Cars

the-2025-genesis-gv80-coupe-proves-to-be-a-real-crowd-pleaser

The 2025 Genesis GV80 Coupe proves to be a real crowd-pleaser

The 27-inch OLED screen combines the main instrument display and an infotainment screen. It’s a big improvement on what you’ll find in older GV80s (and G80s and GV70s), and the native system is by no means unpleasant to use. Although with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, most drivers will probably just cast their phones. That will require a wire—while there is a Qi wireless charging pad, I was not able to wirelessly cast my iPhone using CarPlay; I had to plug into the USB-C port. (The press specs say it should have wireless CarPlay and Android Auto, for what it’s worth.)

Having a jog dial to interact with the infotainment is a plus in terms of driver distraction, but that’s immediately negated by having to use a touchscreen for the climate controls.

Beyond those gripes, the dark leather and contrast stitching look and feel good, and I appreciate the way the driver’s seat side bolsters hug you a little tighter when you switch into Sport mode or accelerate hard in one of the other modes. Our week with the Genesis GV80 coincided with some below-freezing weather, and I was glad to find that the seat heaters got warm very quickly—within a block of leaving the house, in fact.

I was also grateful for the fact that the center console armrest warms up when you turn on your seat heater—I’m not sure I’ve come across that feature in a car until now.

Tempting the former boss of BMW’s M division, Albert Biermann, away to set up Genesis’ vehicle dynamics department was also a good move. Biermann has been retired for a while now, but he evidently passed on some skills before that happened. The GV80 Coupe is particularly well-damped and won’t bounce you around in your seat over low-speed obstacles like potholes or speed bumps that, in other SUVs, can result in the occupants being shaken from side to side in their seats.

The 2025 Genesis GV80 Coupe proves to be a real crowd-pleaser Read More »

the-2026-mercedes-benz-cla-is-good-enough-to-make-a-believer-out-of-ev-skeptics

The 2026 Mercedes-Benz CLA is good enough to make a believer out of EV skeptics


But if you’re still skeptical, don’t worry: There’s a hybrid version, too.

A camouflaged EV prototype in the snow

It’s not quite ready to be seen uncamouflaged, but Mercedes-Benz was ready to let us drive the new CLA. Credit: Tim Stevens

It’s not quite ready to be seen uncamouflaged, but Mercedes-Benz was ready to let us drive the new CLA. Credit: Tim Stevens

Mercedes-Benz’s EV efforts aren’t exactly burning up the sales charts. Models like the EQS and EQE haven’t convinced the brand’s demanding clientele that batteries are the future, forcing the company to scale back its electric ambitions.

Scale back, but not abandon. Benz is about to launch a new generation of EVs relying on technology derived from the epically efficient EQXX. The first is the new CLA. It’s coming soon, and after getting some time behind the wheel of a prototype vehicle undergoing final testing in the snowy wilds of Sweden, I’m convinced this could be the car to change Mercedes’ electrified fortunes.

And, for anyone who isn’t convinced, there’ll be a hybrid version too.

The EV is definitely the focus, though, and it tackles many of the most significant sticking points for would-be buyers of the company’s current electric offerings. First among those points is the styling. The somewhat anonymous shapes of the EQS and EQE have not earned those machines many fans outside of obsessive aerodynamicists. While the CLA I drove was unfortunately clad beneath some eye-warping camouflage, it seems to share enough lines with the Concept CLA Class that I’m already convinced it’ll be a looker.

The second concern with many of Benz’s current EVs is cost. Yes, you can get an EQB in the mid-$50,000 range, but that’s based on the older GLB. The least expensive of the company’s current EV range is the EQE sedan, with a mid-$70,000 starting price. That puts it well out of reach for many avid EV enthusiasts.

The front half. of a Mercedes-Benz CLA prototype

The CLA will have Mercedes’ first entirely in-house EV powertrain, and it’s far more efficient than the ones its currently offering. Credit: Tim Stevens

The current, gas-powered CLA starts in the mid-$40,000 range. Mercedes isn’t saying how much this new one will cost, but while the EV version will presumably be more, it should come in well beneath the EQE.

Next is the driving dynamic, which is really what brought me to Sweden. Both the EQS and EQE are fine cars, comfortable and calm with plenty of torque and power to be fun. However, they’re simply not the most engaging of machines. Can the CLA do better?

First impressions are definitely a yes. My driving was performed in the low-grip, wintery environment of northern Sweden, making it a little difficult to tell exactly how the car will feel when pushed in a more temperate world. But lowering the level of adhesion also lets you get an immediate sense of how well-balanced a machine is, and the CLA feels very well-balanced indeed.

When pushed beyond the limit of adhesion, it did have a tendency to understeer, but it didn’t take much provocation to bring the rear end around. Even with the stability control on, the 4matic-equipped car I drove was happy to swing out the rear as I danced from one corner to the next. When cruising at more relaxed speeds, the car soaked up the decidedly rough road surfaces extremely well for a car with such petite dimensions.

Most impressive was how well it handled the limited grip. One of the prime advantages of electrification is how quickly and smoothly stability and traction control can react to a loss of grip. The CLA didn’t immediately cut all power when it detected wheelspin, it quickly and automatically raised or lowered output to match the available grip.

