Cars

bmw’s-next-ev-is-its-most-sustainable-car-yet—here’s-why

BMW’s next EV is its most sustainable car yet—here’s why

Sadly, the US is unlikely to get the Econeer trim, which uses a seat fabric made entirely from recycled PET bottles (instead, we should be getting an eco vinyl option).

Of course, you need to do more than just pick better materials, some of which have been recycled, if you want to seriously dent the carbon footprint of your new vehicle. That’s especially true if it’s electric—for all an EV’s benefits, they remain significantly more energy-intensive to build than a new internal combustion engine vehicle. And automakers do need to make serious dents in their carbon footprints: BMW has to slash its carbon emissions from a 2019 level of 150 million tons down to 109 million tons in 2030. For 2024, it was down to 135 million tons, the company told us.

Fishing nets are turned into plastic granules, then used to make bits of the car.

The Neue Klasse is essential to meeting that goal. The factory in Debrecen, Hungary, is powered entirely by renewable energy, including an entirely electric paint shop, and it generates two-thirds the amount of CO2 as one of BMW’s established factories. And the battery pack, which uses an all-new BMW cylindrical cell, has a 42 percent smaller carbon footprint per kWh than the prismatic cells used in BMW’s current 5th-generation EVs.

We can’t say much about the expected efficiency of the new 6th-gen powertrain until later this month, but we can say that BMW calculates that the iX3 can reach its break-even point with an ICE vehicle within just a year. Charge the car with entirely renewable electricity, and within just 10,900 miles (17,500 km), it’s on par with an ICE vehicle; using the normal European energy generation mix, that crossover comes at a little more than 13,300 miles (21,000 km).

At 124,000 miles (200,000 km), the iX3 should have a lifetime carbon footprint of 23 tons (or 14.6 tons exclusively using renewable energy); by contrast, a conventionally powered BMW X3 crossover would have a footprint of 52.8 tons.

Check back on August 25, when we can tell you what else we learned about BMW’s next EV crossover.

BMW’s next EV is its most sustainable car yet—here’s why Read More »

tesla-loses-autopilot-wrongful-death-case-in-$329-million-verdict

Tesla loses Autopilot wrongful death case in $329 million verdict

Tesla was found partially liable in a wrongful death lawsuit in a federal court in Miami today. It’s the first time that a jury has found against the car company in a wrongful death case involving its Autopilot driver assistance system—previous cases have been dismissed or settled.

In 2019, George McGee was operating his Tesla Model S using Autopilot when he ran past a stop sign and through an intersection at 62 mph then struck a pair of people stargazing by the side of the road. Naibel Benavides was killed and her partner Dillon Angulo was left with a severe head injury.

While Tesla said that McGee was solely responsible, as the driver of the car, McGee told the court that he thought Autopilot “would assist me should I have a failure or should I miss something, should I make a mistake,” a perception that Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk has done much to foster with highly misleading statistics that paint an impression of a brand that is much safer than in reality.

The jury heard from expert witnesses about Tesla’s approach to human-machine interfaces and driver monitoring, as well as its use of statistics, then considered their verdict on Thursday afternoon and Friday before deciding that, while McGee was two-thirds responsible for the crash, Tesla also bore a third of the responsibility for selling a vehicle “with a defect that was a legal cause of damage” to Benavides’ relatives and Angulo. The jury awarded the plaintiffs $129 million in compensatory damages, and a further $200 million in punitive damages.

Tesla loses Autopilot wrongful death case in $329 million verdict Read More »

lotus-still-knows-how-to-make-a-driver’s-car:-the-2025-emira-v6,-driven

Lotus still knows how to make a driver’s car: The 2025 Emira V6, driven

The mid-engine sports car is an increasingly rare breed, but Lotus still carries the torch with its Emira, which is available with a choice of supercharged V6 or turbocharged inline-four cylinder engines. Between its steering, compact dimensions, standard manual transmission, and low mass, it’s a breath of fresh air, and it’s ready to capture the hearts of enthusiasts. Pricing starts at $102,250 for the V6, which is in direct competition with the Porsche 718 Cayman GTS while it lasts, and a sea of mostly cosmetic options inflated this example to $116,950.

