F1

f1-in-imola-reminds-us-it’s-about-strategy-as-much-as-a-fast-car

F1 in Imola reminds us it’s about strategy as much as a fast car


Who went home happy from Imola and why? F1’s title race heats up.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 17: Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 on track during during Qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 17, 2025 in Imola, Italy

In Italy there are two religions, and one of them is Ferrari. Credit: Ryan Pierse/Getty Images

In Italy there are two religions, and one of them is Ferrari. Credit: Ryan Pierse/Getty Images

Formula 1’s busy 2025 schedule saw the sport return to its European heartland this past weekend. Italy has two races on the calendar this year, and this was the first, the (deep breath) “Formula 1 AWS Gran Premio Del Made in Italy e Dell’Emilia-Romagna,” which took place at the scenic and historic (another deep breath) Autodromo Enzo e Dino Ferrari, better known as Imola. It’s another of F1’s old-school circuits where overtaking is far from easy, particularly when the grid is as closely matched as it is. But Sunday’s race was no snoozer, and for a couple of teams, there was a welcome change in form.

Red Bull was one. The team has looked a bit shambolic at times this season, with some wondering whether this change in form was the result of a number high-profile staff departures toward the end of last season. Things looked pretty bleak during the first of three qualifying sessions, when Yuki Tsunoda got too aggressive with a curb and, rather than finding lap time, found himself in a violent crash that tore all four corners off the car and relegated him to starting the race last from the pit lane.

2025 has also been trying for Ferrari. Italy expects a lot from the red team, and the replacement of Mattia Binotto with Frédéric Vasseur as team principal was supposed to result in Maranello challenging for championships. Signing Lewis Hamilton, a bona fide superstar with seven titles already on his CV, hasn’t exactly reduced the amount of pressure on Scuderia Ferrari, either.

Frederic Vasseur, Team Principal of Scuderia Ferrari, is at the Formula 1 AWS Gran Premio del Made in Italy e dell'Emilia-Romagna 2025 in Imola, Italy, on May 17, 2025, at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari.

Ferrari team principal Frédéric Vasseur. Credit: Alessio Morgese/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Lewis Hamilton was much closer to teammate Charles Leclerc this weekend, which will be encouraging to everyone. After Hamilton’s exclusion from the Chinese Grand Prix, he has had to run a higher ride height, which has cost him speed relative to his younger teammate. Now it looks like he’s getting a handle on the car and lost out to Leclerc by 0.06 seconds in Q1 and 0.16 seconds in Q2. Unfortunately, Leclerc’s time was only good for 11th, and Hamilton’s was only good for 12th.

Sunday brought smiles for the Red Bull and Ferrari teams. In the hands of Verstappen, the Red Bull was about as fast as the black-and-orange McLarens, and while second was the best Verstappen could do in qualifying, the gap to McLaren’s Oscar Piastri was measured in the hundredths of seconds.

Verstappen’s initial start from the line looked unremarkable, too—the Mercedes of George Russell seemed more of a threat to the pole man. But Verstappen saw an opportunity and dove around the outside almost before Piastri even registered he was there, seizing the lead of the race. Once the Red Bull driver was in clean air, he was able to stretch the gap to Piastri.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 18: Oscar Piastri of Australia driving the (81) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes leads Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 George Russell of Great Britain driving the (63) Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team W16 Lando Norris of Great Britain driving the (4) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes Fernando Alonso of Spain driving the (14) Aston Martin F1 Team AMR25 Mercedes and the rest of the field at the start during the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 18, 2025 in Imola, Italy.

Oscar Piastri is seen here in the lead, but it wouldn’t last more than a corner. Credit: Mark Thompson/Getty Images

Getting past someone is notoriously hard at Imola. In a 2005 classic, Fernando Alonso held off Michael Schumacher’s much faster car for the entire race. Even though the cars are larger and heavier now and more closely matched, overtaking was still possible, like Norris’ pass on Russell.

Undercut? Overcut?

But when overtaking is as hard as it is at a track like Imola, teams will try to use strategy to pass each other with pit stops. Each driver has to make at least one pit stop, as drivers are required to use two different tire compounds during the race. But depending on other factors, like how much the tires degrade, a team might decide to do two or even three stops—the lap time lost in the pits by stopping more often can be less than the time lost running on worn-out rubber.

In recent years, the word “undercut” has crept into F1 vocab, and no, it doesn’t refer to the hairstyles favored by the more flamboyant drivers in the paddock. To undercut a rival means to make your pit stop before them and then, on fresh tires and with a clear track ahead, set fast lap after fast lap so that when your rival makes their stop, they emerge from the pits behind you.

The undercut doesn’t always work, but in Imola, it initially looked like it did. Charles Leclerc stopped on lap 10 and leapfrogged Russell’s Mercedes, as well as his former Ferrari teammate and now Williams driver Carlos Sainz. Since Piastri wasn’t closing on Verstappen up front, McLaren decided to bring him in for an early stop.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 18: Race winner Max Verstappen of the Netherlands and Oracle Red Bull Racing celebrates on the podium during the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 18, 2025 in Imola, Italy.