The back half of a Mercedes CLA prototype

There will also be a hybrid version of the CLA for those who aren’t ready for a full EV. Credit: Tim Stevens

Power delivery, then, wasn’t all-or-nothing, and when it gave all it was plenty. The electric CLA felt comparably quick to the 402-hp EQE 500 4matic. The CLA 4matic makes similar power: 268 hp (200 kW) from the rear motor and 107 hp (80 kW) from the front. It gets off the line quickly, with the two-speed transmission on the rear axle ensuring that motor was still pulling strongly as I approached 100 mph (160 km/h).

Things were even more interesting when I needed to slow down. The CLA will be the debut of a new, unified braking system that effectively decouples the brake pedal from the actual physical action of the brakes. It’s not quite a full brake-by-wire system as there’s still a mechanical linkage there as a sort of fall-back, but in normal operation, the sensation you get from the brake pedal is entirely artificial, created by springs and bushings, not hydraulics.

There’s no feedback here, no haptics or adjustable resistance to signal what the brakes are doing. Indeed, the only indication that I’d triggered ABS on hard stops was the chatting noise coming from the wheels. In exchange, you get a consistent, solid brake feel, with the car mixing regenerative braking and physical braking as needed to deliver clean, consistent stops.

It’ll take more extensive testing to know how well the system handles something like a summer track day, but I can say that in my testing I got the brakes hot enough to be quite pungent, yet the car still stopped cleanly and predictably.

When it comes to one-pedal driving, the CLA offers a “D-” mode that will bring the car to a complete stop, but the outright deceleration rate after lifting off the accelerator is nowhere near as strong as something like a Tesla on Standard mode. That’s in addition to two lighter regen modes, plus “D Auto,” which varies regen based on surrounding traffic and terrain, just like the company’s current EVs.

A mercedes-benz CLA prototype seen head-on

The CLA was well-balanced on the ice. Credit: Tim Stevens

The CLA is also designed to address any concerns about efficiency with a number of improvements. That includes a new heat pump that can scavenge waste energy from the motor, the battery pack, and the ambient air. It’s said to heat the cabin twice as quickly with half the power consumption of the old heat pump.

There’s also a revised motor design, utilizing permanent magnets on both the front and rear axle. The system relies on a decoupling system to reduce drag on the front axle when it’s not needed, as on the EQE SUV, but the engagement is so quick and seamless that I never noticed.

The battery pack has also been revised, with a new chemistry that Mercedes says boosts overall energy density by 20 percent while also enabling a “significant reduction” in the use of cobalt.

The net result is a machine that promises to go 5.2 miles/kWh (11.9 kWh/100 km) and offers 466 miles (750 km) of range from the 85 kWh usable capacity “premium” battery pack. That’s on the European WLTP cycle, so on the American EPA cycle we can probably expect something closer to 400 miles (644 km). That still compares very favorably to the 308 miles (497 km) the current EQE can manage from its 96 kWh battery pack.

And, when you run out of juice, the new CLA’s 800-volt architecture enables charging rates of up to 320 kW. That theoretically means 186 miles (300 km) of charge in just 10 minutes.

The back of a Mercedes-Benz prototype in the snow

Battery energy density is up, and there’s a more efficient heat pump for the cabin. Credit: Tim Stevens

So, then, the promise is for a better-looking, better-driving, more-affordable, longer-range, and quicker-charging EV. That sounds like a winning bet, but Mercedes still has a hedge in. I didn’t just drive the electric CLA up in Sweden. I also got a go in the 48-volt hybrid version.

Yes, there’s a new CLA for you even if you’re still not on board with the EV revolution. This one’s built around a 1.5 L four-cylinder engine paired with an electric motor that’s integrated with an eight-speed, dual-clutch transmission. Engine output is rated at 188 hp (140 kW), plus an additional 27 hp (20 kW) from the electric motor.

That’s enough to drive the car up to 62 mph (100 kph) without spinning up the gasoline engine, but with only 1.3 kWh of battery at its disposal, you won’t go far without combustion. Mercedes doesn’t even quote an all-electric range. The engine comes on early and often.

In fact, during my time behind the wheel, I couldn’t get the engine to turn off. The engineers blamed the below-freezing temperatures. So, I can’t say just how sprightly the car will be without internal combustion. With that four-cylinder humming, the car was reasonably sprightly, the transmission slipping smoothly through the gears. Outright power is definitely on the limited side, though. Anyone who cares about acceleration should go for the other CLA, the one with the bigger battery.

The front of a Mercedes-Benz CLA prototype in the snow.

Mercedes-Benz may well have a winner here with the new CLA.

I got a good look at the interior of the two cars, but sadly, I’m not allowed to talk about that yet. Suffice it to say it includes some tasteful and practical changes that should be well-received. More on that to come.

Will the new CLA change Mercedes-Benz’s BEV fortunes? Initial impressions are indeed very good. If it looks half as good as that concept, delivers on the range promise, and is priced right, it should be a winner.

We won’t have long to wait to find out how it looks, but don’t expect an answer to the pricing question until closer to the car entering production later this year. Regardless, it’s great to see all the testing in the EQXX finally bearing fruit. At first bite, it’s tasting sweet.

The 2026 Mercedes-Benz CLA is good enough to make a believer out of EV skeptics Read More »

driving-an-ev-restomod-that-costs-as-much-as-a-house—the-jia-chieftain

Driving an EV restomod that costs as much as a house—the JIA Chieftain

The Chieftain Range Rover is a fascinating thing—a refitted, reskinned, restored classic Range Rover is no new thing, nor is one with a ludicrous American V8 stuffed under the hood. But one that can be had as a gas car, plug-in hybrid, or as an EV? It can be all of those things depending on which boxes you tick. Ars Technica went for a spin in the EV to see how it stacks up.