Like many Lotuses before it, the Emira’s foundation is a bonded aluminum chassis with Bilstein passive damper-equipped double-wishbone suspension at all four corners and the engine mounted right behind the seats. Curb weight isn’t as low as you’d think at 3,187 lbs (1,445 kg), but it’s contained within an overall length, width (sans mirrors), and height of 173, 75, and 48 inches (4,395 mm, 1,905 mm, 1,220 mm), respectively.

Mid-engine layouts generally put the same components like radiators in the same places, and the Emira’s shape follows its predecessors (as well as cars from McLaren or Ferrari) with large intake ducts straked across its doors and rear fenders, a low nose, and little overhang past the axles. In fact, these are key in its sense-of-occasion appeal; climbing over its door sills and into its driver position is teeming with “let’s go” energy, and the view out the windshield—fenders, short nose, and all—is more exotic than anything else at its price.

A lime green Lotus Emira in profile

The shape is dictated by the underlying form. Credit: Peter Nelson

Behind the seats is a Toyota-sourced 3.5 L V6. Lotus has tuned the engine and added an Eaton/Edelbrock-sourced supercharger. It revs freely like a sportbike, and it produces a sharp, angry tone anywhere above 2,000 rpm. Adding to the drama is a clear view of the bypass valve in the rear-view mirror, feeding or re-routing boost depending on throttle input. Power is rated at 400 hp (300 kW)  and 310 lb-ft (420 Nm) of torque, which feels healthy everywhere—but especially within the final thousand rpm or so. Hitting 60 mph (97 km/h) from a standstill takes just 4.3 seconds.

Lotus still knows how to make a driver’s car: The 2025 Emira V6, driven Read More »

tesla-picks-lges,-not-catl,-for-$4.3-billion-storage-battery-deal

Tesla picks LGES, not CATL, for $4.3 billion storage battery deal

Tesla has a new battery cell supplier. Although the automaker is vertically integrated to a degree not seen in the automotive industry for decades, when it comes to battery cells it’s mostly dependent upon suppliers. Panasonic cells can be found in many Teslas, with the cheaper, sturdier lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery cells being supplied by CATL. Now Tesla has a new source of LFP cells thanks to a deal just signed with LG Energy Solutions.

According to The Korea Economic Daily, the contract between Tesla and LGES is worth $4.3 billion. LGES will begin supplying Tesla with cells next August through until at least the end of July 2030, with provisions to extend the contract if necessary.

The LFP cells probably aren’t destined for life on the road, however. Instead, they’ll likely be used in Tesla’s energy storage products, which both Tesla and LGES hope will soak up demand now that EV sales prospects look so weak in North America.

The deal also reduces Tesla’s reliance on Chinese suppliers. LGES will produce the LFP cells at its factory in Michigan, says Reuters, and so they will not be subject to the Trump trade war tariffs, unlike Chinese-made cells from CATL.

Although Tesla CEO Elon Musk has boasted about the size of the energy storage market, its contribution to Tesla’s financials remains meagre, and actually shrank during the last quarter.

Tesla picks LGES, not CATL, for $4.3 billion storage battery deal Read More »

2025-polestar-3-drives-sporty,-looks-sharp,-can-be-a-little-annoying

2025 Polestar 3 drives sporty, looks sharp, can be a little annoying

Earlier this month, Ars took a look at Volvo’s latest electric vehicle. The EX90 proved to be a rather thoughtful Swedish take on the luxury SUV, albeit one that remains a rare sight on the road. But the EX90 is not the only recipe one can cook with the underlying ingredients. The ingredients in this case are from a platform called SPA2, and to extend the metaphor a bit, the kitchen is the Volvo factory in Ridgeville, South Carolina, which in addition to making a variety of midsize and larger Volvo cars for the US and European markets also produces the Polestar 3.

What’s fascinating is how different the end products are. Intentionally, Polestar and Volvo wisely seek different customers rather than cannibalize each other’s sales. As a new brand, Polestar comes with many fewer preconceptions other than the usual arguments that will rage in the comment section over just how much is Swedish versus Chinese, and perhaps the occasional student of history who remembers the touring car racing team that then developed some bright blue special edition Volvo road cars that for a while held a production car lap record around the Nürburgring Nordschliefe.

That historical link is important. Polestar might now mentally slot into the space that Saab used to occupy in the last century as a refuge for customers with eclectic tastes thanks to its clean exterior designs and techwear-inspired interiors. Once past the necessity of basic transportation, aesthetics are as good a reason as most when it comes to picking a particular car. Just thinking of a Polestar as a brand that exemplifies modern Scandinavian design would be to sell it short, though. The driving dynamics are just too good.

