three stops—the lap time lost in the pits by stopping more often can be less than the time lost running on worn-out rubber.

In recent years, the word “undercut” has crept into F1 vocab, and no, it doesn’t refer to the hairstyles favored by the more flamboyant drivers in the paddock. To undercut a rival means to make your pit stop before them and then, on fresh tires and with a clear track ahead, set fast lap after fast lap so that when your rival makes their stop, they emerge from the pits behind you.

The undercut doesn’t always work, but in Imola, it initially looked like it did. Charles Leclerc stopped on lap 10 and leapfrogged Russell’s Mercedes, as well as his former Ferrari teammate and now Williams driver Carlos Sainz. Since Piastri wasn’t closing on Verstappen up front, McLaren decided to bring him in for an early stop.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 18: Race winner Max Verstappen of the Netherlands and Oracle Red Bull Racing celebrates on the podium during the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 18, 2025 in Imola, Italy.

Verstappen’s wins this season are far from inevitable. Credit: Clive Rose/Getty Images

But his advantage on new tires was not enough to eat into Verstappen’s margin, and he did not emerge in clean air but rather had to overtake car after car on track as he sought to regain his position ahead of those who hadn’t stopped. Sometimes, a strategy is the wrong one.

McLaren’s other driver, Lando Norris, couldn’t make a dent on Red Bull’s race, either. Having recognized the two-stop undercut wouldn’t work, Norris had stayed out, but he was almost 10 seconds behind Verstappen when it was finally time to change tires on lap 29. Shortly afterward, Esteban Ocon pulled his Haas to the side of the track with a powertrain failure, triggering a virtual safety car. With all the cars required to drive around at a prescribed, reduced pace, Verstappen was able to take his pit stop while only losing half as much time as anyone who stopped under green flag conditions.

Victory required a little more. Kimi Antonelli’s Mercedes also ground to a halt in a position that required a full safety car. With some on fresh rubber and others not, there were battles aplenty, but Verstappen wasn’t involved in any and won by seven seconds over Norris, with the recovering Piastri a few more seconds down the road.

Meanwhile, Hamilton had been having a pretty good Sunday of his own. Although he started 12th, he finished fourth, to the delight of the partisan, flag-waving crowd. Some of that was thanks to Leclerc coming together with the Williams of Alex Albon; after that on-track scuffle was sorted, Albon lay fifth, with Leclerc at sixth. Albon was right to feel aggrieved that he lost fourth place but equalled his best finish of the year.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 18: Ferrari fans wave their flags in a grandstand prior to the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 18, 2025 in Imola, Italy.

A fine fourth and a sixth were redemption for the Tifosi. Credit: Bryn Lennon – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images

Leclerc needed to cede the place to Albon, but at the same time, his complaint about the amount of rules lawyering that now accompanies every bit of wheel-to-wheel action is getting a bit tedious. If F1 isn’t careful, the rulebook will end up being too constraining, with drivers playing to the letter even if it’s bad for the sport and the show. And sixth place was still a decent result from 11th; the championships already look out of reach for Ferrari for 2025, but at least it’s in no danger of being overtaken by Williams in the tables, even if that is a threat on track.

McLaren is already at 279 points in the constructors’ championship, 132 points ahead of next-best Mercedes, so the constructors’ cup is looking somewhat secure. Things are a lot closer in the drivers’ standings, with Piastri on 146, Norris on 133, and Verstappen still entirely in the fight with 124 points.

Next weekend, it’s time for the Monaco Grand Prix.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

F1 in Imola reminds us it’s about strategy as much as a fast car Read More »

removing-the-weakest-link-in-electrified,-autonomous-transport:-humans

Removing the weakest link in electrified, autonomous transport: humans


Hands-off charging could open the door to a revolution in autonomous freight.

An electric car charger plugs itself into a driverless cargo truck.

Driverless truck meets robot EV charger in Sweden as Einride and Rocsys work together. Credit: Einride and Rocsys

Driverless truck meets robot EV charger in Sweden as Einride and Rocsys work together. Credit: Einride and Rocsys

Thanks to our new global tariff war, the wild world of importing and exporting has been thrust into the forefront. There’s a lot of logistics involved in keeping your local Walmart stocked and your Amazon Prime deliveries happening, and you might be surprised at how much of that world has already been automated.