The UK is something of an EV restomod hub. It’s been throwing electricity in things that didn’t come off the line electrified in the first place for years. Businesses like Electrogenic, Lunaz, and Everrati will, for a price, make an old car feel a little more peppy—depending on who you go to, it’ll come back restored as well. The Chieftain isn’t quite like them. Developed by Oxfordshire, UK, based Jensen International Automotive (the company’s bread ‘n butter is Jensen Interceptors), the Chieftain is an old Range Rover turned up to VERY LOUD. Or, actually, not loud at all.

Of course, these things come at a cost. A Chieftain EV Range Rover conversion, today, will set you back at least $568,000 should you choose to order one. This one was a private commission, and at that price there won’t be any built on spec on the off chance someone wants to buy one “off the peg.” By any stretch of the imagination it is a huge amount for an old car, but they’re custom-built from start to finish.

The Range Rover has aged well. Alex Goy

Yours will be made to your specification, have CarPlay/Android Auto, and the sort of mod cons one would expect in the 2020s. Under its perfectly painted shell—the color is your choice, of course—lives a 120 kWh battery. It’s made of packs mounted under the hood and in the rear, firing power to all four wheels via three motors: one at the front, and two at the rear. The tri-motor setup can theoretically produce around 650 hp (485 kW), but it’s paired back to a smidge over 405 hp (302 kW), so it doesn’t eat its tires on a spirited launch. There’s a 60: 40 rear-to-front torque split to keep things exciting if that’s your jam. Air suspension keeps occupants comfortable and insulated from the world around them.

Driving an EV restomod that costs as much as a house—the JIA Chieftain Read More »

driving-the-new-mercedes-cla-made-me-a-believer-in-mercedes-benz’s-ev-future

Driving the new Mercedes CLA made me a believer in Mercedes-Benz’s EV future


And if it doesn’t, they’ve got a hybrid version, too.

A camouflaged EV prototype in the snow

It’s not quite ready to be seen uncamouflaged, but Mercedes-Benz was ready to let us drive the new CLA. Credit: Tim Stevens

It’s not quite ready to be seen uncamouflaged, but Mercedes-Benz was ready to let us drive the new CLA. Credit: Tim Stevens

Mercedes-Benz’s EV efforts aren’t exactly burning up the sales charts. Models like the EQS and EQE haven’t convinced the brand’s demanding clientele that batteries are the future, forcing the company to scale back its electric ambitions.

Scale back, but not abandon. Benz is about to launch a new generation of EVs relying on technology derived from the epically efficient EQXX. The first is the new CLA. It’s coming soon, and after getting some time behind the wheel of a prototype vehicle undergoing final testing in the snowy wilds of Sweden, I’m convinced this could be the car to change Mercedes’ electrified fortunes.

And, for anyone who isn’t convinced, there’ll be a hybrid version too.

The EV is definitely the focus, though, and it tackles many of the most significant sticking points for would-be buyers of the company’s current electric offerings. First among those points is the styling. The somewhat anonymous shapes of the EQS and EQE have not earned those machines many fans outside of obsessive aerodynamicists. While the CLA I drove was unfortunately clad beneath some eye-warping camouflage, it seems to share enough lines with the Concept CLA Class that I’m already convinced it’ll be a looker.

The second concern with many of Benz’s current EVs is cost. Yes, you can get an EQB in the mid-$50,000 range, but that’s based on the older GLB. The least expensive of the company’s current EV range is the EQE sedan, with a mid-$70,000 starting price. That puts it well out of reach for many avid EV enthusiasts.

The front half. of a Mercedes-Benz CLA prototype

The CLA will have Mercedes’ first entirely in-house EV powertrain, and it’s far more efficient than the ones its currently offering. Credit: Tim Stevens

The current, gas-powered CLA starts in the mid-$40,000 range. Mercedes isn’t saying how much this new one will cost, but while the EV version will presumably be more, it should come in well beneath the EQE.

Next is the driving dynamic, which is really what brought me to Sweden. Both the EQS and EQE are fine cars, comfortable and calm with plenty of torque and power to be fun. However, they’re simply not the most engaging of machines. Can the CLA do better?

First impressions are definitely a yes. My driving was performed in the low-grip, wintery environment of northern Sweden, making it a little difficult to tell exactly how the car will feel when pushed in a more temperate world. But lowering the level of adhesion also lets you get an immediate sense of how well-balanced a machine is, and the CLA feels very well-balanced indeed.

When pushed beyond the limit of adhesion, it did have a tendency to understeer, but it didn’t take much provocation to bring the rear end around. Even with the stability control on, the 4matic-equipped car I drove was happy to swing out the rear as I danced from one corner to the next. When cruising at more relaxed speeds, the car soaked up the decidedly rough road surfaces extremely well for a car with such petite dimensions.

Most impressive was how well it handled the limited grip. One of the prime advantages of electrification is how quickly and smoothly stability and traction control can react to a loss of grip. The CLA didn’t immediately cut all power when it detected wheelspin, it quickly and automatically raised or lowered output to match the available grip.