Although it shares a platform with the big Volvo, the Polestar 3 is strictly a two-row SUV. Jonathan Gitlin

High praise

In fact, if there’s another brand out there that might be starting to pay attention to the way Polestars drive, it should be Porsche. Bold words indeed. Often, dual-motor EVs have one motor rated as more powerful than the other, or perhaps even of different designs. But the long-range dual motor Polestar 3 (MSRP: $73,400) is fitted with a pair of identical 241 hp (180 kW), 310 lb-ft (420 Nm) permanent magnet motors. The drive units are not entirely identical, however—at the rear, clutches on either side allow for true torque vectoring during cornering, as well as disconnecting the rear axle entirely for a more efficient mode.

2025 Polestar 3 drives sporty, looks sharp, can be a little annoying Read More »

f1-in-belgium:-the-best-racetrack-in-the-world

F1 in Belgium: The best racetrack in the world


Changeable conditions usually make for exciting races, but 2025 was a bit dull.

Lewis Hamilton of Ferrari during the Formula 1 Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps in Spa, Belgium on July 27, 2025.

Does every race track have to have a ferris wheel now? For the record, Eau Rouge is the left-hand corner those cars are approaching—the corner at the top of the hill is Radillion. Credit: Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Does every race track have to have a ferris wheel now? For the record, Eau Rouge is the left-hand corner those cars are approaching—the corner at the top of the hill is Radillion. Credit: Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Formula 1 made its annual stop at Spa-Francorchamps, the historic track that winds its way through the hills and trees of the Ardennes. I’ll admit, I’d been waiting for this one; in fact, I’ve become somewhat of a Spa bore, having fallen in love with the place all over again a few weeks ago while attending the Crowdstrike 24-hour GT3 race.

The 4.3 mile (6.9 km) track delivers, whether that’s as a challenge to the drivers—corners like Eau Rouge, Raidillon, Pouhon, and Blanchiment are the equal of any. There’s elevation change, something that neither Monza nor Silverstone nor Montreal can offer. It has history, dating back well before the start of the Formula 1 world championship in 1949, albeit in a much longer, much scarier version that was truncated by more than half in 1979. The views are spectacular from almost anywhere you choose to watch from, and despite the track’s size, its a pleasant and easy walk through the forest paths (just as long as you can stop imagining that one scene from Band of Brothers).

The food and drink in the region are worth a visit by themselves, and architecture fans will enjoy the Belgians’ chaotic attitude toward planning permission and house renovations, which appears to boil down to “do whatever you like as long as it looks good and won’t fall down.” Pretty good driving roads in the area, too, although they get even better toward the Nürburgring, just over an hour away in Germany.

The other thing Spa has plenty of is weather. (Well, almost always; while it rained during practice for the 24 hour race last month, the race itself was completely dry. As was the Nürburgring 24 the weekend before. And the 24 Hours of Le Mans the week before that. Which scares me.) But there was weather aplenty for the 2025 Belgian Grand Prix.

Sprint weekend

This year Spa held a sprint weekend, significantly shortening the practice time available to teams, most of whom brought technical upgrades to the race. Sprint qualifying was determined by track evolution, with the surface getting grippier as more and more cars attempted to set fast times. Sauber rookie Gabriel Bortoleto in particular garnered some well-deserved attention for getting into SQ3, up among the very fastest cars, as did the Haas of Oliver Bearman (and his anything-but-a-rookie teammate Nico Hulkenberg).

McLaren’s Oscar Pastri secured the pole for the sprint race, lining up next to the Red Bull of Max Verstappen, a team now under the direction of Laurent Miekes after Red Bull’s corporate owners gave founding team principal Christian Horner his marching orders two weeks ago. As I wrote some months ago, for the past few years Red Bull’s design team has built cars that, while theoretically fast, are so difficult to drive at the limit that only Verstappen can exploit them properly. A single driver in the fastest car can win the driver’s championship, but if you want the team’s title—and that’s the one the bonuses are tied to, usually—then you better have both cars scoring good points. Just ask McLaren.

And Red Bull can no longer claim to have built the fastest car, even in Verstappen’s hands.