While cars from autonomy providers like Waymo are still extremely rare in most stretches of the open road, the process of loading and unloading cargo has become almost entirely automated at some major ports around the world. Likewise, there’s an increasing shift to electrify the various vehicles involved along the way, eliminating a significant source of global emissions.

But there’s been one sticking point in this automated, electrified logistical dream: plugging in. The humble act of charging still happens via human hands, but that’s changing. At a testing facility in Sweden, a company called Rocsys has demonstrated an automated charger that works with self-driving electric trucks from Einride in a hands-free and emissions-free partnership that could save time, money, and even lives.

People-free ports

Shipping ports are pretty intimidating places. Towering cranes stand 500 feet above the ground, swinging 30-ton cargo crates into the air and endlessly moving them from giant ships to holding pens and then turning around and sending off the next set of shipments.

A driverless truck heads out onto the road from a light industrial estate

This is Einride’s autonomous cargo truck. Credit: Einride

That cargo is then loaded onto container handlers that operate exclusively within the confines of the port, bringing the crates closer to the roads or rail lines that will take them further. They’re stacked again until the arrival of their next ride, semi-trucks for cargo about to hit the highway or empty rail cars for anything train-bound.

Believe it or not, that entire process happens autonomously at some of the most advanced ports in the world. “The APM terminal in Rotterdam port is, I would say, in the top three of the most advanced terminals in the world. It’s completely automated. There are hardly any people,” Crijn Bouman, the CEO and co-founder of Rocsys, said.

Eliminating the human factor at facilities like ports reduces cost and increases safety at a workplace that is, according to the CDC, five times more dangerous than average. But the one link in the chain that hasn’t been automated is recharging.

Those cargo haulers may be able to drive themselves to the charger, but they still can’t plug themselves in. They need a little help, and that’s where Rocsys comes in.

The person-free plug

The genesis of Rocsys came in 2017, when cofounder Bouman visited a fledgling robotaxi operator in the Bay Area.

“The vehicles were driving themselves, but after a couple of test laps, they would park themselves in the corner, and a person would walk over and plug them in,” Bouman said.

Bouman wouldn’t tell me which autonomy provider was operating the place, but he was surprised to see that the company was focused only on the wildly complex task of shuttling people from place to place on open roads. Meanwhile, the seemingly simple act of plugging and unplugging was handled exclusively by human operators.

A Rocsys charging robot extends its plug towards the EV charge port of a cargo truck.

No humans required. Credit: Einride and Rocsys

Fast-forward eight years, and The Netherlands-based Rocsys now has more than 50 automated chargers deployed globally, with a goal to install thousands more. While the company is targeting robotaxi operators for its automated charging solution, initial interest is primarily in port and fleet operators as those businesses become increasingly electrified.

Bouman calls Rocsys’s roboticized charger a “robotic steward,” a charming moniker for an arm that sticks a plug in a hole. But it’s all more complicated than that, of course.

The steward relies on an AI- and vision-based system to move an arm holding the charger plug. That arm offers six degrees of freedom and, thanks to the wonders of machine learning, largely trains itself to interface with new cars and new chargers.

It can reach high and low enough and at enough angles to cover everything from consumer cars to commercial trucks. It even works with plugs of all shapes and sizes.

The biggest complication? Manual charging flaps on some consumer cars. This has necessitated a little digital extension to the steward’s robotic arm. “We’ll have sort of a finger assembly to open the charge port cover, connect the plug, and also the system can close it. So no change to the vehicle,” Bouman said.

A Rocsys charging robot extends its plug towards the EV charge port of a cargo truck.

Manually opening charge port covers complicates things a bit. Credit: Einride and Rocsys

That said, Bouman hopes manufacturers will ditch manual charge port covers and switch to powered, automatic ones in future vehicles.

Automating the autonomous trucks

Plenty of companies around the globe are promising to electrify trucking, from medium-duty players like Harbinger to the world’s largest piece of rolling vaporware, the Tesla Semi. Few are actually operating the things, though.

Stockholm-based Einride is one of those companies. Its electric trucks are making deliveries every day, taking things a step further by removing the driver from the equation.