Verstappen’s wins this season are far from inevitable. Credit: Clive Rose/Getty Images

But his advantage on new tires was not enough to eat into Verstappen’s margin, and he did not emerge in clean air but rather had to overtake car after car on track as he sought to regain his position ahead of those who hadn’t stopped. Sometimes, a strategy is the wrong one.

McLaren’s other driver, Lando Norris, couldn’t make a dent on Red Bull’s race, either. Having recognized the two-stop undercut wouldn’t work, Norris had stayed out, but he was almost 10 seconds behind Verstappen when it was finally time to change tires on lap 29. Shortly afterward, Esteban Ocon pulled his Haas to the side of the track with a powertrain failure, triggering a virtual safety car. With all the cars required to drive around at a prescribed, reduced pace, Verstappen was able to take his pit stop while only losing half as much time as anyone who stopped under green flag conditions.

Victory required a little more. Kimi Antonelli’s Mercedes also ground to a halt in a position that required a full safety car. With some on fresh rubber and others not, there were battles aplenty, but Verstappen wasn’t involved in any and won by seven seconds over Norris, with the recovering Piastri a few more seconds down the road.

Meanwhile, Hamilton had been having a pretty good Sunday of his own. Although he started 12th, he finished fourth, to the delight of the partisan, flag-waving crowd. Some of that was thanks to Leclerc coming together with the Williams of Alex Albon; after that on-track scuffle was sorted, Albon lay fifth, with Leclerc at sixth. Albon was right to feel aggrieved that he lost fourth place but equalled his best finish of the year.

IMOLA, ITALY - MAY 18: Ferrari fans wave their flags in a grandstand prior to the F1 Grand Prix of Emilia-Romagna at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari on May 18, 2025 in Imola, Italy.

A fine fourth and a sixth were redemption for the Tifosi. Credit: Bryn Lennon – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images

Leclerc needed to cede the place to Albon, but at the same time, his complaint about the amount of rules lawyering that now accompanies every bit of wheel-to-wheel action is getting a bit tedious. If F1 isn’t careful, the rulebook will end up being too constraining, with drivers playing to the letter even if it’s bad for the sport and the show. And sixth place was still a decent result from 11th; the championships already look out of reach for Ferrari for 2025, but at least it’s in no danger of being overtaken by Williams in the tables, even if that is a threat on track.

McLaren is already at 279 points in the constructors’ championship, 132 points ahead of next-best Mercedes, so the constructors’ cup is looking somewhat secure. Things are a lot closer in the drivers’ standings, with Piastri on 146, Norris on 133, and Verstappen still entirely in the fight with 124 points.

Next weekend, it’s time for the Monaco Grand Prix.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

F1 in Imola reminds us it’s about strategy as much as a fast car Read More »

f1-in-miami:-like-normal-f1,-but-everyone-wears-pastels

F1 in Miami: Like normal F1, but everyone wears pastels

Yet again, Ferrari’s Lewis Hamilton did well in the sprint, making it to the third step of the podium. Hamilton was much closer to his Ferrari teammate Leclerc this weekend, which would perhaps be encouraging if not for the fact that Leclerc was also just slow. In fact, both Williams cars outqualified the Ferraris for the main race, although Carlos Sainz finished just behind the pair of them on Sunday.

Rain canceled Sunday’s F1 Academy race and threatened to interrupt or affect the main event. But the worst of it was some spray during the driver parade, which this time made use of some full-size Lego F1 cars. The race was to be dry, fast, and furious.

Verstappen led at the start, but his car was not fast enough to keep him there for long. Rudy Carezzevoli/Getty Images

Max Verstappen had dragged his car to pole position for Sunday’s race and kept his elbows out at turn 2 at the start to force Norris off at the apex, dropping the McLaren driver from second to sixth place. A virtual safety car interrupted the race as Alpine’s Jack Doohan got wrecked. It was a terrible weekend for the Australian, who had his sprint-qualifying session ruined by his own team and is now almost certain to be replaced at the next race by Franco Colapinto.

Piastri made rather quick work of Antonelli, who was in second, then got past Verstappen to take the lead with a clinically precise move on lap 14. It took Norris a little longer to deal with the reigning World Champion, four laps in which Norris lost a second a lap to Piastri before he slotted into second place.

From there, the pair of McLarens disappeared off into the distance. Last time, I wrote about how close the entire grid has become under this latest set of rules. The race in Miami bucked that trend as the McLaren showed much faster race pace than anyone else, thanks in large part to much higher track temperatures. Third place went to George Russell, who is getting the most out of his Mercedes every time he straps in. Even so, Russell was more than half a minute behind the orange-and-black cars at the checkered flag.

MIAMI, FLORIDA - MAY 04: Race winner Oscar Piastri of Australia driving the (81) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes takes the chequered flag during the F1 Grand Prix of Miami at Miami International Autodrome on May 04, 2025 in Miami, Florida.

Piastri wins again. Credit: Mark Thompson/Getty Images

Piastri now leads Norris in the championship by 16 points.

F1 in Miami: Like normal F1, but everyone wears pastels Read More »

nascar,-imsa,-indycar,-f1:-gm’s-motorsport-boss-explains-why-it-goes-racing

NASCAR, IMSA, IndyCar, F1: GM’s motorsport boss explains why it goes racing

The late Richard Parry-Jones, who rose to CTO over at rival Ford, had a similar take: vehicle dynamics matter.