SPA, BELGIUM - JULY 26: Oscar Piastri of Australia driving the (81) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes leads Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 Lando Norris of Great Britain driving the (4) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes and the rest of the field at the start during the Sprint ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Belgium at Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps on July 26, 2025 in Spa, Belgium.

The grid negotiates the first corner—La Source—at the start of the sprint race. Credit: Clive Rose – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images)

That said, starting in second place at Spa is not so bad. After the slow hairpin of La Source—which McLaren has finally built a car able to cope with—there’s a long run to Les Coombes, with the challenge of Eau Rouge and Raidillon on the way. Verstappen got a good tow from the slipstream behind Piastri’s car along the Kemmel straight toward Les Coombes (isn’t it better when all the parts of the track have actual names and not just turn 1, turn 2, etc?) and got past, staying there in first place until the end, 15 laps later. Behind him, Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc did something similar to Piastri’s McLaren teammate, Lando Norris.

Although the Mclaren is a faster car than either the Red Bull or Ferrari, at Spa its speed came in the corners, and the orange cars were unable to close on or pass their rivals on the straights.

Teams and drivers faced a dilemma for Sunday’s race. They could either set their cars up for dry running, with less downforce and more top speed, or give them a higher downforce setup to capitalize on the rain. The thing is, they have to make that decision before qualifying on Saturday, then stick with it. Changes are allowed to setup, but only if you opt to start from the pitlane.

The McLarens took first and second in qualifying, with an amazing lap by Charles Leclerc that pipped Verstappen to third place by 3 milliseconds. Alex Albon got his Williams into a fine fifth place, and Red Bull’s other driver, Yuki Tsunoda—who has a much better relationship with Miekes than he ever did with Horner—made it into seventh just 0.3 seconds behind his otherworldly teammate. Bortotelo repeated his feat, snatching 10th in qualifying.

Not everyone had a good quali, particularly not Ferrari’s Lewis Hamilton, who was eliminated among the first drivers for the second time in two days, something the seven-time World Champion described as unacceptable. Mercedes’ young phenom, Kimi Antonelli, who replaced Hamilton, was also eliminated among the first batch, part of a miserable weekend for the Italian who just graduated from high school.

Race day

Sunday morning was greeted with plenty of rain, affecting the support races and then delaying the start of the Grand Prix. Formula 1 has both intermediate and wet grooved tires, which pump gallons of water into the air from the track at speed, creating huge clouds of visibility-obscuring spray that, at a place like Spa, just hang between the trees. It’s this lack of visibility, rather than the wet track itself, that makes F1 so cautious, and so the formation lap was held behind the safety car, at which point the race officials decided to red flag things and wait for some more rain to come through and then leave.

Aston Martin F1 Safety Car, Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri of McLaren during the Formula 1 Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps in Spa, Belgium on July 27, 2025.

The FIA was far too cautious in bringing in the safety car and getting the race started. Credit: akub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The race eventually began 90 minutes late and circulated behind the safety car for far longer than was necessary, given the emergence of a dry line before too long. The red flag gave plenty of drivers and teams the opportunity to tweak their setups for the rain—something that turned out to be the wrong move given the FIA’s reticence to throw the green flag.

Piastri, in second place behind Norris, did to his teammate what Verstappen had done to him the day before and snatched the lead well before Les Coombes, staying just far enough ahead of his closest rival for the championship throughout the race. A small mistake by Norris and a slightly slower pitstop from his team meant he never got close enough to challenge Piastri for the lead. Behind them, Verstappen was similarly unable to make his way past Leclerc.

Star of the race for me, and the viewers who voted him driver of the day, was Hamilton. Starting from the very back of the queue in the pitlane, Hamilton’s Ferrari was set up for wet weather, and yet again we saw the skills that have won him more F1 races than any other driver in history. Have you ever seen someone overtake at Stavelot? I might have, but only in Gran Turismo 7.

A key to Hamilton’s success was pitting for slick tires at the right time—lap 11, just ahead of almost everyone else—and the British driver finished in seventh place at the end, behind the low-downforce Williams of Albon.