The wild-looking, cab-less autonomous electric transport (AET) vehicles, which would not look out of place thundering down the highway in any science-fiction movie, are self-driving in most situations. But they do have a human backup in the form of operators at what Einride’s general manager of autonomous technology, Henrik Green, calls control towers.

Here, operators can oversee multiple trucks, ensuring safe operation and handling any unexpected happenings on the road. In this way, a single person can operate multiple trucks from afar, only connecting when it requires manual intervention.

“The more vehicles we can use with the same workforce of people, the higher the efficiency,” he said.

Green said Einride has multiple remote control towers overseeing the company’s pilot deployments. Here in the US, Einride has been running a route at GE Appliance’s Selmer, Tennessee facility, where autonomous forklifts load cargo onto the autonomous trucks for hands-off hauling of your next refrigerator.

A woman monitors a video feed of an autonomous truck. A younger woman stands to her side.

The trucks are overseen remotely. Credit: Einride

Right now, the AETs must be manually plugged in by an on-site operator. It’s a minor task, but Green said that automating this process could be game-changing.

“There are, surprisingly, a lot of trucks today that are standing still or running empty,” Green said. Part of this comes down to poor logistical planning, but a lot is due to the human factor. “With automated electric trucks, we can make the transportation system more sustainable, more efficient, more resilient, and absolutely more safe.”

Getting humans out of the loop could result in Einride’s machines operating 24/7, only pausing to top off their batteries.

Self-charging, self-driving trucks could also help open the door to longer-distance deliveries without having to saddle them with giant batteries. Even with regular charging stops, these trucks could operate at a higher utilization than human-driven machines, which can only run for as long as their operators are legally or physically able to.

That could result in significant cost savings for businesses, and, since everything is electric, the environmental potential is strong, too.

“Around seven percent of the world’s global CO2 footprint today comes from land transportation, which is what we are addressing with electric heavy-duty transportation,” Green said.

Integrations and future potential

This first joining of a Rocsys robotic steward and an Einride AET took place at the AstaZero proving ground in Sandhult, Sweden, an automation test facility that has been a safe playground for driverless vehicles of all shapes and sizes for over a decade.

This physical connection between Rocsys and Einride is a small step, with one automated charger connected to one automated truck, compared to the nearly three million diesel-powered semis droning around our highways in the United States alone. But you have to start somewhere, and while bringing this technology to more open roads is the goal, closed logistics centers and ports are a great first step.

“The use case is simpler,” Bouman said. “There are no cats and dogs jumping, or children, or people on bicycles.”

And how complicated was it to connect Einride’s systems to those of the Rocsys robotic steward? Green said the software integration with the Rocsys system was straightforward but that “some adaptations” were required to make Einride’s machine compatible. “We had to make a ‘duct tape solution’ for this particular demo,” Green said.

Applying duct tape, at least, seems like a safe job for humans for some time to come.

Removing the weakest link in electrified, autonomous transport: humans Read More »

forgive-me,-volvo,-i-was-wrong:-the-2025-v60-cross-country-review

Forgive me, Volvo, I was wrong: The 2025 V60 Cross Country review

Perhaps if I was more patient I’d have gotten closer to the EPA combined 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km), too—instead the best I could average was 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km). One wonders how much lower it would be without the 48 V mild hybrid system.

While I am a big fan of the way the V60’s front seats look, they could do with quite a lot more lateral support. It definitely feels like you’re sat on them, not in them, if that makes sense. The $56,595 (including delivery charge) Ultra trim adds ventilation and a good massage function to the front seats, as well as options like the tan Nappa leather you see in the (not-great) photo. (Sadly Volvo’s media site didn’t have any good ones either.) Ultra also adds a heads-up display and a better sound system, although our test car was given an even better $3,200 Bowers and Wilkins sound upgrade.

Otherwise, the cabin is still much as it was five years ago. I appreciate the helpful features, like well-designed hooks in the cargo area that keep your shopping bags in place, which aren’t always as useful as the ones here. While the infotainment system is old and its screen is small by 2025’s standards, there are four USB-C ports in the car, and Google is built-in. There’s also Apple CarPlay, but you’ll need to use a cable. You’ll want to plug your phone in anyway, as there’s no wireless charging pad.