“There are people that think no one can tell the difference, you know, and I’ve always said they absolutely can tell the difference. They don’t know what it is. And the structural feel of the car going down the road, you know, people might explain, ‘It feels like a vault.’ Well, I can tell you exactly what’s going on, physically, from the parts and the tuning, and it’s an outcome that we strive for,” Morris said.

Does it need to be electrified?

The addition of electrified powertrains has certainly been one of the biggest trends in motorsport over the past decade or so. Since F1 made hybrids mandatory in 2014, we’ve also seen hybridization come to IMSA and WEC’s prototypes, and most recently, IndyCar added a supercapacitor-based system. But it hasn’t been a one-way street; this year, both the World Rally Championship and the British Touring Car Championship have abandoned the hybrid systems they adopted just a few years ago.

Win on Sunday, sell on Monday, like concrete tech transfer, is much less of a thing in the early 21st century, but marketing remains a central reason for OEM involvement in the sport. I asked Morris if Cadillac would be endurance racing with the V-Series R if the LMdh ruleset didn’t require a hybrid system.

“I think it’s an interesting discussion because you know, current EVs—the development [needed] where you can really do lapping at the Nürburgring or lapping full laps and not one hot lap, then you’re done, there’s just going to have to be development, development iteration, iteration, and that’s what racing is,” Morris said.

While the mechanical specifications of the hybrid Cadillac (and its rivals) are locked down, software development is unfettered, and Morris is not the first competitor to tell me how important that development path is now. Battery cell chemistries and battery cooling are also very active research areas and will only get more important once Cadillac enters F1. At first, that will be with Ferrari engines in the back, but starting in 2029, the Cadillac team will use a powertrain designed in-house.

NASCAR, IMSA, IndyCar, F1: GM’s motorsport boss explains why it goes racing Read More »

f1-in-saudi-arabia:-blind-corners-and-walls-at-over-200-mph

F1 in Saudi Arabia: Blind corners and walls at over 200 mph


After four years of the same technical rules, there’s not much left to find.

JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA - APRIL 19: Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 leaves the garage during qualifying ahead of the F1 Grand Prix of Saudi Arabia at Jeddah Corniche Circuit on April 19, 2025 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Max Verstappen pilots his Red Bull out of the garage during qualifying for the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix. Credit: Alex Pantling/Getty Images

Max Verstappen pilots his Red Bull out of the garage during qualifying for the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix. Credit: Alex Pantling/Getty Images

The Formula 1 race in Saudi Arabia last night was the fifth race in six weeks. The latest venue is a temporary street circuit of a breed with Las Vegas. It’s a nighttime race set against a backdrop of bright-colored lights and sponsor-clad concrete walls lining the track. Except in Jeddah, many of the corners are blind, and most are very fast. As at Suzuka, qualifying was very important here, with just a few milliseconds making the difference.

Although it’s far from the only autocratic petrostate on the F1 calendar, some people remain uncomfortable with F1 racing in Saudi Arabia, given that country’s record of human rights abuses. I’ve not been, nor do I have any plans to attend a race there, but I had my eyes opened to a broader perspective by a couple of very thoughtful pieces written by motorsport journalist and sometime Ars contributor Hazel Southwell, who has attended several races in the kingdom, including as an independent journalist. Feel free to blast the sport in the comments, but do give Hazel’s pieces a read.

JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA - APRIL 20: Fireworks light the sky at the end of the race during the F1 Grand Prix of Saudi Arabia at Jeddah Corniche Circuit on April 20, 2025 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Fireworks, drones, lasers, floodlights, LEDs… you’d think this was compensating for something. Credit: Clive Mason/Getty Images

Red Bull really doesn’t want next year’s engine rules

Despite a meeting last week that was meant to put the matter to bed, the ongoing saga of changes to next year’s powertrain rules just won’t go away. From 2026 until 2030, the new powertrains will use a V6 that provides 55 percent of the car’s power and an electric hybrid motor that provides the other 45 percent. So that means an F1 car will only be able to make its full 1,000 hp (750 kW) if there’s charge in the battery. If the pack is depleted or derates, the car will have just 536 hp (400 kW) from its V6 engine.

Getting these new powertrains right is a big challenge, but it’s one that almost all the OEMs and teams are on board with. Despite the introduction of supposedly carbon-neutral fuel next year, hybrid powertrains are why companies like Audi and Cadillac are joining and why Honda is coming back. So the idea to ditch them after a couple of years in favor of throwback V10s got turned down in Bahrain.

The problem is Red Bull, which is currently Honda’s partner. Next year, Red Bull will use a V6 engine of its own making, with hybrid technology supplied by Ford. And for the last couple of years now, Red Bull team boss Christian Horner has been warning that the cars will run out of power halfway down the straights at tracks like Monza or Baku.

JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA - APRIL 20: Alexander Albon of Thailand and Williams reacts to the sound of the fireworks in the media pen during the F1 Grand Prix of Saudi Arabia at Jeddah Corniche Circuit on April 20, 2025 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

No, Alex, I can’t believe they keep talking about changing the rules again, either. Credit: Kym Illman/Getty Images

Yesterday, The Race reported that there’s yet another proposal to change next year’s engine regulations, one that would reduce the amount of energy deployed by the hybrid systems during the race. “What we desperately want to avoid is a situation where drivers are lifting and coasting from halfway down the straight,” Horner told The Race.