The back half of a Mercedes CLA prototype

There will also be a hybrid version of the CLA for those who aren’t ready for a full EV. Credit: Tim Stevens

Power delivery, then, wasn’t all-or-nothing, and when it gave all it was plenty. The electric CLA felt comparably quick to the 402-hp EQE 500 4matic. The CLA 4matic makes similar power: 268 hp (200 kW) from the rear motor and 107 hp (80 kW) from the front. It gets off the line quickly, with the two-speed transmission on the rear axle ensuring that motor was still pulling strongly as I approached 100 mph (160 km/h).

Things were even more interesting when I needed to slow down. The CLA will be the debut of a new, unified braking system that effectively decouples the brake pedal from the actual physical action of the brakes. It’s not quite a full brake-by-wire system as there’s still a mechanical linkage there as a sort of fall-back, but in normal operation, the sensation you get from the brake pedal is entirely artificial, created by springs and bushings, not hydraulics.

There’s no feedback here, no haptics or adjustable resistance to signal what the brakes are doing. Indeed, the only indication that I’d triggered ABS on hard stops was the chatting noise coming from the wheels. In exchange, you get a consistent, solid brake feel, with the car mixing regenerative braking and physical braking as needed to deliver clean, consistent stops.

It’ll take more extensive testing to know how well the system handles something like a summer track day, but I can say that in my testing I got the brakes hot enough to be quite pungent, yet the car still stopped cleanly and predictably.

When it comes to one-pedal driving, the CLA offers a “D-” mode that will bring the car to a complete stop, but the outright deceleration rate after lifting off the accelerator is nowhere near as strong as something like a Tesla on Standard mode. That’s in addition to two lighter regen modes, plus “D Auto,” which varies regen based on surrounding traffic and terrain, just like the company’s current EVs.

A mercedes-benz CLA prototype seen head-on

The CLA was well-balanced on the ice. Credit: Tim Stevens

The CLA is also designed to address any concerns about efficiency with a number of improvements. That includes a new heat pump that can scavenge waste energy from the motor, the battery pack, and the ambient air. It’s said to heat the cabin twice as quickly with half the power consumption of the old heat pump.

There’s also a revised motor design, utilizing permanent magnets on both the front and rear axle. The system relies on a decoupling system to reduce drag on the front axle when it’s not needed, as on the EQE SUV, but the engagement is so quick and seamless that I never noticed.

The battery pack has also been revised, with a new chemistry that Mercedes says boosts overall energy density by 20 percent while also enabling a “significant reduction” in the use of cobalt.

The net result is a machine that promises to go 5.2 miles/kWh (11.9 kWh/100 km) and offers 466 miles (750 km) of range from the 85 kWh usable capacity “premium” battery pack. That’s on the European WLTP cycle, so on the American EPA cycle we can probably expect something closer to 400 miles (644 km). That still compares very favorably to the 308 miles (497 km) the current EQE can manage from its 96 kWh battery pack.

And, when you run out of juice, the new CLA’s 800-volt architecture enables charging rates of up to 320 kW. That theoretically means 186 miles (300 km) of charge in just 10 minutes.

The back of a Mercedes-Benz prototype in the snow

Battery energy density is up, and there’s a more efficient heat pump for the cabin. Credit: Tim Stevens

So, then, the promise is for a better-looking, better-driving, more-affordable, longer-range, and quicker-charging EV. That sounds like a winning bet, but Mercedes still has a hedge in. I didn’t just drive the electric CLA up in Sweden. I also got a go in the 48-volt hybrid version.

Yes, there’s a new CLA for you even if you’re still not on board with the EV revolution. This one’s built around a 1.5 L four-cylinder engine paired with an electric motor that’s integrated with an eight-speed, dual-clutch transmission. Engine output is rated at 188 hp (140 kW), plus an additional 27 hp (20 kW) from the electric motor.

That’s enough to drive the car up to 62 mph (100 kph) without spinning up the gasoline engine, but with only 1.3 kWh of battery at its disposal, you won’t go far without combustion. Mercedes doesn’t even quote an all-electric range. The engine comes on early and often.

In fact, during my time behind the wheel, I couldn’t get the engine to turn off. The engineers blamed the below-freezing temperatures. So, I can’t say just how sprightly the car will be without internal combustion. With that four-cylinder humming, the car was reasonably sprightly, the transmission slipping smoothly through the gears. Outright power is definitely on the limited side, though. Anyone who cares about acceleration should go for the other CLA, the one with the bigger battery.

The front of a Mercedes-Benz CLA prototype in the snow.

Mercedes-Benz may well have a winner here with the new CLA.

I got a good look at the interior of the two cars, but sadly, I’m not allowed to talk about that yet. Suffice it to say it includes some tasteful and practical changes that should be well-received. More on that to come.

Will the new CLA change Mercedes-Benz’s BEV fortunes? Initial impressions are indeed very good. If it looks half as good as that concept, delivers on the range promise, and is priced right, it should be a winner.

We won’t have long to wait to find out how it looks, but don’t expect an answer to the pricing question until closer to the car entering production later this year. Regardless, it’s great to see all the testing in the EQXX finally bearing fruit. At first bite, it’s tasting sweet.

Driving the new Mercedes CLA made me a believer in Mercedes-Benz’s EV future Read More »

yes,-it-turns-out-you-can-make-a-tesla-cybertruck-even-uglier

Yes, it turns out you can make a Tesla Cybertruck even uglier

There’s a saying about putting lipstick on a pig, but what if it’s not lipstick? That’s the question the universe set out to answer when it aligned in such a way that famed (or perhaps infamous) car customizer Mansory got itself a Tesla Cybertruck. The Mansory Elongation—a name that must have taken ages to think of—offers exterior, interior, and wheel and tire upgrades for the straight-edged stainless steel-wrapped pickup.