My biggest complaint about the V60 Cross Country is the over-eager rear emergency braking system. A large curb or bollard can trigger it, slamming on the anchors in the process, which is annoying when I am backing into a parking space at maybe 5 mph, but I understand why the safety-conscious automaker has programmed it the way it has. After two weeks with the car there was little else I could find to criticize, and I missed its agility, easy ride, and relatively reasonable size compared to the big electric SUVs that have taken its place in the testing schedule since.

Raising the V60 by 2.4 inches does not in fact ruin the car. Jonathan Gitlin

Station wagon shopping in 2025 is a short process; once Audi stops selling the A4 Allroad, this V60 Cross Country has no real rival left. So it’s a good thing it’s a pretty decent example of the breed.

Forgive me, Volvo, I was wrong: The 2025 V60 Cross Country review Read More »

the-2025-vw-tiguan-caters-to-us-tastes-at-an-affordable-price

The 2025 VW Tiguan caters to US tastes at an affordable price

In the modern era, cars keep getting bigger and bigger between generations. Or at least, they’re certainly not getting smaller. That’s especially true in America, where bigger is always better and the vehicles in the current crop of “compact” crossovers are now nearly as large as full-size SUVs from a decade ago. Don’t ask about curb weights, either, as more powerful drivetrains, including widespread adoption of hybrid-electric components, add significant mass, as highlighted by the new BMW M5 “sport sedan.” 

Within that fray, however, the new Volkswagen Tiguan stands apart. VW purposefully refined the third-gen Tiguan to cater better to American consumer needs, which meant dropping the third row to create more interior volume for the front and rear seats. The wheelbase still measures the same length at 109.9 inches (2,791 mm), but shorter overhangs mean the overall length actually shrinks by nearly two inches. Yet more efficient packaging on the inside also results in a marginal passenger volume increase of about two percent.

To help keep pricing attractive at below $30,000 to start, VW also decided to skip out on a hybrid variant, but the new EA888evo5 2.0 L turbocharged-four nonetheless delivers more power and improved fuel economy. And all of the above actually contributes to the Tiguan losing weight while evolving from the second to third generation, shaving about 160 lbs (72.5 kg), depending on trim.

There’s some ID.4 in here, but also a big helping of generic. Michael Teo Van Runkle

Generic outside, great inside

Volkswagen USA recently invited Ars to join a rainy test drive of the Tiguan’s SE and SEL R-Life trims in Bozeman, Montana. At first glance, the new exterior definitely hews more closely to current crossover trends, which the Tiguan arguably helped to inaugurate back in the late-2000s. There’s also a healthy dose of Volkswagen ID.4 design language throughout, especially at the nose. The interior truly steps up to a new level, though. I started out in an almost-base Tiguan SE, which means front-wheel drive and minimal options, not even onboard navigation.

Like most buyers, though, I connected my iPhone via Wireless CarPlay, which effectively makes onboard nav obsolete. And the SE’s 12.9-inch touchscreen atop the dash provides all the necessary tech, as premium materials throughout clearly prioritize touchpoints to enhance the impression of quality.

The 2025 VW Tiguan caters to US tastes at an affordable price Read More »

apple’s-new-carplay-ultra-is-ready,-but-only-in-aston-martins-for-now

Apple’s new CarPlay Ultra is ready, but only in Aston Martins for now

It’s a few years later than we were promised, but an advanced new version of Apple CarPlay is finally here. CarPlay is Apple’s way of casting a phone’s video and audio to a car’s infotainment system, but with CarPlay Ultra it gets a big upgrade. Now, in addition to displaying compatible iPhone apps on the car’s center infotainment screen, CarPlay Ultra will also take over the main instrument panel in front of the driver, replacing the OEM-designed dials like the speedometer and tachometer with a number of different Apple designs instead.

“iPhone users love CarPlay and it has changed the way people interact with their vehicles. With CarPlay Ultra, together with automakers we are reimagining the in-car experience and making it even more unified and consistent,” said Bob Borchers, vice president of worldwide marketing at Apple.

However, to misquote William Gibson, CarPlay Ultra is unevenly distributed. In fact, if you want it today, you’re going to have to head over to the nearest Aston Martin dealership. Because to begin with, it’s only rolling out in North America with Aston Martin, inside the DBX SUV, as well as the DB12, Vantage, and Vanquish sports cars. It’s standard on all new orders, the automaker says, and will be available as a dealer-performed update for existing Aston Martins with the company’s in-house 10.25-inch infotainment system in the coming weeks.