The 2025 race will not rank high in the pantheon of Belgian Grands Prix in terms of a thrilling race, but if you’re a motorsport fan, you owe it to yourself to make it out there sometime. Did I mention the World Endurance Championship has a six-hour race there in May? The tickets are far cheaper than F1, and you get a lot more access, too.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

F1 in Belgium: The best racetrack in the world Read More »

the-electric-stark-varg-ex-is-brutally-fast-but-a-little-too-unrefined

The electric Stark Varg EX is brutally fast but a little too unrefined


This all-electric enduro monster needs a little more time in the oven.

A man rides a motorbike towards the camera.

Finding high-speed off-road harmony with the electric Stark Varg EX. Credit: Stark Future

Finding high-speed off-road harmony with the electric Stark Varg EX. Credit: Stark Future

The sport of off-roading suffers from a fundamental discordance: The desire to get out into nature and the irreparable harm inherent in the process of off-roading. That harm comes not only from damage to the land itself, but from an environment polluted with both fumes and noise.

Off-roading in an EV isn’t exactly a panacea, but it goes a long way toward at least solving those last two concerns. Over the years, I’ve been lucky enough to off-road in quite a few extremely capable EVs, but none more so than the new Stark Varg EX. This thing is an all-terrain monster, a diminutive 264 lb (120 kg) motorcycle with twice the torque of a Porsche 911 GT3, enough capability to cross nearly anything you care to run it over, and just enough civility to be street-legal.

It’s a wildly impressive two-wheeled machine—but one that’s not quite ready for primetime.

A new electric player

Founded in 2020, Stark Future’s first motorcycle is the Varg, which means “wolf” in Swedish. The Varg MX is an electric motocross and enduro monster that has already won numerous races and even the British Arenacross Championship. Where that machine was designed exclusively for off-road play and competition, the new Varg EX makes some concessions in the name of on-road legality and practicality while delivering a number of upgrades and tweaks over the earlier MX.

The Varg EX is built around two things: a 7.2 kWh battery pack and a permanent-magnet electric motor that, despite not being much larger than a can of soda, produces 80 hp (60 kW) and an astonishing 692 lb-ft (938 Nm) of torque.

Bikes are built at Stark’s facility in Barcelona, Spain, where workers assemble battery packs plus the bikes they power. While much of the bike is traditionally constructed, the company is experimenting with titanium laser sintering, a form of 3D printing used to create the bike’s beautifully sculpted footpegs. They provided a strong, secure platform for me on the adventure that lay ahead.

Ride time

Take a look at the back wheel of your average electric motorcycle, a Zero or LiveWire or the like, and you’ll see a rubber belt connecting the electric motor to the rear wheel. This has the primary benefit of reducing noise while also virtually eliminating the need for maintenance.

Chains are much louder and require oiling, eventually stretching enough that they’ll need replacing. On the surface, then, the chain at the back of the Varg EX might seem out of place, but it has its advantages.

That chain helps give the Varg EX a distinctive sound in the world of electric motorcycles. It’s a fair bit louder than much of the competition but still a stealthy machine compared to the screaming two-stroke or droning four-stroke engines that dominate the world of off-road riding.

The rear wheel and chain of an electric Stark motorcycle.

The rear wheel and its noisy chain. Credit: Stark Future

Neither of those power sources holds a candle to the Varg EX. I was politely but firmly encouraged to start my ride with the bike set to deliver only 35 hp (26 kW), less than half its outright capability. I expected to graduate to higher levels before long, but I quickly learned there wasn’t much point. Even limited, the Varg EX is scary quick.

It takes only a quick twitch of the wrist to lift the front wheel toward the sky, something that’s thankfully easy to catch with the rear brake mounted on the left bar rather than its traditional position by the rider’s right foot. No transmission means no clutch lever, freeing up that space on the grip.

Yes, there’s just one gear, but that single speed, combined with the 14,000 rpm motor, equals a top speed of 81 mph (130 km/h). A swap of the sprocket spinning that chain can bring that higher if needed, but this isn’t a machine built for high speed. It instead has the kind of instant torque and smooth power to crawl up technical terrain at a walking pace if you like or, with a little more twist of the wrist, send it over the worst obstacles.

Tech time

You select your power in the Varg EX through the handlebar-mounted touchscreen, which is actually a basic Android smartphone in a proprietary case that Stark aspirationally calls an Arkenstone. Through here, you can plan routes, track your bike’s performance, and craft five custom drive modes, selecting exactly how much power and regenerative braking you want. It’s a brilliant level of customization that I wish more EVs offered.