“It will be interesting to see” is among the list of banned phrases among the editors at Ars Technica, but between these complaints about the powertrains rules and other concerns about the moveable aerodynamics being introduced in 2026, I think it applies here. Are next year’s rules a big misstep? Will the active aero work or the narrower tires? I can’t wait to find out.

As I noted, qualifying was a game of milliseconds, best illustrated by this ghost car comparison video between Red Bull’s Max Verstappen and McLaren’s Oscar Piastri. According to the stopwatch, there was just a hundredth of a second between them. Less than a second covered the top 10 in qualifying. In Q2, where 15 cars compete for those 10 spots in Q3, there was just 1.1 seconds between first and last. And a second was all the difference between 1st and 18th in Q1.

That is far closer than F1 has ever been—many longtime fans can remember the days when the gap between first and second on the grid might be more than a second. And the reason is also why overtaking has become harder, despite aerodynamic rules meant to make passing easier.

Over the years, F1’s technical rules have become increasingly prescriptive, and the current set is quite rigid in terms of how a car must be designed. Even something like weight balance front-to-rear is tightly controlled, and after four years of the same rulebook, the teams have all gotten a good enough handle on things that the difference comes down to the finest of margins.

Those last few milliseconds are found in clean air, however. Following in someone’s wake isn’t anything like the problem it used to be in terms of losing front downforce, but it’s still worse than it was in 2022 or 2023.

Max got Maxxed, Lando got Lewised

Throughout practice, it looked like McLaren’s car was much faster than anyone else’s, but Piastri only lined up second, and Norris had to start 10th after wrecking early in Q3. At turn 1, Piastri got alongside Verstappen, then made it cleanly to the apex. Rather than concede the place and stay within the track limits, Verstappen chose to run across the painted surface that’s out of bounds, using it to gain a second or more on the orange car behind him.

JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA - APRIL 20: Max Verstappen of the Netherlands driving the (1) Oracle Red Bull Racing RB21 cuts across ahead of Oscar Piastri of Australia driving the (81) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes George Russell of Great Britain driving the (63) Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team W16 Charles Leclerc of Monaco driving the (16) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 Andrea Kimi Antonelli of Italy driving the (12) Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team W16 and the rest of the field during the F1 Grand Prix of Saudi Arabia at Jeddah Corniche Circuit on April 20, 2025 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Piastri made the corner; Verstappen did not. Credit: Clive Rose – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images

Although lap 1, turn 1 incidents are treated more leniently by the stewards than the rest of the race, Verstappen’s actions (and his failure to yield the place back to Piastri) earned him a five-second penalty, which all but ensured Piastri the win after the mandatory tire-changing pit stops had cycled through.

The advantage of running in clean air was such that Verstappen would probably have held onto first place had he not been issued the penalty. And those predictions of McLaren’s long-run pace turned out to be off the mark—Verstappen finished less than three seconds behind the McLaren.

There was more overtaking behind those two. Charles Leclerc got his Ferrari past the Mercedes of George Russell in the late stages of the race to snatch third, and McLaren’s Lando Norris recovered from 10th place to 4th at the finish. Norris has lost the lead in the driver’s championship to his younger teammate, though, and while it’s probably too early to be talking about momentum, Piastri is gaining some.

A telling moment came when Norris had to get past Lewis Hamilton, who was having a torrid time in his Ferrari. Overtaking at Jeddah was helped a lot by having three zones for the drag reduction system, but you had to be smart about where you made your move.

The second DRS zone led to the final hairpin (turn 27), but overtaking someone here just gives them the opportunity to use their DRS to overtake you almost immediately, as the third zone runs the length of the start-finish straight, just after that hairpin. We saw this to good effect when Hamilton and Verstappen fought for the title in 2021, but apparently Norris didn’t get the memo. He twice tried to overtake Hamilton going into turn 27 rather than after it, and both times, Hamilton took advantage of his error.

JEDDAH, SAUDI ARABIA - APRIL 20: Race winner Oscar Piastri of Australia and McLaren celebrates on arrival in parc ferme during the F1 Grand Prix of Saudi Arabia at Jeddah Corniche Circuit on April 20, 2025 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Piastri in victory lane. History warns us that teams with two equal drivers and the best car often lose out on the driver’s championship to an extremely good driver in a slightly lesser car and a less quick teammate. Will 2025 be like 1986 and 2007? Credit: Mark Sutton – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images

Those extra laps behind Hamilton could have cost Norris the final spot on the podium, something he may well rue at the end of the season when all the points are added up.

Photo of Jonathan M. Gitlin

Jonathan is the Automotive Editor at Ars Technica. He has a BSc and PhD in Pharmacology. In 2014 he decided to indulge his lifelong passion for the car by leaving the National Human Genome Research Institute and launching Ars Technica’s automotive coverage. He lives in Washington, DC.

F1 in Saudi Arabia: Blind corners and walls at over 200 mph Read More »

f1-in-bahrain:-i-dare-you-to-call-that-race-boring

F1 in Bahrain: I dare you to call that race boring

What a difference a week makes. This past weekend, Formula 1 went back to Bahrain, the site of this year’s preseason test, for round four of the 2025 season. Last week’s race in Japan sent many to sleep, but that was definitely not the case on Sunday. The overtaking was frenetic, the sparks didn’t set anything on fire, and the title fight just got that little bit more complicated. It was a heck of a race.