“The next generation of CarPlay gives drivers a smarter, safer way to use their iPhone in the car, deeply integrating with the vehicle while maintaining the very best of the automaker. We are thrilled to begin rolling out CarPlay Ultra with Aston Martin, with more manufacturers to come,” Borchers said.

Apple’s new CarPlay Ultra is ready, but only in Aston Martins for now Read More »

gm’s-lmr-battery-breakthrough-means-more-range-at-a-lower-cost

GM’s LMR battery breakthrough means more range at a lower cost

Kelty also believes it just makes sense to localize production. He pointed out that when consumer electronics with batteries took off, the supply chain developed around the customers in Southeast Asia. The customers, in that case, are the electronics manufacturers. He said the same thing makes sense in the United States.

There might be an inclination to give President Trump and his administration credit for this onshoring initiative, but the company has been working on localizing battery production for years. Even development on the LMR battery technology had been happening long before the current administration took over.

A battery technician at the General Motors Wallace Battery Cell Innovation Center takes a chemistry slurry sample. Credit: Steve Fecht for General Motors

That research and development of new technologies remains ongoing. In addition to testing battery cells in every known condition on Earth, GM can produce packs in production-ready format on site in Warren, just at a slower pace, to fine-tune the process and ensure a better-quality product. The company is currently working on a facility that will be able to make production-quality batteries at production speeds, so when a new line or a new plant is brought online somewhere else, all the kinks will already have been worked out.

GM’s LMR batteries feel like a logical evolution of the lithium-ion batteries that appear in EVs already. The company now has the facilities to build the highest-quality battery solution that it can. It’s also clear that the company has been working on this for quite some time.

If this all sounds like what Ford announced recently, it is. For its part, Ford says its research is not a lab experiment and that it will appear in vehicles before the end of the decade. While I can’t say who landed on the technology first, it’s clear that GM has a production plan and knows what specific products you’ll see it in to start.

A building with a truck in front of it.

General Motors Wallace Battery Cell Innovation Center focuses on advanced technical work for cutting-edge battery technology and prototyping full-size cells. Credit: General Motors

If LMR delivers on the promise, we’ll have a battery technology that delivers more range for less money. If there’s one takeaway from talking to the folks working on batteries in Warren, it’s that their guiding star is to make EVs affordable.

Kelty even challenged the room full of reporters. “Can anybody name a reason why you would not buy an EV if it’s price parity with ICE? I’ll argue it,” he said.

Kelty also hinted at some upcoming technology to help GM’s batteries work better in sub-optimal weather conditions, though he wouldn’t comment or elaborate on future products.

We’re still a couple of years away from production, but if General Motors can deliver on the tech, we’ll be one step closer to mainstream adoption.

GM’s LMR battery breakthrough means more range at a lower cost Read More »

2025-bentley-continental-gt:-big-power,-big-battery,-big-price

2025 Bentley Continental GT: Big power, big battery, big price


We spend a week with Bentley’s new plug-in hybrid grand touring car.

The new Bentley Continental GT was already an imposing figure before this one left the factory in Crewe clad in dark satin paint and devoid of the usual chrome. And under the bonnet—or hood, if you prefer—you’ll no longer find 12 cylinders. Instead, there’s now an all-new twin-turbo V8 plug-in hybrid powertrain that offers both continent-crushing amounts of power and torque, but also a big enough battery for a day’s driving around town.

We covered the details of the new hybrid a bit after our brief drive in the prototype this time last year. At the time, we also shared that the new PHEV bits have been brought over from Porsche. There’s quite a lot of Panamera DNA in the new Continental GT, as well as some recent Audi ancestry. Bentley is quite good at the engineering remix, though: Little more than a decade after it was founded by W.O., the brand belonged to Rolls-Royce, and so started a long history of parts-sharing.

Mind if I use that?

Rolls-Royce and Bentley went their separate ways in 2003. The unraveling started a few years earlier when the aerospace company that owned them decided to rationalize and get itself out of the car business. In 1997, it sold the rights to Rolls-Royce to BMW, or at least the rights to the name and logos. Volkswagen Group got the rest, including the factory in Crewe, and got to work on a new generation of Bentleys for a new century.