Among those who mod cars, there are the tuners, who focus on adding power and (one hopes) performance, and then there are the customizers, who concentrate more on aesthetics. Once upon a time, the entire luxury car industry worked like that—a client would buy a rolling chassis from Bugatti, Rolls-Royce, or Talbot and then have bodywork added by coachbuilders like Gurney Nutting, Touring, or Figoni et Falaschi.

The rear 3/4 view of a modified Cybertruck

At least the rear winglets don’t entirely compromise access to the bed. Credit: Mansory

Modern homologation requirements have mostly put an end to that level of coachbuilding, but for the ultra-wealthy prepared to spend telephone numbers on cars, brands like Rolls-Royce will still occasionally oblige. More common now are those aftermarket shops that spiff up already luxurious cars, changing normal doors for gullwing versions, adding flaring fenders and bulging wheel arches, and plastering the interior in any hue of leather one might imagine.

Mansory has been on the scene since the end of the 1980s and has made a name for itself festooning Rolls-Royces, Lamborghinis, Ferraris, and even Bugattis with extra bits that their original designers surely did not want added. Now it’s the Tesla Cybertruck’s turn.

Yes, it turns out you can make a Tesla Cybertruck even uglier Read More »

donut-lab-and-the-electric-motors-everyone-has-been-talking-about

Donut Lab and the electric motors everyone has been talking about

“The set of benefits is different to each application or each size,” Piippo said. “In small things, you’re very price conscious, and you need to kind of optimize for the cost. And then the bigger you go, the more performance you can get or the more performance increase compared to the conventional setup you can get.”

“But then there’s also the kind of unlocked new industries where nobody has been that capable making a heavy lift… drone—like lifting shipping containers or something like this—until now. Because we have a very compact shape and very lightweight design, we can do quite a bit of performance in everything that flies because we can play with the cooling in a smart way with this design,” Piippo said.

For a compact EV crossover, Donut Lab thinks its tech could reduce the number of components in a powertrain by three-quarters, saving weight and assembly time—and therefore money. For a semi-truck, the savings could be an order of magnitude higher, according to the company’s case study.

Credit: Donut Labs

In fact, the first use has been for motorcycles. The Verge TS Pro electric motorcycle we tested last summer was created to show off the motor technology.

The reaction at CES was positive—”we had maybe 10 to 20 times more business than we anticipated, and we were aiming quite high,” Lehtimäki said.

“Major OEMs have understood for decades that in-wheel motors would be the golden solution if they could get the weight down,” he said. “But I feel that there’s been some education going on in the last few years because it felt to us that everybody we spoke to, you just show the graph of torque and power per kilogram, and they’re like, ‘OK, when can we have it?'”

Plenty can happen between an OEM testing parts for proving and a product appearing in the showroom that uses that technology. But if all goes well, we might see vehicles with Donut Lab’s motors in a couple of years. They may show up elsewhere, too. Lehtimäki told me that interest has come in from outside the automotive and mobility sectors, including applications like wind turbines and washing machines.

That last one has some charming history to it—when inventors were tinkering with electric cars in the 1970s, they often turned to washing machines for a source of torquey electric motors.

Donut Lab and the electric motors everyone has been talking about Read More »

the-acura-zdx-is-an-example-of-badge-engineering-for-the-software-age

The Acura ZDX is an example of badge engineering for the software age

Acura is gearing up to build its first entirely in-house battery-electric vehicles, but it has gotten a head start with the ZDX SUV. Built in collaboration with General Motors, the ZDX is a comfortable and competent luxury EV. More than that, it’s a shining example of what badge engineering looks like in the digital age.

Automakers have long collaborated with each other. Sometimes that means working together on a powertrain or vehicle platform for use in quite different products. Sometimes, it’s a little less involved—the Dodge Hornet differs very little from the Alfa Romeo Tonale, for example.

In the case of the Acura ZDX, the vehicle platform and the battery-electric powertrain are all thoroughly GM, what used to be called Ultium, until the American automaker retired that branding. It is, in essence, Acura’s take on the Cadillac Lyriq and is similar, if not identical, in terms of power output and pricing.

Although the range starts with the rear-wheel drive $64,500 ZDX A-Spec, our test car was the range-topping all-wheel drive ZDX Type-S, which costs $73,500 before the $7,500 clean vehicle tax credit. It has an output of 499 hp (372 kW) and 544 lb-ft (738 Nm), and it has an EPA range of 278 miles (447 km) on a full charge of the 102 kWh lithium-ion battery pack.

Despite winter temperatures and 22-inch tires (a $600 option), that range estimate seems spot-on—over the course of a week, we averaged 2.7 miles/kWh (23 kWh/100 km).

The next Acura EV to launch will have a NACS port, but ZDXs feature CCS1 for now. Adapters, and access to Tesla’s Supercharger network, should happen in this spring. Jonathan Gitlin

Fast charging wasn’t particularly impressive, especially compared to other luxury SUVs in this price bracket. Acura quotes 42 minutes to go from 20–80 percent state of charge; in practice, I plugged in with 38 percent SoC showing on the dash and had to wait 45 minutes to get to 80 percent. Charging peaked at 91 kW but had dropped to 69 kW by 50 percent SoC.