V10s? Not any time soon

Before the racing got underway, the sport got some clarity on future powertrain rules. An ambitious new ruleset goes into effect next year, with an all-new small-capacity turbocharged V6 engine working together with an electric motor that powers the rear wheels. Just under half the total power comes from the hybrid system, much more than the two hybrid systems on current F1 cars, and developing them is no easy task. Nor is it cheap.

F1 is also moving to supposedly carbon-neutral synthetic fuels next year, and that has prompted some to wonder—increasingly loudly—if instead of the expensive hybrids lasting for four years, maybe they could be replaced with a cheaper non-hybrid engine instead, like a naturally aspirated V10.

BAHRAIN, BAHRAIN - APRIL 13: Sparks fly behind Lewis Hamilton of Great Britain driving the (44) Scuderia Ferrari SF-25 and Lando Norris of Great Britain driving the (4) McLaren MCL39 Mercedes on track during the F1 Grand Prix of Bahrain at Bahrain International Circuit on April 13, 2025 in Bahrain, Bahrain.

McLaren’s Norris and Ferrari’s Hamilton at speed. Credit: Mark Sutton – Formula 1/Formula 1 via Getty Images

This would placate Red Bull. Next year, that team will field an engine of its own design and manufacture (albeit with Ford providing the hybrid stuff), and it’s been increasingly noisy about looking for alternatives to the small-capacity V6—problems with that program, perhaps? It would also start to decouple F1 from the automakers.

But naturally aspirated V10s don’t mean much to the tens of millions of fans that have flocked to the sport since the start of the decade—they’ve only ever known the muted drone of turbocharged V6s.

V10s mean even less to OEMs like Audi, Honda, Cadillac, and Ford, which committed to the 2026 rule set specifically because the powertrains are hybridized. So we’re going to stick with the original plan and can expect hybrids to continue into the 2031 ruleset, too, albeit probably a much smaller, lighter, cheaper, and less powerful electrified system than we’ll see next year.

F1 in Bahrain: I dare you to call that race boring Read More »

honda-will-sell-off-historic-racing-parts,-including-bits-of-senna’s-v10

Honda will sell off historic racing parts, including bits of Senna’s V10

Honda’s motorsport division must be doing some spring cleaning. Today, the Honda Racing Corporation announced that it’s getting into the memorabilia business, offering up parts and even whole vehicles for fans and collectors. And to kick things off, it’s going to auction some components from the RA100E V10 engines that powered the McLaren Honda MP4/5Bs of Ayrton Senna and Gerhard Berger to both F1 titles in 1990.

“We aim to make this a valuable business that allows fans who love F1, MotoGP and various other races to share in the history of Honda’s challenges in racing since the 1950s,” said Koi Watanabe, president of HRC, “including our fans to own a part of Honda’s racing history is not intended to be a one-time endeavor, but rather a continuous business that we will nurture and grow.”

The bits from Senna’s and Berger’s V10s will go up for auction at Monterey Car Week later this year, and the lots will include some of the parts seen in the photo above: cam covers, camshafts, pistons, and conrods, with a certificate of authenticity and a display case. And HRC is going through its collections to see what else it might part with, including “heritage machines and parts” from IndyCar, and “significant racing motorcycles.”

Honda will sell off historic racing parts, including bits of Senna’s V10 Read More »

f1-may-ditch-hybrids-for-v10s-and-sustainable-fuels

F1 may ditch hybrids for V10s and sustainable fuels

High-revving naturally aspirated engines and their associated screaming soundtracks might be on their way back to Formula 1. Not with next year’s rule changes—that will see even bigger lithium-ion batteries and an even more powerful electric motor, paired with a turbocharged V6. But the sport is starting to think more seriously about the technical rules that will go into effect in 2030, and in an Instagram post yesterday, the man in charge of those rules signaled that he’s open to cars that might be louder, lighter, and less complicated.

Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s tenure as president of the Federation Internationale de l’Automobile has been packed with controversy. The former rally driver has alienated many F1 drivers with clampdowns on jewelry and, most recently, swearing, as well as a refusal to explain what happens to the money the FIA collects as fines.

He also ruffled feathers when the FIA opened up the entry process for new teams into the sport and then approved an entry by Andretti Global. While the FIA said yes, the commercial side (which is owned by Liberty Media) and the teams wanted nothing to do with an 11th team—at least until the $200 million anti-dilution fee was more than doubled and Michael Andretti stepped aside.

This time, Ben Sulayem is saying all the right things, to this author at least. “While we look forward to the introduction of the 2026 regulations on chassis and power unit, we must lead the way on future technological motorsport trends. We should consider a range of directions including the roaring sound of the V10 running on sustainable fuel,” he wrote.

F1 may ditch hybrids for V10s and sustainable fuels Read More »

perfecting-honda’s-2026-f1-powertrain-is-“not-so-easy,”-says-racing-boss

Perfecting Honda’s 2026 F1 powertrain is “not so easy,” says racing boss

The new rules have been extremely attractive to carmakers. In addition to causing Honda to reconsider its exit, Ford is also coming back (developing the hybrid system for Red Bull Powertrains), and both Audi and Cadillac are also entering the sport, although the American brand won’t have its own engines ready until 2028.

