NAS

self-hosting-is-having-a-moment-ethan-sholly-knows-why.

Self-hosting is having a moment. Ethan Sholly knows why.

Self-hosting is having a moment, even if it’s hard to define exactly what it is.

It’s a niche that goes beyond regular computing devices and networks but falls short of a full-on home lab. (Most home labs involve self-hosting, but not all self-hosting makes for a home lab.) It adds privacy, provides DRM-free alternatives, and reduces advertising. It’s often touted as a way to get more out of your network-attached storage (NAS), but it’s much more than just backup and media streaming.

Is self-hosting just running services on your network for which most people rely on cloud companies? Broadly, yes. But take a look at the selfh.st site/podcast/newsletter, the r/selfhosted subreddit, and all the GitHub project pages that link to one another, and you’ll also find things that no cloud provider offers.

Ethan Sholly, proprietor of the selfh.st site, newsletter, and occasional podcast, recently walked me through the current state of self-hosting, and he shared some of the findings from his surveys of those people doing all that small-scale server administration.

“Turn your desktop on—it’s movie night”

Ethan Sholly headshot, in front of a blue bookshelf.

Ethan Sholly, proprietor of the selfh.st media mini-conglomerate.

Credit: Ethan Sholly

Ethan Sholly, proprietor of the selfh.st media mini-conglomerate. Credit: Ethan Sholly

Sholly works in finance, not tech, but he was a computer science minor with just enough knowledge to get Plex working on a desktop PC for his friends and family. “I’d get a call or text: ‘Can you turn your desktop on—it’s movie night,'” Sholly said.

He gradually expanded to building his own tower server with 10 terabyte drives. Once he had his media-serving needs covered, the question inevitably became “What else can I self-host?” He dug in, wandered around, and found himself with tons of bookmarked GitHub repos and project pages.

Sholly, a self-professed “old-school RSS junkie,” wanted one place to find the most commonly recommended apps and news about their changes and updates. It didn’t exist, so he assembled it, coded it, and shared it. He also started writing about the scene in his newsletter, which has more personality and punch than you’d expect from someone in a largely open source, DIY-minded hobby.

After Plex increased subscription prices and changed its business model in March, Sholly wrote in his newsletter that, while there were valid concerns about privacy and future directions, it would be a good time to note something else: The majority of people don’t donate to a single self-hosted project.

Self-hosting is having a moment. Ethan Sholly knows why. Read More »

synology-confirms-that-higher-end-nas-products-will-require-its-branded-drives

Synology confirms that higher-end NAS products will require its branded drives

Popular NAS-maker Synology has confirmed and slightly clarified a policy that appeared on its German website earlier this week: Its “Plus” tier of devices, starting with the 2025 series, will require Synology-branded hard drives for full compatibility, at least at first.

“Synology-branded drives will be needed for use in the newly announced Plus series, with plans to update the Product Compatibility List as additional drives can be thoroughly vetted in Synology systems,” a Synology representative told Ars by email. “Extensive internal testing has shown that drives that follow a rigorous validation process when paired with Synology systems are at less risk of drive failure and ongoing compatibility issues.”

Without a Synology-branded or approved drive in a device that requires it, NAS devices could fail to create storage pools and lose volume-wide deduplication and lifespan analysis, Synology’s German press release stated. Similar drive restrictions are already in place for XS Plus and rack-mounted Synology models, though work-arounds exist.

Synology also says it will later add a “carefully curated drive compatibility framework” for third-party drives and that users can submit drives for testing and documentation. “Drives that meet Synology’s stringent standards may be validated for use, offering flexibility while maintaining system integrity.”

Synology confirms that higher-end NAS products will require its branded drives Read More »

qnap-firmware-update-leaves-nas-owners-locked-out-of-their-boxes

QNAP firmware update leaves NAS owners locked out of their boxes

A recent firmware pushed to QNAP network attached storage (NAS) devices left a number of owners unable to access their storage systems. The company has pulled back the firmware and issued a fixed version, but the company’s response has left some users feeling less confident in the boxes into which they put all their digital stuff.

As seen on a QNAP community thread, and as announced by QNAP itself, the QNAP operating system, QTS, received update 5.2.2.2950, build 20241114, at some point around November 19. After QNAP “received feedbacks from some users reporting issues with device functionality after installation,” the firm says it withdrew it, “conducted a comprehensive investigation,” and re-released a fixed version “within 24 hours.”

The community thread sees many more users of different systems having problems than the shortlist (“limited models of TS-x53D series and TS-x51 series”) released by QNAP. Issues reported included owners being rejected as an authorized user, devices reporting issues with booting, and claims of Python not being installed to run some apps and services.

QNAP says affected users can either downgrade their devices (presumably to then upgrade once more to the fixed update) or contact support for help. Response from QNAP support, as told by users on forums and social media, has not measured up to the nature of losing access to an entire backup system.

QNAP firmware update leaves NAS owners locked out of their boxes Read More »