The Acura ZDX is an example of badge engineering for the software age Read More »

this-ev-could-reboot-medium-duty-trucking-by-not-reinventing-the-wheel

This EV could reboot medium-duty trucking by not reinventing the wheel


Modest goals and keeping within the lines have done this startup well.

A rolling medium-duty truck chassis in a factory

Harbinger’s rolling chassis, at the company’s factory in Garden Grove, California. Credit: Tim Stevens

Harbinger’s rolling chassis, at the company’s factory in Garden Grove, California. Credit: Tim Stevens

GARDEN GROVE, Calif.—There’s no shortage of companies looking to reinvent the delivery experience using everything from sidewalk drones to electric vans. Some are succeeding, but many more have failed by trying to radically rethink the simple, age-old task of getting stuff from one place to another.

Harbinger likewise wants to shake up part of that industry but in a decidedly understated way. If you found yourself stuck in traffic behind one of the company’s all-electric vehicles, there’s a good chance you wouldn’t even notice. The only difference? The lack of diesel smoke and clatter.

From the outside, Harbinger’s pre-production machine looks identical to the standard flat-sided, vinyl-wrapped delivery vehicles that seemingly haven’t changed in decades. That’s because they really haven’t. Those familiar UPS and FedEx machines are built on common chassis like Ford’s F-59 or Freightliner’s MT45, with ladder chassis and leaf spring designs dating back to the earliest days of trucking.

Rather than discarding decades of learning and optimization, Harbinger is keeping its focus narrow, changing only what’s required to move the industry away from expensive and ugly combustion to cleaner and cheaper electric drive.

Harbinger is exclusively focused on medium-duty options right now, trucks that are significantly larger than the Rivians or Mercedes eSprinters of the world. “That’s basically everything 5 through 15 tons or thereabouts,” co-founder and Harbinger CTO Phillip Weicker said, “the dominant product for what’s called a strip chassis, essentially what in the passenger market is called a skateboard.”

Yes, Harbinger just builds the chassis. Everything on top comes from somewhere else.

“Most medium-duty vehicles are built by one company building the chassis [and] another company installing the body,” Weicker said. “So this made the perfect sense for our first product because we’re going to be focused almost entirely on the differentiated aspects. We don’t have to deal with the high capital investments for body in white, paint shop, [and] a lot of the things that have cost EV startups lots of money just to get to a table-stakes position with their incoming competitors.”

If you’re a company that wants a medium-duty vehicle like this, your dealer sources the chassis for you and then coordinates sending it to a company called an upfitter. The upfitter then builds the entire body on top of the chassis to your exact specifications.

Designs from upfitters have been defined and refined over decades of experience by the companies that operate them. Those giant white or brown delivery vans might look very similar from the outside, but there’s a lot of nuance to their design.

“The door handles work slightly differently. The locking logic works differently. The vehicles are about 2 inches narrower for one of those companies than the other,” Harbinger co-founder and CEO John Harris said. “These are all designed to get the driver in and out of the door one second faster at every stop, to get in and out of the depot and load the vehicle two or three minutes faster.”

A man drives a delivery van

Harbinger CTO Phillip Weicker demoing the delivery van. Credit: Tim Stevens

Harbinger’s solution fits the same template but operates in a very different way. It’s still a big, long ladder-frame, and it uses a leaf-spring rear suspension. But rather than slapping a big engine up front, Harbinger relies on a 330-kW (443 hp) electric motor that’s wound in-house and mounted between the rear wheels. It uses a De Dion arrangement, which isolates the heavy motor from the rear suspension.

The idea was to keep the whole thing simple and familiar so that any company that wanted to get off diesel could start ordering vehicles with a Harbinger chassis without radically changing its fleet management or driver training.

I got a chance to see just how familiar the two things are during my visit to Harbinger’s 5,000-square-foot headquarters in Garden Grove, California. I wish I could say driving the Harbinger was an evocative, world-changing experience, but the company’s ethos of not reinventing the wheel very much continues through to the experience of sitting behind the wheel that steers the thing.

I started by taking a lap of the Harbinger parking lot in a Ford F-59-based machine, a former delivery truck that had already lived a hard life before it was put out to pasture, becoming something of a test mule for Harbinger. I’d never driven anything exactly like this before, but I have spent many hours droning down the highway in various abused U-Haul trucks, and the experience is much the same.

The same, but louder. Yes, the 6.7-liter diesel certainly makes a lot of noise, but the creaking and crashing of the boxy body built on top of that aged ladder-frame chassis is deafening. The automatic transmission has a leisurely approach to its job, delivering the next gear only when absolutely needed. The throttle delivers the kind of precision response that had me slamming my foot to the floor just to get around the parking lot. Doing so made a lot more noise but not much more acceleration.

That part, at least, is radically different in the Harbinger. While the throttle pedal has the same long throw, you needn’t dip nearly so far into it. A light pedal brush had the empty Harbinger delivery truck leaping forward. It’s hardly a Lucid Air Sapphire, but it still surged forward with the sort of instant acceleration that makes EVs so addictive.

Braking, too, is far more sharp. I lurched against the racy orange seatbelt the first time I stepped on the left pedal, and the combination of regenerative braking and fresh disc brakes made for a far more effective slowing solution.

There’s no transmission to worry about here, either. Instead of slinging a giant column shifter downward, in the Harbinger, you just hit the D button and pull away.