You then cycle through those modes with a pair of buttons mounted just inside the left grip, part of an impressively machined-looking set of controls. Sadly, in practice, neither of these systems works well. In my two days in the saddle, I lost count of the times those buttons got stuck, likely jammed internally thanks to the fine Pyrenean dust that filled the air as I rode.

Sticky buttons meant I was never sure when the bike had changed modes. A touch of haptic feedback in there is supposed to confirm you’ve switched from one mode to the next, but as you can imagine, a little buzz from the handlebar is hard to feel when riding over rough terrain.

The grip and controls for an electric motorbike

The buttons next to the grip could be better. Credit: Tim Stevens

So I was left squinting at the screen—which was a challenge to see in the bright Catalonian sun—and sadly, even that was unreliable. The Stark app on that Arkenstone crashed on me a half-dozen times while I was riding, leaving me with no way to know what mode I was in or, indeed, how fast I was going until the thing rebooted.

OTA and a prayer

The software can be fixed, and I’m sure it will be soon enough via over-the-air updates, but I fear the issue with the buttons is going to be harder to address. A better system would be something like BMW’s multi-controller, a wheel you rotate forward or backward, which would not only fix the sticking issue but also let the rider know precisely how many modes they’ve cycled through by feel.

I also wish the Varg EX offered some sort of rider-assistance system. Traction control and wheelie control would be nice, but even basic ABS would be appreciated. These are features that serious riders would turn off when off-road, but they’d be helpful for more casual riders on-road.

A Stark Varg EX motorbike on display in the wilderness.

Needs more work, sadly. Credit: Tim Stevens

Still, its features are on par with competitors like the Husqvarna FE 501s or KTM 500 EXC-F, only with way more power and available at a fair price of $12,990. For that, you’re getting a machine with incredible off-road performance plus enough battery capacity to spend all day riding the trails. Stark says to expect up to six hours of off-road riding on a single charge. While the constant software failures made tracking efficiency difficult, after one three-hour ride, I still had 42 percent remaining. High-speed on-road riding will surely drain things much faster.

In many respects, the Varg EX is a wildly impressive package, but it’s one I struggle to recommend as it currently stands. The software is broken, those buttons are a concern, and for a bike positioned as being tech-forward and streetable, the lack of even a token traction control system or ABS is unfortunate.

However, in its element, the Varg EX is a remarkable ride. I was blown away by its capability, which will far exceed that of most riders, certainly including my own. Despite being a rookie off-roader, after a few hours of riding, I was climbing and crossing some incredibly challenging terrain. Yet I could just as easily cruise my way through cattle pastures, weaving between cows and calves who stood there curious and unconcerned by the bike’s quiet whir. Just try doing that on a two-stroke.

The electric Stark Varg EX is brutally fast but a little too unrefined Read More »

going-chain-free-with-the-priority-gemini-gravel-bike

Going chain-free with the Priority Gemini gravel bike

In combining a belt drive with a gravel bike, Priority Bicycles has put a smart idea into action with the Priority Gemini Smart.Shift. The execution is mostly there, although the Gemini is perhaps best described as a fantastic commuter bike with a solid gravel upside—as long as the road isn’t too rough.

The Priority Gemini comes in both aluminum and titanium frames. I tested the $3,499 aluminum model; the titanium version retails for $5,499. The aluminum version weighs in at 24 lb (10.9 kg), about a half-pound more than the titanium version, and comes with 40 mm WTB tires, WTB i23 ST tubeless-ready wheels (our test bike had inner tubes), and semi-hydraulic disc brakes. Both models use the Priority Smart.Shift hub and Gates Carbon Drive Belt.

No mess, no fuss

At first glance, a belt drive and internal gear hub seem the perfect match for a gravel bike. But implementation is key, and Priority has largely nailed it. Regular gravel grinding means regularly washing your bike and lubricating the chain. While the Gemini got dirty and needed to be hosed off, there were no gloves or chain lube involved. There were also no worries about dirt and dust making their way into a derailleur or coating the cassette. Belt drives are also dead quiet and have an excellent reputation for longevity, lasting up to three times longer than a chain.

What about that internal gear hub? The Priority Smart.Shift hub in the Gemini offers a fantastic 600 percent gear range. By comparison, the Trek Checkpoint SL 7 we reviewed last year has a typical gear ratio for a 1x gravel bike, topping out at 400 percent (40t chainring and 10-42 cassette).