Audi and Cadillac will both count as new engine suppliers, so they are allowed some extra development resources. However, Honda is counted as an existing manufacturer and doesn’t get any special treatment.

When I asked Watanabe how the work was progressing, he said, “Not so easy. We are struggling. Now we are trying our best to show the result next year,” he said. “Everything is new. [The] motor is new, [developing] 350 kW—it’s a very compact one that we need. And also the lightweight battery is not so easy to develop. Also the small engine with big power. So everything is very difficult, but we try our best.”

Getting it right will be vital—although Aston Martin now has the advantage of legendary designer Adrian Newey among its staff. Newey is on record saying that the 2026 rules have a “big chance” of being an engine formula, where each car’s aerodynamics are far less important, unlike today’s situation.

Trickle-down

OEMs go racing to raise their profile and sell more cars, but they also do it as a way to learn how to make their products better. Honda and HRC are no exception to that. But concrete examples of technology transfer from track to road are rare these days—it’s more about cross-pollination between engineers.

“There is a group within Honda that shares technical information yearly. It’s not just the racing; it’s all across Honda, so I think there’s been some interest in the technology and software we’ve developed,” Fu said. “Whether it trickles down to road cars… it’s a big jump from a race car to road cars, but I think some of the fundamental technical ideas can propagate down there.”

“From the F1 project, we can learn how to improve the hybrid system itself, and of course, we can learn how to create high-efficiency batteries and motors for the future. That’s why we decided to reparticipate in Formula 1,” Watanabe said.

Perfecting Honda’s 2026 F1 powertrain is “not so easy,” says racing boss Read More »

f1-arcade-trip-report:-great-sims-make-for-a-compelling-experience

F1 Arcade trip report: Great sims make for a compelling experience

Formula 1’s recent popularity still feels a little strange to longtime fans of the sport, particularly in the US, where it had been so niche for so long. But the past five years have seen F1 rise meteorically, and a new, much younger fanbase infused with enthusiasm for the cutting-edge race cars and the athletes who pilot them has emerged. F1 Arcade capitalizes on that popularity, combining food and drinks—including Lewis Hamilton’s agave tipple—with dozens and dozens of race simulators that let you race against friends or compete in teams against others.

With Washington, DC, chosen for F1 Arcade’s second US location, I obviously had to go check it out.

My first visit to the arcade in DC’s Union Market district was several weeks ago at the launch party, an affair that was packed with influencers and loud music. But I returned earlier this week, having booked a 45-minute, five-race session playing head-to-head against a friend. Prices vary depending on the number of races and whether you’re that at peak time, starting at $22/player for three races off-peak and going up to $42/player for five races at peak time. There’s no charge for people who are just spectating (or eating and drinking), not racing.

Perhaps surprisingly, the sims—which use hardware from Vesaro—don’t run the official Codemasters’ F1 game but instead a custom version of rFactor2 made by Motorsport Games for F1 Arcade, a title that’s notorious for being hard to master.

F1 Arcade’s CTO Gavin Williams thinks back to 2021. “There were a lot of things that weren’t quite right with the game,” he told me. “We actually went to Vesaro, who manufactured the simulators. We tried it, and literally none of us could race. It was just so unbearable to watch, and there were things that were missing, like the racing line, the skill settings weren’t quite right.”

F1 Arcade trip report: Great sims make for a compelling experience Read More »

brad-pitt-stages-a-formula-one-racing-comeback-in-first-teaser-for-f1

Brad Pitt stages a Formula One racing comeback in first teaser for F1

Vroom, vroom —

Pitt: “You’ve never seen speed, you’ve never seen just the G forces like this.”

Brad Pitt and Damson Idris co-star in F1, coming to theaters next summer.

Can a washed-up Formula One driver come out of retirement to mentor a young rookie into a champion? That’s the basic premise for F1, a forthcoming film starring Brad Pitt and directed by Joseph Kosinski (Tron: Legacy, Top Gun: Maverick). Warner Bros. dropped the first teaser for the film yesterday, right before the 2024 British Grand Prix.

Pitt plays Sonny Hayes, a fictional Formula One driver who crashed horribly in the 1990s and retired from the sport. Then his longtime friend Ruben (Javier Bardem), owner of the fictional team APXGP, approaches him about coming out of retirement to mentor his team’s rookie prodigy, Joshua “Noah” Pearce (Damson Idris). “They’re a last place team, they’re 21-22 on the grid, they’ve never scored a point,” Pitt told Sky Sports last year. “But they have a young phenom (Idris) and they bring me in as kind of a Hail Mary and hijinks ensue.”

In addition to Pitt, Bardem, and Idris, the cast includes Kerry Condon as Kate; Tobias Menzies as Banning; Kim Bodnia as Kaspar; Shea Wigham as Chip Hart; Joseph Balderrama as Rica Fazio; Sarah Niles as Noah’s mother, Bernadette; Samson Kayo as Cashman; Callie Cooke as Jodie; and Layne Harper as Press.

  • Brad Pitt plays mentor to Damson Idris’ hotshot rookie driver.