Harbinger truck interior

It’s not the most stylish cabin we’ve sat in. Credit: Tim Stevens

In motion, though, the experience is much the same. You’re seated up high, deafened by the clatter and bangs from the empty, boxy body, which, again, is exactly like that built on a traditional truck. The feedback is so harsh that it’s actually difficult to separate the overall ride quality of the truck. Still, even unladen, and thus at its harshest, it’s a far smoother drive than the Ford.

It’s easier to turn, too. The Harbinger offers 50 degrees of steering angle at the front. I pulled off my first U-turn on a narrow, suburban LA street quickly enough to not get honked at by even a single impatient Angelino.

It ultimately wasn’t the plush, hushed experience offered by your average electric sedan, but that’s not the point. By keeping everything familiar, Harbinger CEO John Harris told me Harbinger can offer a product with price parity to those aged, diesel-powered machines. Harris declined to provide formal pricing, but its affordability is at least partially dependent on federal incentives.

Currently, alternatively fueled medium-duty vehicles like Harbinger’s are eligible for the Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit 45W, which provides incentives of up to $40,000, depending on vehicle size and propulsion type.

A shelf of battery cell assemblies

Battery modules. Credit: Tim Stevens

“Where we’re pricing the vehicles, we need that 45 W if we want to undercut diesel, and that’s what we’re doing,” Harris said. “With 45 W, we can undercut the typical diesel vehicle by a few thousand dollars.”

But even if that credit goes away under the current administration, Harbinger has some price flexibility to remain competitive, he added.

That’s doubly true if you factor in operating costs. Harris says the average cost to operate a medium-duty vehicle like this is $0.50 per mile for fuel, or $0.85 if you factor in all costs relating to the vehicle itself. Harbinger is aiming to halve that, targeting $0.40 per mile. But, Harris says, Harbinger doesn’t need to lean on that total cost of ownership (TCO) logic.

“On a TCO basis, it’s easy: We blow diesel trucks away. But the whole point is to have the right acquisition cost from day one, and then the simpler operating costs deliver savings every day,” he said.

A cast EV battery case

The cast battery pack enclosure. Credit: Tim Stevens

Still, that’s potentially a huge savings when you consider the hundreds of thousands of miles a machine will cover over its lifespan, which is expected to be measured in decades, not years. Many of the medium-duty delivery vehicles you see on the road today date from the last century. Harbinger’s chassis has been designed to last just as long, including its custom-made, gigacast battery packs, which were designed for durability.

“If you took the battery pack out of a Tesla Model 3, and you put it in a commercial truck, and you tried to operate it in that environment, even if the cells lasted, I think the rest of the battery system would kind of shake itself to pieces,” Weicker said.

Harbinger customers can specify their desired pack size, and there’s even a hybrid model with an onboard generator for extended running. Harris, Harbinger’s CEO, declined to say when the company’s chassis will be in full production other than “very soon.” The company has 4,000 preorders on the books, and it has already delivered pre-production models to customers like Thor.

It’s a modest start for the company, which today counts 330 employees, but in an age of EV startups promising the moon and delivering little more than hype, the Harbinger’s focus on the basics is refreshing—and encouraging.

This EV could reboot medium-duty trucking by not reinventing the wheel Read More »

nissan’s-latest-desperate-gamble—see-if-tesla-will-buy-the-company

Nissan’s latest desperate gamble—see if Tesla will buy the company

Senior politicians in Japan are not going to let Nissan die easily. The automaker has been struggling for some time now, with an outdated product portfolio, ongoing quarterly losses, and soon, the closure of factories and thousands of layoffs. The Japanese government has been trying to find a suitor and had hoped that Honda would do its patriotic duty and save its rival from extinction.

That deal—one branded “a desperate move” by former Nissan CEO and fugitive from Japanese justice Carlos Ghosn—fell apart last week after Renault demanded a price premium for its shares in Nissan, and Nissan demanded a merger of equals with Honda. In reality, it was always going to be a takeover, with very little in it for Honda in the way of complimentary product lines or access to new technologies.

Today, we learned of yet another desperate move—the former Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga is among a group that is trying to get Tesla to invest in Nissan instead.

Such a merger seems exceedingly far from likely, even if Tesla CEO Elon Musk wasn’t completely distracted dismantling the federal government and its workforce. While the company still maintains a ludicrous market capitalization thanks to retail investors who believe it is poised to sell billions of humanoid robots to every human on earth, as an automaker, it may well be struggling almost as much as Nissan.

As experts told us last year, Tesla is not a well-run enterprise. Its product range suffers, like Nissan’s, from being outdated compared to the competition. It appears that consumers have turned against the brand in Europe and increasingly the US, and its quarterly financial results have been more than disappointing of late. Tesla’s free cash flow fell by 18 percent in 2024 to $3.6 billion, although such is the value of Tesla stock that, were a Tesla-Nissan deal to happen, the former could pay for the latter with equity, should it entertain the idea seriously.

Nissan’s latest desperate gamble—see if Tesla will buy the company Read More »

f1-may-ditch-hybrids-for-v10s-and-sustainable-fuels

F1 may ditch hybrids for V10s and sustainable fuels

High-revving naturally aspirated engines and their associated screaming soundtracks might be on their way back to Formula 1. Not with next year’s rule changes—that will see even bigger lithium-ion batteries and an even more powerful electric motor, paired with a turbocharged V6. But the sport is starting to think more seriously about the technical rules that will go into effect in 2030, and in an Instagram post yesterday, the man in charge of those rules signaled that he’s open to cars that might be louder, lighter, and less complicated.

Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s tenure as president of the Federation Internationale de l’Automobile has been packed with controversy. The former rally driver has alienated many F1 drivers with clampdowns on jewelry and, most recently, swearing, as well as a refusal to explain what happens to the money the FIA collects as fines.

He also ruffled feathers when the FIA opened up the entry process for new teams into the sport and then approved an entry by Andretti Global. While the FIA said yes, the commercial side (which is owned by Liberty Media) and the teams wanted nothing to do with an 11th team—at least until the $200 million anti-dilution fee was more than doubled and Michael Andretti stepped aside.

This time, Ben Sulayem is saying all the right things, to this author at least. “While we look forward to the introduction of the 2026 regulations on chassis and power unit, we must lead the way on future technological motorsport trends. We should consider a range of directions including the roaring sound of the V10 running on sustainable fuel,” he wrote.

F1 may ditch hybrids for V10s and sustainable fuels Read More »

see-a-garbage-truck’s-cng-cylinders-explode-after-lithium-ion-battery-fire

See a garbage truck’s CNG cylinders explode after lithium-ion battery fire

When firefighters arrived on scene, they asked the driver to dump his load in the street, which would reduce the risk of anything on the truck itself—gasoline, CNG, etc.—catching fire. Then the firefighters could put out the blaze easily, treating it like a normal trash fire, and have Groot haul away the debris afterward. But this didn’t work either. The flames had spread far enough by this point to put the truck’s dumping mechanism out of commission.

So, firefighters unrolled hoses and hooked up to a nearby fire hydrant. They recognized that the truck was CNG-powered, as were many Groot vehicles. CNG offers a lower maintenance cost, uses less fuel, and creates less pollution than diesel, but best practices currently suggest not spraying CNG cylinders directly with water. Firefighters instead tried to aim water right into the back of the garbage truck without wetting the CNG cylinders nearby on the roof.

They were waiting for the telltale hiss of the pressure relief system to trigger. These valves typically open within two to five minutes, depending on fire conditions, and they should be capable of venting all their natural gas some minutes before the CNG canisters would otherwise be in danger of exploding. But the hiss never came, and as Fire Chief Lance Harris and his crew worked to secure the scene and put water onto the burning load, the CNG canisters exploded catastrophically instead.

A photo of the explosion, as captured by a bodycam.

The explosion, as captured by a bodycam.

In a board of trustees meeting this week in Arlington Heights, Harris recounted the incident, noting that he felt lucky to be alive—and thankful that no township personnel or residents sustained serious injuries.

“We can’t prove it,” he said, but after two months of investigating the situation, his department had concluded with high probability that the fire had been caused by a lithium-ion battery discarded into a recycling container. This suspicion was based on the amount of fire and the heat and speed with which it burned; lithium-ion batteries that enter “thermal runaway” can burn hot, at around 750° Fahrenheit (399° C).

Harris’ takeaway was clear: recycle even small lithium-ion batteries responsibly, as they can cause real hazards if placed into the waste system, where they are often impacted or compressed.

See a garbage truck’s CNG cylinders explode after lithium-ion battery fire Read More »

protesters-demonstrate-outside-tesla-showrooms-in-us

Protesters demonstrate outside Tesla showrooms in US

“The worry of the Street is that Musk dedicating so much time—even more than we expected—to Doge takes away from his time at Tesla,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.

“In addition, Musk’s Doge-related actions and more powerful alliance with Trump clearly could alienate some consumers to move away from the Tesla brand.”

About 50 to 100 protesters turned out in Portland, Oregon on Saturday, carrying signs saying, “Dethrone Musk” and “If Tesla survives, your country dies.”

Edward Niedermeyer, author of Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors, was one of them. Since Musk’s power is not derived from election to public office, he said, boycotting and divesting from Tesla is the only tool available to curb his agenda.

He argued that Tesla was overvalued and that its core business of making and selling cars was deteriorating. Significant losses could force investors to sell, triggering a drop in the share price and forcing Musk to sell a portion of his shares to meet a margin call.

“Every Tesla sale that you prevent, every dollar not spent servicing a Tesla, not charging at the Supercharger—these further degrade the business,” Niedermeyer said.

“It’s not easy, it’s not guaranteed, but we do have the opportunity to wipe out a huge amount of Elon Musk’s wealth.”

In Chicago, protesters carried a banner saying “Stop buying Nazi cars.”

City resident Lisa Pereira said she came to the demonstration because “you have to do something.” She said she was disturbed by the administration’s attempts to crush diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, its aggressive immigration enforcement, and the power wielded by Musk.

“Everything is a little off the rails,” she said. “So I decided I had to show up. I had to be in cahoots with my soul.”

Chris White said he attended on Saturday because he fears “we’re living through a fascist coup.”

“My kids are trans,” he said. “I’m getting told they don’t exist. I don’t know if their healthcare will exist.”

Though one man yelled from a truck, “Elon’s my hero!” most passers-by in the heavily Democratic city expressed support.

“I’d rather buy a Rivian,” said one, referring to the electric-truck maker whose showroom was a block away from the protest.

Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

© 2025 The Financial Times Ltd. All rights reserved. Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way.

Protesters demonstrate outside Tesla showrooms in US Read More »