The Pinion Smart.Shift gearbox can be adjusted with an app. We used it to swap shifter buttons so that the larger paddle shifts to higher gears and the smaller to lower. There’s also an auto-shift option, which will shift to a selected gear when stopping. It works well enough that we eventually forgot about downshifting before stopping at a red light. If you’re the type of rider who tries to avoid coming to a complete stop whenever possible, you will find this feature less useful.

Going chain-free with the Priority Gemini gravel bike Read More »

the-2025-audi-rs-3-is-a-five-cylinder-firecracker

The 2025 Audi RS 3 is a five-cylinder firecracker

First offered in a passenger car by Mercedes-Benz back in 1974, the five-cylinder engine has always been a bit of an automotive oddball. The unconventional configuration eventually gained a foothold in the 1980s with manufacturers who needed a transversely mounted motor that was narrower than a V6 but wanted something smoother and more powerful than an inline-four.

For a time, the engine, with its distinctive exhaust warble, became closely associated with Audi’s lineup, aided in no small part by the motorsport successes of five-cylinder rally cars like the Sport Quattro S1 E2. But as technology progressed and turbocharging became more prevalent, the need for a straight-five layout dwindled. Today, the $63,400 RS 3 is the final five-cylinder holdout—not just for Audi, but for production cars in general.

In an era increasingly focused on electrification and modularity, the improbable introduction of the second-generation RS 3 back in 2022 seemed like fan service—an apparition that would likely vanish after a handful of diehards got their fill. But despite the headwinds that traditional performance cars have faced in recent years, the RS 3 not only lives on, it has actually been refreshed for 2025. While the tweaks are more evolutionary than revolutionary, they make what was already a highly entertaining sports sedan even more compelling. Well, for the most part anyway.

On the outside, the RS 3 scores new front and rear fascias that clean up the look, while new matrix LED headlights and a new 19-inch wheel design bolster the performance-oriented vibe. The cabin, meanwhile, is outfitted with new multi-colored ambient LED lighting, a new low-profile shifter design, and a new steering wheel that incorporates two dedicated drive mode buttons and aluminum paddle shifters. The steering wheel’s C8 Corvette-style flat top and bottom design complements the interior’s angular theme, but the touch-sensitive control panels on the spokes (which replace the physical buttons and dials on the outgoing car’s steering wheel) feel like a step backward in terms of accuracy and overall usefulness.

The 2025 Audi RS 3 is a five-cylinder firecracker Read More »

yet-another-bad-three-months-as-tesla-reports-its-q2-2025-results

Yet another bad three months as Tesla reports its Q2 2025 results

Tesla posted its financial results for the second quarter of 2025 this afternoon. The numbers show yet another bad three months for the automaker. As competition in the EV marketplace has exploded, Tesla has increasingly been left behind, with a small and aging model lineup, before we even contemplate how CEO Elon Musk has tarnished what was once the hottest brand in the car world. Earlier this month, we learned that sales dropped by 13 percent year over year in Q2 2025; today, the financials show that automotive revenues fell even more, dropping 16 percent year over year to $16.7 billion.

Tesla’s battery business has been feeling the pain, too. For a while, this was a growth area for the company, albeit one with a relatively minor contribution to the bottom line. During Q2 2025, Tesla’s energy generation and storage division brought in $2.8 billion in revenue, a 7 percent decline from the same period in 2024.

Sales of Carbon credits—those government-issued permits that other automakers buy in order to pollute—shrank by more than half, to $490 million. Those other automakers are now selling EVs, at least most of them, and have less need to buy credits from Tesla. It’s likely this subsidy, which has kept the company out of the red in the past, will be even less of a contributor in the coming years as the US strips away environmental protections.

Yet another bad three months as Tesla reports its Q2 2025 results Read More »

audi-has-a-new-midsize-ev,-and-we’ve-driven-it:-the-2025-a6-sportback

Audi has a new midsize EV, and we’ve driven it: The 2025 A6 Sportback

Audi S6 drives on a straight road past vineyards

Long straight roads glide underneath. Credit: Audi

The car’s cabin layout and ergonomics are starting to feel familiar at this point—it shares much not only with the electric Q6 e-tron but also Audi’s new midsize combustion cars, the A5 and Q5. (We’ll leave for now the fact that a combustion A6, unrelated to today’s vehicle in virtually all but name, is also in development, bringing an end to the “odd numbers for ICE, even numbers for EV” convention that briefly took hold at the automaker. Now nameplate chaos reigns.)