    Warner Bros/Apple TV+

  • This film is really about the cars.

    YouTube/Warner Bros.

  • Racing footage was shot on location during the regular F1 season.

    YouTube/Warner Bros.

  • Ready for its closeup.

    YouTube/Warner Bros

  • In the driver’s seat.

    YouTube/Warner Bros.

Playing themselves in the film: seven-time Formula One champion Lewis Hamilton, Max Verstappen, Carlos Sainz Jr., Sergio Perez, Benoit Treluyer, and the rest of the F1 drivers and team members. Hamilton is a co-producer on the film and was also involved during the script-writing process to keep the film as realistic as possible by drawing on his own experiences. “We want everyone to love it and to really feel that we can encapsulate what the essence of this sport is about,” Hamilton said last year.

We don’t get much dialogue in this first teaser, or much information about the plot. Honestly? The teaser comes off as a bit cheesy from a marketing standpoint. (Since when do people in the racing community scoff so dismissively at safety concerns?) But that’s all real racing footage shot on actual tracks during bona fide F1 Grand Prix weekends. Pitt himself raced an adapted F2 car between practice sessions around the Northamptonshire circuit.

“There are cameras mounted all over the car,” Pitt told Sky Sports during filming at the 2023 British Grand Prix. “You’ve never seen speed; you’ve never seen just the G forces like this.” Based on the teaser, the visual efforts to immerse audiences in the F1 experience paid off. This is a film you’ll probably want to see in IMAX.

F1 arrives in theaters in the summer of 2025 and will stream on Apple TV+ sometime after that. It’s the sixth film from Apple Original Films to snag theater distribution, following in the footsteps of Martin Scorsese’s Oscar-nominated Killers of the Flower Moon and this weekend’s Fly Me to the Moon, among others.

Apple Original Films/Warner Bros.

Listing image by Warner Bros/Apple TV+

Brad Pitt stages a Formula One racing comeback in first teaser for F1 Read More »

f1-cars-in-2026-will-be-smaller,-safer,-more-nimble,-more-sustainable

F1 cars in 2026 will be smaller, safer, more nimble, more sustainable

A render of a 2026 F1 car

Enlarge / For 2026, F1 cars are going on a little bit of a diet.

Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile

Earlier today, the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile laid out the direction for Formula 1’s next set of technical regulations, which will go into effect in 2026. It will be the second big shakeup of F1’s technical regs since 2022 and involves sweeping changes to the hybrid powertrain and a fundamental rethink of how some of the aerodynamics work.

“With this set of regulations, the FIA has sought to develop a new generation of cars that are fully in touch with the DNA of Formula 1—cars that are light, supremely fast and agile but which also remains at the cutting edge of technology, and to achieve this we worked towards what we called a ‘nimble car’ concept. At the center of that vision is a redesigned power unit that features a more even split between the power derived from the internal combustion element and electrical power,” said Nikolas Tombazis, the FIA’s single-seater technical director.

Didn’t we just get new rules?

It feels like F1 only just got through its last big rule change with the (re)introduction of ground-effect cars at the start of 2022. Since the early 1980s, F1 cars have generated aerodynamic grip, or downforce, via front and rear wings. But drivers found it increasingly difficult to follow each other closely through corners as the dirty air from the car in front starved the following car’s front wing of air, robbing it of cornering grip in the process.

The 2022 rules changed this, requiring cars to use a sculpted floor that generates downforce via the venturi effect. This reduced the importance of the front wing, and indeed, the cars were able to race closely in 2022. In two years’ time, F1 cars will use less complicated floors with smaller venturis that generate a smaller ground effect, which the FIA says should mean no more having to run “ultra-stiff and low setups” to avoid the problem of porpoising.

Overall downforce is being reduced by 30 percent, but there’s an even greater reduction in drag—55 percent is the target, which is being done in part to accommodate the new hybrid powertrain.

More hybrid power

The V6 internal combustion engine is becoming less powerful, dropping to an output of 536 hp (400 kW), but the electric motor that also drives the rear wheels will now generate 470 hp (350 kW). That leaves the combined power output roughly where it is today, but only when the battery has enough charge. However, cars will be allowed to harvest twice as much energy (8.5 MJ) per lap under braking as now.

And as Ars has covered in the past, the engines will run on drop-in sustainable fuels. The new engine regulations have succeeded in tempting Honda back into the sport, as well as bringing in Ford and Audi, and possibly Cadillac in time.

Since the cars will be less powerful when they’re just running on internal combustion, more than halving the amount of drag they experience means they shouldn’t be too slow along the straights.

When F1 first introduced its original hybrid, called KERS (for kinetic energy recovery system), the electric motor boost was something the driver could use on demand. But that changed when the current powertrain rules came into effect in 2014, and it became up to the car to decide when to deploy energy from the battery to supplement the V6 motor.

In 2026, that changes again. The hybrid system is programmed to use less of the electric motor’s power as speeds pass 180 mph (270 km/h), down to zero at 220 mph (355 km/h), relying just on the V6 by then. But if a car is following within a second, the chasing driver can override that cutoff, allowing the full 470 hp from the electric motor at speeds of up to 209 mph (337 km/h), with up to half a MJ of extra energy.