This paint is called Anthracite Satin. Jonathan Gitlin

VW Group was then under the overall direction of Ferdinand Piëch, often one to let bold engineering challenges make it all the way through into production. Piëch wanted to prove to the rest of the industry that VW could build a car every bit as good as Mercedes, and thus was born the Phaeton. Over-engineered and wearing too-plebeian a badge, the Phaeton was a flop, but its platform was the perfect foundation for some new Bentleys. These days, VW itself doesn’t have anything quite as sophisticated to share, but Porsche certainly does.

It has become common these days to disclose power and torque; in more genteel times, one was simply told that the car’s outputs were “sufficient.” Well, 771 hp (575 kW) and 737 lb-ft (1,000 Nm) could definitely be described by that word, even with two and a half tons to move. The twin-turbo 4.0 L V8 generates 584 hp (435 kW) and 590 lb-ft (800 Nm), and, as long as you have the car in sport mode, sounds rather like Thor gargling as you explore its rev range.

Even if you can’t hear that fast-approaching thunder, you know when you’re in Sport mode, as the car is so quick to respond to inputs. I was able to tell less of a difference between Comfort and B mode, the latter standing for “Bentley,” obviously, and offering what is supposed to be a balanced mix of powertrain and suspension settings.

Even in Sport, the Continental GT will raise its nose and hunker down at the rear under hard acceleration, and the handling trends more toward “heavy powerful GT” rather than “lithe sports car.” For a car like this, I will happily take the slightly floaty ride provided by the air springs and two-valve dampers over a bone-crushing one, however. It can be blisteringly quick if you require, with a 0-to-60 time of just 3.2 seconds and a top speed of 208 mph (335 km/h), while cosseting you from most of the world outside. The steering is weighty enough that you feel you’re actually piloting it in the corners, and it’s an easy car to place on the road.

As this is a plug-in, should you wish, you can drive off in silence thanks to the electrical side of that equation. The 188 hp (140 kW) electric motor isn’t exactly fast on its own, but with 332 lb-ft (450 Nm) there’s more than enough instant torque to get this big GT car underway. The lithium-ion battery pack is in the boot—ok, the trunk—where its 25.9 kWh eat some luggage capacity but balance out the weight distribution. On a full charge, you can go up to 39 miles, give or take, and the electric-only mode allows for up to 87 mph (140 km/h) and 75-percent throttle before the V8 joins the party.

Recharging the pack via a plug takes a bit less than three hours. Alternatively, you can do it while you drive, although I remain confused even now about what the “charge” mode did; driving around in Sport did successfully send spare power to the battery pack for later use, but it was unclear how much charge actually happened. I still need to ask Bentley what the miles/kWh readout on the main display actually refers to, because it cannot be the car’s actual electric-only usage, much as I like to imagine the car eeking out 8 miles/kWh (7.8 L/100 km).

Made in England

Then again, the Bentley is British, and as noted with another recent review of an import from those isles, electrical and electronic oddness is the name of the game with cars from Albion. There was an intermittent check engine light on the dashboard. And sometimes the V8 was reluctant to go to sleep when I switched into EV mode. And I also had to remind it of my driving position more than once. Still, those are mere foibles compared to an Aston Martin that freaks out in the rain, I suppose.

The ride on 22-inch wheels is better than it should be. Jonathan Gitlin

Even with a heavy dusting of spring pollen drybrushing highlights onto the Continental GT’s matte exterior, this was a car that attracted attention. Though only a two-door, the rear seats are large enough and comfortable enough for adults to sit back there, although as noted, the cargo capacity is a little less than you’d expect due to the battery above the rear axle.

Obviously, there is a high degree of customization when it comes to deciding what one’s Bentley should look like inside and out. Carbon fiber is available as an alternative to the engine-turned aluminum, and there’s still a traditional wood veneer for the purists. I’d definitely avoid the piano black surrounds if it were me.

I also got deja vu from the main instrument display. The typefaces are all Bentley, but the human machine interface is, as far as I can tell, the exact same as a whole lot of last-generation Audis. That may not be obvious to all of Bentley’s buyers, but I bet at least some have a Q7 at home and will spot the similarities, too.