Hey Audi…

The voice control proved a frustrating alternative to using the touchscreen, with a lot of “I’m sorry I can’t do that” and “can you ask me that again” for commands that I’m pretty sure ought to have worked. But both the A6 and S6 felt mature in terms of software, something that wasn’t true for the same infotainment platform a year ago. I remain frustrated with how limited the UI options remain for the main instrument display, however.

I keep writing this, but Audi pioneered the use of high-resolution digital displays instead of analog dials and gave owners quite a lot of choice, including the option of a moving map for navigation. Now, there’s a way to make the display very minimal, which would be useful at night, but otherwise, you’re extremely limited in what you can display in front of you. The optional full-color heads-up display has the same augmented-reality direction tech that we’ve seen in other luxury cars, and it remains helpful when driving on unfamiliar roads, although that requires using the native navigation app; Apple CarPlay users should still see turn-by-turn directions on the HUD, though.

The layout is starting to become familiar. Audi

There’s no true one-pedal driving mode, just a choice between B—0.25 G of lift-off regeneration deceleration—and D, which can be toggled between none, 0.06 G, and 0.15 G of lift-off regen braking using the paddles behind the steering wheel. B is preferable when the road turns twisty, something both A6 and S6 coped with surprisingly well. Hairpins proved the steering and suspension rapid enough to rotate the car quickly, and what felt like numb steering initially began to reveal some information about road surfaces and available grip as the road surface changed then changed again. There’s also a noticeable difference between the drive modes. Comfort feels a little soft and wallowing, Dynamic effectively transfers more bumps into the cabin, and Balanced is a rather good midpoint between the two, and where I spent most of my time. I should also note the lack of fatigue I felt despite a full day behind the wheel of both cars.

Audi has a new midsize EV, and we’ve driven it: The 2025 A6 Sportback Read More »

2025-aston-martin-vanquish-volante:-a-m’s-ultimate-gt-goes-topless

2025 Aston Martin Vanquish Volante: A-M’s ultimate GT goes topless

It’s hard to blame them. Top up or down, the Vanquish’s aesthetic is one of eagerness and aggression, largely due to the F1-derived aero elements to cool the massive power unit as well as to balance out air from front to back. The rest is all Aston Martin-quality craftsmanship, shaping the Vanquish into a taut, sleek form wrapped in formal attire.

An Aston Martin Vanquish engine bay

Yes, you could just have an electric motor make this much torque and power almost silently. Credit: Aston Martin

Bond. Aluminum Bond.

The secret underlying the Vanquish’s capabilities is its bonded aluminum body, which is perfectly suited for a grand tourer like this. Bonding panels together rather than welding them makes controlling the NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) levels much easier as the adhesives absorb vibrations, while the stiffness provides much more control in terms of lateral movement. This also means the suspension has less to compensate for, which means it can be stiffer without adding teeth-rattling jitter.

Indeed, on the move, the Vanquish Volante is velvety-smooth on the highway, and with the top down, conversations don’t need to be shouted. Raise the soft top and the well-sealed cover is indistinguishable from the coupe as far as your ears are concerned.

The even-keeled nature is also due in part to the balance Aston Martin maintains between the throttle input and the electronic rear differential. At low speeds, the Vanquish is quite agile, but a progressive power band keeps it from being nervous or jerky when laying down the power, with the wheels effectively locked in place at high speeds for added stability.

A silver Aston Martin Vanquish Volante seen in profile

If a Vantage is for track work, a Vanquish is for cruising. Credit: Aston Martin

We’re talking autobahn speeds, here, by the way. What we’d usually muster on the highway is a cakewalk for this immense luxury chariot. It goes too fast too quickly, for better or for worse, with 80 mph (129 km/h) feeling like half of that. Different drive modes make a palpable difference in behavior, with GT mode supporting smooth, long stretches while Sport and Sport + offer more engaging, throaty behavior for twisty backroads. Here, the car continues to be well-mannered, though the occasional dab for power triggers an overeager automatic into dropping a gear or two, sending the V12 into a fury.

2025 Aston Martin Vanquish Volante: A-M’s ultimate GT goes topless Read More »