F1 cars in 2026 will be smaller, safer, more nimble, more sustainable Read More »

here-are-all-the-f1-cars-designed-by-the-legendary-adrian-newey

Here are all the F1 cars designed by the legendary Adrian Newey

the goat? —

No other F1 designer has penned more championship winning cars than Adrian Newey.

Red Bull Racing Chief Technical Officer, Adrian Newey prepares to drive the Red Bull Racing RB5 up the hill during day one of The Goodwood Festival of Speed at The Goodwood Estate on July 2, 2010 in Chichester, England.

Enlarge / When you’re a legendary F1 designer like Adrian Newey, it’s easy to persuade the team to let you have a go in one of your own creations.

Andrew Hone/Getty Images for Red Bull

In Formula 1, the car isn’t quite everything, but ultimately, how well the team’s designers did their job creating a racing car is a more important factor in a team’s success on track than how good their drivers are. It’s not that F1 drivers don’t matter, but even the best driver on the grid will struggle to earn points if they’re not in a competitive car.

One designer has been responsible for creating competitive cars more than any other, penning 12 championship-winning cars in 32 years. His name is Adrian Newey, and this week, we discovered he’s looking for a new job.

As in other sports, F1’s “silly season” is what they call that time period when contracts are up and people are switching to new teams; it’s named as such because it’s what happens when there’s no real news to report but you need a story anyway.

This year, the silly season got underway well before the first of the year, and it’s been sillier than most. First, Andretti Cadillac got snubbed by the sport—because an email went to a spam folder—then seven-time World Champion Lewis Hamilton announced he was leaving longtime home Mercedes, for Ferrari. Just as everything started to calm down, the Red Bull team started to look a little… implodey as Red Bull team boss Christian Horner was accused of inappropriate behavior by a female employee.

At the time, rumors circulated that Red Bull’s superstar Max Verstappen could try to use the Horner scandal as a way to leave the team. That didn’t happen, but something just as consequential did—it precipitated the departure of Newey. The superstar designer will finish the Red Bull RB17 hypercar project before departing the team early in 2025.

“Ever since I was a young boy, I wanted to be a designer of fast cars. My dream was to be an engineer in Formula 1, and I’ve been lucky enough to make that dream a reality,” Newey said in a statement. His autobiography, which tells the story of how he made that happen, is worth a read, but today we’ve put together some galleries of Newey’s various creations—an illustrated history of his career as the world’s most successful race car designer.

The early years

Newey’s first racing cars weren’t F1 machines. He started work at the race car builder March, and after working as a race engineer in IndyCar and then F2 for March customers, he designed the March 82G, aka the Lobster Claw, which raced in IMSA’s GTP category. He then penned the 1985 Indy 500-winning March 85C, then its successor in 1986, before leaving March for a couple of years, then returning to design his first F1 car for the small F1 team Leyton House in 1988. Newey designed Leyton House’s cars for March until 1990 when he moved to Williams as chief designer.

  • Newey worked as race engineer for Keke Rosberg’s Fittipaldi F8 before moving to March to design cars.

    Bernard Cahier/Getty Images)

  • You can see why the March 82G earned the nickname Lobster Claw, seen here racing in Miami in 1983.

    Brian Cleary/Getty Images

  • Newey is known for his F1 accolades, but winning the Indy 500 with his first IndyCar (the March 85G) is nothing to sneeze at either.

    Focus on Sport via Getty Images

  • Newey’s first F1 chassis, the March 881.

    Pascal Rondeau/Allsport/Getty Images

  • Ivan Capelli of Italy drives the #16 Leyton House Racing March CG891 Judd V8 during the Fuji Television Japanese Grand Prix on 22 October 1989 at the Suzuka Circuit in Suzuka City, Japan.

    Pascal Rondeau/Getty Images

  • Mechanics assemble the Adrian Newey designed Leyton House CG901Judd V8 on 1st June 1990 at the Leyton House Formula One Racing Team in Bicester, Great Britain.

    Photo by Pascal Rondeau/Getty Images

The Williams years

Williams was a much more competitive team then than now, and Newey’s FW14 turned out to be one of the most successful F1 cars, notching up seven wins in 1991 and 10 wins in 1992, earning Nigel Mansell the championship in the process. 1993 saw Alain Prost take the crown with the Newey-designed FW15C, then Damon Hill became champion in 1996 with the FW18, followed by Jacques Villeneuve in 1997 with the FW19.

  • The FW14 was the first Newey car to win an F1 race. It was so good, Williams kept it for the following season (in B-spec), where it won the championship.

    Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images

  • The FW15C is considered by many to be the most advanced F1 car ever thanks to fully active suspension, a semi-automatic gearbox, and anti-lock brakes.

    Pascal Rondeau/Allsport/Getty Images

  • Damon Hill almost won the 1994 championship in the FW16. Here, we see Newey driving the car up the hill at the Goodwood Festival of Speed.

    Mark Thompson/Getty Images

  • In 1995, Damon Hill did not drive a great season, and Michael Schumacher won everything.

    Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images

  • But 1996 went much better and Hill took the title. Williams dumped him anyway, and Newey also left, disliking the way Hill was treated.

    Darren Heath/Getty Images

  • Newey was on gardening leave while his FW18 earned another championship in 1997.

    Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images

Here are all the F1 cars designed by the legendary Adrian Newey Read More »