No such qualms concern the rotating infotainment display. When you don’t need to see the 12.3-inch touchscreen, a button on the dash makes it disappear. Instead, three real analog gauges take its place, showing you the outside air temperature, a clock, and a compass. First-time passengers think it quite the party trick, naturally.

Even with the UK’s just-negotiated tariff break, a new Continental GT will not be cheap. This generation got noticeably more expensive than the outgoing model and will now put at least a $302,100 hole in your bank account. I say at least, because the final price on this particular First Edition stretched to $404,945. I’m glad I only learned that toward the end of my week with the car. For that much money, I’m more annoyed by the decade-old recycled Audi digital cockpit than any of the other borrowed bits. After all, Bentleys have (almost) always borrowed bits.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

2025 Bentley Continental GT: Big power, big battery, big price Read More »

trump-cuts-tariff-on-uk-cars;-american-carmakers-not-happy-about-it

Trump cuts tariff on UK cars; American carmakers not happy about it

The British car industry got a big break from US President Donald Trump yesterday afternoon. Trump and UK Prime Minister Kier Starmer have agreed to a bilateral trade agreement that cuts tariffs on a range of imports from the UK, including pharmaceuticals, aluminum and steel, and cars.

Now, the first 100,000 cars that come to the US from the UK will only be subject to a 10 percent tariff rather than the 27.5 percent they have been under since the start of this trade war in April.

“The car industry is vital to the UK’s economic prosperity, sustaining 250,000 jobs,” said Jaguar Land Rover CEO Adrian Mardell. “We warmly welcome this deal which secures greater certainty for our sector and the communities it supports. We would like to thank the UK and US Governments for agreeing this deal at pace and look forward to continued engagement over the coming months,” Mardell said.

As it turns out, 100,000 is almost as many cars as the UK exported to the US last year—about 102,000 last year. Not every car that wears a British brand’s name is made there, but Aston Martin, Bentley, Jaguar Land Rover, McLaren, Mini, and Rolls-Royce all manufacture cars in the UK.

Trump cuts tariff on UK cars; American carmakers not happy about it Read More »

uspto-refuses-tesla-robotaxi-trademark-as-“merely-descriptive”

USPTO refuses Tesla Robotaxi trademark as “merely descriptive”

“We are an AI, robotics company,” Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced last April. Despite the fact that the company’s revenues are overwhelmingly derived from selling new electric vehicles, such prosaic activities hold no luster for the boss. Instead, Tesla’s future, according to Musk, depends upon a (claimed) sub-$30,000 driverless two-seater, revealed to the world last October in a staged demonstration on a film set. But Musk’s plans just hit a snag: The company must find some new names.

As spotted by Sean O’Kane at TechCrunch, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has informed Tesla that it will not be allowed to trademark the word “robotaxi” to describe the vehicle. According to the USPTO, the term is far too generic. Indeed, a Google n-gram search shows a steady growth in the use of “robotaxi” starting more than a decade ago.

According to the USPTO, the term is merely descriptive. The agency cites evidence from Wikipedia, The Verge, and the Amazon-backed autonomous vehicle startup Zoox in its denial of Tesla’s trademark application.

A Tesla Cybercab prototype at a Tesla store in San Jose, California, US, on Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2024. Tesla CEO Elon Musk said the robotaxi, which has no steering wheel or pedals, could cost less than $30,000 and

Maybe they should just have called it the Teslapod. Credit: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Tesla could challenge this decision, but it would have to show the USPTO all the product’s marketing materials, brochures, and manuals that intend to use the name. If those aren’t available, Tesla must explain to the patent and trademark office’s satisfaction how this product will differ from others, with detailed specifics, not generalities. Tesla must also explain whether the car features robotic systems and whether any of Tesla’s competitors use “robo,” “robot,” or “robotic” to describe their own goods and services—the fact that Zoox refers to its autonomous pods as robotaxis will be very inconvenient for Tesla.

It’s not the first time that Tesla has been accused of a lack of originality. Alcon Entertainment sued Warner Brothers and Tesla after it refused them permission and adamantly objected to WB’s and Tesla’s attempt to link the vehicle with vehicles seen in Blade Runner 2049. Although Tesla attempted to get the case dismissed, in April, the court ordered the parties to enter into mediation.

USPTO refuses Tesla Robotaxi trademark as “merely descriptive” Read More »